Temporal and spatial heterogeneity in aging colloids: a mesoscopic model Nikolaj Becker and Paolo Sibani FKF, Syddansk Universitet, DK5230 Odense M, Denmark Stefan Boettcher and Skanda Vivek Department of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA A model of dense hard sphere colloids building on simple notions of particle mobility and spa- tial coherence is presented and shown to reproduce results of experiments and simulations for key quantities such as the intermediate scattering function, the particle mean-square displacement and the χ mobility correlation function. All results are explained by two emerging and interrelated 4 dynamicalproperties: i) arateofintermittentevents, quakes,whichdecreasesastheinverseofthe 4 system age t, leading to µq(tw,t) ∝ log(t/tw) as the average number of quakes occurring between 1 the ‘waiting time’ tw and the current time t; ii) a length scale characterizing correlated domains, 0 whichincreaseslinearlyinlogt. Thisleadstosimpleandaccuratescalingformsexpressedinterms 2 of the single variable, t/t , preferable to the established use of t and of the lag time τ = t−t w w w as variables in two-point correlation functions. Finally, we propose to use χ (t ,t) experimentally n 4 w to extract the growing length scale of an aging colloid and suggest that a suitable scaling of the a J probability density function of particle displacement can experimentally reveal the rate of quakes. 5 PACSnumbers: 82.70.Dd,05.40.-a,64.70.pv 2 ] t Aging is a spontaneous off-equilibrium relaxation pro- thespatial formoftheclustersonalatticeinanydimen- f o cess,whichentailsaslowchangeofthermodynamicaver- sion. Thisenablesustocalculatetheinternalenergy,the s ages. Inamorphousmaterialswithquencheddisorder[1– intermediate scattering function, the mean square dis- . t 6], measurable quantities such as the thermo-remanent placement,themobilitycorrelationfunctionχ andother a 4 m magnetization [7] and the thermal energy [5, 8–10] de- measures of spatial complexity. We can hence compare crease, on average, at a decelerating rate during the ag- with simulational [20] and experimental [21, 22] data, - d ing process. In dense colloidal suspensions, light scatter- and suggest a number of experiments to probe colloidal n ing[11,12]andparticletrackingtechniques[13–16]have dynamics. o uncovered intermittent dynamics and a gradual slowing Our particles reside on a lattice with periodic bound- c down of the rate at which particles move. Intermittency ary conditions, each lattice site occupied by exactly one [ suggest a hierarchical dynamics, instead of coarsening, particle. Particles are either mobile singletons (cluster- 1 as the origin of this process. However, changes in spa- size h = 1) or form immobile contiguous clusters of size v tiallyaveragedquantitiessuchasenergyandparticleden- h > 1. When picked for an update, mobile particles ex- 1 2 sity are difficult to measure and the question of which change position with a randomly selected neighbor and 5 physical properties are actually evolving in an aging col- join that neighbor’s cluster. If the particle is not mobile, 6 loid [17, 18] lacks a definite answer. either its entire cluster “shatters” into h newly mobile . 1 particles with probability In a recent paper [19], two of the authors proposed 0 that kinetic constraints bind colloidal particles together 4 P (h)=e−h, (1) 1 in ‘clusters’. As long as a cluster persists, its center : of mass position remains fixed, on average, but once it v ornoactionistaken. Whenstartingwithaninitialstate breaksdowntheparticleswhichbelongtoitcanmove in- i consisting of singletons, i.e., without any structure, the X dependentlyinspace,andareabletojoin otherclusters. model develops spatially heterogeneous clusters with a r The dynamics is controlled by the probability per unit a length scale growing logarithmically in time. The state of time, P(h), that a cluster of size h collapses through ofthesystemonasquarelatticewithL=256after1015 a quake. Specifically, if the cluster-collapse probability is sweeps is depicted in Fig. 1(a) while Fig. 1(b) shows the exponential, as in Eq. (1) below, quakes follow a Poisson logarithmic growth of the average cluster size. process whose average is proportional to the logarithm As previously shown [19], the rate of events deceler- of time. Log-Poisson processes describe the aging phe- ates as 1/t, see inset of Fig. 1(b), which makes random- nomenology of a wide class of glassy systems [5, 7–10] sequential updates inefficient. In our simulations, we and, specifically in our case, imply that particle motion thereforeusetheWaiting Time Method [23,24], wherea is(nearly)diffusiveonalogarithmictimescale, asfound random“lifetime”isassignedtoeachclusterbasedonthe in our analysis [19] of tracking experiments [14]. geometric distribution associated with P(h); the cluster InthisLetter, weintroduceamodelofclusterdynam- withtheshortestremaininglifetimeisshatteredandlife- ics based on these principles that explicitly accounts for times for other pre-existing or newly formed clusters are 2 40 0.7 30 1.5 i t0.6 hhi20 )1100−04 i heIn0.5 tλ(10−8 nt 10 10−12 eI 1 0.4 1001041081012 h 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 t 0 1/plog(t) 100 103 106 109 1012 t FIG. 1: (a) Snapshot of a 256×256 system after t = 1015 0.5 sweeps. Random colors are assigned to different clusters for 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 visibility. Cluster sizes apparently are peaked around some 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 average value (cid:104)h(cid:105) ∼ logt, as shown in (b). The decelerating t rate λ(t)∼1/t of cluster break-up events that emerges from the probability in Eq. (1) is shown in the inset. FIG. 2: Average interface energy per particle, (cid:104)eInt(cid:105), for L= 64. For large t, the interface energy follows the form (cid:104)e (cid:105)∼ Int (cid:112) 1/ log(t) derived in Eq. (2), as confirmed by the inset. adjusted or newly assigned, following the Poisson statis- tics. Withthisevent-drivenalgorithm,wehavebeenable sesses two-time correlations used to resolve dynamical tofollowourmodelevolutionover15decadesintime,far characteristics of non-equilibrium systems. Formally, it exceeding current experimental time windows. is defined as the spatial Fourier transform, Important aspects of aging dynamics are described by ˆ observablequantitieswithtwotimearguments. Here,we f ((cid:126)q,t ,t)= d(cid:126)rG ((cid:126)r,t ,t)exp[−i(cid:126)q·(cid:126)r], (3) denote by t the current time and by t the waiting time s w s w w before measurements are taken for a system initialized of the self-part of the van Hove distribution function, at t = 0. To conform to common usage, the lag time τ ≡t−tw isusedasabscissainthemainplotofrelevant 1 (cid:88) figures. However, we also provide a collapse of the data, Gs((cid:126)r,tw,t)= N δ[(cid:126)r−∆(cid:126)rj], (4) which is best accomplished when global time t is scaled j by t as independent time variable. w with ∆(cid:126)r (t ,t)=(cid:126)r (t)−(cid:126)r (t ) as displacement of par- Using the details of the Lennard-Jones potential in j w j j w ticlesj inthetimeintervalbetweent andt. Ingeneral, theirmoleculardynamicssimulation,El-Masrietal. [20] w SISF can be interpreted as a measure of the “reciprocal were able to determine the evolution of the internal en- ofmovement”,meaningtheaveragetendencyofparticles ergy of a colloidal system in terms of its pressure. We to stay confined in cages whose size scales with inverse simply monitor the interface between clusters as a proxy magnitude of the wave vector (cid:126)q. Using symmetry and of the internal energy, assuming that a shrinking inter- theintegervaluesofthepositions,thediscreteversionof face indicates a decline in free volume which allows par- SISF reduces to ticles within clusters to relieve their mutual repulsion. The average number of clusters (cid:104)n(cid:105) can be written in (cid:42) N (cid:43) 1 (cid:88) terms of average cluster size (cid:104)h(cid:105) as (cid:104)n(cid:105) = L2/(cid:104)h(cid:105). Since fs(q,tw,t)= N cos((cid:126)q·∆(cid:126)rj) . (5) the average cluster size increases with (cid:104)h(cid:105) ∼ log(t), see j=1 Fig. 1(b), and since for compact clusters in two dimen- (cid:112) Duetospatialisotropy,theSISFisonlyafunctionofthe sions the interface-length scales as S(h) ∝ (cid:104)h(cid:105), the √ magnitude q, with q =2π/L≤q ≤π 2=q . average energy per particle (cid:104)e (cid:105) is estimated as min max Int Figure 3 shows the results of simulating an L = 64 (cid:104)n(cid:105) 1 1 system using 2000 instances and waiting times varying (cid:104)e (cid:105)=S(h) ∼ ∼ √ . (2) Int L2 (cid:112)(cid:104)h(cid:105) logt from 210 to 218 in powers of two. Panel (a) depicts the behavior of SISF as a function of lag time. For large Fig. 2 shows that the approximation holds after a more t ,toagoodapproximationthedatacanberepresented w rapid initial decay. The slow decay matches that of the by a power law of the scaling variable tˆ = log(t/t ), w Lennard-Jones simulations in Fig. 1 of Ref. [20], and it f ∼ Ctˆ−A, where C is a constant and A a positive, s is reminiscent of granular compactification [25], where non-universal exponent, see panel (b) of Fig. 3. Some noisy tapping slowly anneals away excess free volume. curvature remains, nevertheless, and data do not com- The same process drives our cluster growth, although pletely collapse. In contrast, panel (c) achieves excellent densitychangesarenotexplicitlyexpressedinthemodel. scaling and collapse using the form (discussed later) Readilyavailablethroughlightscatteringexperiments, the self-intermediate scattering function (SISF) f as- f ∝exp(cid:8)−Atˆ(cid:0)1−(cid:15)tˆ(cid:1)(cid:9), (6) s s 3 1 (a) 0.18 (b) tw: 210 0.8 0.6 t : 211 0.4 w 0.6 t : 212 w ) 0.2 tw: 213 x ma0.4 100 102 104 106 108 t : 214 f(qs 0.18 t/tw (c) tww: 215 0.6 tw: 216 0.2 0.4 t : 217 w 0.2 tw: 218 10 0 103 10τ6 109 1012 0 Atˆ(11−ǫtˆ) 2 FIG. 4: Persistence on a 64×64 lattice. For times t from √ t =212 to 4t activations are recorded. Within a dominant w w FIG.3: DecayofSISFatq = 2πandsystemsizeL=64 max inert background (white), domains are encircled with darker for t =2k, k =10,11,...,18, using three different forms of w to lighter contours to mark one to ten activations. This mo- independent variable: (a) the lag time τ, (b) the total run bility pattern demonstrates dynamic heterogeneity and the time t scaled by waiting time t , and (c) the correction to w associatedthepreferentialreturnofactivitytothesamesites. tˆ=log(t/t )inEq.(6)(seetextfordetails). Thefittedvalues w A and (cid:15) remain approximately constant across the range of differentt ;withA≈0.1andacorrectionofmerely(cid:15)≈1%. w then over the ensemble. Using (cid:104)·(cid:105) for the ensemble aver- age and |·| for the Euclidean norm, the MSD is written as with (cid:15)≈0.012. Thepower-lawexponent A≈0.1weakly depends on tw and changes systematically by about 40% (cid:42) 1 (cid:88)N (cid:43) overtwodecadesoftw,likelyreflectingtheeffectofhigher ∆r2(tw,t)= N |(cid:126)rj(t)−(cid:126)rj(tw)|2 . (8) order corrections in Eq. (6). Note that A is comparable j=1 to the same exponent found in expensive Lennard-Jones simulations, see Fig. 2 of Ref. [20]. Figure5showstheMSDforasystemofsizeL=64with waiting times t = 2k for k = 10,11...18. In analogy An alternative characterization of immobility, persis- w with Fig. 3, the MSD is plotted vs. three different vari- tence, measures the average fraction of particles that ables: Panel (a) uses the lag time, panel (b) the scaling never move [19, 26]. Conceptually simple and easily ac- variablet/t ,andpanel(c)usesthesametypeofcorrec- cessible in simulations, persistence must be deduced in- w tion as in Eq. (6), that is, ∆r2 ∝ A(cid:48)tˆ(cid:0)1−(cid:15)tˆ(cid:1) with the directly in experiments from the SISF at its peak wave- same(cid:15)=0.012andthe“log-diffusion”constantA(cid:48) ≈0.2. vector. In terms of Eq. (4), persistence is defined as Note that a system aged up to time t has a “plateau” w P(tw,t)=Gs(|(cid:126)r|≤d,tw,t), (7) of inactivity for lag times up to τ ∼tw. These plateaus, often associated with the “caging” of particles [13], are i.e., the fraction of particles that have coordinates at timest andtwith|(cid:126)r(t)−(cid:126)r(t )|≤d,wheredisathresh- old repwresenting the largest dwistance a particle can move (a) 3(b) tw: 210 3 without detection. For small d, the SISF in Eq. (5) re- 2 tw: 211 ducestopersistencefor|(cid:126)q|→∞. Toavoidover-counting t : 212 1 w particles that return to their original position, in simu- t : 213 slainticoentsww.eOounrlyrecsouultnstfpoarrptiecrlseissttehnactehwaivtehbdee=n1acatrievavtierd- ∆2ri2 