The Anti-Christ-World-Government-01-17-14

29 Pages·2014·2.22 MB·English

Miracle Deliverance
Antichrist World Government
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drpatholliday/2014/01/18/antichrist-world-governmentdr-pat-
hollidaydr-sabrina-sessionsmarshall-perot

WHY IS WILLIAM HOLDING A CLOVEN HIND HOOF IN THE PHOTOGRAPH?
Leviticus 11 - Clean and Unclean Animals
PRINCE WILLIAM BORN ON RARE SOLSTICE ECLIPSE AND DURING THE 666
SAROS CYCLE

On the eve of June 21 1982, Satanic witches from all over the world celebrated at the birth of William
Arthur, the Future King, with his birthday not coincidentally falling upon the day of the pagan's

Summer Solstice, a day that has been celebrated for centuries within the Pagan calendar. As
such, the Summer Solstice of 1982 was indeed unique within England for it was also prophesied
by the ancient Druids that their Sun-King will return to them, upon some future Solstice to bring
the balance back (explained later). Therefore, much like Christ's own birth that was foretold by certain
prophecies as well as signs in the heavens, so was his.

Where Christ was known to have an alignment of stars foretelling His own birth as the new
King of Israel, those celestial signs from 1982 announcing William's arrival were no less telling.
At precisely 9:03pm, June 21st, Princess Diana of Wales gave birth to Prince William, thus
England was given its next King. Some hours earlier that day was the Solstice celebration at
Stonehenge, with Pagans, in keeping the ancient tradition of their Druid ancestors (who
worshipped there centuries earlier by sacrificing a child just as those first bloody rays of dawn
came over the horizon) do so even today to honor both the Druid ways, as well as their most
ancient Sun-God (ultimately, Lucifer) being reborn. Sunset and night came late that day, as it
being the longest day of the year, did not go by without another event in the heavens taking
place. Specifically, William's birth took place just after a Solar Eclipse on the Summer Solstice,
an especially powerful moment when the Sun, Moon, and North node aligned in the Prince’s 7th House
under Cancer.

Eclipses are the great power points of the Zodiac. They run through space and time in
regular series called Saros cycles. The Saros cycles take about 1200 years to travel from the
North to the South Pole, and vice-versa, each series has a different founding horoscope as well as
a different theme. William was born into a series called 2 Old North, which began in 792 AD,
just before the first recognized English King was crowned. It is due to end in 2036 AD, when King
William is 54 years old. This raises many questions. The most obvious is whether William, if he
becomes the King of Great Britain, might in fact be the last. The meaning of the Saros 2 Old North
Series is said to be that of “separation or ending of unions,” a recurring theme clearly lived out in
William's young life thus far. [The time allotted for this period of 'Saros' is 18x37, the equivalent
of 666 years]. 1

