THE APPEAL TO BE HEARD AND THE TROPE OF LISTENING IN CLASSIC FILM AND AFRICAN AMERICAN LITERATURE by Mike Kolakoski __________________________ Copyright © Mike Kolakoski 2013 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2013 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Mike Kolakoski, titled The Appeal to be Heard and the Trope of Listening in Classic Film and African American Literature and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: May 8, 1013 _______________________________________________________________________ Charles Scruggs Date: May 8, 2013 _______________________________________________________________________ Susan White Date: May 8, 2013 _______________________________________________________________________ Lynda Zwinger Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. ________________________________________________ Date: May 8, 2013 Dissertation Director: Charles Scruggs 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: Mike Kolakoski 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the faculty and staff at the University of Arizona’s Department of English—in particular, Charlie for your ceaseless encouragement, Susan for your incomparable guidance, Lynda for your selflessness, Meg Lota for your inspiration “to get things done,” and Marcia for doing all you do. I would also like to acknowledge my gratitude for the David L. Patrick Dissertation Fellowship, which helped fund my research and writing. And, of course, I would like to thank my family and friends, without whom I would be nowhere. Mom and Dad, your moral (and financial) support has been immeasurable—I can only hope you are half as proud of me as you have made me feel. Andrea, Laura and Amy, your collegial companionship has sustained me throughout the dissertation process. My only regret for having the unconditional love and encouragement of so many family members and friends along the way is that you are too numerous to mention here all by name. I just hope the cliché is true and trust you know who you are. To all who have read the many manifestations of my argument presented below and to those who might take the time in the future to read the final product: may I say— quite simply but no less genuinely—thank you for listening. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................7 ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ 9 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER ONE: TO FALL ON DEAF EARS: THE NARRATIVE USE OF SOUND AND CONSTRUCTIONS OF SUBJECTIVITY IN EARLY TALKING- PICTURES........................................................................................................................ 26 CHAPTER TWO: LISTENING WITH “A THIRD EAR”: THE RECOGNITION OF SUBJUGATED VOICES IN ABOLITIONIST RHETORIC AND AFRICAN AMERICAN DISCOURSE ON CIVIL RIGHTS............................................................ 83 CHAPTER THREE: A RHETORIC OF DEAFNESS AND THE LISTENING SUBJECT IN RICHARD WRIGHT’S NATIVE SON...................................................................... 131 CHAPTER FOUR: “PAYING FULL ATTENTION TO A PART”: THE TROUBLE WITH LISTENING IN RICHARD WRIGHT’S A FATHER’S LAW AND ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S ROPE.................................................................................................. 187 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued CONCLUSION............................................................................................................... 241 ENDNOTES................................................................................................................... 247 WORKS CITED............................................................................................................. 253 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 ............................................................................................................................ 35 Figure 2 ............................................................................................................................ 36 Figure 3 ............................................................................................................................ 37 Figure 4 ............................................................................................................................ 39 Figure 5 ............................................................................................................................ 40 Figure 6 ............................................................................................................................ 42 Figure 7 ............................................................................................................................ 42 Figure 8 ............................................................................................................................ 45 Figure 9 ............................................................................................................................ 46 Figure 10 .......................................................................................................................... 46 Figure 11 .......................................................................................................................... 61 Figure 12 .......................................................................................................................... 62 Figure 13 .......................................................................................................................... 62 Figure 14 .......................................................................................................................... 65 Figure 15 .......................................................................................................................... 66 Figure 16 .......................................................................................................................... 70 Figure 17 .......................................................................................................................... 70 Figure 18 .......................................................................................................................... 71 Figure 19 .......................................................................................................................... 74 Figure 20 .......................................................................................................................... 74 8 LIST OF FIGURES — Continued Figure 21 .......................................................................................................................... 76 Figure 22 .......................................................................................................................... 77 Figure 23 .......................................................................................................................... 79 Figure 24 .......................................................................................................................... 79 Figure 25 .......................................................................................................................... 81 Figure 26 .......................................................................................................................... 81 Figure 27 .......................................................................................................................... 85 Figure 28 ........................................................................................................................ 141 Figure 29 ........................................................................................................................ 204 Figure 30 ........................................................................................................................ 206 Figure 31 ........................................................................................................................ 209 Figure 32 ........................................................................................................................ 209 Figure 33 ........................................................................................................................ 215 Figure 34 ........................................................................................................................ 218 Figure 35 ........................................................................................................................ 238 9 ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the narrative use of sound, the rhetorical appeal to be heard and the trope of listening in African American literature as well as Hollywood and international cinema. Contributing to the burgeoning fields of film sound and listening studies, Chapter One explores the relationship between the first experiments with synchronous sound recording technology and the construction of subjectivity along the lines of ethnicity, religion and gender in early talkies such as Al Jolson’s The Jazz Singer and Alfred Hitchcock’s Blackmail. Chapter Two surveys a range of abolitionist texts and select essays from the Civil Rights movement—particularly David Walker’s Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World, Frederick Douglass’s first autobiography Narrative of the Life and his novella “The Heroic Slave,” W. E. B. Du Bois’s The Souls of Black Folk and Richard Wright’s White Man, Listen!—in order to review the role of listening across racial divides in the United States. Chapter Three analyzes the multiple ways in which listening functions for narrative purposes in Wright’s best-selling novel, Native Son; and Chapter Four addresses the trouble with listening in Wright’s posthumous novel A Father’s Law and Hitchcock’s first color film, Rope. Contributing to film studies, gender studies, and critical race theory, this thesis argues that the act of listening comes to function figuratively as a trope, signifying not only a means of recognition, interpellation and subjugation of an Other but also an instrument of justice; a matter of politics; a means of education; a potential remedy for alienation, while at the same time working as a tool of oppression; a formative act in 10 familial and other social relations; a governing form of surveillance; an audial gaze, so to speak; a way to frighten, or more generally, evoke emotion; a part of the therapeutic process; an indication of trust or confidence; a manifestation of (sexual) desire; and, last but certainly not least, an age old form of entertainment forever transformed by sound technology of the industrial age.
Description: