Tesla's Flying Machine

303 Pages·2006·0.73 MB·English

Tesla's Flying Machine
Description
Nikola Tesla's "flying machine", contrarily to what many have been lead to believe by his misleading late VTOL
patent, was not an aerodynamically based one, but electropropulsive. While his VTOL patent was far ahead of his
time, it was of aerodynamic design with wings and propeller - this was *not* his "flying machine". There are several
references to his "ideal flying machine" in his interviews and articles. Most have been put together in a pdf with
footnotes in the files area for everyone that is interested in researching this occulted but prime moving life objective.
It would be also appropriate to straighten out some facts regarding Tesla's life.
These facts are:
- UFOs are real, Man-made electropropulsive crafts based on Tesla Technology
- The alien scenario is a misleading "charade" to get people "hooked"
- Nikola Tesla was never "contacted" by any alien entity!
- He "worked out" his Dynamic Theory of Gravity by 1893-4
- The US government refused his offer to build and develop this machine, so he most probably turned to the
Germans *prior* to WWII as he already had sold them a generator system.
- All other saucer shaped projects, information and data (AVRO, Schauberger repulsine, jet aerodynes etc) have
been most probably released for misdirection and to arrange confusion.
- The undeniable occultation of Tesla's name and accomplishments from mainstream media and academia underline
an unexplainable gesture - why else go to such great lengths than to hide something so important?
Excerpt from the New York Herald Tribune Oct 15, 1911:
“And it makes the aeroplane practical,” I suggested.
“Not the aeroplane, the flying machine,” responded Dr. Tesla. “Now you have struck the point in which I am most
deeply interested — the object toward which I have been devoting my energies for more than twenty years — the
dream of my life. It was in seeking the means of making the perfect flying machine that I developed this engine.
9
Dracozny,
"lifter" technology is only half of the game - it really won't
yield practical results so to speak. The thrust is only a few grams
and can only displace so little in that setup. The complete setup is
Tesla's "p2" system, involving HV HF AC currents and a HV DC
negative brush discharge *together*, electrifying a hull. The lifter
is an "open" setup, only utilizing DC. A hint is given when "pulsed"
DC is used on the lifter, as the performance is enhanced, but the
setup does not take advantage due to a missing hull or cage with
which "tubes of force" can be manipulated/synthesized.
I would suggest anyone who wants to try this to use a sphere or
whatever "empty" metal object, preferably with a small opening
through which a HV source can be fed through an umbilical cord with
enough isolation. My first attempt utilized a pseudo saucer shaped
iron object, a small Tesla coil and a color TV output. Incredibly I
got better results with the DC output of the TV set: the hull was
suspended with rubber bands from the ceiling and it would wobble and
oscillate when the discharges were fed to the hull. Sometimes it
would oscillate from side to side and the next disharge would make
it halt instantly, or it would increase the oscillation. If you
think of it, any discharge to the hull would create a virtual LC
circuit with ground through the atmosphere (as with a TC) and it
will ring at a very high frequency. It is clear that 27KV are
nowhere near the necessary "Voltage pressure" to see things happen,
as over 200KV are needed to probably just get things going. Size is
not an issue, the bigger actually the better. Only corona leakage is
and must be considered when upscaling. Tesla also used "Ultraviolet"
sources to ionize the atmosphere and make it conduct better which I
believe he also used to "bring in" more tubes of force and enhance
the effect.
I don't think just a TC would fly, you need a hull to encase it.
Consider also that the "standard TC" was only a brief part of
Tesla's "evolution" line where he was searching for the most
appropriate "power source". The next step was his Pancake Coil which
was more ideal and could handle high voltages in less space when
encased and isolated well due to it's flat spiral configuration.
Everything he actually developed was for a purpose, and the flat
pancake coil was for this type of power source. Infact, from
the "method of signalling" and "system of signalling" patents you
can see that from one single HF alternator he could energize 2
coils, one tuned to an AC 1/2 wave and the other to a DC brush 1/4
or 3/4 wave output, hence the name "p2", 2 potentials. He put
this "method" to good work, not only to just send "signals"
evidently.