Just hours after his birth that night, came an unusually dark night in the form of a completely
blacked-out New Moon, a time traditionally known since ancient times to be a time of death,
murder, war, and anything else evil needs to carry out its nefarious act during the darkest of
nights once every month. These events occurring all on the same day seemed to herald
something of extra significance was indeed taking place. As mentioned, Pagans from all over the
world descended upon the UK for various celebrations. To them, the fact that a Diana was giving
birth, Diana being the name of their epic Moon Goddess, even as she was said to be giving birth to
her son (making the Moon/Sun eclipse that day all the more significant), with William born as a
"Sun-King" with ties to not only the rumored Occult connections within the British Royal
Family, themselves seen as the Grand Royalty of all Witch Covens worldwide, but also Diana's
son was believed to be a literal reincarnation of the ancient Anglo-Welsh Pagan King Arthur
himself. This of course was largely kept secret within only Occult circles, however, one news
item that did get widely reported in the British media at the time was when Prince Charles was
visiting his new wife and newborn child at St. Mary's hospital, a member of the public shouted
out to ask him the boy's name. The Prince of Wales is quoted as rather hastily replying, "You'll
have to ask my wife, we're having a bit of an argument over that!" The name William was finally
given and made public to a waiting world, yet not until several days after his birth. It has been
speculated that had Charles had his way, his son would have been touted much too early on as
King Arthur II (The Second). However, in the article "No More Sacrifice," the London
Psychogeographical Association Newsletter reminds us that there are some British Christians
who have already pointed out that should William become King, he would be called King
William V yet by taking the W as two V's with the I's as Roman numerals for one, they have
constructed a most unsettling anagram for the future King of England: I AM VI VI VI or I AM
666.
The Antichrist will be possessed by the First Beast that rises up from the Abyss of the Sea.
“And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven
heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of
blasphemy. 2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of
a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his
seat, and great authority,” (Rev.13:1-2).
“The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit,
and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not
written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that
was, and is not, and yet is. (Rev.17:8).
And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify
himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and
shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any
god: for he shall magnify himself above all. 38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of
forces: and a god whom his father’s knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and
with precious stones, and pleasant things. 39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a
strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them
to rule over many, and shall divide the land for gain.(Dan.11:36-39).
And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a
king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. 24 And his
power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and
shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. 25 And through
his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in
his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of
princes; but he shall be broken without hand, (Dan. 8:23-25) 2
DOES THIS LOOK LIKE AN ANGLICAN ROBE? OR A SUN GOD ROBE?
Rowan Douglas Williams, Baron Williams of Oystermouth preformed the wedding
ceremony of Prince William and Kate Middleton.
He was the 104th Archbishop of Canterbury, Metropolitan of the Province of Canterbury
and Primate of All England, offices he held from December 2002 to December 2012.[3][4]
Performing the Royal wedding for Prince William, He wore a golden pagan robe with
druidic symbols which relates to the sun. He is a druidic priest. He was criticized in the
press for allegedly supporting a 'pagan organization', the Welsh Gorsedd of Bards, (he is a
member, see below) which promotes Welsh language and literature and uses druidic
ceremonial but is actually not religious in nature.[17] 3
However, since 2012 all these ranks are treated as equal, with new members all being
called 'Druids' and with the colour of their robes reflecting the area of their contribution
rather than an ascending order of honour.
The head of a Gorsedd is known as an ''Archdderwydd+'' (English: Archdruid), and wears a
golden robe, and is elected for a term of three years, and is responsible for conducting the
Gorsedd ceremonies during Eisteddfod week. These ceremonies are held to honour literary
achievements amongst Welsh poets and prose writers. The ranks within the Breton Gorsedd are
the same. In the Cornish Gorsedd (Cornish: ''Gorseth'') there is only one rank, that of bard, and
all robes are blue. Link: Gorseth Kernow - The Gorseth of Cornwall: Ceremonies and Regalia

In the Welsh Gorsedd, a person may become an ovate or a bard by passing an
examination+ in the Welsh language+. Druids may only be nominated by existing druids.
Often a new inductee will take a pseudonym, called a "bardic name+." To become an
Archdruid, an individual must have won one of the Eisteddfod's three highest awards: the
Crown+, the Chair+, or the Literature Medal. In 2003, Robyn Lewys+ (Robin Llŷn) became the
first winner of the Literature Medal to be elected Archdruid, and the first Archdruid to be elected
by a vote of all Gorseddogion.

People are also made ovates or druids as an honour to reward their contributions to Welsh
culture+. In 1946, Queen Elizabeth II+ was inducted into the Welsh Gorsedd at the National
Eisteddfod of Wales+. In recent years, Ron Davies+, Rowan Williams+, Matthew Rhys+,
Ioan Gruffudd+ and Rebecca Evans+ have been honoured in this way.4

For his designs Herkomer researched early engravings of mythological 'Archdruids',
among them the picture of the 'archdruid' in Henry Rowlands's Mona Antiqua Restaurata, 1723.
Herkomer's new robe, crown and breastplate were ready for the Newport Proclamation
Ceremony in 1896 and he took pride in his contribution:
'Fortunately the love of the picturesque has not been eradicated from man's nature; for an
arch druid to be wrongly dressed, that is too dreadful to contemplate. I am happy to think that
such a calamity has been, for all times, averted. The Gorsedd with its chief must above all be
distinctive in its outer appearance as well as in its inner spiritual being.'
Dyfed was the first Archdruid to wear a stola, with the eye of the sun and its rays, a
rampant red dragon and a dove emblazoned on it, in
1911. 5

During the ceremonies, the Archdruid and the members
of the Gorsedd gather on the Eisteddfod stage in their
ceremonial robes. When the Archdruid reveals the
identity of the winning poet, the 'Corn Gwlad' (a
trumpet) calls the people together and the Gorsedd
Prayer is chanted (the Corn Gwlad symbolically calls
everyone from the four corners of Wales). The Archdruid
partially withdraws a sword from its sheath three times,
and cries "''A oes heddwch''?" ("Is there peace?"), to
which the assembly reply "''Heddwch''" ("Peace"). The
sword is then placed fully back into its sheath, and hence
is never drawn fully. Then the Horn of Plenty is

presented to the Archdruid by a young local married
Archdruid Brinli (1972- woman, who urges him to drink the 'wine of welcome'. A
75); Brinley Richards. young girl presents him with a basket of 'flowers from
the land and soil of Wales' and a floral dance is
performed, based on a pattern of flower gathering from the fields.

The symbol commonly used to represent a Gorsedd is a triple line, the middle line upright
and the outer two slanted towards the top of the centre, thus: /|\. This symbol, called "awen+", is
often explained as representing the sun+. The word "awen" means "muse" in Welsh.6
2010 General Synod address
On 9 February 2010, in an address to General Synod, Williams warned that damaging
infighting over women bishops and gay priests could result in a permanent split in the
Anglican Communion. He stressed that he did not "want or relish" the prospect of division and
called on the Church of England and Anglicans worldwide to step back from a "betrayal" of
God's mission and to put the work of Christ before schism. But he conceded that, unless
Anglicans could find a way to live with their differences over women bishops and homosexual
ordination, the Church would change shape and become a multi-tier communion of different
levels – a schism in all but name.[21]
SATANIC HOLIDAYS APRIL 29TH
It is worth noting that the wedding date of 29th April is surrounded by Satanic holidays.
The 'Grand Climax' takes place between April 26-May 1 and is characterized by sexual
interaction with female victims between the ages of 1-25. 'Walpurgisnacht Roodmas Day' takes
place on April 30th and contains animal and/or human sacrifice of any age. 'Beltane Eve' also
takes place on April 30th and is a fertility rite.7
In my investigations into the Illuminati, I was provided information from several ex-
Illuminati members about an important ritual called The Feast of the Beast.8
A Satanic holiday of special relevance to the Royal wedding is the 'Feast of the Beast'.
According to Fritz Springmeier, it is a year-long event that occurs every 28 years and is attended
by Illuminati leaders from around the world. It is a very high level ceremony, and would not be
recognized at the anarchy ritual level of the Illuminati. 9
The last two Feast of the Beast ceremonies occurred in 1954 and 1982, the last one was
supposed to start in 2009 or 2010 meaning that it could still be going on and coincide with the
royal wedding. Springmeier's description of the event resonates somewhat with a Royal
wedding:
At the Feast of the Beast, a beautiful bride is trained and presented to Satan, and she may
well be a virgin. This ceremony is most likely held at a castle or palace, and is also likely to be
held over in Europe for the principle ceremony. Lesser ceremonies may be held here in the
states. Witnesses claim that Satan appears and interacts with his human leadership. He provides
them with detailed instructions for what he wants done until the next Feast of the Beast. In other
words, he provides the top Illuminati hierarchy with their future long-range plans.10
Given that our leaders are practicing Satanists, is it a coincidence that the Royal wedding is
in the middle of a host of Satanic holidays? 11
PRINCE WILLIAM’S FAMILY CREST
PRINCE WILLIAM’S CREST

KATE MIDDLETON AND PRINCE CHARLES FAMILY CREST
Some people think that Kate Middleton, quite possibly the next Queen of England, just might be
somewhat Jewish? ... You see, Kate's mother's maiden name is Goldsmith.
SONS OF BELIAL (SATAN)
(Deut. 13:13) -- “Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and
have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye
have not known.” [Children of Belial] B liya±al, from b liy, not, and yaa±al, profit;-
Septuagint, Andres paranormal, lawless men,-persons good for nothing to themselves or
others, and capable of nothing but mischief. 12
In (Deut. 15:9, and in Nah. 1:11, the word "Belial" is rendered in our translation by the
adjectives "immoral, depraved.” The word means "decadent, debauched, worthlessness. 13
In verse 13 of our text we see men, "The children of Belial", also referred to as the sons of
worthless men, wicked men, ungodly men; men who have gone out from among us and have
drawn others to follow them into their diabolical sins of folly and deceit. The name Belial also
refers to Satan in another text.
Growing up without God's yoke on your life
In (I Sam. 2:12) we read that Eli's two sons did not know the Lord. The word 'know'
also means 'recognize' or 'acknowledge'. These men did not have a relationship with God
and lived as if He did not exist. The Bible calls them sons of Belial (corrupt or useless).14

PORTRAIT OF BELIAL
The Hebrew word 'Belial' means literally 'without a yoke' or in other words 'without
something above you', in the sense of authority. It is an expression that is used to describe
something that is completely useless, worthless and bad. 'Son of' is a Hebrew way of saying
that you carry the character of someone or something. 'Sons of Belial' can also be
translated as 'sons of lawlessness'. It refers to their father - Eli, who had raised his sons
without the yoke of Gods law.
A 'son of Belial' is the opposite of the son of a king.
Characteristics of 'sons of Belial'
In (II Cor. 6:1) we read that Christ has nothing whatsoever in common with Belial. In
fact the Bible teaches that we should not listen to or watch any of the things of Belial, and that
we should even hate these things. The things of Belial are translated as 'worthless': “I will set
no wicked thing before mine eyes: I hate the work of them that turn aside; it shall not cleave
to me,” (Psa.101:3).
The Bible also calls someone who is deceptive or who stirs up arguments or digs up
scandal, a man of Belial.
(Prov. 6:12), “A naughty person, (worthless person) a wicked man, (man of Belial),
walketh with a froward mouth. (perverse mouth).

(Prov. 16:27), “An ungodly man (man of Belial) diggeth up evil: and in his lips there is as
a burning fire.”
We need to keep away from people like this.
(II Thess. 3:6), “Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the
tradition which he received of us.”
The yoke of service
A yoke in the Bible is a metaphor for service. Service or servitude can be negative, for
instance when someone has to work as a slave. In the positive sense it means to work together
through helping and serving. 15
In (Lam. 3:27), it is written: It is good for a man to bear the yoke in his youth. A child
needs to be taught to serve and help others. In the same way, they will learn what it means
to serve God. Learning this young is a big advantage. In Proverbs 22:6 is written: Train up a
child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.
Eli's sons had apparently not learnt these things. They thought only of themselves and
stole the meat that people came to offer to God, stealing not only from their own people but
also from God (I Samuel 2:13-15). They also slept with the women at the entrance of the
tabernacle (I Samuel 2:22). These were women who had dedicated themselves for a period of
time to intercession and prayer and ministry to God (Comparer Lk. 2:37. These ruthless men
took advantage of them for their own selfish needs. They were sons without a yoke, in other
words, 'sons of Belial'.