Table Of Content

NAVAL HISTORY & HeRITAge cOmmANd | The U.S. Navy aNd The vieTNam War The Battle Behind Bars Navy and Marine POWs in the Vietnam War DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON, DC www.history.navy.mil Stuart I. Rochester Front Cover: Lieutenant Commander Robert Shumaker, shown here at capture in February 1965, was the second pilot shot down over North Vietnam. The U.S. Navy aNd The vieTNam War Edward J. Marolda and Sandra J. Doyle, Series Editors The Battle Behind Bars Navy and Marine POWs in the Vietnam War Stuart I. Rochester DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON, DC 2010 © 2010 Naval Historical Foundation All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the Naval Historical Foundation. Printed in the Unites States of America. Published by Naval History & Heritage Command in partnership with the Naval Historical Foundation 805 Kidder Breese Street SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5060 www.history.navy.mil Book design by Dean Gardei and Gwynn Fuchs US. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Use of ISBN This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of 978-0-945274-61-2 is for U.S. Government Printing Office Editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rochester, Stuart I., 1945– The battle behind bars : Navy and Marine POWs in the Vietnam War / Stuart I. Rochester. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-945274-61-2 (alk. paper) 1. Vietnam War, 1961–1975—Prisoners and prisons, American. 2. Vietnam War, 1961–1975—Prisoners and prisons, Vietnamese. 3. United States. Navy—History—Vietnam War, 1961–1975. 4. United States. Marine Corps—History—Vietnam War, 1961–1975. 5. Prisoners of war—United States—Social conditions—20th century. 6. Prisoners of war—United States— Psychology. 7. Prisoners of war—Vietnam—Social conditions—20th century. 8. Prisoners of war—Vietnam—Psychology. I. Title. DS559.4.R59 2010 959.704’37—dc22 2009043826 ∞ The paper used in this publication meets the requirements for permanence established by the American National Standard for Information Sciences “Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials” (ANSI Z39.48-1984). For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: Bookstore.gpo.gov; Phone: toll free 866-512-1800; DC area 202-512-1800; Fax: 202-512-2104 Mail Stop: CSAPS, Washington, DC 20401 CoNTeNTS Prologue 1 A Chronicle of the Captivity 5 Resistance 23 Punishment 35 Coping 45 Relief and Release 57 Sidebars Marine Captain Donald Cook 9 Prisoner of War Camps in North Vietnam 20 The Tap Code 27 The Most Extraordinary POW in North Vietnam 30 Indoctrination: Torturing the Mind 40 POW Medical Care by the Enemy 52 The Author 67 Acknowledgments 67 Suggested Reading 67 Collection History D S O This image, part of a Pentagon corridor exhibit during the Vietnam War, depicts the environment of a typical Hanoi prison cell. ProLoGUe t was fitting that the senior officer aboard The Marine captives fell primarily into two Ithe first plane to land at Clark Air Base in categories: aviators shot down over North Vietnam the Philippines following the release of the and held in permanent detention facilities in and American prisoners of war from Hanoi in around Hanoi; and younger enlistees and NCOs 1973 was a naval officer. When a thin, wan Captain (noncommissioned officers), along with a handful of Jeremiah Denton descended the ramp to a bank of officers, seized by Viet Cong or North Vietnamese microphones and uttered the poignant words, “We Army (NVA) troops in ground action in South are honored to have had the opportunity to serve Vietnam. The latter group was moved between our country under difficult circumstances,” he spoke makeshift camps mostly in the northern provinces for the entire body of comrades who over the past of the South before joining the first group in the decade had endured the longest wartime captivity North. Because of the disparity in age and rank and of any group of U.S. prisoners in the nation’s history. related factors of training and discipline, as well as But no servicemen suffered through a longer, separate geographical locations and circumstances rougher captivity, or played a more prominent role of confinement, the POW experiences of the two in the leadership and life of the American-occupied groups were distinct. Neither had an easy road, but prison camps in Southeast Asia, than the veteran each encountered advantages and disadvantages Navy and Marine POWs among the Operation relative to their situation that improved or compli- Homecoming returnees. They comprised a high per- cated their lot. centage of the early captures, dominated the ranks By contrast, captured Navy personnel were a of the early seniors, and contributed vitally by deed homogeneous group who for the most part came and by example to the high standard of conduct and from similar backgrounds and, allowing for differ- resistance that so distinguished the POWs of the ences in dates and duration of captivity, shared a Vietnam War. similar experience in prison. Of the 138 men Navy All told, the nearly six hundred U.S. prisoners, analysts examined at Homecoming, all were officers including 25 civilians, repatriated between February and aviators, the majority college-educated, with an and April 1973 during Operation Homecoming average age of 31 at time of capture and five years included 138 Navy and 26 Marine Corps personnel. on average spent in confinement between 1964 Additionally, another seven Navy POWs had either and 1973. All were captured and held in North escaped (two) or been released (five) earlier, and Vietnam following shootdowns or accidents that nine died in captivity. Captured Marines besides the required them to ditch their planes in the North. Homecoming contingent included nine who died Notable exceptions among those returned to U.S. while incarcerated, ten who escaped, two who were control earlier were two pilots, Lieutenant Charles released prior to 1973, and one who was returned in Klusmann and Lieutenant (jg) Dieter Dengler, who 1979. Although only a fraction of the services’ POW went down in and subsequently escaped from Laos, totals of previous wars, they, along with captured and Seaman Douglas Hegdahl, who joined his members of the other services, had an influence aviator comrades in the Hanoi prison system after and significance disproportionate to their small falling from his ship in the Gulf of Tonkin. numbers, owing to their being at the center of a war The unconventional nature of the war and (waged in large part by propaganda and political the unforgiving environment of Southeast Asia persuasion) in which prisoners were key pawns and inflicted special hardships on the Vietnam-era bargaining chips. POWs, whether they spent their captivity in the 1 jungles of the South or the jails of the North. All were affected by the extremes of a mon- soonal climate that brought misery to captor and captive alike. Oppressively hot and humid summers that turned cells into ovens alternated with bone-chilling winters, the cold made worse by lack of adequate clothing and blankets. The absence of edible O Files M food, potable water, and medi- DP Senior POW leaders in Hanoi, Navy Commanders James B. Stockdale, left, and cine in POW encampments Jeremiah A. Denton Jr. in the South, and their chronic scarcity in the North, caused widespread hunger, malnutrition, and disease. The brutal conditions were matched by abusive Compounding the harsh elements were challenges handling—systematic torture in the North, exhaust- peculiar to an undeclared war that left American ing marches and cruel neglect in the South, and the prisoners in a legal limbo. Characterizing the fallen danger of outright execution for the unfortunate aviators and captured ground personnel as “air few held in Laos. Even during periods of relaxed pirates” and mercenaries, the enemy denied them treatment, prisoners confronted crippling anxiety the protection of the Geneva wartime conventions and depression over their uncertain fate; as the and at one point threatened to put the prisoners on captivity lengthened, mental deterioration became trial for war crimes. as grave a threat to survival as physical deprivation. Downed pilots suffered serious injuries—burns, The horrors of captivity in Southeast Asia may wrenched sockets, broken vertebrae—from both have been surpassed by atrocities committed by high-speed ejections and low-level bailouts that the Communist captors in Korea, but the period of resulted in hard parachute landings on often rough incarceration in Korea was much shorter and the terrain. Dr. Richard Wilbur, Assistant Secretary of episodes of severe punishment and suffering not Defense for Health and Environment during the as recurrent. Marine Chief Warrant Officer John 1973 repatriation, estimated that nearly one-third Frederick survived repeated torture and years of of the returning Navy and Air Force pilots entered health problems before succumbing to typhoid in captivity with major fractures. Wounds and injuries the summer of 1972, just months before the POWs typically went untreated, sometimes at the prisoner’s were freed. The sheer length of captivity in so hostile insistence. The men often worried less about infec- an environment—Frederick was well into his seventh tion and discomfort than permanent disability year in prison when he died—introduced risks and from botched surgery or unnecessary amputation. perils that gave an extra dimension to suffering in Marine prisoners in the South, stuffed into bamboo Vietnam unknown in Korea for all its own particular cages lacking shelter or even primitive sanitation, abominations. fell victim to malaria, pneumonia, and all manner of Almost from the moment of capture, U.S. parasitical and intestinal illnesses. The deficient diet POWs of the Vietnam War faced major challenges and nonexistent hygiene of an itinerant captivity left and profound adjustments. Navy pilot Lieutenant them susceptible to excruciating, sometimes fatal Commander Robert Doremus remembered the 2 bouts of dysentery and beriberi. trauma of his initial confinement in a squalid cell in Hanoi, which contrasted sharply with the spit- the “sojourn through hell” that the same services and-polish gleam of the quarters he had occupied which produced some of the most esteemed POW hours before on board his carrier. “The quick change leaders and most remarkable profiles in courage also from a field grade officer to pajama clad captive, produced some of the most conspicuous failures from clean sheeted foam rubber pillowed bed . . . to and slackers. The journey that ended with Denton’s cement bed complete with foot stocks” had an Alice- words on the tarmac at Clark brought some of the into-the-rabbit-hole suddenness. Navy prisoners as prisoners home to hard-won honor and tributes and a group might have been expected to adjust more others to new trials. For all of them, their tenure as readily than their Air Force or Army comrades to POWs would be a defining chapter in their lives, just their sharply circumscribed existence, having been as their homecoming would be a singular moment in accustomed to cramped conditions on board ships. the life of the nation that celebrated their return. • But there was no prior experience to prepare one for the loss of toothbrushes, hot water, and other essentials to perform simple ablutions; the nightly invasion of foraging rodents and mosquitoes; the stench from fetid waste buckets and soiled clothes; and the extended stays in solitary. At length they would devise substitute clocks and calendars to track time, exercises to stay fit, techniques to relieve toothaches and mask odors, and strategies to cope with numbing routine and malaise. Marine Major Howard Dunn commented after the war that in terms of education, maturity, and survival skills, the officer-aviators who dominated the POW rolls in Vietnam were “vastly superior to any group of prisoners in any previous conflict in which the United States has engaged.” Yet much more than proficiency and training, their adaptation would depend on qualities of resiliency and faith, for which rank or résumé were no guarantor of success. In the end, the Navy and Marine Corps could point with pride to the performance of the great majority of their prisoners of war but also had to acknowledge instances of weakness, misconduct, and outright collaboration with the enemy by a few men. As Medal of Honor recipient Captain (later Vice Admiral) James Stockdale noted, the elemental tests posed by captivity in Southeast Asia brought out “the very best and the very worst” in individuals. As much as they relied on the cohesiveness, support, and inspiration of their fellow inmates, their experience under such mental and physical duress ultimately became intensely personal. It was indica- tive of how often inexplicable and divergent were the paths taken to negotiate what one prisoner called 3 Panhandles of North Vietnam and Laos.