Regards
Luke
12
Dracozny,
let me re-iterate what I meant: not one bifilar coil but 2
seperate pancake coils, one for AC and the other for the DC brush
powered by the same HF alternator. The coils would be attached to
the hull in a "real" scenario with proper isolation. The DC brush is
responsible for "bringing in" tubes of force, or what Tesla calls
the "veritable rope" which is what keeps or holds the ship in
position or propels it to any desired destination ("a great
propelling force"). To augment this "veritable rope" Tesla developed
a bulb, first in vacuum, then only encapsulated in glass - an
aluminum hemisphere. This is what he used to "conduct" also power to
his remote devices, and was one of the devices in his "death ray" or
Teleforce machine, depending on how it was set up and focused. The
critical part is electrifying the hull with AC and contemporarily
feeding it a DC brush - but this can be overcome by using "pressure
controlled" brush discharges towards the hull to control the brush.
The "bulbs" are positioned above (for bouyancy) and in the desired
direction of travel. A completely "inertia free" hull will be solely
electrified using HV HF AC currents. It will be free to "tumble",
rotate or flip so to speak in any direction - good evidence is the
heavy precession problem the early saucers were afflicted with.
Stability seems to have been reached using microwaves in the IR
spectrum around the rim to counter act precession.
I think a good testbed is the suspended hull powered by only HV
HF AC with such a pancake coil. If there is a good "interaction" the
hull will lift being pulled up by the rubber bands as it will "weigh
less" or even go weightless.
Regards
Luke
14
Yes that is what I meant: the best setup would be to have a large
enough hull to contain a small pancake coil suspended by isolated
rubber bands - only the HF pilot voltage could be fed from the
outside. There are ground problems though which I did not mention.
Considering a large hull, there would be another internal hull,
isolated and with enough dielectric to avoid breakdown between the
external and internal hull which is the ship's "floating" ground. Both
coils' ground are connected to this internal hull. Ideally the coils
would be located between the internal shielded hull and the external
hull away from operators.
Luke
17
Jeff,
as you have seen unfortunately it is difficult with all the
brainwashing propaganda to keep the term "UFO" dissociated
from "Alien". Normally, when people think of a UFO, they think of ET.
When you tell them there's really no ET other than the "BIG LIES" and
that Nikola Tesla is the man behind this occulted flying machine all
sorts of wierd ideas start popping up. Cut these out, and you are left
with a handful of people that really see the picture. This is obvious
to me, having researched Tesla's documents, articles and lectures for
years, but not so obvious to others who seem to depend on "webinfo". It
is also obvious to me that these crafts are no regular aerodynamic
ones, as some still try to describe them (I have been lucky enough also
to see them in action).
I am glad you wish to get the information out, this is what I have
been trying to do for the last 3 years. The "technology" is now over
100 years old, since Tesla first verified and tested it. WWII came
along and since then it has been taken "undergound" by the various
governments with all their lies and charades. Now they are playing with
colorful lights to get even more people on the "alien bandwagon" and
continue refining the technology.
Regarding your note on cigar UFOs: during WWII, the Nazis used this
technology in stripped U-boot hulls, which were pressurized and
contained batteries and various equipment, perfect also for an airborne
craft. The hulls were fitted with the coils and HV HF alternator
generators which were at first driven by their own diesel engines and
subsequently by a different kind of generator. They also used spherical
crafts (kugelblitz) which lit up due to their corona.
What the real problem is, that researchers are working with the
wrong set of "standards". It is obvious that since such a craft exists,
that the technology behind it is really not complex, but based on ether
mechanics and no Relativism (since Tesla despised Relativists).
Thinking in terms of "curving space-time" and "emitting gravity waves"
is totally out of line and only disinformation. This is the highest and
toughest wall to overthrow. This is why researchers still haven't got
anywhere and the ones that have, have been bought or removed. Add to
this the fact that you need a well equipped lab and toolshop, money to
buy very good insulators and dielectrics possibly to withstand up to
and over the megavolt range, well it's not that straight forward is it?
