ebook img

Taxonomic notes about the Middle American genus Cyrtolaus Bates (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini) PDF

10 Pages·1991·4.4 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Taxonomic notes about the Middle American genus Cyrtolaus Bates (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini)

PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 93(2), 1991, pp. 230-239 TAXONOMIC NOTES ABOUT THE MIDDLE AMERICAN GENUS CYRTOLAUS BATES (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE: PTEROSTICHINI) George E. Ball Department ofEntomology, University ofAlberta T6G 2E3, Edmonton, Alberta, Can- ada Abstract.—Basedon featuresofadultsandonchorological considerations, 2 newspecies of Cyrtolaus {s. str.) are described from Oaxaca, Mexico: C. oaxacanus (type locality— Sierra Zempoal, 10.4 km S. Totontepec), and C whiteheadi (type locality—Sierra Madre de Oaxaca, 1 1.7 km E. Huautla de Jimenez). Character states and localities ofspecimens C notrecordedpreviouslyofthe Chiapan-Guatemalan subiridescensWhiteheadand Ball, C. ricardo Whitehead and Ball, C.furculifer Bates, and C. grumufer Whitehead and Ball confirm generally the published treatments ofthese taxa. Key Words: new species, phylogeny, biogeography, Mexico, Coleoptera, Carabidae In August, 1965, toward the beginning of be ranked as subtribes ofPterostichini, and the 14-month period that Don Whitehead that Cyrtolausshouldgoin itsownsubtribe, and I spent in Mexico, we found in a cloud Cyrtolaina,whichweproposed. Thelastde- forest in central Chiapas 2 carabid adults of cision was based on both the seeming in- rather remarkable form (heavy-bodied, but termediate position of Cyrtolaus in the withstrikinglylongmandibles, narrowhead, Pterostichini, anditsseemingrelictstatus— andmarkedlyvaultedelytra)thatwethought the genus seemed not to have close phylo- represented some aberrant species of the genetic relatives. platynine genus Colpodes {sensu latissimi). Liebherr (1986) discovered that 2 Antil- Someyearslater, afterstudyingmany ofthe lean species, described originally as mem- types that H. W. Bates had described in bers ofColpodes, in fact represented an un- writingthecarabidpartoftheBiologiaCen- describedgenus, which he named Barylaus. trali-Americana, we concluded that our Further, Liebherrdetermined thatBarylaus specimens were members ofthe genus Cyr- and Cyrtolaus, though phylogenetically iso- tolaus Bates (1882: 99). We described this lated, were endemic New World represen- speciesand fourothersas new, in a revision tatives of the pterostichine subtribe Coe- oiCyrtolaus (Whitehead and Ball 1975). In lostomina, a group that had been thought that treatment, we combined in a single ge- to be confined to the Old World (except for nus Ithytolus Bates and Cyrtolaus, ranking an introduced speciesofCoelostomusin the each group as a subgenus. Antilles). Thus,thenameCyrtolainaWhite- Because the range of elytral features of head and Ball, 1975 is ajunior synonym of Cyrtolaus {sensu lato) seemed to bridge the Coelostomina. Also, Liebherr argued that range ofelytral features ofthe tribes Ptero- the platynines should be ranked as a tribe, stichini and Agonini (= Platynini), we con- andthusequivalenttothe Pterostichini, and cluded that this genus belonged in neither not as a component ofthe latter. tribeintherestrictedsense,thattheyshould I regard as elegant Liebherr's discovery VOLUME 93, NUMBER 2 231 of the subtribal relationships of Cyrtolaus detailed examination suggested otherwise, andBarylaus. However, onthebasisofcho- the specimens were regarded as taxonomi- rological considerations, I do not accept his cally distinct, and were ranked as species. conclusion thatBarylausis moreclosely re- For specific ranking of C. oaxacanus, new lated to the geographically distant Afro- species, primacy was given to chorological tropicallineageofCoelostomina thantothe features. See below for details. more proximal Middle American Cyrto- Measurements.—Thefollowingmeasure- mentswere madeaspartofthe descriptions laus. As knowledge ofrelationships of Cyrto- oftaxa and to compare with those reported laus was increasing, so was additional ma- by Whitehead and Ball (1975: Tables 1-3). terial accumulating ofthe species. Below, I HL = length ofhead from base ofdorsal reportandanalyzethe newinformation thus condyle of left mandible to poste- acquired,toseekvalidationofthestructural rior margin ofeye; andchorologicallydiagnosticfeaturesoftaxa ML = length of left mandible, from apex previously described, and to make known to base ofdorsal condyle; taxa not known previously. PL = length ofpronotum along mid-line, from anterior to posterior margin; Material and Methods EL = length ofelytra, along suture, from Material basal ridge to apex. suTbhgiesnusstuCdyyrtoislabuass,ecdololnect3e6daidnultthse oMfextih-e LeSnigztehw(aSsBLe)xparensdseisdtahseStsaunmdaorfdiHzLed+BoPdLy can states of Oaxaca and Chiapas, and in + EL. Two ratios were computed: ML/PL and PL/EL. southwestern Guatemala. Four-letter cod- Not reported in detail are values for the ens used in the text to indicate sources or ratio Antennomere 3: width/length. Values depositories ofstudy material are: are between 0.26 and 0.32, thus well within CASC Department ofEntomology, Cal- the range reported previously (0.26-0.38) ifornia Academy ofSciences; for Cyrtolaus {s. str.), excluding C. lobipen- UASM DepartmentofEntomology, Uni- nis. These relatively low values indicate the versity ofAlberta; and relatively elongate antennae that are char- USNM Department of Entomology, acteristicofthemostderivedlineageofCyr- United States National Museum tolaus. — ofNatural History. Chorology. Localitiesreportedareinthe followingmountainranges: SierraMadrede Methods OaxacaandSierraZempoal, intheMexican Recognition.—Specieswereidentifiedus- state ofOaxaca (see outline map ofthe re- ing the key and illustrations in Whitehead gion in Ball and Roughley [1982: 364, Fig. bayndexBaalmlin(1a9t7i5o)n,oafntdhiedmenatlietygewnaitsalcioan,fwihrimcehd n63o]r)t;hwaensdterMneCshaiapCaesnt,raaln,d SiinerrcaenMtraadlreandde Chiapas, in southeastern Chiapas and were prepared using standard techniques. southwestern Guatemala (see outline map Specimens the combination of features of which did not fit the couplets and regarded ofregion in Whiteheadand Ball [1975: 606, initially as taxonomically distinct entities Figs. 22, 23]). were examined in detail. If such examina- Key to Species of Cyrtolaus Bates, tion showed them to be distinctive in few Based on Characteristics of Adults and varied features, the specimens were in- This key is modified from the one pre- cluded as members ofthe described species sented by Whitehead and Ball (1975: 598), towhich eachwas mostsimilar. Ifthe more andincludesallknownspeciesoiCyrtolaus. , 232 PROCEEDINGSOFTHE ENTOMOLOGICALSOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 01. Pronolum with anterior marginal bead bate,lateralmarginsbroadlyrounded,not complete; postero-lateral setae near pos- sinuate; anterior angles produced. Geo- terior angles. Elytron with plica clearly graphical range—central Guatemala . . developed, epipleuron interrupted C. spinicauda Bales ("crossed"); interneurs impunctate. Ab- 07'. Elytron with interneurs hardly punctate dominalsternumVIIwith2setaeinmale, todistinctlyso. Pronotum with hmdan- 4 in female Subgenus Ithytolus Bates gles various; lateral margins less round- C. orizahae Bates ed, orsinuateposteriorly(Figs. 2, 4);an- or. Pronotum without anterior marginal teriorangles not produced 08 bead; postero-lateral setae distinctly an- 08(07'). Geographical range—Sierra Madre de teradposteriorangles(Figs. 2-4). Elytron Chiapas, southeastern Chiapas and with epipleuron interrupted or not; in- southwestern Guatemala. Elytron with terneursmoreorlesspunctate(Figs. 5A- apical declivity gradual (Fig. 7B), apical 7A).AbdominalsternumVIIwith4setae spine longeror shorter(Fig. 7\) in male, 6 to 8 setae in female C. ricardo Whd. & Ball, p. 238. Subgenus Cyrtolaus 02 08'. Geographical range—Mesa Jentral of 02(01'). Elytron with epipleuron interrupted by Chiapas, or mountains ofOaxaca. Ely- plica. Labrum with 4 marginal setae tron with apical declivity various; apical . . C. lohipennis Bates spine short (Fig. 5A) 09 02'. Elylral epipleuron not interrupted. La- 09(08'). Pronotum with posterior angles rectan- brum with 6 marginal setae 03 gular. Elytron with interneurs distinctly 03(02'). Elytron with microsculpture of trans- punctateondisc;slopeofelytraldeclivity verse lines, surface faintly iridescent; in- moreabrupt.Geographicalrange—Mesa terneursgrossly punctate; intervals cari- Central, Chiapas nate; apex spined or not, spines shorter C. hrevispina Whd. & Ball or longer(Figs. 6A, B) 09'. Pronotum with posterior angles acute. C. subiridescensWhd. & Ball, p. 237. Elytron with interneurs very obscurely 03'. Elytron with microsculpture mesh pat punctate on disc; apical declivity sloped tern isodiametric; apex spined 04 gradually (Fig. 5B) 10 04(03'). Headwith2(singlepair)or3supraorbital 10(09'). tLaurmgerrel(atSiBvLelymoshroerttehra(nM1L1/.0PLmm0).6;6-p0r.o7n4o)-. setigerous punctures 05 Male with apex ofmedian lobe pointed 04'. Head with 4 (2 pairs) supraorbital setig- erous punctures 07 (Fig. IA). Geographical range—Sierra Zempoal (vicinity of Volcan Zempoal- 05(04). Elytron with interval 2apically moreor tepetl, Oaxaca) lBe)s.sGfleato,gnroatphdiicstailnctrlayngsewo—llHeunau(tFiigas.P5lAa,- C. oaxacanus, new species, p. 232. teau, Oaxaca 10'. Smaller(SBLlessthan 10.0mm);prono- C. whitehcadi, new species, p. 236. tGeuomgrraeplhaitciavlelyralnogneg—erSi(erMrLa/MPaLdr0e.60d).e 05'. Elytron with interval 2 swollen apically. Geographical range—Mesa Central and Oaxaca(near Valle Nacional, Oaxaca) . Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Chiapas, and C. newioni Whd. & Ball Guatemala 06 06(05'). Elytron with interval 3 markedly raised apically. Disc ofpronotum with micro- New Taxa, New Locality Records, and sculpture normal, surface without seri- Variation in Diagnostic Features ceousluster. Geographical range—Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Chiapas and Guate- Cyrtolaus oaxacanus, New Species mala C.furculifer Bates, p. 238. (Figs. lA-C) 06'. Elytron with interval 3 not raised api- cally. Disc ofpronolum with microlines Type material.—HOLOTYPE male and dense,surfacewithsericeousluster.Geo- ALLOTYPE female, each labelled: MEX. graphical range—western part of Mesa OAXACA 10.4 km./ s. Tolontepec cloud/ Central, Chiapas 07(04'). ElytronwithC.ingtreurmnuefuresrgWrhosds.ly&puBnacltla,tep.. 238. f1o9r7es9t:7t9r-e3e8f;erMnsE/XiIn CliAtteNr 2E4X8P0.m.1/97J9u/neJ.1S7., Pronotum with hind anglesrounded, lo- Ashe, G. E. Ball/ and D. Shpeley/ Collec- VOLUME 93, NUMBER 2 233 Fig. 1. MalegenitaliaofCyrtolausoaxacanus. newspecies: A, median lobe, apical portion, dorsalaspect; B andC,median lobe, with internal saceverted—B, leftlateral aspect; C, rightlateralaspect. Scalebar= 1.0 mm. Legend(forfeaturesofinternal sac): 1, 2,and 3, spinosesclerites 1, 2. and 3, respectively;C-scl, C-sclerite; V.I., ventral lobe. tors. The holotype is in USNM, and allo- The 2 pairs of supraorbital setae distin- type in UASM. guish adults ofC. oaxacanus from C. white- Type locality.—Mexico, Oaxaca, Sierra headi, the third species o^Cyrtolaus known Zempoal, 10.4 km S. Totontepec. from Oaxaca, the adults ofwhich have only Derivation ofspecific epithet.—The Lat- a single pair ofsuch setae. inized adjectival form of "Oaxaca," the The virtually impunctate elytral inter- name ofthe Mexican state that includes the neurs, angulate elytral apices and isodia- type locality ofthis species. metricmesh patternoftheelytradistinguish Recognition.—The type specimens re- adults of C. oaxacanus from those in the semble closely the holotype of C newtoni mountains of Chiapas and Guatemala. Whitehead and Ball. However, they are Males are distinguished by details of the larger (Table 1), and the pronotum is rela- genitalia (Figs. 1A-C): apex ofmedian lobe tively shorter, as reflected by higher values acute (Fig. lA); internal sac with sclerite 1 forthe ratio ML/PL(Table 2). These 2 taxa hardly evident (Fig. IB), and spinose scler- occur in different but adjacent mountain ites 2 and 3 small, and widely separated ranges(C oaxacanusin theSierraZempoal, from one another (Figs. IB, C). at 2400 m; C. newtoni in the Sierra Madre Description.—Adultswithcharacterstates de Oaxaca, at 1700 m). ofsubgenus Cyrtolaus, and following. Data 234 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFWASHINGTON Figs. 2-7. PronotaandleftelytraofspeciesofCyrtolaus. 2-4, Pronotum, dorsalaspectof: 2, C. whiteheadi, new species; 3, C. subtridescens Whitehead and Ball; 4, C. ricardo Whitehead and Ball. 5-7, Left elytron. A, dorsal aspect, B. outline ofleft lateral aspect, respectively, of: 5, C. whiteheadi, newspecies; 6, C subiridescens Whiteheadand Ball; and 7, C. ricardoWhitehead and Ball. VOLUME 93, NUMBER 2 235 Table 1. Data about variation in Standardized Body Length (SBL—mm) among samples ofthe species of Cyrtolaus{s. str.). 236 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFWASHINGTON Table 3. Data about variation in values for the ratio PL/EL among sample ofthe species ofCyrtolaus {s. str.). VOLUME 93, NUMBER 2 237 1975; MEX. EXP. 1975/ G.E. Ball &./ H.E. Chorological affinities.—The locality for USNM Frania/ collectors. Holotype in and this species is the northernmostforthe sub- paratype in UASM. genus Cyrtolaus. It is 80 km west of the Type locality.—Mexico, Oaxaca, Sierra locality ofthe next nearest species (C. new- Madre de Oaxaca, 1 1.7 km E. Huautla de toni) and is on the western rim ofthe Rio Jiminez. Grande basin, which is probably one ofthe Derivationofspecificepithet.—Latinized major barriers for montane taxa in eastern genitive form of the surname of the late Mexico. — Donald R. Whitehead, in whose honor and Phylogenetic relationships. Evidently, C C memory this species is named. this species is related to newtoni and Recognition.—Adultsofthisspecieshave oaxacanus, based on the derived form of a single pair ofsupraorbital setae, a feature the posterior angles of the pronotum, and distinguishing them from all other species on geographical proximity but disjunct dis- ofCyrtolaus, except C.furculifer Bates and tribution ofthe three species. C grumuferWhitehead and Ball. Adults of Cyrtolaus subiridescens Whitehead and Ball the latter 2 species have the apical portions ofone or more elytral intervalselevated {cf. (Figs. 3, 6A, B) — Whitehead and Ball 1975: 600, Figs. 12, Material examined. Sixteen specimens, C 13A, B), whereas in whitehead!, the api- as follows. All localities are in Mexico, in cal portion ofinterval 2 is not more convex the state ofChiapas, on the Mesa Central. thanisthebasalportionofthisinterval(Figs. Municipio Mitontik, 1 1 km N. Tzonte- 5A, B). huitz, on road to Pueblo Viejo, 1981 m, Description.—With features ofsubgenus X.22.1976 (7 males, 3 females-CASC). Cyrtolausand following. See Tables 1-3 for MunicipioTenejapa, TenejapaCenter, 2042 data about variation in Standardized Body m, III.15.1975 (male-CASC). Municipio Length and in values forratios ML/PL and Las Margaritas, 48 km NE Las Margaritas PL/EL. on road to Campo Alegre, 2134 m, Head, antennae and mouthparts average X.25.1976 (2 males, 2 females-CASC). for subgenus Cyrtolaus. MunicipioLasRosas,VillaLasRosas, 1371 Pronotum. Form as in Fig. 2, anterior m, X.30.1976 (female-CASC). angles obtuse, narrow, protruded slightly; Taxonomic notes.—In body size (SBL) posteriorangles subspinose, protruded pos- and in proportions (ML/PL and PL/EL) all teriorly;lateralareaselevated,morebroadly of the specimens are within the ranges re- so posteriorly; lateral margins slightly sin- ported previously (Tables 1-3; cf. White- uate posteriorly. head and Ball 1975: Tables 1-3). The ma- Elytra. Inform, as in Figs. 5A, B, vaulted. terialfrom MitontikandTenejapaistypical Humerus narrowly rounded; lateral margin inallrespects,asdeterminedbycomparison sinuate preapically, apex with short spine with paratypes ofC. subiridescens. about opposite termination of interval 2. The specimens collected at Las Margar- Intervals slightly convex; intemeurs finely itas and Villa Las Rosas, however, are dis- and sparsely punctate on disc, punctures tinctive in having fairly long apical elytral larger on apical declivity. spines (Figs. 6A, B). In pronotal form (Fig. Legs. Average for subgenus Cyrtolaus. 3) and in details ofthe male genitalia, these Habitat.—The type material was found specimens are typical of C. subiridescens. indamp leafHtteronagentle slope in cloud The difference in elytral spination, in the forest. genus as a whole, is important phylogenet- Geographical distribution.—Known from ically, and one might be tempted on this the type locality only. basis to propose taxonomic recognition, at - 238 PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ENTOMOLOGICALSOCIETY OFWASHINGTON the subspecies level. The localities, how- 1975: 610). The range of morphological ever, are within the known geographical variation is extended slightly, but not tax- C range of subiridescens (Whitehead and onomically significantly so. Ball 1975: Fig. 23). Under this circum- stance, I doubt that the difference in elytral Cyrtolausfurculifer Bates spinationisindicativeofanythingmorethan Material examined.—Five specimens, as minor intraspecific geographical variation. follows. All were collected on the north- Cyrtolaus ricardo Whitehead and Ball eastern slopes of the Volcan Tacana, in (Figs. 4, 7A, B) southeasternChiapas, Mexico. UnionJuar- — ez, Barranca Providencia, montane tropical Material examined. Eleven specimens, forest, in leaf litter, 1500 m, XII.15.1975 as follows. The localities are in the Sierra (male and female, UASM). Union Juarez, (cMMsaiaenddvdTrelaneecdamAenamalCe,ehrsiNi,acEpafa.sesl,moMapoEeln,Xe—It1h8CUe3O0AP,aSmcM,iC)fhiX.icIaIvp.Gea2Urs0s.A.aTn1Vt9oE7lo-6-f FmUMiu,AnxScbXMaaI)lIM.,.u2x6bU.1an14li96,o73e5nxm(pJ2,iulaefrXeeoImzf,Iam.lo2eausg1rl-.id1cUy9uA7lwt6SouMroa(d)lf,.eml1aa4Rln3ied0o,, MALA. San Marcos Sivinal, cloud forest, 1720 m, Xn.14-26.1975 (set of elytra 2621 m, XII.31.1976 (male, 2 females- UASM). UASM). Taxonomicnotes.—Thespecimensnoted Taxonomic notes.—Tables 1-3 provide above, mostofthemcollectedin ornearthe data about variation in Standardized Body Barranca Providencia, from where White- Length and in values for the ratios ML/PL head and Ball (1975: 611) reported this andPL/EL. The specimenscollected on Ta- species,aretypicalmembersofC. furculifer, cana are indistinguishable from the type se- asshownbyStandardized Body Lengthand ries, which wascollected in the samegeneral proportions (Tables 1-3). The individual caroesa.SiTvihneals,poecnitmheensslcooplelsecotfedVoatlcSaannTMaajru-- collected at 1720 m extends the known ver- tical range ofthis species upwardbyca. 200 mulco, adjacent to and within a few hours m, but still beneath the known altitudinal walkfromTacana,aresimilartotheTacana range ofC. ricardo (see comments for that material in pronotal form (Fig. 4), and in species, above). details of the male genitalia (2 males dis- sected). In proportions, the 2 groups differ Cyrtolaus grumufer Whitehead and Ball slightlyinvaluesfortheratioML/PL(Table 2). Also, the apical spines of the elytra of Material examined.—One female, from theSan Marcosspecimensare shorter(Figs. Chiapas, Mexico, in the Mesa Central: Cer- NW 7A, B). ro Baul, slope, west of Rizo de Oro, Elevation.—The new material collected 1768 m, X.2.1979(CASC). on Volcan Tacana extends the known alti- Taxonomic notes.—This specimen is tudinal rangeofC. ricardodownwardbyca. within the morphological range ofthe type C 900 m. However, this species and fur- material (Whitehead and Ball 1975: 612) as culifer, the only other species of Cyrtolaus shown by Standardized Body Length and inhabitingtheslopesofthisvolcano,remain body proportions (Tables 1-3). It is also allopatric, though it seems likely that their within the reported vertical range (1524- rangesare (orwere) in contact, at least mar- 1829 m), and from northwestern Chiapas. ginally. However, Cerro Baul is about 160 km from Conclusion.—The new material is within theonlyareareportedpreviouslyforC. gru- the general geographical range that we mufer. This is a marked but not surprising ascribed to C. ricardo (Whitehead and Ball range extension for this species. VOLUME NUMBER 93, 2 239 Notes about Phylogenetic Aspects Breedlove. It is a distinct pleasure, also, to A reconstructed phylogeny ofthe species acknowledge the continuing efforts of Dr. ofCyrtolaus was offered by Whitehead and Breedlove, adistinguished systematistinthe Ball (1975: 615, Fig. 25). The newdata sug- Academy's Department of Botany, to en- gest that the Oaxacan species (C oaxacan- rich the entomological holdings of his in- us, C. newtoni, and C. whiteheadi) form a stitution. clade apart from a Chiapan-Guatemalan Finding specimens ofCyrtolaus is both a complex (C brevispina, C. ricardo, C. spini- challenge and a delight. I am grateful to H. cauda, C. furculifer, and C grumufer). E. FraniaandD. Shpeley,whoaccompanied The longer apical elytral spines reported me on the trips when the new Oaxacan C species of Cyrtolaus were taken, and who for 2 samples of subiridescens render C collectedthe specimensof whiteheadiand equivocal the position ofthistaxon. Ifthese spineswere developed independently ofthe C. oaxacanus, respectively. I thank also Chiapan-Guatemalancomplexnotedabove, Henry Frania, J. Belicek, and D. R. Procter for their efforts to obtain material of Cyr- C. subiridescens could continue to occupy a tolaus during Christmas time sojourns on relatively basal position, as postulated pre- viously by Whitehead and Ball (1975). If, the chilly slopes ofVolcan Tacana. The careful illustrations for this contri- however, the longer spines are indicative of butionwerepreparedbyDianeHollingdale. relationship (and their absence from most C D. Shpeley, Assistant Curator ofthe Strick- specimens of subiridescens a loss), then land Museum, provided the curatorial as- this species could be placed with the Chia- aplatne-rGnautaitveemoanlacnhcooromlpolgeixc.alI fgarvoourndtsh.e lTathtiesr sisFtuanncdeinognfwohrifciheldIadnedpemndu.seum work and forpublicationcostswasprovidedbyGrant resolution postulatesa monophyletic Oaxa- A- 1399, Natural Sciences and Engineering can assemblage and a monophyletic Chia- Research Council ofCanada. pan-Guatemalan assemblage, separated from one another by the Isthmus of Te- Literature Cited huantepec. In part, such a hypothesis depends upon Ball,G.E.andR.E.Roughley. 1982. TheHypherpes- the relationships ofthe Oaxacan species of like taxa ofsouthern Mexico: Classification, and Cyrtolaus. Until males are known for C. evolutionary considerations (Coleoptera: Carabi- newtoni and C. whiteheadi, their relation- dae: Ptewstichus). Transactions ofthe American Entomological Society 108: 315-399. ships to one another and to C. oaxacanus Bates, H. W. 1882. Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, will remain equivocal. Consequently, it Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 40-152, plates iii-v. In God- seemsprematuretopursuethistopicfurther man,F. D.,andO. Salvin,eds., BiologiaCentrali- at this time. Americana. 1879-1911.Coleoptera, 7 volumesin 17 parts. London. Acknowledgments Liebherr, J. K. 1986. Barylaus, new genus (Coleop- tera: Carabidae) endemic to the West Indies with I take pleasure in thanking D. H. Kava- Old World affinities. Journal of the New York naugh, Department of Entomology, Cali- Entomological Society 94: 83-97. fornia Academy of Sciences, for making Whitehead,D.R.andG.E.Ball. 1975. Classification of the Middle American genus Cyrtolaus Bates availableforstudymaterialo^Cyrtolausthat (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini). Quaes- was collected in Chiapas by Dennis E. tiones Entomologicae 11: 591-619.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.