This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Investigating the contribution of astrocytes and neuroinflammation to pathological tau changes in Alzheimer's disease Phillips, Emma Claire Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to: Share: to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. D ownload date: 06. Nov. 2017 Investigating the contribution of astrocytes and neuroinflammation to pathological tau changes in Alzheimer's disease Emma Phillips Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London September 2016 1 Declaration I hereby declare that all of the work presented in this thesis is my own, with the exception of the following: Electron microscopy of synthetic Aß was carried out by Covance (Princeton, NJ, US). 1-42 Immunohistochemical staining of post-mortem brains was carried out by the London Neurodegenerative Diseases Brain Bank. Emma Phillips September 2016 2 Acknowledgements Firstly, many thanks to Dr Wendy Noble for her continual guidance and support. Wendy was always able to provide encouragement and advice when most needed. Thank you also to Prof Diane Hanger for her invaluable additional input and guidance. I also appreciate the perspective gained by being mentored by two strong women so early in my career. Thanks also to Dr Michael O’Neill and everyone at Eli Lilly for being so helpful and making me feel so welcome. In particular, thank you to Dr Joanna Wolak and Dr Daniel Ursu. Also, Emma, Sarah, Yugesh, Elena, Jasmeet and Silvia, without your help I would have been completely lost. Thanks to Fiona for helping me with the CHO cells. A huge thank you to Team Tau, particularly the Noble group. Also, especially to Dawn and Teresa for being lovely right from the start. Lizzie, for early morning neuron prep gossips and Charlotte for wanting to throw yourself over obstacles just as much as me. Also to Martina, for the chocolate and Mount Everest chat! Thank you to my friends who supported me along the way: my ice skating family, GoodGym friends and the Wadhamites. Particularly thanks to Sam, Dan, Ella and Ella for the pub and tube walks, Abi and Emily for the girl’s nights, and to Becca, without whom I wouldn’t have got through the last four years - thank you for the wine, feminism and Meryl Streep films! A special thanks goes to my family who have always been there, even when I’m a crying mess ruining our Canadian holiday! Thank you to my parents who support and believe in me no matter what. To my sisters, Sal, Soph and Grace (adopted sister!), who always know how to lighten the mood and remind me what life is actually about – fun! Most importantly, thanks to Ed, literally my other half, without you this thesis would not have happened. Thank you for caring about Alzheimer’s and tau even though it’s really not your thing! Finally, this thesis is dedicated to my Gransha, Mac Norgrove, whose love, laughter and dignity in the face of neurodegeneration sparked this whole journey off. 3 Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterised by accumulation of ß-amyloid in extracellular plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of abnormally phosphorylated and aggregated tau, and widespread synaptic dysfunction and neuron loss that underlie the clinical symptoms of AD. Glial activation and a neuroinflammatory immune response is also a key aspect of the pathological progression of AD. The activation of astrocytes appears to be particularly associated with pathological changes in tau. This thesis aims to investigate the association between astrocyte activation and abnormal tau processing using primary cell culture and human post-mortem brain. Furthermore, it aims to explore possible regional differences in this role of astrocytes, and the molecular signalling pathways by which astrocytes exert their effects on tau. Experiments in primary astrocyte and neuron co-cultures demonstrated that astrocytes were involved in accelerating Aß-induced neurotoxicity in hippocampal cultures, but not cortical cultures although the differences were quite subtle. Interestingly, astrocytes were important for the neuronal release of tau from cortical neurons under basal conditions, suggesting that astrocytes may be important for pathological tau spread in AD. Analysis of human post-mortem brain showed differences in astrocytic changes in hippocampus and cortex as AD progresses. In addition, these experiments also suggested regional differences in mechanisms related to synaptic dysfunction and loss as disease progresses. These data suggest that different mechanisms may underlie the neurodegenerative effects of ß-amyloid and/or activated astrocytes in distinct brain regions; an important consideration when considering therapeutic strategies for AD. In addition, the potential benefits for tauopathy of repurposing an already licenced drug with anti-inflammatory action were investigated. Despite showing significant modulation of tau phosphorylation in primary cultures, dimethyl fumarate had little influence on disease- associated tau species when tested in vivo in a mouse model of tauopathy. 4 Overall, the findings of this thesis suggest that there are regional differences in astrocyte activation during the development of AD, that are somewhat associated with AD-relevant changes in tau. This work also supports a role for astrocytes in physiological tau release. Further elucidating these differences will increase understanding of neurodegenerative mechanisms. Moreover, these data suggest that regional involvement at different disease stages could be an important consideration when targeting specific mechanisms for therapeutic development. 5 Contents Declaration .................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 6 List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. 12 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 16 Publications arising from this studentship .................................................................................. 17 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 24 1.1 Historical perspective .................................................................................................. 24 1.2 Neuropathology .......................................................................................................... 25 1.2.1 ß-amyloid plaques ............................................................................................... 26 1.2.2 Neurofibrillary tau tangles .................................................................................. 26 1.3 The genetics of AD ...................................................................................................... 28 1.4 Amyloid precursor protein and ß-amyloid .................................................................. 31 1.4.1 Amyloid precursor protein processing ................................................................ 31 1.5 Tau............................................................................................................................... 34 1.5.1 Protein structure ................................................................................................. 34 1.5.2 Post-translational modifications of tau .............................................................. 35 1.5.3 Tau cleavage ........................................................................................................ 