If Tesla did it in the 1900s without all the current technology, it is
a matter of tuning and getting the "coils right" to give the correct
brush and voltages. The pancake coil was one of Tesla's "ultimate"
coils, withstanding the highest voltages and frequencies - have you
seen anyone replicate them? I don't think so. I have said these things
before and tried to explain, but to be honest, I don't think anyone
really listens or cares; it's like everyone feels comfortable to "go
with the flow". I am certain the occultation of this technology won't
last forever, it is bound to "blow the lid" sooner or later. In the
mean time, it seems to me it's "aliens and bozos" that lead the scene.
So as you see, don't be in a hurry to "seriously find the truth",
because it won't be put on plate for people to see that easily. People
wouldn't even believe that UFOs were man made if they landed in their
backyard and saw GIs in jumpsuits run out of them shouting their
platoon song - they would think that "we and the aliens" have a "hybrid
project" going on, because X-Files said so.
In the mean time, I suggest you read Pentagon Aliens and Occult
Ether Physics for a bigger picture on the "Tesla connection" if you
haven't already. In the footnotes you will find loads of references to
verify and see for yourself.
Regards,
Luke
25
Luke,
I have heard of noises coming from the UFOs. For example, there can be a
"boom" noise caused by the Tesla turbines which used to have a tendency to
backfire occasionally. This caused the whole UFO shell to "boom!" like a
sort of large tub being struck with a drumstick.
There is also another noise, such as the one which was related to me by a
lady doctor from El Paso, Texas. As she was standing on one of the overlooks
on a road up Mt. Franklin, a UFO approached her near the cliff and hovered
only a few feet away. She heard a "singing" sound. The particular ship was
one
of those German types with the slot around the middle. I think the "singing"
sound
is produced by electrical corona---like raindrops falling on a large metal
bowl---
as the corona jumps across that gap.
On the other hand, there have been cases where weird "space frame" type UFOs
have traveled over my area from the southeast to the northeast headed for
Albuquerque
moving about the speed of a slow small plane. You could see sporadic bright
flashes of
corona coming from different parts of the framework. I believe that this is
a type of
stabilization technology being experimented with at that time. There
apparently is a
motion detector which triggers the corona discharges on different points of
the
framework to counteract any tendency to wobble as it flies along its
trajectory.
These ships were absolutely silent until they got almost directly over head
in my
small village area, then the sound gadget was cut on abruptly making a
mechanical
"motor sound" which was obviously being produced electronically using an
amplifier.
The sound did not produce the usual doppler effect which is observed with
normal reciprocating propellor-driven craft which they were trying to
imitate. Then
once the ships passed over a bit the sound makers were turned abruptly off.
It was clear from this that they wanted to create the impression from the
ground
that eyewitnesses were seeing conventional small planes.
Bill
27
Jeff,
naturally I am aware of TT Brown, De Serversky & co. Keep in mind
that Tesla was "the first" and predates these (his Dynamic Theory of
Gravity is the culmination of his work on the link between
electromagnetic phenomena and gravity which occurred around 1893).
Brown for example did his supposed research backed by the CIA. I have
his original (but mute) lab footages where they test different shapes
and forms (they started with aluminum coated umbrellas, then went on
to discs). However, after studying the footages, it is clear to me
that they are "piloted". There are various reasons to believe this
and the first most blatant is that what they show is not the correct
or complete "technology" as they use only DC currents, even if HV. I
can also point out why. The sole use of DC HV currents will not lift
any large heavy hull and free you from inertia, they must be tethered
to show the thrust - it is more like the "lifter" setup. The lifters
show thurst but they must be light (default structure must be less
than 8 grams or it won't lift with less than 25KV) and this gives
ample space for Ion Vs Something else theories. You won't get
anywhere on that road. The Tesla system, called the "p2" system
(called KT-p2 by Von Braun meaning Kreisel Teller or Gyrating Saucer)
involves Twin potentials or currents, DC *and* HF HV AC. Only
combining these in the proper fashion (using a negative DC brush to
propel the ship bringing in the tubes of force and the AC "blocking"
current to "free" the hull and occupants from inertial momentum) will
one at least have a good chance in getting positive results. And
again, size and weight is not really an issue, the larger actually
the better. All that is needed is to calculate the "leakage" currents
of your hull and that is the only real worry of power dissipation you
have on such a machine. That is why a rounded hull and a good
dielectric must be used. Possibly as low as 150-200KV will yield some
results on smaller "lab sized" setups but anything less is a no go.
So you see, any theory that involves only DC currents is actually
bogus or incomplete. Feel free to read Occult Ether Physics or take a
look at some of Tesla's patents labeled "p2" around his 2 pancake
coils powered by a single HF HV alternator with his "make and break"
device. Tesla used these coils for a variety of things because he
first wanted to test their efficiency and "tuning affinity". He used
them to transmit power and "intelligence" together with some of his
other devices, most importantly his "targetless bulb" which is one of
those other inventions that have been literally wiped out. It is the
final stage of his research (and Lee DeForest must have had some
insight on this) on vacuum/ion tubes. It is called "targetless"
because the "target plate" (usually platinum) inside the tube was
completely removed together with the vacuum. The result was an
aluminum hemisphere encapsulated in glass with a contact. This
emitted a "hair like" ray on which he could superimpose anything he
wanted (modulation, thus power) and transmit it to "any distance"
with "little or no loss". The only drawback was that it's target was
to be always in the line of sight. This little gadget is what is used
on these flying machines to "draw in" the tubes of force and to keep
the ship in a certain position. This can be noted by viewing the top
and bottom of "saucers" as they emit a pinkish corona onthe bottom
(AC) and a dark blue hairy like corona on the top (negative brush
discharge) projected by the bulbs.
All this is pure Tesla technology - I have found no other link to
any other prior to this. Yes, there are many after, but none really
have the complete "set". Also, bear in mind that this "flying
machine" is actually a Free Energy machine as mentioned before as you
already have noted. The implications of acknowledging such a machine
is not only limited to debunking the fake modern theories out there
but also confirming how to cut yourself loose from the "grid" with
only your imagination as boundary. You must see this for yourself
through your own research on Tesla, then you will really see what I
mean. The evidence is hard to dig out, but it is fortunately still
around. I have attempted to put together the most "capturing"
interviews in that pdf just to show what research can do, and that is
only the tip of the iceberg.
Regards,
Luke
28
Jeff,
you have to be aware of what is "disinformation" and eliminate it from
your thinking. All "CIA-backed" (or connected) " experiments are
disinfo. That includes T. Townsend Brown, whose information completely
reverses the true technology. There are also many lies about when his
experiments were done and what the results were. All Brown did was
make what was called the "electric fly" in the 19th century by static
electricity experimenters. That was a little disc shape which was
tethered on a pilon and flew around in a circle suspended from the
pilon. It used "ion-propulsion" which is not UFO technology at all. In
fact, it will counteract the correct technique and so anyone who believes
it and bases their experiments on it can do no more than replicate an
early 19th century electrostatic experiment.
Brown's experiments date from the 1950s and some have been fraudulently
"back-dated" to make it look like Brown had something to do with UFO
technology, which is a complete CIA lie.
Bill
31
Jeff,
the fact is, the lifter technology did not begin with T.T. Brown or J.
Naudin.
It actually, in the modern, recent sense, began with some Michigan high
school students. They contacted me and asked for consultation, bought
my books, and had success, only afterwards, they were forced by their
high school teacher to describe it as being T.T.Brown technology when
in fact is is based on Tesla technology. What Luke proved is that it is not
T. T. Brown because it works upside down. That means that the upper
wire, charged positively, is accellerating the negative charges from the
bottom so that they pass upward and bring in what are called the "tubes
of force" (Faraday, J. J. Thomson, Wm. Thomson, Tesla, etc.) which
carry momentum. When the tubes of force are dissolved in the body they
impart upward momentum to the body. The T. T. Brown stuff has nothing
to do with it.
Bill
41
I said that "image inverters" are used to view the outside. This is similar
to
a video camera and came under development in Germany about 1931.
This device amplifies the optical image and can be used to project the
image on an inner screen. By placing these devices at regular points on
the surface of the ship an entire picture of what can be viewed from the
ship may be produced on a globular screen inside which the pilot sits.
This was what Travis Walton originally described as seeing in a
simulator that he played around with when he was semi-sedated
when he got up from a table in the infirmary in the secret government
UFO base in Arizona. This kind of technology can be used with high
voltage simply by lengthening the barrel of the device, since it is not
like a TV screen. It is the granddaddy of the video projector. It can
be produced to view infrared images and in darkness, ideal for UFO
visibility. This same type of device has been used on tanks for many
years.
Besides, as discovered by Faraday, electrostatic charges go to the
outside of a "closed vessel".
Bill
43
Jeff,
Not coincidentally these devices were devised by Von Braun (I have
a Walt Disney documentary with Von Braun in it that explains himself
how they work and how they could train astronauts for the trip to the
moon) and are called "astrospheres": they are used to train pilots in
spherical simulators. They project the surroundings of a "windowless"
craft towards an internal spherical screen which surrounds the pilots
and they seem to be in mid air. Von Braun originally said they were
for "celestial navigation training" as the simulator would simulate
the approach to the moon and the pilots would learn to use the stars
to correct trajectory when needed, hence the name "astrosphere". It
is also funny how the term goes side by side with the "flying saucer"
term.
Luke
46
Luke,
I'd like to thank you for the really good post here regarding von Braun
and the astrospheres, which I really didn't know about unless I just forgot
about them. Travis Walton played around with one of them which was
a flight simulator for UFO pilots which is where I got my info. I was tuned
into the radio during Walton's first radio interview in the early '70s
before the spooks got
hold of him and worked him over, finally coercing him to go into
disinformation
as a new profession. They just simply kept him out of work with the Forest
Service until he finally agreed to accept their money.
Bill
54
Yes, Luke, not to let the discussion get sidetracked into La La Land
by misinfo. However, I have some things to add, such as a little stunt that
Hutchison did in which metal was supposed to be "coming apart". I
easily recognized the special effect of turning the entire setup upside
down then using gravity to make it "levitate" using slow motion footage
which was obviously shot with a 16mm camera then converted to video.
The "metal" was actually a glob of aluminum powder which had been
mixed with some sort of oily material then pressed into a shape to make
it look solid. When it fell apart (upside down), the same granular texture
was visible that I had observed when mixing aluminum powder to make
silk-screen inks. In some of these "experiments" (hoaxes) Hutchison used
magnets to pull the objects around and make them move weirdly, since
such spooky and cheap effects are supposed to be essential to and add
credibility to such lies.
Bill
61
Luke,
good point! I have believed for many years that the "real"
stealth technology being used on American UFOs have used
plasma screening, in fact, I know it. The big red globe we saw
appeared to be similar. Sort of like, "Fight radar with IR" in
that case. I don't think we were seeing the real surface of that
ship but rather some sort of electromagnetic "film" over it's
surface, and experiment maybe, but it looked slick and glossy
red yet not like a solid surface. Electrons will reflect light which
is how a silver-coated mirror reflects light,.because of all the free
electrons available with silver. The same thing seems to happen
with atoms where the electron cloud's inner surface must be
able to trap heat radiation which then bounces around inside the
space between the nucleus and the electon cloud until the cloud
is opened up so the heat radiation can escape.
I don't think the Russians are the first to do this although they either
have convinced themselves it is so, but maybe they know it isn't and
are just trying to impress the public. I know that American UFOs don't
show up on radar screens anymore and they don't have stealth coatings
on them so the plasma screening must be doing the trick---for many
years now.
Bill
62
Tesla didn't have a messianic complex. He was a real genius, so he didn't have to fake reality.
Messiahs are all full of shit and they fake reality. You can't equate a legitimate genius with some
nut with a messiah complex, trying to impress a bunch of psychophants ("disciples"). The kind
of complexes that Tesla had---and he had them---were the typical manifestations of genius. He
didn't have a bunch of disciples fawning after him, although he did make some sensational
news and play it for all it's worth when he had the chance, but he knew how to deliver the goods.
Anyone who could create 100 million volts passing a current of 2200 amps between
the earth and the sky was no fake. Tesla had his faults and certainly had blind spots in
his approximation of the nature of social and economic reality but had remarkable insight
into the nature of electromagnetic phenomena.
TS wrote: "...one doesn't obtain such a commanding grasp of the nature of reality without
associative 'complexes' of one kind or another."
A "commanding grasp of reality" has nothing to do with "complexes". It has to do with using
the senses as valid tools of cognition---rather than sitting in Plato's cave and speculating
on the nature of the "shadows of reality" being cast on the cave's walls---and going
out into the real world and seeing reality for itself.
TS seems to be hurt by my statements about those with an "Einstein complex." It seems
to me that maybe he'd find more compatibility and glean more of his own kind of value
from some sort of relativist self-love chat group rather than this group which is dedicated to
searching out and revealing the facts about Tesla's electrodynamic propulsion technology.
We don't need interjections of all the latest nut theories which clutter up the Intenet thanks
to the CIA, the dupes which can't see the forest for the trees, and the occasional
nut with the messianic complex who just had his latest epiphany.
Bill
64
That could be true with "stealth planes", but have you seen the plasma screens
on UFOs? I have. When you refer to "our stealth technology" you are apparently
not addressing the issue of UFO stealth technology, which is another issue. You
only know what they want you to know which is unclassified information. If you
knew what I am referring to (classified technology, the existence of which is
categorically denied by the government), you wouldn't be writing about it, since
to have such "definite" knowledge of it would imply that you had a security clearance
authorizing you to have access to such secrets, as well as a verifiable requirement
in your security job (a "need to know") to have access to said information, which
would put you in violation of the National Security Laws.
I know that these UFOs having plasma screening on them do not show up on radar
because that was confirmed with local sightings in my neighborhood which were
clearly visible---by me and by three others who reported it that I know of---as it went
from my vicinity to Los Alamos, and was not visible on radar when reported.
The Russian claim appears to only pertain to "stealth planes" and no mention is
made of UFOs. The UFO secrets are likewise shared by ALL major governments
who all have this secret technology and all of them signed an international
agreement in Switzerland in 1955 to keep it and all valid sightings related to it secret.
Operation Blue Book for example never made any of the sightings reported to it
public. The only thing they ever made public was bogus sightings which it used
for disinformation. That is because Operation Blue Book was a CIA project, the
undisclosed purpose of which was to intercept possibly all public sightings and
to file them away in a dead letter file so information relating to UFO technology
relating to the sightings could not fall into private hands..
Even if the Russian pulsed radar revealed legitimate UFOs on radar they wouldn't
say anything about it because they are prohibited by their own national security
laws and international agreements from doing so. What you see is an act. The
same act is played out by my own government and I usually know when they
are doing it.Since all the major governments have this UFO technology and have
agreed to keep it secret they are not hiding it from each other, they are hiding it
from US.
Bill
68
Yes, exactly Jeff, good going. Hugo Gernsback was much "inline"
with Tesla and this was not just an exception. It's all
the "Relativistic baloney" that popped up AFTER WWII and the disinfo
propaganda that "suppressed" the real Ether Physics. Mainly, people
think that if something is old, it's either surpassed, obsolete or
simply WRONG. How wrong these people are!
I uploaded a JPG version of the article for who does not have Word.
Regards,
Luke
71
Janzen200,
the stuff about Tesla flying around at night in Colorado on a platform
is a load of crap. Tesla's flying machine didn't work on a principle like
that, but rather on a closed ship. Most of these idiots don't understand
the principle at all. They keep thinking of something "repelling" the force
of gravity. Childress will publish all kinds of crap just to make a buck
and hype any suckers who are stupid enough to fall for it. Not that he
is inherently evil, only that he will publish so much hype. The Tesla ship
relied on :"veritable ropes of air" created by his bulb and electrostatic
discharges carried by the beam produced in the direction of desired
travel. Meanwhile, a high frequency current was placed on the ship's
outer surface to break inertia.