To MY Wife, Jessica G. Cosgrave, AND TO A. R. OrAGE, who HAVE BORNE MUCH OF THE HEAT AND BURDEN OF THIS BOOK P R E F A C E I gather from my editing of the proofs of this book that the irascible Martian and his behavioristic vis-a-vis are con vinced that the Universe is self-conscious and that humanity may be redeemed from anonymity. Glad tidings, undoubt edly for whoever can guess what is meant by it, but these must be in a minority since for most of us the Universe is no better than stellar scenery, and our identities derive from our forbears. There are those who contend that the members of our race should long ago have supplied themselves with more accurate biographies than the superficial accountings of biology and geology, but men are practical folk devoted to the end of staying put where they have found themselves, and so their indifference deprives them of nothing they could eat, drink or wear. In fact, it figures rather as an advantage, since if we discovered that our identities were greater or less than is taken for granted, it might devolve on us to change our viewpoints or technics, which, obviously, would make for trouble and confusion. On the other hand, if the Universe is self-conscious, it must be responsible for our presence on Earth, and aware of our plight. As thus far it has shown no disposition to alter the errors of our ways, save by periodic removal of our units from their contamination, perhaps some need of its own is served by our being as we are. Maybe this world is a reformatory for refractory or abnormal souls, and ex posure to the rigors of its experiences has educational as well viii PREFACE as punitive values. The theory that another purpose than sustaining our own lives is being developed here, though speculative, should not be rejected because of its novelty. Today all the old moorings are adrift, and between Einstein and Eddington, Jeans and Whitehead, not to mention Sir Oliver Lodge, or the upsetting postulates of Walter Russell, the character of the Universe is any man’s guess. So though the Martian’s epistemology seems at variance with prevail ing texts, who knows but that tomorrow or next week some local authority may not confirm or advance his predications? In the meantime it may be said for his version that despite a flavor of the occult, it involves neither faith nor the old Fourth Dimension. Yet though the argument is based on mechanics it is liable to displease the disciples of automatic determinism as greatly as it will disturb the Fundamentalists. It’s a realistic view of the cosmos he propounds, less pic turesque than Revelation and more matter-of-fact than the offerings of our philosophers. He depicts it as a large-scale power-plant whose activities are devoted to maintaining the existence of the creator who materialized his ideal of his entity in its works. He would have us accept the revolving aggregation of stellar satellites as constituting the physical body and person of this Being, assume its motivation as in fulfilment of his obligations, and regard the vital organisms which pervade all its spheres as instrumentalities for the conduction of his self-consciousness. Life, he construes as the ebb and flow of this awareness, kindling to action the forms devised for its commitments, and developing in each that power of exchange with environment which enables the assertion of individual birthrights. Thus he establishes premises anterior to phenomena, and design as precedent to performance. Consciousness, separated from structure, be PREFACE ix comes the executive principle for coordination and super vision in a mechanical system. Rank, therein, is graduated according to capacity to understand processes and objectives, and in ability to participate in management of relations, but all that move sequentially in the orbit of its ordination return some moiety of energy to the unit of control. To the failure of men to discriminate between conscious ness as the positive factor and the organisms which it both inspires and pilots, this Martian attributes the ills that can ker our civilization, and he is offensively derisive of what he calls our ignorance of meaning, identity and origin. In the development of his fantastic hypothesis this audacious in truder revives all the discarded notions of animism, dualism and design, and goes far beyond Eddington, Jeans or Milli- kan in insisting on the inevitability of an administrator God. Thus we are invited to exchange for the comfortable as surances of natural selection and the survival of the fittest in which experience had demonstrated there remained scope for personal aggrandizement, an almighty determinism in whose colossal dimension men shrink to insignificance. We are mere looking and listening posts or messengers for con veying the will of a Galactic Entity. The freedom we pre sume we exercise in going about our affairs is likened to that which we impute to the wild ass, and our most precious in- herencies, including self-preservation, indicated as installed on behalf of an Interest that is forwarded by the activities set up in pursuit of food for the maintenance of our bodies. On the same terms, pain, sorrow and suffering are made to appear as ferments for engendering in instinctive races the growth of a latent property,—Intelligence,—^which will drive them to apply its native functions of recognition and reasoning in removing their woes. This latter might be X PREFACE construed either as a scoff at the doctrine of vicarious atone ment, or an attempt to deprive our populations of their primordial alibis, for in the type of mechanical framework delineated, good and evil would be reduced to misconstruc tion, maladjustment, mishap or insubordination. Morals, in turn, fall into the category of prescriptions for regulating conduct and associations among animal organisms confined to a common environment. Without straining my imagination, I can hear the ancients and the Fathers spluttering at so facile a disposition of their pet embarrassments. Yet, for all his animadversions, our censor admits that the state of our peoples is not so lowly as to be irremediable. We wear to him the aspect of ducks that might, if they had the will, be swans. He declares us scions of a loftier ordina tion, not fallen from a higher estate, but who have failed to realize and redeem their prerogative. He reviles us be cause we loll lazily in a servitude of instinct and habit which might be relieved by enlarging the conception of our mission in the scheme of things. Princes, he says we are, content to eke out existence as paupers rather than exert the energy required for grasping the rich inheritance of our endow ment. In the bodies of men, this Martian alleges, the Master of the World invested the powers he would have his subjects apply to the conduct of his work, but though he retains first call on their services, provision had been made for their comfort and the enhancement of their stature. If they have omitted to observe the conditions of tenure or the trends of his requirements or have not entered into such command of the noble vehicle of Being as would return control of its faculties and forces, the blame for their unhappiness PREFACE XI is not on his head, but on their own shoulders. Have they not eyes to recognize, and legs to deliver them from tempta tion? In the pages that follow, this bumptious oracle parades his theories at full length. He may flatter himself that the proof he advances of the reality of the element. Conscious ness, is irrefutable but until the Association for the Advance ment of Science makes formal recognition of mind force, of what avail are his wisecracks.? That Mankind at large should heed the utterances of one who saddles its errancy on the racial inertia, is ridiculous. If the episode and the argument were not palpably fictitious, grounds would appear for resenting their effrontery. Setting down the achieve ments of humanity as the products of unconscious cerebra tion amounts to impertinence. Stigmatizing our civilization as instinctive, is sheer impudence. Moreover, the idea of projecting the tutelary deity in the role of an executive director is churlish. Denuding him of the familiar and endearing attributes of love, and mercy, and placing his administration on a strictly business basis, is something akin to blasphemy, or, at least lese-majeste. And that those pre cious emotions whose indulgence lends inspiration and color to our lives should be accorded no higher than an endocrine rating, deserves the reprobation of all who cherish sentiment for its own sake. Who, may I ask in all seriousness, would exchange the glorious privilege of kicking up his heels in the wilderness of his imagination for a precisely ordered, paved and sew ered universe such as is presented by this Martian? Is it not enough that in commerce and mechanics we must observe and conform to the depressing laws that govern process and Work? Bounds should be set against the encroachments of XU PREFACE whoever would limit the horizons of our fancy. Without its worries our race would be as devoid of topics for disputa tion as a dog, deprived of his fleas, is of use for his leisure. So I urge banishment to any country in the throes of po- litico-economic revaluation, of all persons who threaten hereafter to resolve our perplexities. As Editor of this record, it is stipulated that I am not obligated to subject my own person to the disciplines re quired for the establishment of that Self the Martian de clares may be found by hard seeking. The being I think I am, even if he be no better than the subject of his own activi ties, is probably more tolerable as friend and companion than his internal prototype, who if developed into a positive, could hardly refrain from instituting invidious comparisons between himself and his contemporaries. John O’Hara Cosgrave. C O N T E N T S I. THE VOICE IN THE EAR The Martian introduces himself. How he reached Earth. Pattern of his individuality projected here by powerful etheric waves. Recovers consciousness and faculty, and integrates an invisible organism. Superiority of Martian culture, and knowledge of the laws of energy and matter. An arrogant and supercilious per sonality. Declares the race of men benighted, and our scientists ignoramuses. Life on this planet a muddle. II. REVOLT OF THE MARTIAN EN GINEERS 13 Trees as inventions. Mechanical determinism on Mars. The hierarchy of Science. An iconoclast asperses the fabric of its faith. Matter denied capacity to create forms. Natural selection called wishful thinking. Uni verse peopled with conscious beings of various develop ment. Cults and heresies. A tyranny overthrown by propaganda. Renaissance. A civilization of reason and intelligence. III. FUNDAMENTS OF A REALISTIC PHILOSOPHY 21 In defense of Orthodox Science. Its rescue of mankind from superstition. We are creatures of the environ ment. Martian ridicules theory of spontaneous genera tion of life. Location does not explain function. The fallacies of Behaviorism. A causal agent required for every phase of phenomenal activity. Engineers suggest objective study to find what Life is about. They draw up statement of principles and elements coordinated in the production of work.