OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES NO. 43 / FEBRUARY 2006 THE ACCUMULATION OF FOREIGN RESERVES by an International Relations Committee Task Force OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES NO. 43 / FEBRUARY 2006 THE ACCUMULATION OF FOREIGN RESERVES by an International Relations Committee Task Force * In 2006 all ECB publications This paper can be downloaded without charge from will feature a motif taken http://www.ecb.int or from the Social Science Research Network from the €5 banknote. electronic library at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=807417. * The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors listed on page 6 and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank or the national central banks that the authors are affiliated with. © European Central Bank, 2006 Address Kaiserstrasse 29 60311 Frankfurt am Main Germany Postal address Postfach 16 03 19 60066 Frankfurt am Main Germany Telephone +49 69 1344 0 Website http://www.ecb.int Fax +49 69 1344 6000 Telex 411 144 ecb d All rights reserved. Any reproduction, publication and reprint in the form of a different publication, whether printed or produced electronically, in whole or in part, is permitted only with the explicit written authorisation of the ECB or the author(s). The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank. ISSN 1607-1484 (print) ISSN 1725-6534 (online) CONTENTS PREFACE 6 ANNEX 3 RISKS TO AND CHALLENGES FOR THE CONDUCT MEMBERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF MONETARY POLICY 37 COMMITTEE TASK FORCE ON ACCUMULATION 1 Background 37 OF FOREIGN RESERVES 7 2 Institutional characteristics and monetary policy responses in SUMMARY 8 some major reserve-accumulating 1 The puzzle of reserve accumulation economies 38 since 2002 9 2 Possible drivers of the recent ANNEX 4 reserve accumulation 13 THE FOREIGN POSITIONS OF SEVEN ASIAN CENTRAL BANKS: 3 Domestic risks and costs of TRENDS AND POTENTIAL RISKS 40 reserve accumulation 17 1 Background 40 4 Main trends in central bank reserve management 19 2 Trends in the net foreign position of seven Asian central banks 41 5 Alternative uses of accumulated foreign assets 23 3 Potential costs of net foreign asset holdings 42 6 Impact on yields and asset prices 24 4 Institutional arrangements related to the management of foreign currency reserves 44 ANNEXES ANNEX 5 ANNEX 1 DEVELOPMENTS IN CENTRAL BANK STYLISED FACTS OF THE ACCUMULATION OF RESERVE MANAGEMENT AND THEIR POSSIBLE FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES 27 MARKET IMPLICATIONS 46 1 Individual countries and regions 27 1 Background 46 2 Reserves channelled into oil and 2 Main trends in reserve management heritage funds 28 since 1999: diversification, but to what extent? 47 ANNEX 2 MAIN DRIVERS OF RESERVE ACCUMULATION: 3 The coexistence of various foreign A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 29 reserve management frameworks 51 1 Background 29 4 US and euro area fixed income markets: can differences limit 2 Precautionary motives 30 currency diversification? 51 3 The “global savings glut” 34 5 Market implications of excessive 4 Management of exchange rates 35 foreign reserve accumulation in 5 Costs of managing exchange rates, terms of possible distortions of and “socialisation” of exchange current bond market dynamics 55 rate risk 35 6 Unconventional monetary policies 36 ECB OccasionalPaperNo.43 3 February2006 ANNEX 6 THE IMPACT OF ASIAN RESERVE ACCUMULATION ON ASSET PRICES 55 1 Background 55 2 The role of changes in the relative supply of Treasuries on yields: A review of available evidence 56 3 A model to explain the impact of Asian reserve accumulation on ten-year Treasury yields 57 4 A model to explain the impact of Asian reserve accumulation on three-year Treasury yields 59 5 Impact on other asset prices 61 ANNEX 7 THE FINANCING OF THE US CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT: A SHORT REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND SOME EVIDENCE 63 1 Background 63 2 Review of the literature, and links with current policy issues 64 3 A descriptive analysis of US current account deficit financing 66 REFERENCES 68 LIST OF OCCASIONAL PAPERS 74 ECB 4 OccasionalPaperNo.43 February2006 PREFACE PREFACE The report – on which this occasional paper is based1 – was discussed by the IRC in June In a number of countries, especially emerging 2005, and the authors gratefully acknowledge market economies, the public sector has in the comments made by the Committee recent years been accumulating sizeable cross- members on that occasion. In addition, in border financial assets, mainly in the form of September 2005 the report was sent to the official foreign exchange reserves. World General Council of the European Central reserves have risen from USD 1.2 trillion in Bank (ECB) and, subsequently, to the January 1995 to above USD 4 trillion in Economic and Financial Committee, a September 2005, growing particularly rapidly consultative committee that contributes to the since 2002. The impressive pace of reserve preparation of the work of the ECOFIN growth has become an important issue on the Council. international policy agenda and has been considered from various perspectives, including the financing of the growing US current account deficits, the debate on high net savings in the Asian economies and oil- exporting countries, the sustainability of reserve accumulation, and the factors behind exceptionally low yields within and outside the United States. In January 2005 the International Relations Committee (IRC), a committee established by the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) to deal with international monetary and financial affairs, asked a group of ESCB central bank experts to study the accumulation of foreign reserves in greater detail. The ensuing report by the IRC task force investigated the features, drivers, risks and costs of reserve accumulation, as well as the other uses that certain countries have been making of their accumulated foreign assets. The report also reviewed the main trends in 1 Georges Pineau (ECB) chaired the IRC task force and central bank reserve management and provided coordinated its work. Ettore Dorrucci (ECB) drafted the paper, and the other task force members carried out the some evidence for the impact of reserve corresponding background studies as acknowledged in the accumulation on yields and asset prices. footnotes to each of the seven annexes. ECB OccasionalPaperNo.43 5 February2006 MEMBERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE TASK FORCE ON ACCUMULATION OF FOREIGN RESERVES European Central Bank Georges Pineau Ettore Dorrucci Fabio Comelli Angelika Lagerblom Nationale Bank van België/ Banque Nationale de Belgique Michel Soudan Deutsche Bundesbank Gudrun Leichtlein Banco de España Emiliano González-Mota Banque de France Guy Levy-Rueff Banca d’Italia Maurizio Ghirga De Nederlandsche Bank Philipp Maier Banco de Portugal Teresa Balcao Reis Suomen Pankki Jouko Rautava OTHER AUTHORS OF THIS OCCASIONAL PAPER Deutsche Bundesbank Antje Kreye Banco de España Lucía Cuadro Sáez Sergio Gavilá ECB 6 OccasionalPaperNo.43 February2006 SUMMARY SUMMARY strong depreciation of their currencies, the crisis-hit Asian economies pursued export-led World foreign exchange reserves grew from growth supported by exchange rate regimes USD 1.2 trillion in January 1995 to more than anchoring their currency, de jure or de facto, USD 4.0 trillion in September 20052. Reserve to the US dollar. Third, certain features of accumulation in this period exhibited four the domestic financial systems of EMEs, features that seem largely unprecedented. especially in Asia, are likely to have played Three of these features became particularly a role. Such characteristics relate mainly to: prominent in 2002-04. First, world reserves (i) their underdeveloped local financial grew by around 85% (or 91% if the first eight systems, entailing difficulties in properly months of 2005 are included), at a pace three channelling domestic private savings to times faster than in 1999-2001. Second, investment as well as inefficient and/or costly monetary authorities in Asia, including Japan hedging markets; (ii) the resultant tendency until March 2004, accounted for the bulk of the towards dollarisation of official and/or private accumulation, and eight of them are currently cross-border assets on the part of certain among the ten largest reserve holders. Third, creditor EMEs; and (iii) from a macro fewer official creditors held an increasingly viewpoint, an excess of domestic savings over larger share of the total accumulation. The top investment driven by either a savings glut five reserve accumulating central banks, which (e.g. China) or an investment drought (other accounted for almost 57% of the total reserve Asian emerging market economies). All these accumulation on average in the period 1995- features have significant links to reserve 2001, increased their share to more than 68% of accumulation, as explained below. the total world accumulation in 2004. The top two, Japan and China, accounted for about half These recent drivers of reserve accumulation of the total world accumulation in 2002-04, and seem to have one aspect in common, namely the currently hold around 40% of the total world role played by the build-up of official foreign stock of reserves. A fourth, equally important assets both as an outcome of and an instrument development has come about more recently: for integration of the EMEs concerned into the the oil-exporting countries, whose combined global financial markets. Several emerging current account surplus is estimated to have countries, especially in Asia, have in fact exceeded that of the Asian economies in 2005, become major players in international trade but have emerged as a new major group of net are still underdeveloped from a financial angle. capital exporters in the world economy. They, This asymmetry is probably one reason why however, have accumulated assets not only in EMEs now hold around two-thirds of world the form of “traditional” reserves, but also by reserves compared with less than 30% at the building up foreign assets in so-called oil funds end of the Bretton Woods period in the early – a phenomenon that is not yet fully captured by 1970s, whereas the total reserves of mature the available statistics, including those on the economies with complete and deep financial financing of the US external deficit. markets, excluding Japan, have remained stable at around USD 500 billion since the early Such an unprecedented accumulation of 1990s. official foreign assets can be seen as the outcome of three main drivers in addition to the As underlined in the literature, continued more recent oil price hike. First, in the reserve accumulation may over time entail some aftermath of the financial crises that occurred in the 1990s and early 2000s, many emerging 2 As reported by the IMF in its latest update of the database on market economies (EMEs) felt the need to self- Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves. In the remainder of this paper, however, data are insure against future crises. Second, at the updated until the end of August 2005, when world reserves beginning of their recoveries and following stood at USD 3.9 trillion. ECB OccasionalPaperNo.43 7 February2006 risks and costs, such as inflationary pressure, intervention on US Treasury yields are quite over-investment, asset bubbles, complications different, and range from negligible to 200 in the management of monetary policy, basis points. This paper shows that purchases potentially sizeable capital losses on monetary of US government debt securities by Asian authorities’ balance sheets, sterilisation costs, monetary authorities might have affected the segmentation of the public debt market and level and dynamics of their yields; in misallocation of domestic banks’ lending. particular, there is some evidence that Japanese purchases of US Treasuries might have had an Two other noteworthy developments have been impact of around 65 basis points on three-year recorded in several economies in recent years. US Treasury yields at the time of the most First, some progress has been made towards sizeable interventions. Looking forward, the more active management of official reserves, overall market impact of portfolio changes resulting, for instance, in investment in a more could differ, depending on the preferences of diversified range of instruments with longer the private sector. maturities. Second, a substantial share of official foreign assets has been channelled into In conclusion, a significant share of the US vehicles with purposes other than reserve current account deficits is financed by foreign holding. Examples include (i) the creation of official institutions pursuing objectives that oil funds in countries such as Norway, Russia, are, to some extent, insensitive to risk-return Venezuela, Kuwait and Oman, which aim to considerations. However, EMEs could either stabilise their oil revenues (stabilisation progressively lessen their need for reserve funds) or save part of them for future accumulation by developing policies such as: generations (savings funds) or for early (i) structural and macroeconomic measures to reimbursement of foreign debt; (ii) the foster domestic demand; (ii) financial system establishment of “heritage funds” which have reforms both at domestic and regional levels, more explicit return objectives in economies including bond market development; (iii) a such as Singapore; (iii) the injection of USD 60 well-sequenced shift towards greater exchange billion from reserve assets into three major rate flexibility, coupled with money market state-owned commercial banks in China in reforms and, possibly, financial account order to increase their capital base for their liberalisation; (iv) regional economic partial privatisation; and (iv) the allocation of surveillance and monetary cooperation which, USD 15 billion to banks in the Taiwan Province ceteris paribus, would reduce the need for of China (hereinafter called Taiwan) for use in unilateral reserve accumulation. major domestic investment projects. The effects of these innovative ways of using 1 THE PUZZLE OF RESERVE ACCUMULATION official foreign assets are still to be fully SINCE 2002 understood, in particular with regard to the link between exchange rate and fiscal policy (e.g. in The accumulation of world foreign exchange Russia), between the macroeconomic and the reserves (hereinafter called reserves)3 has micro-prudential dimension of economic exhibited largely unprecedented features since policy (e.g. in China), and between the 2002 with respect to: (i) the size and pace of the management of very liquid, low-risk assets at accumulation, (ii) the degree of concentration central bank level and the management of of ownership, and (iii) the geographical longer-term, more return-oriented portfolios distribution. by other financial entities (e.g. in Singapore). 3 For further evidence, see Annex 1. In this paper the Regarding the impact of reserve accumulation expression “reserves” always refers to foreign exchange reserves – i.e. reserves net of gold, special drawing rights on yields, in the existing literature the (SDR) and reserve positions at the IMF – unless otherwise estimates of the effect of foreign exchange specified. ECB 8 OccasionalPaperNo.43 February2006 1 THE PUZZLE OF RESERVE Table 1 Year-on-year changes in foreign exchange reserves and their contribution to global reserve growth ACCUMULATION SINCE 2002 (January 1995–August 2005) 2002–2005 1999–2001 1997–1998 1995–1996 USD Contribution USD Contribution USD Contribution USD Contribution bn to world bn to world bn to world bn to world growth (%) growth (%) growth (%) growth (%) China 536 29.0 67 14.7 36 47.8 50 14.4 Japan 443 24.0 177 39.0 -4 -5.2 91 26.1 Taiwan 130 7.1 30 6.7 2 2.6 -5 -1.5 Russia 114 6.1 26 5.6 -2 -2.8 9 2.6 Korea 102 5.5 49 10.8 21 27.7 8 2.2 India 92 5.0 18 3.9 7 9.4 0 0.0 Malaysia 49 2.7 3 0.7 -1 -1.8 2 0.4 Singapore 41 2.2 1 0.3 -3 -3.4 18 5.2 Algeria 33 1.8 12 2.5 2 2.6 2 0.5 Brazil 19 1.0 2 0.3 -14 -19.0 22 6.2 World 1,849 100 455 100 76 100 349 100 Sources: IMF and ECB Staff calculations. First, while world reserves more than tripled in however, world reserves have risen by 91% the past ten years, they have almost doubled in (i.e. almost USD 2 trillion), which seems the last four years alone, with the rate of largely unprecedented. In terms of both reserve accumulation increasing dramatically since holdings and contribution to world reserve 2002. World reserves have in fact grown from growth, the top three accumulators have been USD 1.2 trillion in January 1995 to more than China, Japan and Taiwan. In the case of a few USD 4.0 trillion in September 2005 (according countries such as Turkey and, since 2003, to the latest data for 2005 made available by Argentina and Brazil, such moves can still be the IMF)4, but the pace varied significantly interpreted as reserve replenishment, but in throughout the period. Between 1995 and 2001, most other cases the rate of accumulation the financial crises affecting a number of EMEs appears particularly high not only in in a context of increasingly liberalised capital comparison with the previous seven years, but flows, and the ensuing need to use reserves and also by historical standards. then replenish them as self-insurance against future crises, were important factors. However, Looking back, while world foreign exchange in 1997-98, in particular, global reserves reserves doubled from USD 16 billion to USD increased by just USD 76 billion, with crisis- 33 billion in the decade from 1959 to 1969, they hit countries considerably reducing their then tripled in just three years, between 1970 foreign assets (see Table 1). Conversely, world and 1972, reflecting large interventions at a reserves grew significantly – by around 30% – time when the Bretton Woods system was in 1995-96 and 1999-2001. In 1995-96 this unravelling. Since the early 1970s, i.e. the end growth was mainly driven by the interventions of Bretton Woods period, reserve assets have of China and Japan, which accounted for 14% and 26% of world reserve growth respectively. 4 See the IMF Currency Composition of Official Foreign In 1999-2001, the desire for self-insurance Exchange Reserves (COFER) database. In the remainder of this paper, data are updated until the end of August 2005, gained momentum among reserve when world reserves stood at USD 3.9 trillion. accumulators; in particular, the reserves lost in 5 ASEAN stands for Association of East Asian Nations, the members of which are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Laos, 1997-98 were replenished by the ASEAN-5 Myanmar, Vietnam and the so-called ASEAN-5 countries: economies5 and Russia. Since January 2002, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. ECB OccasionalPaperNo.43 9 February2006
Description: