Telangana, 2016-01-05, Extraordinary, No. 7, Job 622, PART I

0.1 MB·English

by  Government of Telangana

Registered No. HSE–49/-2016. [Price : `````. 1-75 Paise.
TTTTTHHHHHEEEEE TTTTTEEEEELLLLLAAAAANNNNNGGGGGAAAAANNNNNAAAAA GGGGGAAAAAZZZZZEEEEETTTTTTTTTTEEEEE
PART-I EXTRAORDINARY
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 5 ] HYDERABAD, TUESDAY, JANUARY 5, 2016.
NOTIFICATION BY HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS, Etc.
——x——
COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE TELANGANA STATE
JUDGEMENT OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.12334 & 19888/2004 – REVISION OF PLACEMENT
OF SRI D. SRINIVAS REDDY, P&EI – NOTICE – ISSUED.
Ref: 1) This office Cr.No.A4/4948/2004, dt.3-9-2007
2) Judgement of the Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.
12334 & 19888/2004, dt.24-6-2014
3) This office Cr.No.A4/4948/2004, dt.7-3-2015
4) CPE Cr.No.1395/2014/CPE/A2, dt.2-7-2015
5) Dy. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Hyderabad
Cr.No A4/4948/2004 —2 dt 30-11-2015
6) Dy. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise. Hyderabad
in Cr.No A4/4948/2004 dt 03.11.2015 while enclosing the copies in
Cr.No.1395/2015/CPE/A2-1.- A Notification was issued by the APPSC vide Notification No.6/94 for recruitment
to the post of Excise Inspector, Excise Sub-Inspector and Extension Officers (RD). In Zone-VI, (22) vacancies of Excise
Inspectors were notified, out of which, the APPSC initially allotted (19) candidates and they joined on 2-11-1996. On the
same day, certain Excise Sub-Inspectors who were also selected under the same notification also joined duty. Subsequently,
on 29-5-1997, the APPSC vide APPSC Lr.No.4619/E.I/94, dt.29-5-1997 communicated the selection list allotting (3)
more candidates for the post of Excise Inspectors viz., Sri A. Srinivas Reddy, Sri R. Tukya and Sri D. Srinivas Reddy in the
deleted vacancies and they joined on 27-12-97.
After appointment of these (3) individuals, Sri R. Mahipal Reddy, Sri R. Kishan and Sri K. Vijay Bhasker,
who were selected as Excise Sub-Inspectors in the same Notification filed O.A.Nos.6750/2000, 1407/98 and 5452/
1997 respectively to consider their cases for the post of Excise Inspector on the ground that the (3) candidates who
were subsequently allotted under deleted vacancies are having less marks than them in the recruitment exam. The
APAT in the respective O.As directed to consider their cases for the post of P&EIs, if necessary by reverting the
other in-eligible candidates. On the advice of the APPSC, they were appointed as Proh. & Excise Inspectors in the
[ 1 ]
G. 622/1.
2 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
year 2001 with retrospective effect from 29-5-1997 i.e. the date of communication of selection list for deletion
vacancies. While the matter stood thus, certain other Excise Sub-Inspectors (applicants herein) who were selected
on 02.11.1996 in the same recruitment and having more marks than the said 3 candidates filed a batch of OAs in
O.A.No.6034/01 & batch staking their claim to the post of P&EI on the ground that they are more meritorious than
the petitioners. The Hon’ble APAT disposed of all the O.As. by a common order dt.29-1-2004 directing that such of
the applicants, who got more marks, but not given appointment as P&EIs due to lack of posts, should be given
appointment in the posts which have fallen vacant on account of non-joining of the selected candidates.
As this was the position, the three candidates selected against deleted vacancies viz., Sri R. Tukya and Sri A.
Srinivas Reddy & Sri D. Srinivas Reddy filed WP.Nos.12334/04 and 19888/04 respectively challenging the orders
of the APAT in O.A.No.6499/2001 and O.A.No.6034/2001 & batch. They also prayed not to cancel/review their
appointment as P&EIs. The Hon’ble High Court in both the WPs granted interim direction on 23-7-2004 not to
cancel/review their appointments as Prohn.& Excise Inspectors, pending WPs on the file of the High Court.
During the pendency of the WPs, the seniority list of P&EIs of Zone-VI was finalized vide reference 1st cited.
In the final seniority list, the names of Sri A. Srinivas Reddy, Sri R. Tukya and Sri D. Srinivas Reddy were placed at
Sl.No.199, 200 and 201 respectively with remarks that their placements will be revised and re-fixed at appropriate
place at the outcome of the Writ Petitions.
In the reference 2nd cited, the Hon’ble High Court in its common order, dt.24-6-2014 in WP.No.No.12334/
2004 and 19888/2004 directed as follows:
“16. The further contention of the learned senior counsel for the writ petitioners is that appointment
of the writ petitioners to the posts of Excise Inspectors is in accordance with Rule 6 of the Rules, which
was in force till 17-6-1997 cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the writ petitioners were placed
in the merit list, which was remain in force for a period of one year and some candidates in the cadre of
Excise Inspectors have not joined, the marks secured by the candidates subject to rule of reservation has
to be taken into consideration by appointing the persons in the order of merit from the candidates selected
in the category of Excise Inspectors, which means, the persons who secured more marks and were given
appointment as Excise Sub Inspectors should have been appointed as Excise Inspectors and the resultant
vacancies in the category of Excise Sub-Inspectors should have been filled in by from the candidates in
the waiting list in the order of merit. That has been given a complete go-by by the APPSC. In view of this
fact, though the settled seniority position has to be necessarily disturbed, passage of time is not a ground
to reject the legitimate claim of the unofficial respondents who are more meritorious persons than the
writ petitioners herein. Therefore, it is a clear case where injustice has been done to the unofficial
respondents herein in not considering their cases for the posts of Excise Inspectors though they are fully
eligible according to the marks secured by them. However, in view of the fact that there are no lapses on
the part of the writ petitioners and they were appointed in pursuance of the recommendations made by
the APPSC, their seniority cannot be disturbed at this point of time, but however, they should be shown
below the unofficial respondents who secured more marks. Considering all these aspects, the Tribunal
rightly disposed of the O.As and that order needs no interference by this Court.
17. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if
any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed.”
In the ref. 5th cited, the DC, Hyderabad has fixed the seniority placement of Sri A.Srinivas Reddy, E.S.
Medchal & Excise Inspector, at Sl.No.18/A in the final seniority list of Proh & Excise Inspectors of Zone-VI, dt.22-
1-2011. In the ref.6th cited, the DC, Hyderabad requested this office to fix his seniority at appropriate place in the
integrated seniority list.
In view of the above, it is proposed to place the name of Sri A.Srinivas Reddy, E.S.Medchal & Excise Inspector,
SHO, Kollapur, Mahbubnagar District (Petitioner in W.P.No.19888/2004) at Sl.No.18/A in the integrated final
seniority list of P&EIs communicated by this office vide Cr.No.7223/2012/CPE/L4 dt 02.8.2013.
Therefore, the individuals noted in the address entry are called upon to submit their objections/representations,
if any within (15) days against the above proposed assignment of seniority. If no reply/representation is received,
the provisional decision will be finalized basing on the material available on record.
January 5, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 3
Sl. No. Name Zone Designation
1. T. Vikramjeet Singh (ZE) VI Retired
2. K. Madhavaiah VI P&EI
3. B. Chanakya VI P&EI
4. K. Venkateshwarlu VI Retired
5. M. Vishnumurthy VI P&EI
6. K.Rajya Laxmi V Promoted as AES
7. K.Mahender Reddy V Retired
8. D.B.Jagjeevan Rao V Expired
9. K. Srinivasa Rao VI P&EI
10. D. Chandrabhan Naik VI P&EI
11. R. Venkateshwarlu VI P&EI
12. B. Ramulu VI Retired
13. J. Jeevan Kiran VI P&EI
14. D.Sarveshwarnath V P&EI
15. P.Srinivas Rao V P&EI
16. A.Kishan V P&EI
17. P.Sathyam V Retired
18. Md.Khaja Moinuddin V Retired
19. K.Venkateshwar Rao V Retired
20. G.Vijay Chander V Retired
21. Y. Radhakrishna Reddy VI P&EI
22. Narayana VI Retired
23. P. Sai Siva Prasad VI Retired
24. Sk. Maqdoom VI Retired
25. P. Aksa Rani VI Retired
26. M. Bheemaiah VI Retired
27. K.Ram Chander V Retired
28. T.Ravinder V Retired
29. M.Haribaba Rao V P&EI
30. B.Mukunda Reddy V P&EI
31. K.Thirupathy V P&EI
32. Ch.Ravinder Reddy V P&EI
33. N. Mohan VI P&EI
34. M. Muthulingam VI P&EI
35. M. Lingachary VI P&EI
36. Md.Niyamuthullah V Retired
37. Sd.Ibrahim V P&EI
38. Y.Sambhaiah V P&EI
39. K.Laxmanna V P&EI
40. Ch.Sheshagiri Rao V P&EI
41. R.Praveen V P&EI
42. P.Karamchand V P&EI
43. A.Srinivas Reddy V P&EI
44. M.Hanumaiah V Retired
45. E.Ramesh Reddy V P&EI
46. L.Narasimha Reddy V P&EI
47. B.Hanumantha Rao V P&EI
48. N.Srinivasa Rao V P&EI
49. G.Hanuma V P&EI
50. M.A.Q.H. Khaleel (ZE) VI Retired
51. B. Srinivas VI P&EI
52. S. Srinivas Reddy VI P&EI
4 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
53. Shaik Dawood VI Expired
54. Abdul Rasheed VI Retired
55. Y. Dasu VI Retired
56. Md. Aleemuddin VI Retired
57. C. Gangaram VI Retired
58. A. Rama Goud VI Retired
59. B. Bhujangam VI Retired
60. B. Shanker Raj VI Retired
61. K. Srinivasa Reddy VI Retired
62. P.Krishna Reddy V Retired
63. U.Isthari V Retired
64. Md. Waliuddin VI Retired
65. J. Murphy VI P&EI
66. B. Sudhakar VI P&EI
67. A. Narsimhulu VI Retired
68. M. Lingaiah VI Retired
69. G. Yellaiah, S/o.Balaiah VI Retired
70. K. Vishwanatham VI Retired
71. M.A. Razak VI Retired
72. Ch. Samuel Johnson VI Retired
73. Ahmed Baig VI Retired
74. Ahmed Chand Karimji VI P&EI
75. Shankeraiah VI Retired
76. Ch. Bheemaiah VI Retired
77. P. Sarvesham VI Transferred to Warangal Zone
78. L. Venkataiah VI Retired
79. Narayana (ZE) VI P&EI
80. R. Ravinder Reddy VI P&EI
81. P. Yadagiri VI Retired
82. P. Chenna Reddy VI Retired
83. G.C. Caleb VI Retired
84. M.A. Quddus VI P&EI
85. G. Yellaiah, S/o.Ramaiah VI P&EI
86. E.Narsaiah V Retired
87. A.Mohan Babu V P&EI
88. I.Vijender Reddy V Expired
89. M.P.R.Chandra Shekar V P&EI
90. C. Narasimha Reddy VI Retired
91. K. Ravinder Reddy VI Retired
92. Ahmed Hussain VI Retired
93. Y. Pushparaju VI Retired
94. K. Yesu Ratnam VI Retired
95. Syed Zainuddin VI Retired
96. Abdul Mujeeb VI Retired
97. Mohd. Qamruddin VI Retired
98. Mohd. Gayasuddin VI P&EI
99. K. Sreeramulu VI Retired
100. Md. Najeebullah Khan VI Retired
101. G. Sopendev VI Retired
102. E. Chalamaiah VI Retired
103. K.Jagannadha Rao V P&EI
104. Fakeera V P&EI
105. D.Jaypal V Retired
106. Ch.Srinivas V P&EI
January 5, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 5
107. M.Ravindra V P&EI
108. Ch.Samuel Ananda Rao V P&EI
109. T.Venkatapalanaidu V P&EI
110. C.Praveen Kumar Reddy V P&EI
111. M.Brahmananda Reddy V P&EI
112. G.Balakishan V Retired
113. H.K.Umesh V Retired
114. Ch.Nagasrinivasa Rao V P&EI
115. S. Ram Mohan Rao VI Retired
116. P.Tataji V P&EI
117. T. Ramulu VI Retired
118. V. Sudershan VI Retired
119. S.Suryanarayana V Retired
120. M.Yadagiri V Retired
121. Sandula Raja VI Retired
122. P. Krishna Swamy VI Retired
The Nodal Dy. Commissioners of Prohibition & Excise, Hyderabad and Warangal, are requested to serve the
notices to the above individuals and return the served copies with dated acknowledgement.
JUDGEMENT OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.12334 & 19888/2004 – REVISION OF PLACEMENT
OF SRI R.TUKYA , P&EI – NOTICE – ISSUED.
Ref: 1) This office Cr.No.A4/4948/2004, dt.3-9-2007
2) Judgement of the Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.
12334 & 19888/2004, dt.24-6-2014
3) This office Cr.No.A4/4948/2004, dt.7-3-2015
4) CPE Cr.No.1395/2014/CPE/A2, dt.2-7-2015
5) Dy. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Hyderabad
Cr.No A4/4948/2004 —1 dt 30-11-2015
6) Dy. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise. Hyderabad
in Cr.No A4/4948/2004 dt 03.11.2015 while enclosing the copies in
Cr.No.1395/2015/CPE/A2-2.- A Notification was issued by the APPSC vide Notification No.6/94 for
recruitment to the post of Excise Inspector, Excise Sub-Inspector and Extension Officers (RD). In Zone-VI, (22)
vacancies of Excise Inspectors were notified, out of which, the APPSC initially allotted (19) candidates and they
joined on 2-11-1996. On the same day, certain Excise Sub-Inspectors who were also selected under the same
notification also joined duty. Subsequently, on 29-5-1997, the APPSC vide APPSC Lr.No.4619/E.I/94, dt.29-5-
1997 communicated the selection list allotting (3) more candidates for the post of Excise Inspectors viz., Sri A.
Srinivas Reddy, Sri R. Tukya and Sri D. Srinivas Reddy in the deleted vacancies and they joined on 27-12-97.
After appointment of these (3) individuals, Sri R. Mahipal Reddy, Sri R. Kishan and Sri K. Vijay Bhasker,
who were selected as Excise Sub-Inspectors in the same Notification filed O.A.Nos.6750/2000, 1407/98 and 5452/
1997 respectively to consider their cases for the post of Excise Inspector on the ground that the (3) candidates who
were subsequently allotted under deleted vacancies are having less marks than them in the recruitment exam. The
APAT in the respective O.As directed to consider their cases for the post of P&EIs, if necessary by reverting the
other in-eligible candidates. On the advice of the APPSC, they were appointed as Proh & Excise Inspectors in the
year 2001 with retrospective effect from 29-5-1997 i.e. the date of communication of selection list for deletion
vacancies. While the matter stood thus, certain other Excise Sub-Inspectors (applicants herein) who were selected
on 02.11.1996 in the same recruitment and having more marks than the said 3 candidates filed a batch of OAs in
O.A.No.6034/01 & batch staking their claim to the post of P&EI on the ground that they are more meritorious than
the petitioners. The Hon’ble APAT disposed of all the O.As. by a common order dt.29-1-2004 directing that such of
the applicants, who got more marks, but not given appointment as P&EIs due to lack of posts, should be given
appointment in the posts which have fallen vacant on account of non-joining of the selected candidates.
6 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
As this was the position, the three candidates selected against deleted vacancies viz., Sri R. Tukya and Sri A.
Srinivas Reddy & Sri D. Srinivas Reddy filed WP.Nos.12334/04 and 19888/04 respectively challenging the orders
of the APAT in O.A.No.6499/2001 and O.A.No.6034/2001 & batch. They also prayed not to cancel/review their
appointment as P&EIs. The Hon’ble High Court in both the WPs granted interim direction on 23-7-2004 not to
cancel/review their appointments as Prohn.& Excise Inspectors, pending WPs on the file of the High Court.
During the pendency of the WPs, the seniority list of P&EIs of Zone-VI was finalized vide reference 1st cited.
In the final seniority list, the names of Sri A. Srinivas Reddy, Sri R. Tukya and Sri D. Srinivas Reddy were placed at
Sl.No.199, 200 and 201 respectively with remarks that their placements will be revised and re-fixed at appropriate
place at the outcome of the Writ Petitions.
In the reference 2nd cited, the Hon’ble High Court in its common order, dt.24-6-2014 in WP.No.No.12334/
2004 and 19888/2004 directed as follows:
“16. The further contention of the learned senior counsel for the writ petitioners is that appointment
of the writ petitioners to the posts of Excise Inspectors is in accordance with Rule 6 of the Rules, which
was in force till 17-6-1997 cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the writ petitioners were placed
in the merit list, which was remain in force for a period of one year and some candidates in the cadre of
Excise Inspectors have not joined, the marks secured by the candidates subject to rule of reservation has
to be taken into consideration by appointing the persons in the order of merit from the candidates selected
in the category of Excise Inspectors, which means, the persons who secured more marks and were given
appointment as Excise Sub Inspectors should have been appointed as Excise Inspectors and the resultant
vacancies in the category of Excise Sub-Inspectors should have been filled in by from the candidates in
the waiting list in the order of merit. That has been given a complete go-by by the APPSC. In view of this
fact, though the settled seniority position has to be necessarily disturbed, passage of time is not a ground
to reject the legitimate claim of the unofficial respondents who are more meritorious persons than the
writ petitioners herein. Therefore, it is a clear case where injustice has been done to the unofficial
respondents herein in not considering their cases for the posts of Excise Inspectors though they are fully
eligible according to the marks secured by them. However, in view of the fact that there are no lapses on
the part of the writ petitioners and they were appointed in pursuance of the recommendations made by
the APPSC, their seniority cannot be disturbed at this point of time, but however, they should be shown
below the unofficial respondents who secured more marks. Considering all these aspects, the Tribunal
rightly disposed of the O.As and that order needs no interference by this Court.
17. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if
any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed.”
In the ref. 5th cited, the DC, Hyderabad has fixed the seniority placement of Sri R. Tukya Prohibition
& Excise Inspector, Ibrahimpatnam R.R. District at Sl.No.388/B in the final seniority list of Proh & Excise Inspectors
of Zone-VI, dt.22-1-2011. In the ref.6th cited, the DC, Hyderabad requested this office to fix his seniority at
appropriate place in the integrated seniority list.
In view of the above, it is proposed to place the name of Sri R.Tukya Prohibition & Excise Inspector, SHO,
Ibrahimpatnam R.R. District (Petitioner in W.P.No.12334/2004) at Sl.No.18/B in the integrated final seniority list
of P&EIs communicated by this office vide Cr.No.7223/2012/CPE/L4 dt 02.8.2013.
Therefore, the individuals noted in the address entry are called upon to submit their objections/representations,
if any within (15) days against the above proposed assignment of seniority. If no reply/representation is received,
the provisional decision will be finalized basing on the material available on record.
Sl. No. Name Zone Designation
1. T. Vikramjeet Singh (ZE) VI Retired
2. K. Madhavaiah VI P&EI
3. B. Chanakya VI P&EI
4. K. Venkateshwarlu VI Retired
5. M. Vishnumurthy VI P&EI
6. K.Rajya Laxmi V Promoted as AES
January 5, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 7
7. K.Mahender Reddy V Retired
8. D.B.Jagjeevan Rao V Expired
9. K. Srinivasa Rao VI P&EI
10. D. Chandrabhan Naik VI P&EI
11. R. Venkateshwarlu VI P&EI
12. B. Ramulu VI Retired
13. J. Jeevan Kiran VI P&EI
14. D.Sarveshwarnath V P&EI
15. P.Srinivas Rao V P&EI
16. A.Kishan V P&EI
17. P.Sathyam V Retired
18. Md.Khaja Moinuddin V Retired
19. K.Venkateshwar Rao V Retired
20. G.Vijay Chander V Retired
21. Y. Radhakrishna Reddy VI P&EI
22. Narayana VI Retired
23. P. Sai Siva Prasad VI Retired
24. Sk. Maqdoom VI Retired
25. P. Aksa Rani VI Retired
26. M. Bheemaiah VI Retired
27. K.Ram Chander V Retired
28. T.Ravinder V Retired
29. M.Haribaba Rao V P&EI
30. B.Mukunda Reddy V P&EI
31. K.Thirupathy V P&EI
32. Ch.Ravinder Reddy V P&EI
33. N. Mohan VI P&EI
34. M. Muthulingam VI P&EI
35. M. Lingachary VI P&EI
36. Md.Niyamuthullah V Retired
37. Sd.Ibrahim V P&EI
38. Y.Sambhaiah V P&EI
39. K.Laxmanna V P&EI
40. Ch.Sheshagiri Rao V P&EI
41. R.Praveen V P&EI
42. P.Karamchand V P&EI
43. A.Srinivas Reddy V P&EI
44. M.Hanumaiah V Retired
45. E.Ramesh Reddy V P&EI
46. L.Narasimha Reddy V P&EI
47. B.Hanumantha Rao V P&EI
48. N.Srinivasa Rao V P&EI
49. G.Hanuma V P&EI
50. M.A.Q.H. Khaleel (ZE) VI Retired
51. B. Srinivas VI P&EI
52. S. Srinivas Reddy VI P&EI
53. Shaik Dawood VI Expired
54. Abdul Rasheed VI Retired
55. Y. Dasu VI Retired
56. Md. Aleemuddin VI Retired
57. C. Gangaram VI Retired
58. A. Rama Goud VI Retired
59. B. Bhujangam VI Retired
60. B. Shanker Raj VI Retired
8 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
61. K. Srinivasa Reddy VI Retired
62. P.Krishna Reddy V Retired
63. U.Isthari V Retired
64. Md. Waliuddin VI Retired
65. J. Murphy VI P&EI
66. B. Sudhakar VI P&EI
67. A. Narsimhulu VI Retired
68. M. Lingaiah VI Retired
69. G. Yellaiah, S/o.Balaiah VI Retired
70. K. Vishwanatham VI Retired
71. M.A. Razak VI Retired
72. Ch. Samuel Johnson VI Retired
73. Ahmed Baig VI Retired
74. Ahmed Chand Karimji VI P&EI
75. Shankeraiah VI Retired
76. Ch. Bheemaiah VI Retired
77. P. Sarvesham VI Transferred to Warangal Zone
78. L. Venkataiah VI Retired
79. Narayana (ZE) VI P&EI
80. R. Ravinder Reddy VI P&EI
81. P. Yadagiri VI Retired
82. P. Chenna Reddy VI Retired
83. G.C. Caleb VI Retired
84. M.A. Quddus VI P&EI
85. G. Yellaiah, S/o.Ramaiah VI P&EI
86. E.Narsaiah V Retired
87. A.Mohan Babu V P&EI
88. I.Vijender Reddy V Expired
89. M.P.R.Chandra Shekar V P&EI
90. C. Narasimha Reddy VI Retired
91. K. Ravinder Reddy VI Retired
92. Ahmed Hussain VI Retired
93. Y. Pushparaju VI Retired
94. K. Yesu Ratnam VI Retired
95. Syed Zainuddin VI Retired
96. Abdul Mujeeb VI Retired
97. Mohd. Qamruddin VI Retired
98. Mohd. Gayasuddin VI P&EI
99. K. Sreeramulu VI Retired
100. Md. Najeebullah Khan VI Retired
101. G. Sopendev VI Retired
102. E. Chalamaiah VI Retired
103. K.Jagannadha Rao V P&EI
104. Fakeera V P&EI
105. D.Jaypal V Retired
106. Ch.Srinivas V P&EI
107. M.Ravindra V P&EI
108. Ch.Samuel Ananda Rao V P&EI
109. T.Venkatapalanaidu V P&EI
110. C.Praveen Kumar Reddy V P&EI
111. M.Brahmananda Reddy V P&EI
112. G.Balakishan V Retired
113. H.K.Umesh V Retired
114. Ch.Nagasrinivasa Rao V P&EI
January 5, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 9
115. S. Ram Mohan Rao VI Retired
116. P.Tataji V P&EI
117. T. Ramulu VI Retired
118. V. Sudershan VI Retired
119. S.Suryanarayana V Retired
120. M.Yadagiri V Retired
121. Sandula Raja VI Retired
122. P. Krishna Swamy VI Retired
The Nodal Dy. Commissioners of Prohibition & Excise, Hyderabad and Warangal, are requested to serve the
notices to the above individuals and return the served copies with dated acknowledgement.
JUDGEMENT OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.12334 & 19888/2004 – REVISION OF PLACEMENT
OF SRI D. SRINIVAS REDDY, P&EI – NOTICE – ISSUED.
Ref: 1) This office Cr.No.A4/4948/2004, dt.3-9-2007
2) Judgement of the Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.
12334 & 19888/2004, dt.24-6-2014
3) This office Cr.No.A4/4948/2004, dt.7-3-2015
4) CPE Cr.No.1395/2014/CPE/A2, dt.2-7-2015
5) Dy. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Hyderabad
Cr.No A4/4948/2004 —3dt 30-11-2015
6) Dy. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise. Hyderabad
in Cr.No A4/4948/2004 dt 03.11.2015 while enclosing the copies in
Cr.No.1395/2015/CPE/A2-3.- A Notification was issued by the APPSC vide Notification No.6/94 for
recruitment to the post of Excise Inspector, Excise Sub-Inspector and Extension Officers (RD). In Zone-VI, (22)
vacancies of Excise Inspectors were notified, out of which, the APPSC initially allotted (19) candidates and they
joined on 2-11-1996. On the same day, certain Excise Sub-Inspectors who were also selected under the same
notification also joined duty. Subsequently, on 29-5-1997, the APPSC vide APPSC Lr.No.4619/E.I/94, dt.29-5-
1997 communicated the selection list allotting (3) more candidates for the post of Excise Inspectors viz., Sri A.
Srinivas Reddy, Sri R. Tukya and Sri D. Srinivas Reddy in the deleted vacancies and they joined on 27-12-97.
After appointment of these (3) individuals, Sri R. Mahipal Reddy, Sri R. Kishan and Sri K. Vijay Bhasker,
who were selected as Excise Sub-Inspectors in the same Notification filed O.A.Nos.6750/2000, 1407/98 and 5452/
1997 respectively to consider their cases for the post of Excise Inspector on the ground that the (3) candidates who
were subsequently allotted under deleted vacancies are having less marks than them in the recruitment exam. The
APAT in the respective O.As directed to consider their cases for the post of P&EIs, if necessary by reverting the
other in-eligible candidates. On the advice of the APPSC, they were appointed as Proh & Excise Inspectors in the
year 2001 with retrospective effect from 29-5-1997 i.e. the date of communication of selection list for deletion
vacancies. While the matter stood thus, certain other Excise Sub-Inspectors (applicants herein) who were selected
on 02.11.1996 in the same recruitment and having more marks than the said 3 candidates filed a batch of OAs in
O.A.No.6034/01 & batch staking their claim to the post of P&EI on the ground that they are more meritorious than
the petitioners. The Hon’ble APAT disposed of all the O.As. by a common order dt.29-1-2004 directing that such of
the applicants, who got more marks, but not given appointment as P&EIs due to lack of posts, should be given
appointment in the posts which have fallen vacant on account of non-joining of the selected candidates.
As this was the position, the three candidates selected against deleted vacancies viz., Sri R. Tukya and Sri A.
Srinivas Reddy & Sri D. Srinivas Reddy filed WP.Nos.12334/04 and 19888/04 respectively challenging the orders
of the APAT in O.A.No.6499/2001 and O.A.No.6034/2001 & batch. They also prayed not to cancel/review their
appointment as P&EIs. The Hon’ble High Court in both the WPs granted interim direction on 23-7-2004 not to
cancel/review their appointments as Prohn.& Excise Inspectors, pending WPs on the file of the High Court.
During the pendency of the WPs, the seniority list of P&EIs of Zone-VI was finalized vide reference 1st cited.
In the final seniority list, the names of Sri A. Srinivas Reddy, Sri R. Tukya and Sri D. Srinivas Reddy were placed at
Sl.No.199, 200 and 201 respectively with remarks that their placements will be revised and re-fixed at appropriate
place at the outcome of the Writ Petitions.
G. 622/2.
10 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
In the reference 2nd cited, the Hon’ble High Court in its common order, dt.24-6-2014 in WP.No.No.12334/
2004 and 19888/2004 directed as follows:
“16. The further contention of the learned senior counsel for the writ petitioners is that appointment
of the writ petitioners to the posts of Excise Inspectors is in accordance with Rule 6 of the Rules, which
was in force till 17-6-1997 cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the writ petitioners were placed
in the merit list, which was remain in force for a period of one year and some candidates in the cadre of
Excise Inspectors have not joined, the marks secured by the candidates subject to rule of reservation has
to be taken into consideration by appointing the persons in the order of merit from the candidates selected
in the category of Excise Inspectors, which means, the persons who secured more marks and were given
appointment as Excise Sub Inspectors should have been appointed as Excise Inspectors and the resultant
vacancies in the category of Excise Sub-Inspectors should have been filled in by from the candidates in
the waiting list in the order of merit. That has been given a complete go-by by the APPSC. In view of this
fact, though the settled seniority position has to be necessarily disturbed, passage of time is not a ground
to reject the legitimate claim of the unofficial respondents who are more meritorious persons than the
writ petitioners herein. Therefore, it is a clear case where injustice has been done to the unofficial
respondents herein in not considering their cases for the posts of Excise Inspectors though they are fully
eligible according to the marks secured by them. However, in view of the fact that there are no lapses on
the part of the writ petitioners and they were appointed in pursuance of the recommendations made by
the APPSC, their seniority cannot be disturbed at this point of time, but however, they should be shown
below the unofficial respondents who secured more marks. Considering all these aspects, the Tribunal
rightly disposed of the O.As and that order needs no interference by this Court.
17. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if
any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed.”
In the ref. 5th cited, the DC, Hyderabad has fixed the seniority placement of Sri D.Srinivas Reddy,
Prohibition & Excise Inspector, SHO, Kollapur, Mahbubnagar District at Sl.No.388/C in the final seniority list of
Proh & Excise Inspectors of Zone-VI, dt.22-1-2011. In the ref.6th cited, the DC, Hyderabad requested this office to
fix his seniority at appropriate place in the integrated seniority list.
In view of the above, it is proposed to place the name of Sri D.Srinivas Reddy, Prohibition & Excise
Inspector, SHO, Kollapur, Mahbubnagar District (Petitioner in W.P.No.19888/2004) at Sl.No.18/C in the integrated
final seniority list of P&EIs communicated by this office vide Cr.No.7223/2012/CPE/L4 dt 02.8.2013.
Therefore, the individuals noted in the address entry are called upon to submit their objections/representations,
if any within (15) days against the above proposed assignment of seniority. If no reply/representation is received,
the provisional decision will be finalized basing on the material available on record.
Sl. No. Name Zone Designation
1. T. Vikramjeet Singh (ZE) VI Retired
2. K. Madhavaiah VI P&EI
3. B. Chanakya VI P&EI
4. K. Venkateshwarlu VI Retired
5. M. Vishnumurthy VI P&EI
6. K.Rajya Laxmi V Promoted as AES
7. K.Mahender Reddy V Retired
8. D.B.Jagjeevan Rao V Expired
9. K. Srinivasa Rao VI P&EI
10. D. Chandrabhan Naik VI P&EI
11. R. Venkateshwarlu VI P&EI
12. B. Ramulu VI Retired
13. J. Jeevan Kiran VI P&EI
14. D.Sarveshwarnath V P&EI
15. P.Srinivas Rao V P&EI
16. A.Kishan V P&EI