37 1.5.4 Tau aggregation .................................................................................................. 38 6 1.5.5 Tau functions in health and disease.................................................................... 39 1.5.6 Tau spread and seeding ...................................................................................... 41 1.6 The amyloid cascade hypothesis ................................................................................ 42 1.6.1 Modelling the amyloid cascade in vitro .............................................................. 45 1.7 Neuroinflammation ..................................................................................................... 47 1.7.1 Glia ...................................................................................................................... 48 1.7.2 Inflammatory mediators ..................................................................................... 60 1.7.3 Neuroinflammation as a therapeutic target in AD ............................................. 64 1.8 Aims and objectives of this thesis ............................................................................... 66 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods ....................................................................................... 67 2.1 General buffer solutions ............................................................................................. 67 2.2 Cell culture .................................................................................................................. 68 2.2.1 Rat primary neurons ........................................................................................... 68 2.2.2 Cell lines .............................................................................................................. 71 2.2.3 ß-amyloid characterisation ................................................................................. 73 2.2.4 Cell treatment ..................................................................................................... 78 2.2.5 Cell viability LIVE/DEAD assay ............................................................................. 81 2.3 Htau mice .................................................................................................................... 82 2.3.1 Genotyping and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ............................................. 82 2.3.2 Treatment and testing of htau mice ................................................................... 85 2.4 Sample preparation and standardisatoin ................................................................... 89 2.4.1 Sample preparation ............................................................................................ 89 2.4.2 Protein standardisation....................................................................................... 94 7 2.5 Immunostaining .......................................................................................................... 95 2.5.1 Immunocytochemistry (ICC) of primary rat cultures .......................................... 95 2.5.2 Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of human post-mortem brain sections .... 97 2.6 Western blotting ......................................................................................................... 98 2.6.1 Materials ............................................................................................................. 98 2.6.2 Antibodies ......................................................................................................... 102 2.6.3 Methods ............................................................................................................ 104 2.7 Immunoassays........................................................................................................... 106 2.7.1 Standard tau ELISA ............................................................................................ 106 2.7.2 Tau sandwich ELISA ........................................................................................... 108 2.7.3 Alphascreen....................................................................................................... 110 2.8 Statistical analysis ..................................................................................................... 115 2.8.1 Protein analysis and cell death assays .............................................................. 115 2.8.2 Analysis of Alphascreen and MSD data ............................................................. 117 2.8.3 Behavioural analysis of htau mice .................................................................... 117 Chapter 3: Investigating regional differences in Aß-induced effects of astrocytes in primary neuron cultures ......................................................................................................................... 118 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 118 3.2 Methods .................................................................................................................... 121 3.3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 123 3.3.1 Preliminary work ............................................................................................... 123 3.3.2 Aßcharacterisation ........................................................................................... 129 8 3.3.3 Astrocytes do not affect Aß-induced changes in 14 DIV primary cortical cultures 141 3.3.4 Astrocytes may mediate some Aß-induced changes in primary hippocampal cultures 152 3.3.5 Summary ........................................................................................................... 156 3.4 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 156 3.4.1 Aß characterisation ........................................................................................... 157 3.4.2 Aß-induced cell death and tau changes were not observed in 14 DIV primary cortical cultures ................................................................................................................. 159 3.4.3 Astrocytes may regulate extracellular tau concentrations ............................... 161 3.4.4 Differences in Aß and minocycline effects in hippocampal cultures versus cortical cultures 162 3.4.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 163 Chapter 4: Exploring the potential of dimethyl fumarate repurposing for Alzheimer’s disease 165 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 165 4.2 Methods .................................................................................................................... 169 4.3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 171 4.3.1 Preliminary work ............................................................................................... 171 4.3.2 The effects of DMF on tau and astrocytes in mixed primary cortical cultures . 173 4.3.3 DMF treatment of htau mice ............................................................................ 175 4.3.4 Possible signalling pathways for DMF action .................................................... 186 4.3.5 Summary ........................................................................................................... 193 4.4 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 194 9
Description: