ebook img

Teichmüller Theory in Riemannian Geometry PDF

223 Pages·1992·15.067 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Teichmüller Theory in Riemannian Geometry

Lectures in Mathematics ETHZiirich Department of Mathematics Research Institute of Mathematics Managing Editor: Oscar E. Lanford Anthony J. Tromba Teichmiiller Theory in Riemannian Geometry based on lecture notes by Jochen Denzler 2nd revised printi ng Springer Basel AG Author's address: Anthony J. Tromba Mathematisches Institut Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitiit Miinchen Theresienstr. 39 D-8000 Miinchen 2 Anthony J. Tromba Department of Mathematics University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA Deutsche Bibliothek Cataloging-in-Publication Data Iromba, Anthony J.: Teichmiiller theory in Riemannian geometry: based on lecture notes by Jochen Denzler / Anthony J. Tromba. - Springer Base! AG, 1992 (Lectures in mathematics) ISBN 978-3-7643-2735-4 ISBN 978-3-0348-8613-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-8613-0 This work is subject to copyright. AII rights are reserved, whether the whole orpart ofthe material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machine or similar means, and storage in data banks. Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law where copies are made for other than private use a fee is payable to «Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort», Munich. © 1992 Springer Base! AG Origina1ly published by Birkhiiuser Verlag in 1992 ISBN 978-3-7643-2735-4 98765432 Preface These lecture notes are based on the joint work of the author and Arthur Fischer on Teichmiiller theory undertaken in the years 1980-1986. Since then many of our colleagues have encouraged us to publish our approach to the subject in a concise format, easily accessible to a broad mathematical audience. However, it was the invitation by the faculty of the ETH Ziirich to deliver the ETH N achdiplom-Vorlesungen on this material which provided the opportunity for the author to develop our research papers into a format suitable for mathematicians with a modest background in differential geometry. We also hoped it would provide the basis for a graduate course stressing the application of fundamental ideas in geometry. For this opportunity the author wishes to thank Eduard Zehnder and Jiirgen Moser, acting director and director of the Forschungsinstitut fiir Mathematik at the ETH, Gisbert Wiistholz, responsible for the Nachdiplom Vorlesungen and the entire ETH faculty for their support and warm hospitality. This new approach to Teichmiiller theory presented here was undertaken for two reasons. First, it was clear that the classical approach, using the theory of extremal quasi-conformal mappings (in this approach we completely avoid the use of quasi-conformal maps) was not easily applicable to the theory of minimal surfaces, a field of interest of the author over many years. Second, many other active mathematicians, who at various times needed some Teichmiiller theory, have found the classical approach inaccessible to them. The spirit of this approach was partially inspired by a paper of Earle and Eells "On a Fibre Bundle Description of Teichmiiller theory" published in 1969 in the Journal of Differential Geometry, and is more in line with the traditional development of ideas in geometry and partial differential equations. Moreover we intended to have the material in this book, both the analytic as well as the geometric, reasonably self-contained. Whereas various authors on classical Teichmiiller theory omit fundamental analytical results like the existence and uniqueness of extremal quasi-conformal maps, we on the other hand include (although in an appendix) the existence and uniqueness of harmonic diffeomorphisms which form part of the analytical basis of this theory. We hope therefore that these notes will indeed find their intended broad audience. There are many individuals who have contributed to the existing literature in classical Teichmiiller theory. Unfortunately due to the limitations of the Nachdiplom-Vorlesungen we could not mention several of their important and interesting results, nor were we able 2 to present a dictionary between our approach and the classical one. Some of these results are available in the books of Gardiner [40J and Lehto [65J. In these lectures on Teichmiiller theory we develop the essentials of the subject from basic fundamentals with the main intention of making Teichmiiller theory easy to learn. Our readers must remain the final judges as to whether we succeeded in this goal. We should also mention that there is some additional material included here that was not presented in the original lectures. Several people have helped us substantially in our efforts. First the Sonderforschungs bereich 256 for Partial Differential Equations in Bonn under the direction of Stefan Hilde brandt and the Max-Planck-Institute under the direction of Friedrich Hirzebruch very generously supported the research which resulted in these notes. My thanks go to my friend, colleague, and co-author Arthur Fischer who taught me much of the advanced geometry I know. Michael Buchner, Hans Duistermaat, Stefan Hildebrandt, Alan Huckleberry, Jerry Mars den, Dick Palais, Andrey Todorov, and Friedrich Tomi provided encouragement as well as mathematical inspirations. The proof of Poincare's theorem, section 1.5, and of the collar lemma in the appendix are due to Tomi and the proof of the Mumford Compact ness Theorem is due to Tomi and the author. Andreas Miiller provided the details of the argument that 'Do is contractible at the end of section 3.4. Kurt Strebel, Ralph Strebel, and Heiner Zieschang provided us with important historical information. Our appreciation goes to our students and to Adimurthi, Horst Knorrer, Alfred Kiinzle, Serge Lang, Michael Struwe, Eugene Trubowitz, and Eduard Zehnder, who attended some or all of the lectures, and whose interest and comments added to the quality of our presentation. We owe a great thanks to Yair Minsky who found an error in our original approach to the Nielsen problem. We also wish to thank Stefan Winiger for his careful typing of the manuscript and Artur Barczyk for professionally drawing the pictures. This book, however, could never have achieved its current polished form without the tireless and enthusiastic efforts of Jochen Denzler for which the author is deeply appreciative. A.J. Tromba ETH Ziirich June 1991 Contents o Mathematical Preliminaries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1 The Manifolds of Teichmiiller Theory 1.1 The Manifolds A and AS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.2 The Riemannian Manifolds M and ,IVls ......................... ....... 18 1.3 The Diffeomorphism M' Ips ~ AS ................. ........ ....... ..... 19 1.4 Some Differential Operators and their Adjoints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26 1.5 Proof of Poincare's Theorem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29 1.6 The Manifold M~l and the Diffeomorphism with MS Ips.......... .... 33 2 The Construction of Teichmiiller Space 2.1 A Rapid Course in Geodesic Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36 2.2 The Free Action of Vo on M -1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 38 2.3 The Proper Action of Vo on M-1 ................................... .. 41 2.4 The Construction of Teichmiiller Space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 44 2.5 The Principal Bundles of Teichmiiller Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 2.6 The Weil-Petersson Metric on T(M)................................... 60 4 Contents 3 T(M) is a Cell 3.1 Dirichlet's Energy on Teichmiiller Space ................................ 63 3.2 The Properness of Dirichlet's Energy. .... .... .. . .... ... .. . .. .. . ... . .. .. 74 3.3 Teichmiiller Space is a Cell... . . .. ... .. ....... .... . .. ... ... . . ... . ... .... 78 3.4 Topological Implications; The Contractibility of 'Do . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 81 4 The Complex Structure on Teichmiiller Space 4.1 Almost Complex Principal Fibre Bundles.. .... . ... .... ... .. .. . ... . .. .. 83 4.2 Abresch-Fischer Holomorphic Coordinates for A. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . ... .. 90 4.3 Abresch-Fischer Holomorphic Coordinates for T(M}................... 94 5 Properties of the Weil-Petersson Metric 5.1 The Weil-Petersson Metric is Kahler.. .. ... . . .. . .. . . .. . .. .. . . . ... . ... .. 96 5.2 The Natural Algebraic Connection on A ............................... 102 5.3 Further Properties of the Algebraic Connection and the non-Integrability of the Horizontal Distribution on A ................... 106 5.4 The Curvature of Teichmiiller Space with Respect to its Weil-Petersson Metric ................................................. 111 5.5 An Asymptotic Property of Weil-Petersson Geodesics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 121 6 The Pluri-Subharmonicity of Dirichlet's Energy on T(M); T(M) is a Stein-Manifold 6.1 Pluri-Subharmonic Funct.ions and Complex Manifolds .................. 123 6.2 Dirichlet's Energy is Strictly Pluri-Subharmonic ........................ 126 6.3 Wolf's Form of Dirichlet's Energy on T(M) is Strictly Weil-Petersson Convex ................................................. 138 6.4 The Nielsen Realization Problem ....................................... 152 Contents 5 A Proof of Lichnerowicz' Formula ......................................... 155 B On Harmonic Maps ...................................................... 158 C The Mumford Compactness Theorem .................................. 184 D Proof of the Collar Lemma .............................................. 192 E The Levi-Form of Dirichlet's Energy ............................ ....... 196 F Riemann-Roch and the Dimension of Teichmiiller Space ............. 201 Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 205 Indexes Index of Notation ........................................................... 214 A Chart of the Maps Used .................................................. 218 Index of Key Words ......................................................... 219 o Mathematical Preliminaries Let us collect some definitions and facts from differential geometry, which will be useful for our presentation: Definition 0.1 A Coo n-manifold M (without boundary) is a paracompact topological Haus dorff space, together with a maximal collection of open subsets (V;)iE! covering M: U Vi = iEI M, and homeomorphisms 'Pi : Vi ---> lRn such that whenever Vi n Vj =1= 0, 'Pi 0 'Pi! is Coo. (The collection {(Vi, 'Pi)} has been suppressed in the notation here, as will be done, when no confusion can arise.) M is said to be orientable, if the covering can be chosen so that detD('Pi 0 'Pi!)('Pj(x)) is always positive. If M is orientable, then, subject to this property, it has two possible maximal coverings. A choice of one is called an orientation. A Coo Banach manifold M is a paracompact topological Hausdorff space, together with a maximal collection of open subsets (Vi)iE!, UiE! Vi = M, and of homeomorphisms 'Pi : Vi ---> E, where E is a Banach space, such that 'Pi 0 'Pi! is Coo whenever defined (i.e. whenever Vi n Vj =1= 0). If E is a Hilbert space, M is called a Coo Hilbert manifold. Similarly, manifolds can be defined, which are modelled after any topological vector space E (say e.g. a Frechet space), and which are of any differentiability class by stipulating that 'Pi 'Pi! should be of the corresponding class. We are especially interested in 0 Definition 0.2 A Riema'nn surface M is a Coo oriented manifold, together with a collection of local homeomorphisms 'Pi : Vi ---> <C in the given orientation with U Vi = M such that 'Pio'Pt : Vij ---> lR2 areholomorphic maps, where defined, i,e. if0 =1= Vii := 'Pi(VinVj) C lR2. 7 Here, IR? is to be considered as <C. The collection c := {(U;, 'Pi) liE I} is called a complex structure for M. If M has a fixed complex structure, we write (M, c) to denote M with its given complex structure. Definition 0.3 A mapping f : M -+ N where (M, c), (N, c') are Riemann surfaces is called holomorphic, iff for all charts (If;,,,pj) E c', (Ui, 'Pi) E c, the mapping "pj 0 f 0 'Pil is holomorphic (where defined). A similar definition holds for Coo maps between Coo manifolds. Note that the definition does not depend on the choice of the charts. M f QUi Figure 0.1: cf. definition 0.3 Definition 0.4 f : M -+ N is a diffeomorphism, iff f E Coo and f-1 is defined and E Coo f : M -+ N is a holomorphic equivalence, iff both f and f-1 are holomorphic. A classical result in surface theory [431 yields Theorem 0.1 If M, N are compact, oriented Coo 2-manifolds (without boundary) which are homeomorphic, then they are diffeomorphic. This shows that the classification of compact oriented 2-manifolds without boundary up to diffeomorphisms is the same as their classification up to homeomorphism, so the

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.