1000 102 1t0/4tw106 108 tww: 214 tually indistinguishable from those for SISF at qmax in h 3(c) tw: 215 Fig. 3. Figure 4 illustrates the recurrance of quake ac- 1 t : 216 w 2 tivity to sites on a L = 64 lattice for a time interval t : 217 w [t ,4t ] with t = 212. While most particles persist in 1 w w w t : 218 their position, mobility concentrates in areas scattered 0 0 w about the system (“dynamic heterogeneities”[13]) with 10 0 103 10τ6 109 1012 0 A1′tˆ(1−2ǫtˆ) 3 future activity favoring previously mobile sites. The positional variance or mean square displacement (MSD) between times t and t is computed by averag- FIG.5: MSDforarangeofdifferentwaitingtimesanddiffer- w ent choices of independent variable. The system parameters ingthesquaredisplacement,firstoverofallparticlesand are the same as in Fig. 3. 4 Deviations from log(t/t )-scaling are visible at long w 1.5 tw: 20 times in both the MSD and the SISF (or, equivalently, t : 22 the persistence). Interestingly, experimental data show w t : 24 a similar behavior, see Fig. 1 in Ref. [19] and Fig. 4 in w t : 26 Ref. [20]. As shown in the insets, these deviations can 1 w be eliminated by a new scaling variable with a small t : 28 χ4 tw: 210 ((cid:15) ≈ 1%) correction in log(t/tw), whose origin is as fol- w lows: Consider first the fraction of persistent particles 0.5 tw: 212 pn after n quakes (marked white in Fig. 4), and neglect tw: 214 that the size of a quake slowly increases with cluster size t : 216 and that particle hits are not uniformly spread through- w tw: 218 out the system. That persistence curve pn then decays 01 00 102 104 106 108 1010 1012 exponentiallywithn. Averagingpn overthePoissondis- t tribution of n gets FIG. 6: Plot of χ4 as a function of time t for various tw at P(tw,t)=exp(−Aµq(tw,t))=exp(−Atˆ), (10) L=64. Note that the peak-height increases with logt . w see Eq. 6, where A is a small constant and µ (t ,t) ∝ easily removed with t/t as independent variable, see q w w log(t/t ) as the average number of quakes occurring be- Fig. 5(b), leading to the approximate scaling behavior w ∆r2 ∼ log(t/t ) and a reasonable data collapse. The tween tw and t. In reality, spatial heterogeneity means w that quakes increasingly hit the same parts of the sys- residual curvature is removed altogether in panel (c) us- tem,seeFig.4,andthattheireffectonpersistencehence ing the same correction as in Fig. (3), (cid:15) = 0.012, but a constant A(cid:48) ≈0.2 that is unrelated to A. gradually decreases. Heuristically, this effect is accom- modated by correcting the exponent with the O((cid:15))-term To gauge correlated spatial fluctuation and dynamical in µ , as in Eq. 6. More precisely, since all moments of heterogeneity, we consider the 4-point susceptibility [22] q the quaking process can be expressed in terms of µ , the q χ (t ,t)=(cid:104)M(t ,t)2(cid:105)−(cid:104)M(t ,t)(cid:105)2, (9) correction is the first term of a Taylor expansion of the 4 w w w actualexponent. Furthermore,thedependenceofcluster with mobility measure M(tw,t) = (cid:80)jcj(tw,t), size distribution on tw leads to a similar dependence of c (t ,t)=exp{−||(cid:126)r (t)−(cid:126)r (t )|| }, where ||·|| denotes A. The downward curvature of the MSD plotted vs. tˆ j w j j w 1 1 the Manhattan norm. Figure 6 shows χ vs. t for a is analogously explained, thus, the weak curvature seen 4 range of waiting times t . While the data does not al- in our data appears to be a direct consequence of spa- w low a global collapse, the logarithmic increase in peak- tial heterogeneity. The mobility correlation function in height vs. t is clearly visible. This is expected since, by Eq. (9) reveals the presence of a growing length scale in w model construction, heterogeneous dynamics is mainly colloidal systems, here, the average linear cluster size. due to the collapse of clusters, locked in at a typical size Finally, wesuggestthreemeasurementstofurtherelu- h ∼ logt , that re-mobilizes a corresponding number of cidatecolloidaldynamics. Thefirstusestheχ suscepti- w 4 particles at a time t > t , which is reflected in the bilityfunction, aswepresentlydo, toinvestigateagrow- peak w height of the peak. Fig. 6 is reminiscent of results in ing correlation length as a function of the age. The sec- Ref. [21] for experiments and simulations, where χ is ond collects the PDF of fluctuations in particle positions 4 measured for a sequence of equilibrium states prepared over short time intervals of length ∆t = at , where a is w ever closer to jamming, either by increasing density or a small constant, uniformly covering the longer interval decreasing temperature. (t ,2t ). If the rate of intermittent quakes decreases as w w Insummary,ourmodelcoarse-grainsawaythe“in-cage 1/t , the log-Poisson statistic in Eq. (10) predicts PDFs w rattling” of particles while incorporating time intermit- whichareindependent oft ,asshowninRef.[6]forspin- w tencyandspatialheterogeneity. Itsbehavior,whichqual- glasssimulations. Finally,wesuggestthattheslightcur- itativelyaccountsforrelevantexperimentalfindings, can vatureseeninexperimentsforMSDvs.log(t/t )[19]and w be described analytically using the log-Poisson statistics in the tail of the SISF [20] reflects spatial heterogeneity, of cluster collapses [19]. asdiscussedabove. Moredetailedexperimentsmightas- Two-point averages have been plotted versus the lag certain if the correction producing our data collapse has time, τ =t−t , to adhere to the established usage and, a similar effect on experimental data. w ininsets,versusthescaledvariablet/t . Thefirstchoice NB thanks the Physics Department at Emory Univer- w lacks a theoretical basis in the absence of time transla- sityforitshospitality. TheauthorsareindebtedtotheV. tional invariance. The second indicates that the distinc- Kann Rasmussen Foundation for financial support. SB tion between an early dynamical regime τ < t and an is further supported by the NSF through grant DMR- w asymptotic aging regime τ >t is moot. 1207431, and thanks SDU for its hospitality. w 5 [16] R.Candelier,O.Dauchot,andG.Biroli,Phys.Rev.Lett. 102, 088001 (2009). [17] H. G. E. Hentschel, V. Ilyin, N. Makedonska, [1] L. Struik, Physical aging in amorphous polymers and I. Procaccia, and N. Schupper, Phys. Rev. E 75, other materials (Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, 1978). 050404 (2007), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10. [2] P. Nordblad, P. Svedlindh, L. Lundgren, and L. Sand- 1103/PhysRevE.75.050404. lund, Phys. Rev. B 33, 645 (1986). [18] G. C. Cianci, R. E. Courtland, and E. R. Weeks, Solid [3] H. Rieger, J. Phys. A 26, L615 (1993). State Comm. 139, 599 (2006). [4] W. Kob, F. Sciortino, and P. Tartaglia, Europhys. Lett. [19] S. Boettcher and P. Sibani, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 49, 590 (2000). 23, 065103 (2011). [5] A.CrisantiandF.Ritort,Europhys.Lett.66,253(2004). [20] D.E.Masri,L.Berthier,andL.Cipelletti,Phys.Rev.E [6] P. Sibani and H. J. Jensen, Europhys. Lett. 69, 563 82, 031503 (2010). (2005). [21] L.Berthier,G.Biroli,J.-P.Bouchaud,L.Cipelletti,D.E. [7] G.G. Kenning, G.F. Rodriguez and R. Orbach, Phys. Masri,D.L’Hote,F.Ladieu,andM.Pierno,Science310, Rev. Lett. 97, 057201 (2006). 1797 (2005). [8] P. Sibani, Eur. Phys. J. B 58, 483 (2007). [22] L. Berthier, Physics 4, 42 (2011). [9] P. Sibani and S. Christiansen, Phys. Rev. E 77 (2008). [23] A.B.Bortz,M.H.Kalos,andJ.L.Lebowitz,Journalof [10] S. Christiansen and P. Sibani, New Journal of Physics Computational Physics 17, 10 (1975). 10, 033013 (2008). [24] J. Dall and P. Sibani, Comp. Phys. Comm. 141, 260 [11] L. Cipelletti, S. Manley, R. C. Ball, and D. A. Weitz, (2001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2275 (2000). [25] E. Ben-Naim, J. Knight, E. Nowak, H. Jaeger, [12] D.E.Masri,M.Pierno,L.Berthier,andL.Cipelletti,J. and S. Nagel, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S3543 (2005). 123, 380 (1998), ISSN 0167-2789, annual Interna- [13] E. R. Weeks, J. Crocker, A. C. Levitt, A. Schofield, and tional Conference of the Center for Nonlinear Stud- D. Weitz, Science 287, 627 (2000). ies, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ [14] R. E. Courtland and E. R. Weeks, J. Phys.: Condens. article/pii/S0167278998001365. Matter 15, S359 (2003). [26] R. Pastore, M. P. Ciamarra, A. de Candia, and [15] J.M.Lynch,G.C.Cianci,andE.R.Weeks,Phys.Rev. A. Coniglio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 065703 (2011). E 78, 031410 (2008).