ebook img

The Anti-Samuelson. Volume Two - Microeconomics: basic problems of the capitalist economy PDF

475 Pages·1977·11.98 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Anti-Samuelson. Volume Two - Microeconomics: basic problems of the capitalist economy

4 2 5 1981 c-nd 0 n 0 y- 5 b 01 cc- 9 # 3 e dp. us m s_ 7/ es 2 c 0 c 2 a net/ org/ dle. ust. han hitr //hdl. w.hat p: w htt /w / / p: MT htt G / 19:57 atives 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv on er a) mm w Io Co of on N sity on- guest (Univer ons Attributi m or m f o d C Generate Creative //? .5 ot'i L l l i°l 11 4 52 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data 1981 c-nd Linder, Marc. 00 y-n Anti-Samuelson. 5 b 901 #cc- Bibliography. mdp.3 s_use I1.n clSuadmeuse lisnodne,x* Paul Anthony, 1915- Economics. 7/ es I. Sensat, Julius, 1947- joint author. II. Title. 02 cc HB119.S25L5 330 * 76-20796 2 a net/ org/ IISSBBNN 00--991166335544--1176--24 ((vv.. 22)) pbk. dle. ust. han hitr //hdl. w.hat p: w htt /w / / p: MT htt G / 19:57 atives 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv on er Copyright © 1977 by Marc Linder a) mm w Io Co All rights reserved of on N sity on- Manufactured in the United States of America guest (Univer ons Attributi m or m f o d C Generate Creative Contents 10 Money 1 11 Banks and Credit 33 12 Central Banks and Fiscal Policy 53 13 Supply and Demand—An Empirical Approach 87 14 The Failure of Supply and De­ mand as Applied to Agriculture 101 15 Marginal-Utility Theory 117 16 Price Theory 147 17 Monopoly Theory 169 18 Marginal Productivity Theory 181 4 2 19 The Theory of Ground Rent 201 5 1981 c-nd 20 Wages 211 0 n 50 by- 21 Interest 227 01 cc- 39 e# 22 Theories of Profit 241 dp. us m s_ 7/ es IMPERIALISM AND THE WORLD MARKET 2 c 0 c 2 a net/ org/ Introduction to Chapters 23-27 249 dle. ust. 23 The World Market and World han hitr dl. at Money: Theoretical and //h w.h p: w Historical Outline 257 htt /w / / p: 24 World-Trade Theories 299 GMT / htt 25 The Development of Imperialist 19:57 atives Trade Policy 323 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv 26 CaAnrsidpse esc Itns teorfn athtieo nWalo rldC uMrraernkceyt 339 on er a) mm 27 "Underdevelopment 389 w of Io onCo Notes and References 425 N sity on- guest (Univer mons Attributi or m f o d C Generate Creative Chapter 10: Money (S's Chapter 15) This chapter in S is intended as a link between the income analysis of Chapters 10-14 and the anticyclical measures of the Fed in the subsequent chapters. It repeats and embel­ lishes previous material on price and money amidst a selec­ tion of statistics with no theoretical bridge to the text. In order to provide an introduction to what is rather difficult 4 theoretical material we have decided to begin with S's re­ 2 5 1981 c-nd marks on inflation. 0 n 0 y- 015 cc-b INFLATION 9 # 3 e dp. us m s_ Although S has not defined price for us (all we know is 7/ es 2 c that "everything has a price"—43), he nonetheless proceeds 0 c 2 a net/ org/ to measure it and tell us how it has changed over the years dle. ust. in the U.S. Then we are told that "some definitions will be han hitr useful. By inflation we mean a time [? !] of generally rising //hdl. w.hat prices for goods and factors of production—rising prices for http: /ww bread, cars, haircuts; rising wages, rents, etc. By deflation / / p: we mean a time when most prices and costs are falling" MT htt (270). Even though we just "discovered" that inflation re­ G / 19:57 atives p"crheasnengtess "ing erneelartaivlley prriisciensg" ; p"rUicnefos,r"e sSe ensu idndfleantiloyn stheinfdtss ttoo on 2012-04-16 ercial-NoDeriv dcfaoivtmoorers s dateonb dtao rfcsio xnaecndrd-ei tnepc rohomifsitteo rrriececacelei viavenreasrl sya"s ti s( tihboiefd .ie)n.x fplBaetuniots new , ohSfe ncsa reci­­t a) mm rifices this differentiated view in favor of a good guys-bad w of Io onCo guys description: N sity on- guest (Univer ons Attributi l m or m f o C o n o l p Original from Generated Creative C UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Nothing good can be said for a rapid rise of prices such as took place in Germany in 1920-1923 and more recently in China and Hungary. Production and even [!] the social order are then dis­ organized. The total wealth of large groups of the population is wiped out as money becomes worthless. Debtors ruthlessly pursue creditors in order to pay off their obligations in value­ less money. Speculators profiteer [273J. S contradicts himself here. First we are told that "nothing good" can be said about the matter, and then we are in­ formed that large groups were wiped out. Thus small groups who benefited from this operation must have found the whole business "good." An economist with a semioffi­ cial position in Germany, who was the author of a standard history of that inflation, wrote: There is no doubt that the paper inflation would not have as­ sumed such vast proportions if it had not been favoured in many ways from the people who drew a large profit from it. It 4 is clear from the discussions held in 1922 and 1923 in the 2 5 01981 nc-nd c"lEacsosneso musice dC othuenicr ili nofflu tehnec eR oenic hth" et hGaot vreerpnrmeseenntt attoiv iems poefd teh othsee 0 y- 015 cc-b reform of the public finances and to sabotage all proposals for 9 # the stabilization of the German exchange, which they accepted 3 e dp. us only when, at last, an economic catastrophe threatened Ger­ m s_ 7/ es many and it was evident that the consequences of the inflation 2 c 0 c 2 a would rebound against their authors. . .. It may be said that net/ org/ on the whole the inflation generally favoured the entrepreneurs dle. ust. and the owners of the material means of productions, espe­ //hdl.han w.hathitr cciaaullsye ds trae nlogwtheerniningg otfh eth peo rseitailo nws aogfe sin; dtuhsattr iiat l dceacpiimtaalitsetds; othr adt ei­t p: w htt /w stroyed altogether the old middle class of investors. . . .* / / p: MT htt Let us look at some of the methods used to exploit the pro­ G / 19:57 atives lmetaanriya'ts. sTthaete inbcuodmgeet ;t aoxf ththeins, c9o0n sptietructeendt ownaes-t hpiardid obf yG tehre­ 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv wfmrooomrrke itnthhgea irnc l waasa sg.y eeTsa,hr ewa hfwtielore r ktthheeer s c't aaipxnaictbaollmeis etis n tcdaoixdme sen owwt eaprsae y " deteaadxrneusec tdfeo.d"r on er a) mm And because the inflation from 1921 to 1923 was so severe w Io Co they paid their taxes in relatively worthless money. Thus of on N sity on- guest (Univer ons Attributi 2 I ANTI- S AMUELSON, VOLUME II m for om Original from Generated Creative C Digitized by C jO O oQ lt UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN the capitalists were supposed to pay $70 million in taxes in the first quarter of 1923, (from 1921 income); by this time that sum was worth only $1,333 million. Moreover, the capitalists did not immediately hand over the taxes de­ ducted from the workers' wages: they held them for two weeks, during which time they used the money to buy means of production, and sold their newly produced com­ modities at their reproduction price, which, because of the inflation, was of course higher than the production price. Handing over the money to the state in depreciated form, they kept the difference. Next we come to the effect of inflation on total produc­ tion. S asserts that "an increase in prices is usually as­ sociated with high employment. In mild inflation . . . out­ put is near capacity. Private investment is brisk. . . . In de­ flation . . . the growing unemployment of labor and capital causes the community's total well-being to be less . . (272). On an empirical level, contemporary stagflation of 4 course, gives the lie to this. S, however, fails to provide the 2 19815 c-nd mpainssieindg btyh, eoorre triactahl erli nakcsc.o m"Mpailndie"s ,i n"fwlaetilol-nlu bisr icoaftteend awchcoemels­ 0 n 0 y- 5 b of industry" precisely because wages rise more slowly than 01 cc- 39 e# other commodity prices, thereby allowing capitalists to mdp. s_us realize superprofits by buying labor power below its value; 27/ ces as a result there is in the short run increased capital forma­ 0 c 2 a net/ org/ tion and also increased or relatively higher employment. dle. ust. S would have us believe that the contemporary prefer­ han hitr ence for inflation over deflation is the result of some sort of //hdl. w.hat marginal-utility calculus poll that found inflation to be "the p: w lesser of the two evils" because the "losses to fixed income htt /w / p:/ groups are usually less than the gains to the rest of the MT htt community" (272). To the extent that inflation is planned, it G / 19:57 atives is Idt owneo uslod fohro wanedv ebry b cea peritraoln. eous to believe that things are 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv mdtieoupncr heo sfbs ieoitnnted,r u fsoutrnr idtahel er cceaonpnoadrcmiittiyiot ynm so uof sfct osbntaetge mfplaupttio orinan rtytoh aupnne drdseeprfuelatcittliiiovznae-­: on er a) mm given utilization of between 70 and 75 percent, and a GNP w Io Co of, say, at least 600 or 700 billion dollars in terms of 1929 of on N sity on- guest (Univer ons Attributi MONEY I 3 m for om Original from Generated Creative C UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN purchasing power, the total value of output represented by underutilization exceeds that of total GNP at the end of the boom of the 1920s (1929 GNP-103 billion dollars). It is necessary to place this development in a theoretical context. Permanent underutilization (only the Korean and Vietnam wars were able to nudge the percentage even to 90) means permanent capital overproduction; it is no longer only dur­ ing the periodic crisis and depression phases that capital is idled and depreciated: since World War II the conditions of surplus-value expansion have been so altered that a large part of the total social product is maneuvered into invest­ ment and government consumption and there made idle, which from the point of view of capital expansion is tan­ tamount to capital destruction. This development is closely related to "planned" infla­ tion. To begin with, a significant part of capitalized surplus value is neatly tucked away under the rubric "rapid early depreciation allowances"; the ability to do this rests upon the monopoly situation of the largest capitals. Since prices 4 52 must compensate for these "costs," the consumers bear the 1981 c-nd brunt. For nonmilitary capital this means that the 0 n 0 y- monopolies, independent of the state, have the power to 5 b 01 cc- bring about depreciation of money and redistribution of in­ 9 # 3 e dp. us come. (It must be noted, however, that an increase in m s_ 7/ es monopoly prices need not necessarily lead to inflation in 2 c 0 c 2 a the sense of "flooding the conduits with paper." To begin net/ org/ with, monopoly pricing refers to wholesale prices—that is, handle. hitrust. transactions among capitalists [either within Department I p://hdl. ww.hat omra blleyt wcaerernie dI aonnd w IiIt]h; spuacphe rc ommomneoyd ibtyu te rxacthhaenrg bey isin ncroet ansionrg­ htt //w bank money in the form of deposits [increased credit]. This / p: MT htt in part explains- the large increase in commercial bank de­ G / posits. There is also a limit to this credit-deposit creation. 19:57 atives Deposits can be created to the extent that moneyless, recip­ 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv rmsoaoctean le oylin qfeuu indacanttioiootnnhs e oraf.s c Bmlauiemta nsd set apokofe spsi tap ylimancfeelna, tti inoa nnwd h iscic lahai lmstrosa ncpsooamcstspiioebnnles­ a) on mmer when deposits exceed the needs of moneyless transactions; Iow Co if loan capital as money capital exceeds the needs of the of on N sity on- guest (Univer ons Attributi 4 I ANTI-SAMUELSON, VOLUME II m or m d f Co rDiiignitiiiziewd hbuy C n n o Ip UNIVEORrSiIgTiYn aOlF f rMoImCHIGAN Generate Creative turnover of total capital, then a part of it can no longer function as industrial capital. But loan capital is interest- bearing capital: if its mas is increased without a corre­ sponding increase in the mass of surplus value, then the portion of surplus value going to the industrial capitalist [entrepreneurial profit] decreases relative to the portion ap­ propriated by the money capitalists, or the share appropri­ ated by each lender is diminished [equaling a declining rate of interest]. In the former case there is of course a limit to the drop in the rate of entrepreneurial profit below which industrial capital will not employ any more loan capital; similarly, in the latter case, there is an interest rate limit below which the money capitalists will not lend. A resolu­ tion of the conflict between loan and real capital as ex­ pressed in the inflation of the former is sought in the an­ nulment of part of the deposits or in the equal devaluation of all deposits.)2 On the other hand, rising monopoly prices do not neces­ sarily result in an increased supply in retail business; for if 4 2 wage increases do not correspond to the increase in 5 1981 c-nd monopoly prices, then the volume of retail sales remains 00 y-n the same, while the physical volume decreases; thus infla­ 5 b 01 cc- tion takes place without an increase in the money supply. 9 # 3 e dp. us An analogous process takes place in the state-military- 7/m ess_ industrial sphere. 2 c 20 ac As far as practical pricing is concerned, S informs us that net/ org/ there are three possibilities% (1) stable prices, with money dle. ust. and real wages rising; (2) rising prices, with real wages lag­ //hdl.han w.hathitr gminogn eyb ewhiangde s manodn eryi siwnga greesa;l (w3)a gfeasll. inTgh ep trhicireds, pwositshib islittayb lies p: w htt /w immediately ruled out on the grounds that we do not live / / p: MT htt in an "ideal frictionless society" (274); in the appendix to G / Chapter 18, S implies that this "friction" is in reality 19:57 atives monopoly: "If business generally can set its prices so as to 2012-04-16 cial-NoDeriv koteefr emtph irnleaeebd-of"or u'(s7r ttshhh sae,r det, h oepfn. t3ot3hta2el) . rNePsNeurPlht ianaptg s a pwbaoetut etar rnteh ego ifvs apemnri ceae sfh raiissc ttodiorein­­ on er cal taste of what S has in mind with the notion that "most a) mm w vigorous periods of healthy capitalist development without Io Co of on N sity on- guest (Univer ons Attributi m or m f o d C Generate Creative political unrest came during periods of stable or gently ris­ ing prices. Capitalism itself developed during the centuries when Spanish New World gold was raising prices" (274). This is how M. Dobb describes the time: To the extent that money-wages failed to rise as the commodity price-level rose, all employers and owners of capital were ab­ normally enriched at the expense of the standard of life of the labouring class; the price revolution generated that "profit in­ flation" of which Lord Keynes has spoken as being responsible for those "golden years" when "modern Capitalism was bom" and as "the fountain and origin of British Foreign Invest­ ment." ... In France and Britain real wages continued to fall throughout the sixteenth century and remained throughout the seventeenth century below the level at which they had stood in 1500. . . . Real wages in 1600 in England were less than a half what they had been a century before.3 Are these the halcyon days the American worker is de­ 4 stined to bring about through wage moderation and profit 2 5 01981 nc-nd iinnfgl aatinodn ?m Aissl etahdisin lga stto h"idsteofriincael" eixnaflmatpiolen sahso wa sg,e nite irsa lc orinsfeu isn­ 0 y- 5 b 01 cc- the price level, as is commonly done by bourgeois 9 # 3 e economists. The rise in prices set off by the discovery of dp. us m s_ gold in gold-currency economies is clearly an anarchic pro­ 7/ es 2 c cess characteristic of capitalist commodity production and 0 c 2 a net/ org/ exchange. The inflation that "plagues" capitalism today is dle. ust. not to the same degree an anarchic process, inasmuch as han hitr various manipulations can lead through the sphere of circu­ dl. at //h w.h lation to a subsequent redistribution of income between http: /ww bourgeoisie and proletariat. On the other hand, the histori­ / / p: cal process of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries de­ MT htt pended on more than the discovery of gold. If that had G / 19:57 atives bbeeeenn tahffee cotneldy efqacutaolrl,y tahnedn anlol ccolamssm cohdaitnyg epsr icweos uwldo uhladv eh arvee­ on 2012-04-16 ercial-NoDeriv sfteiuorlneted do. .f I ntHh oBowsriete avaienffr e,a cnbtededc ,aF urtahsnee c oee ffa fet hcretess esitrnav gede i aforfemfr ecyan pot iftc aoulu nanecmtcruipemlso uydleiafd­­ a) mm had already developed which depressed wages; in Spain w of Io onCo "the process of primitive accumulation in this still-feudal N sity on- country had not begun"; various other historically con- guest (Univer mons Attributi or m f o d C Generate Creative ditioned factors (the expulsion of Moors, colonization, pes­ tilence) also made the labor market "tight," and thus by 1620, wages were higher than they had been in 1500.4 This excursion into the past makes clear that inflation un­ like, for example, Marx's theory of money, is not an abstract theory. Insofar as inflation is a differentiated and "class-conscious" process, it is in large measure determined by concrete and, viewed from the level of abstraction, say, in Capital, historically accidental phenomena. Unless the term inflation is to become a formal classification bereft of all meaning, it appears necessary to deny that inflation has anything to do with (1) a decrease in the value of gold, (2) an increase in the value of commodities, or (3) a deviation of market prices from value as determined by supply and demand; for as a concept existing on a level much closer to concrete reality than, say, value, inflation must be ex­ plained in terms of concrete phenomena, and it "just so happens" that today none of these three factors has any­ 4 thing to do with rising prices: (1) productivity in the gold 2 5 01981 nc-nd itnridesu;s t(r2y) hparos dnuoctt ivaditvya ninc etdh ef absutelrk tohfa nc otmhamt oidn itoyt-hperro dinudciunsg­ 0 y- 015 cc-b industries has not decreased absolutely; and (3) the gap be­ 9 # 3 e tween supply and effective demand that characterized dp. us m s_ World War II and the postwar periods has been closed by 7/ es 2 c the usual overproduction. Now we know some of the 0 c 2 a net/ org/ things inflation is not. dle. ust. The distinguishing characteristic of inflation is not so han hitr much the flooding of the conduits with paper money as the //hdl. w.hat depreciation of that paper vis-a-vis gold. This is not to say http: /ww that flooding does not also take place; in wartime, for / / p: example, "civilian production" drops: "the excess purchas­ GMT / htt ing power can be used to bid up the prices of goods and 19:57 atives cnoont sutom eorbst aciann aodndliyt iopnaayl mgooored sf. orU gnodoedr s;t htehseey ccoanndniotito ngse,t on 2012-04-16 ercial-NoDeriv mcthreoear es"i engxgoc oethsdess ".s "u5e pfBfpeulcytt ivowefa prdsa epcmearna n mdaol;s note hybi;se thifsie n iasntn actfeead cc ta wnw iththaaoxt u athw aianpy­­ a) mm pened during World War II in the U.S.: taxes increased fas­ w of Io onCo ter than money depreciated. N sity on- If all this is true, then our attention should be fixed on the guest (Univer ons Attributi money i 7 m or m Original from f o d C Generate Creative UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.