Anxiety the Obsolescence of the american novel in the age of television Kathleen Fitzpatrick The Anxiety of Obsolescence The Anxiety of Obsolescence The American Novel in the Age of Television Kathleen Fitzpatrick Vanderbilt University Press • nashville © 2006 Vanderbilt University Press All rights reserved First Edition 2006 10 09 08 07 06 05 1 2 3 4 5 Printed on acid-free paper. Manufactured in the United States of America Portions of Chapter 3 of this book first appeared in different form as “The Clockwork Eye: Technology, Woman, and the Decay of the Modern in Thomas Pynchon’s V.,” in Thomas Pynchon: Reading from the Margins, ed. Niran Abbas (2002). I gratefully acknowledge the permission granted by the Associated University Presses to reprint this material. The “schematic diagram of a general communication system” on page 156 is reprinted from The Mathematical Theory of Communication, copyright 1949, 1998 by Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Press, and is used with permission of the University of Illinois Press. The “encoding/decoding” diagram on page 157 is reprinted from Culture, Media, Language, copyright 1980 by Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham, and is used with permission of Taylor & Francis. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Fitzpatrick, Kathleen, 1967– The anxiety of obsolescence : the American novel in the age of television / Kathleen Fitzpatrick.—1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-8265-1519-3 (acid-free paper) ISBN 0-8265-1520-7 (pbk. : acid-free paper) 1. American fiction—History and criticism. 2. Television broadcasting—United States—Influence. 3. Literacy—United States. 4. Popular culture—United States. I. Title. PS371F58 2006 813’.5409—dc22 2005031076 For Rick Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction: The Anxiety of Obsolescence 1 1 Three Discourses on the Age of Television 11 2 Machine 58 3 Spectacle 98 4 Network 149 5 Obsolescence, the Marginal, and the Popular 201 Notes 235 Bibliography 249 Index 259 Acknowledgments Any text such as this one owes its existence to countless individuals and in- stitutions that have supported its coming into being, and any expression of gratitude seems destined for inadequacy. Such an inadequacy in what follows should be understood as a failure in the expression, rather than the absence, of sincere emotion. This project has taken a long and often painful path to its final fruition but has been fostered at each stage by teachers, counselors, and guides who have managed through their efforts to make it something more than I could have produced on my own. At New York University, the instruction and mentor- ship of Cyrus Patell, Phillip Brian Harper, Josephine Hendin, Pat Hoy, and Carolyn Dever created the atmosphere of support and rigor that enabled me to take an ill-formed question about the relationship between television and the novel and develop a project that has sustained my interest through many dark moments. The material support of both the English Department and the Expository Writing Program were crucial to the speedy completion of the dissertation from which the present project developed. That dissertation also benefited from the critical input of the postmodernist dissertation support group, including Sandy Baldwin, Martin FitzPatrick, and Jae Roe, whose camaraderie and friendly challenges made the process as worthwhile as the product. I also want to thank Megan Abbott, Margaret Longbrake, and Laurie Marcus for their demanding, insightful readings of my work. For their unflag- ging support through the always tendentious and often exhilarating days in the doctoral program, I’d like to convey my deepest gratitude to Corinne Abate, Stephen Brauer, Joshua Gaylord, Michael Matto, Lahney Preston-Matto, James Polchin, Aaron Rosenthal, and all the members of Table 13, whose sympathy, kindness, and eternal readiness with the appropriate televisual reference made the early days of this project more fun than I could have hoped. At Pomona College, I have been blessed with generous colleagues, both pres- | ix
Description: