The Ark of Yahweh in the Old Testament: An Exegetical-Theological Study D.I. Shin Drs. Thesis submitted for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in Theology at the North West University Promoter: Prof. F.N. Lion-Cachet 2004 Potchefstroom Abstract The aim of this dissertation is to unravel the meaning of the ark of Yahweh in the Old Testament primarily from the perspective of redemptive history. This central theme of the Scriptures encompasses the totality of history and forms a unity in Christ while providing a progressive realization of God's eternal counsel in time. The first chapter is an introduction which demonstrates that the variety of conclusions of earlier studies about the significance of the ark in the Old Testament is due to the application of different modem critical studies to the exegesis of Biblical texts: each study has problems. In order to overcome the flaws, there is a need to examine the biblical text acknowledging the intention of the divine author and his use of subordinates. The second chapter offers discussions on exegetical methodology. The method of interpretation, a three dimensional approach, namely philological-historical-theological approach, applied to this thesis, is in contrast to the historical-literary and the traditio-historical approaches which most prior studies about the ark have used. The redemptive-historical theological method has validity since much of the Bible itself reflects redemptive history. The third chapter attempts to exegesis all biblical texts referring to the ark. The text of Exodus demonstrates that the ark was made to serve as a comfortable assurance that Yahweh would indeed accompany the Israelites on their journey to the promised land and as a tool of God's revelation. The Numbers' text shows that Yahweh led and protected his people in the presence of the ark in the wilderness, even though it is not a thronethariot. The ark passages in Deuteronomy emphasize Yahweh's law and tell us that the ark still has the symbolic meaning of the glorious presence of Yahweh. Yahweh used the ark when he wanted to retrieve his corrupt people and redeem them with the covenantal law. In the book of Joshua we find that occupancy of the promised land as a phase of redemptive history was accomplished by the guidance of the ark using it as a vanguard, as a physical representation of divine presence. The narrative pertaining to the ark in the book of 1 Samuel explains that the ark is not permitted to be mobilized into the battle as a war-palladium. Nor is it a throne. Rather, the ark is closely 2 linked with Yahweh's advanced redemptive work in conformity to his sovereign and eternal design for salvation, despite the Israelite's abuse. The historical event of the transporting of the ark in 2 Samuel 6 suggests Yahweh's sovereign choice of Zion and the climax of a long series of events which began when Moses promised the people 'rest' from all their enemies (Deut. 12:lO). The occasion of bringing up the ark into the temple in 1 Kings 8 explains that Yahweh's resting place was emboded by the ark's position in the inner sanctuary of the temple, the Most Holy Place. The allusion to the stone tablets on which the law of the covenant had been engraved accentuates the importance of the observance of the law in maintenance of the people's relationship with Yahweh. In Psalm 132, the ark as the emblem of God's presence is propounded as a literary work linking the oaths of David and Yahweh and as a foundation of prosperity for the kingdom of Israel. This psalm newly accentuates the redemptive - historical significance of the transportation of the ark to Jerusalem. In Jeremiah 3:16, which obviously hints at the disappearance of the original ark, the function and meaning of the ark vanishes around the time of the new covenant era in the progressive course of redemptive history. The fourth chapter provides theological concepts of the ark. The appellations for the ark are not used as a norm to classify sources. The ark with Kapporet and the cherubim as a holy object the designed on Sinai was given by Yahweh himself has Mosaic origin. The ark was a kind of cultic article used for revelation of his attributes, but it was not to be worshipped. It is not a throne, nor footstool, nor a war-palladium but a symbol of Yahweh's presence in a sacramental and covenantal sense. Notwithstanding, the 'whole unit of the ark' has the concept of footstool, implying his sovereignty. The glorious epiphany of Yahweh occurs around the ark in a tangible and sublime manner. Thus, the significance of the ark is related to a core biblical thought: God is with us; Yahweh fulfils his promise concerning the redemption of human beings in the period of the Old Covenant. Although the ark stood at the center of Israelite culture throughout history, it was a dspensable object in the process of the redemptive historical progression of God. God wants to reside among his people in a different way in the era of the new covenant: through his Holy Spirit. In this regard, the disappearance of the ark may have been a part of God's sovereign plan. Die doe1 van hierdie proefskrif is om die betekenis van die ark van Jahwe in die Ou Testament veral vanuit 'n heilshistoriese perspektief te ondersoek. Die heilsgeskiedenis is 'n sentrale lyn wat dwarsdeur die Skrif loop en saamtrek in Chrism om so God se ewige raadsplan in die tyd tot 'n werklikheid bring. Die eerste hoofstuk is 'n inleiding wat aantoon dat die menigvuldige resultate ten opsigte van die betekenis van die ark in die Ou Testament grootliks die gevolg is van verskillende modeme kritiese metodes van Skrifeksegese. Eke navorsing het probleme. Om die gebreke te probeer oorkom, is die Bybelse tekste weer intensief ondersoek om die bedoeling van die Goddeliie Outeur in die werk van die sekondere auteurs in hulle historiese konteks te verstaan. In hoofstuk twee word eksegetiese metodes bespreek. 'n Filologies-histories metode word in die eksegese gebruik tenvyl die teologie heils-historiese benader word. So het die navorsing 'n drie-dimensionele benaderingsmetode. Dit vorm 'n teenstelling met 'n literer-historiese en tradisioneel-historiese benaderings wat in meeste navorsings oor die ark gebruik is. Die heils- historiese benadering is besonder geskik in die teologiese aspek van die Bybelse verklaring omdat die Bybel self die aandag op die heilsgeskiedenis plaas. In die derde hoofstuk is al die Bybelse tekste met betrekking tot die ark geeksegetiseer. Die tekste uit Eksodus het aangetoon dat die ark gemaak moes word om as 'n versekering te dien dat Yahweh die Israeliete sal vergesel op hulle pad na die beloofde land. Dit was ook 'n plek van openbaring. In Numeri word aangetoon dat Yahweh soos met die teenwoordigheid van die ark sy volk gelei en beskerm het. Die ark was nie 'n troonwa is nie. Die ark-gedeeltes in Deuteronomiurn beklemtoon steeds die simboliese betekenis van die heerlike teenwoordigheid van Yahweh. Yahweh het die ark gebruik om aan te toon dat Hy sy sondige volk in sy verbondsliefde wil verlos. In die boek Josua vind ons die inbesitname van die beloofde land as 'n fase in die heilsgeskiedenis. Die ark is vooruit gedra en dit is as die sigbare teenwoordigheid van Yahweh beskou Die geskiedenis van die ark in I Samuel toon aan dat die ark nie as 'n oorlogsverskansing gebruik mag word nie. Dit is ook nie 'n troon nie. Die ark word steeds nou verbind met die voortgesette verlossingwerk van Yahweh in die uitvoering van sy soewereine en ewige verlossingsraadsplan. Die vervoer van die ark na Sion in 2 Samuel beklemtoon Yahweh se soewereine keuse van Sion. Dit vorm die klirnaks van 'n lang reeks gebeurtenisse wat by Moses begin het toe hy die volk "rus" van al hulle vyande belowe het (Deut. 12:lO). Die plasing van die ark in die Allerheiligste van die tempel (I Kon. 8) wys na Yahweh se rusplek te midde van sy volk. Die kliptafels waarop die verbondswet gegrafeer was, dien om die belangrikheid van wetsonderhouding in die vok se verhouding met Yahweh te beklemtoon. Die ark dien in Psalm 132 as simbool van God se teenwoordigheid. In hierdie gedig word daar 'n verband gele tussen die eedswering van Yahweh aan Dawid met die belofte van voorspoed vir die koninkryk van Israel. Die psalm beklemtoon ook die heishistoriese betekenis van die vervoer van die ark na Jerusalem. Jeremia 3:16 verwys baie duidelii na die verdwyning van die ark. So verdwyn die funksie en betekenis van die ark in die progressiewe gang van die heilsgeskiedenis. Die vierde hoofstuk bied die teologiese besinning met betrekking tot die ark aan. Eerstens gee die omskrywings van die ark gem norm om die brome aan te dui nie. Vervolgens is die ontwerp van die heilige artikels, naamlik die ark met sy Kapporet en gembs, dew Yahweh self gegee. So is dit deur Moses beskrywe. Die ark was 'n kultiese artikel om die deugde van Yahweh te openbaar maar mag nie aanbid word nie. Dit is nie 'n troon, 'n oorlogsverskansing of 'n voetstoel nie maar 'n sakramentele en verbondsimbool van Yahweh se teenwoordigheid. Die "ark in sy geheel" het egter we1 'n sekere ooreenkoms met die gedagte van 'koetstoel" wat na sy soewereiniteit heenwys. Die heerlike verskyning van Yahweh by die ark geskied in 'n aanvoelbare, maar delikate wyse. So word die betekenis van die ark te nouste verbiid met die hart van die Bybelse gedagte: God is by ons. Yahweh wil so sy beloftes om die mensheid te verlos in die Ou Testamentiese tydperk begin vervul. Alhoewel die ark in die sentrum van die Israelitiese religie en lewe gedurende hdle geskiedenistydperk gestaan het, was dit in die voortgang van die verlossingsgeskiedenis vervangbaar. God wil in die nuwe verbondsbedeling op 'n ander manier by sy volk inwoon, naamlik dew sy Heilige Gees. So gesien, is die verdwyning van die ar deel van God se soewereine raadsplan. Acknowledgments It was a long journey to complete my dissertation while working for Kosin University in Korea. During the writing of this thesis, I realized just how difficult it is to practice the old Korean saying 'farm by day and study by night.' I am greatly indebted to many people and I wish to thank them all. I would like to express my gratitude to the faculty of Potchefstroom Theological Seminary who offered me the opportunity to improve my academic ability in this doctoral program. I am grateful to my students at Kosin University and Theological Seminary who ploughed through the draft of this thesis, and whose questions, and suggestions, helped me to clarify some points. Likewise, my gratitude goes out to my colleagues of the Theological Department at Kosin University for their spiritual support and endurance. During every vacation, they were willing to help me concentrate on my research in the libraries of foreign universities such as Potchefstroom University, Geneva College in the United States, Leuven Catholic Univesity in Belgium, and Tyndale House in Cambridge. I wish to express special gratitude to my thesis supervisor, F.N. Lion-Cachet for his patient support, constructive criticism and endless encouragement. Whatever contributions this study may provide are largely due to his impetus. He made substantial contributions to this work. Above all, I owe an incalculable debt of thanks to my wife, Jessica (Jeong Sook) for her unfailing love and untiring assistance at every point during last 10 years of doctoral study. Finally, I want to express my thanks and love to my two sons, Paul (Sang Dm) and Daniel (Sang Hwa) for their many prayers and sacrifices for my thesis. I hope that this small thesis which is established on the Reformed perspective will contribute to Old Testament study. I praise the Lord, my Shepherd, who has led me until now. D.I. Shin Contents 2.4. The redemptive-historical approach as a theological interpretation 52 2.4.1. Redemptive history as a central theme of the Scriptures ........................... 52 2.4.2. The concept of redemptive history ....................................................... 57 2.4.3. The necessity of redemptive history in exegesis 6 1 ---------------------------------.------- 2.4.4. Summary .................................................................................... 63
Description: