ebook img

Systematic Implications of Pollen Morphology in Subfamilies Lamioideae and Pogostemonoideae (Labiatae) PDF

34 Pages·1994·12.1 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Systematic Implications of Pollen Morphology in Subfamilies Lamioideae and Pogostemonoideae (Labiatae)

SYSTEMATIC IMPLICATIONS Mones Abu-Asab 2 and Philip D. Cantino S. MORPHOLOGY POLLEN OF IN LAMIOIDEAE SUBFAMILIES POGOSTEMONOIDEAE AND (LABIATAE) 1 Abstract Pollen morphology was surveyed in 57 of the 60 genera of Lamioideae and Pogostemonoideae sensu Cantino et al. and two genera of uncertain subfamilial affinities: Anisomeles and Eurysolen. Pollen in all Pogostemonoideae, most Lamioideae, Anisomeles, and Eurysolen tricolpate with suprareticulate sculpturing. Variants found in a few is genera of Lamioideae include tetracolpate and hexapantocolpate pollen and psilate, granulate, and rugulate sculpturing. Most species in which pollen was examined in section have simple columellae, but seemingly branched columellae were observed in Gomphostemma Chelonopsis, and one species of Stenogyne. With regard to the genera of uncertain y affinities, the findings presented here support a relationship between Anisomeles and Pogostemon; the position of Lamiophlo- Eurysolen remains unclear. Within subfamily Lamioideae, pollen morphology supports the segregation of mis, Lagopsis, and Phlomidoschema from Phlomis, Marrubium, and Stachys, respectively. Hexapantocolpate pollen is hypothesized to be a synapomorphy of Sideritis section Empedoclea. Similarities in pollen sculpturing were noted between Brazoria, Macbridea, and Physostegia, and between Galeopsis and Synandra. A (Cantino 1992), pollen survey of subfamily Lamioideae sensu alternative classification et al., Erdtman (1945) was undertaken with the hope that which is followed here. Unless otherwise indicated, might further our understanding of systematic references herein to subfamily Lamioideae imply it all relationships. A brief overview of the study as a the circumscription of Cantino et al. (1992). & 55 whole has been published (Abu-Asab Cantino, Subfamily Lamioideae comprises genera, the Subfam- them Eurasian (Table 1992), with elaboration elsewhere on two small vast majority of 1 ). subgroups Pogostemonoideae an Asian group of five that appear not to be closely related to ily is & Based on morphological and molecular ev- the remainder of the study group (Abu-Asab genera. Cantino, 1993a, b). It is our intent here to doc- idence, the two subfamilies are closely related (Can- & ument 1992a; Downie Palmer, 1992), and Eu- in detail the pollen morphology of the bulk tino, — of Erdtman's Lamioideae those genera with rysolen resembles genera in both. (See Table 1 for i.e., names and Appendix authors a gynobasic authors of genus for style. A Anisomeles has been variably we names.) taxonomic needed because of species clarification is have circumscribed subfamily Lamioideae differ- assigned to both subfamilies (see Discussion). members ently here than some our works Most pollen studies that included of in of earlier (e.g., & Pogostemonoideae have centered Cantino Sanders, 1986; Abu-Asab, 1990; Can- Lamioideae and & Huynh, 1972; Bassett genera tino, 1990, 1992a; Abu-Asab Cantino, 1992). on particular (e.g., & Although Munro, 1986) or geographical regions (e.g.. the pollen survey was initiated as a study & Verma, 1968; of the Lamioideae sensu Erdtman 945), and our Waterman, 1960; Varghese 1 ( 1956) and Pozhidaev(1989) earlier papers adopted Erdtman's circumscription, Huang, 1972). Risch( recent evidence (Abu- conducted broader surveys of the Labiatae, but that taxon polyphyletic this is Asab & microscopy, and his descrip- Cantino, 1992; Cantino, 1992b) led to an Risch used only light ' This paper is based in large part on the doctoral dissertation of the first author, submitted to Ohio University in WO. Smithsonian Institution; The Penological Laboratory at the final portions of the study were completed in the We permission *e are most grateful for Joan Nowicke's advice and encouragement. thank the following institutions for was study to remove BHO, BM, CH, K, MO, US. Financial support for this pollen from herbarium specimens: A, Fund BSR-9006209 and Ohio Univer^.y Baker Provided by BSR-8306878 and National Science Foundation grants Award 88-10 1 Department P.O. Box 14, Birzeit, West Bank, via Israel. Reprint of Biology and Biochemistry, Birzeit University, requests should be sent to the second author. ..-. 1 Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701-297 ^ U.>.A. 653-686. 1994 Card. 81: Ann. Missouri Bot. — 654 Annals of the Garden Missouri Botanical Table Genera of Lamioideae and Pogostemonoide- Table Continued. 1 1. . Numbers number ae. in parentheses: of species in the — genus/number of species studied (Appendix). Numbers of Paraphlomis Prain (8/3) Eastern Asia, Malesia — species were taken from a variety of sources, geographic Phlomidoschema (Benth.) Vved. (1/1) Iran to distributions mostly from Mabberley (1987) and Airy Shaw western Himalayas — (1973). Phlomis 100/7) Mediterranean L. (ca. region to China Subfamily Lamioideae (28/5)— Phyllostegia Benth. Hawaii, Tahiti — — mum Achyrospei Blume (10/6) Paleotropics Physostegia Benth. (12/2) North America — — & Acrotome Benth. ex Endl. (8/4) Tropical south- Prasium L. (1/1) Mediterranean region — ern Africa Pseuderemostachys Popov (1/1) Central Asia — Ajugoidcs Makino (1/1) Japan Pseudomarrubium Popov (1/0)— Central Asia — Alajja Ikonn. (1/1) Himalayas Roylea Wallich ex Benth. (1/1)— Himalayas — 130/19)— Ballota L. (35/7) Europe, Africa, western Asia Sideritis L. (ca. Mediterranean region to — Bostrychanthera Benth. (1/0) China southwestern Asia, Macaronesia & Brazoria Engelm. & Gray (4/4)— Oklahoma Stachyopsis Popov Vved. (3/1)— Central Asia to A. Texas, — Chaiturus Temperate western China Willd. (1/1) Eurasia & & 300/2)— Chamaesphacos Schrenk ex Fischer C Meyer (1/ Stachys L. (ca. Northern southern tem- — & & mountains 1) Central southwestern Asia perate subtropical; tropical — — Chelonopsis Miq. (13/2) Himalayas, China, Japan Stenogyne Benth. (20/3) Hawaii — & Colquhounia Wallich (5/2) Himalayas Sulaimania Hedge Rech. (1/1)— Pakistan f. Craniotome Rchb. (1/1)— Himalayas Suzukia Kudo (2/1)— Taiwan, Ryukyus Eremostachys Bunge ex Ledeb. sensu (60/4) Synandra Nutt. (1/1)— Eastern United States lato & Europe to central Asia Thuspeinanta T. Durand (2/1)— Central south- — Eriophyton Benth. (1/1) Himalayas western Asia — & (2/l)-South- Meyer Galeopsis L. (10/6) Temperate Eurasia JVeidemannia Fischer C. Gomphostemma Wallich ex Benth. (30/7)— South- western Asia eastern Asia, Malesia Subfamily Pogostemonoideae Haplostachys (A. Gray) Hillebrand (5/2)— Hawaii — Colebrookea Smith (1/1) India Hypogomphia & Bunge (1/1)— Central southwest- Comanthosphace Moore (7/3)— Eastern Asia S. ern Asia — Leucosceptrum Smith (1/1)— Himalayas, China Isoleucas Schwartz (1/0) Arabia (71/10)— Malesia Pogostemon Desf. China, India, Lagochilus Bunge ex Benth. (35/3)— & Central Rostrinucula Kudo (2/1)— Eastern Asia southwestern Asia Lagopsis Bunge (4/2)— Western Genera Siberia to Japan of uncertain affinities Lamiophlomis Kudo (1/1)— Himalayas (6/4)— Anisomeles R. Br. Paleotropics Lamium (16/7)— Temperate Indoma- L. Eurasia, northern Eurysolen Prain (1/1)— Southeastern Asia, Africa lesia Leonotis (Pers.) R. Br. (15/3)— Tropical & southern Africa, pantropical 1 Leonurus (24/2)— L. Temperate Eurasia morphology size, tions emphasized gross pollen (i.e., Leucas R. Br. (100/17)— Pantropical, southern Afri- used survey shape, Pozhidaev's (1989) color). ca, China (SEM), but tne scanning electron microscopy Loxocalyx Hemsley (3/2)— China, Japan exine on variation in Macbridea suiting publication focused ex (2/2)— Elliott Nutt. Southeastern mor- pollen United States structure in the family as a whole; the Marrubium systematically L. (30/5)— Europe, northern Africa, phology of individual genera was not & central southwestern Asia were provided for described, and micrographs Mrlittis L. (1/1)— Europe We are aware than a third of the genera studied. Metastachvdium Wu & Airy Shaw ex C. Y. SEM only - Li (1/ micrographs for — of published pollen 1) Central Asia Pogostemo- of the 60 genera of Lamioideae and Microtocna Prain (25/4)— Himalayas, China Annan 1978; noideae 1976; Roca Salinas, (Nabli, Moluccclla (2/2)— L. Southern Europe, southwest- & & Galan. Ubera 1982; Moore, 1982; Cantino, ern Asia & Sand- & Cantino 1983; Munro, 1986; hotochaetc Benth. (1/1)— Himalayas Bassett & Abu-Asab Otostegm Benth. (20/5)— ers, 1986; Pozhidaev, 1989, 1992; Northeastern tropical Afri- Trude & 1992; ca to central Asia Cantino, 1992; Demissew Harley, Panzerina Sojak (2/1)— Western & Few have been studies Siberia Mongo- Morton, 1992). species to sur lia in variation so the degree of intrageneric Parakunium Dunn (1/1)— ge Southwestern China unknown most of these sculpturing for is Number Volume 81 4 Abu-Asab & Cantino 655 , 1994 Pollen Morphology Lamioideae and in Pogostemonoideae exceptions are Eremostachys, Paraphlomis, lead citrate, and examined and photographed with Phlomis, Physostegia, and Stachys. Transmission a Hitachi HS-8 transmission electron microscope. (TEM) electron microscope photographs have been published for only three genera (Nabli, 1976; Abu- Results & Asab Cantino, 992). 1 The The objectives of this paper are to document results are summarized in Table 2, and the pollen morphology of subfamilies Lamioideae representative pollen grains are illustrated in Fig- ures 1-247. The between and Pogostemonoideae, distinction foveolate, including interspecific vari- ation within most of the larger genera, and to microreticulate, punctate, reticulate, and scrobic- evaluate the systematic ulate sculpturing follows Vezey et al. (1992), a significance of the resulting data. Because the resulting compilation of SEM more precise system of terminology than used in our previous papers (Abu-Asab, 1990; Abu-Asab photographs includes nearly every genus these in & Cantino, 1989, 1992, 1993a, Abu-Asab subfamilies, should serve as a useful reference b; et it we for those studying the systematics or palynology al., 1993). Pollen that previously referred to as tectate-perforate described here as scrobic- of the Labiatae. is ulate or punctate. Materials and Methods LAMIOIDEAE The study collection (Table comprised 183 1) species representing genera of Pogoste- Pollen of subfamily Lamioideae suboblate to all five is & monoideae, 52 55 Walker of the genera of Lamioideae, euprolate (shape classification follows and two genera of uncertain subfamilial affinities Doyle, 1975, based on P/E ratios in Table 2), ^m 15-59 (Anisomeles and Eurysolen). In most of the larger with the polar axis and the equatorial genera, an effort was made to sample a broad axis 13-52 /im. The grains are inoperculate and spectrum of species by reference to the infrageneric usually tricolpate; tetracolpate and hexapantocol- classifications of Briquet (1895-1897) and avail- pate grains were found in a few genera (Table 2). able monographs and Eremostachys, The exine most species scrobiculate (some- revisions. in is rhlomis, Physostegia, and Stachys were only su- times bordering on microreticulate or punctate). perficially sampled because they have already re- The exine is microreticulate in seven species, re- & ceived considerable study (Azizian Moore, 1982; ticulate in one, and partially foveolate in one (Table & & Cantino, 1982; Ubera Galan, 1983; Bassett The sculpturing suprareticulate in most spe- 2). is Munro, 1986; Demissew & Harley, 1992). The cies (referred to as bi-reticulate by some authors; & monotypic genera Bostrychanthera, Pseudomar- Demissew Harley, 1992; Harley et al., 1992), rubium, and holeucas were not examined for lack but four other forms of sculpturing were found: of material, but micrographs former two granulate, rugulate, and suprareticulate- of the psilate, were provided by Pozhidaev 989); thus only the rugulate. The columellae are usually simple but 1 ( pollen of holeucas remains unknown. sparsely branched in a few species. totally Pollen obtained from mature buds (vouchers The pollen features in a few genera warrant list- ed in Appendix) was prepared SEM, TEM, and a more detailed description than is available in for "ght microscopy (LM) using the prolonged aceto- Table 2: & Gomphostemma 62-76; Pozhidaev, •ysis procedure Abu-Asab (Figs. of Cantino (1989), modified from Erdtman 960). For LM, including 1989): sculpturing exceptionally variable: psilate 1 ( size measurements, the pollen was mounted in gly- or with suprareticulate, rugulate, or granulate cerine jelly and sealed with paraffin. In most cases, sculpturing; columellae branched. seven to ten grains were measured per species. The Lagopsis (Fig. 77): exine rugulate, psilate to- ratio of polar to equatorial axis length (P/E) was ward the poles, apparently nonperforate. oetermined mean 182-196; Huynh, 1972; Nabli, for each measured grain, and the Sideritis (Figs. P/E ratio was calculated from these individual 1976; Roca Salinas, 1978; Pozhidaev, 1992): tet- values. For SEM, pollen was coated with gold- racolpate (the amb circular to more or less square), palladium and examined and photographed with a 6-pantocolpate (the amb circular), or rarely tri- Hitachi HHS-2R amb exine psilate (ap- scanning electron microscope. For colpate (the triangular); 'EM, pollen was treated with osmium tetroxide, proaching a suprareticulate condition in section 'ained with uranyl acetate, and embedded in resin. Empedoclea (Raf.) Benth.; Figs. 192, 193), usu- «nin sections were collected on carbon-stabilized ally scrobiculate (in S. montana, the polar regions ormvar, mesocolpia foveolate, the stained with aqueous uranyl acetate and and centers of the three 0) Table 2. Summary of pollen morp hological data for subfamilies Lamioideae and Pogostemonoideae and genera of uncertain affinities. Colpi: 3, tricolpate; 4, tetracolpate; 6, CJ1 hexapantocolpate. Columellae: simple vs. branched. Sculpturing: Upper layer: Gr, granulate; Ps, psilate; Ru, rugulate; Sr, suprareticulate-rugulate; Su suprareticulate. Lower layer ., , \ (or only layer if psilate): Fo, foveolate; Mi, microreticulate; Np, nonperforate; Pu, punctate; Re, reticulate; Sc, scrobiculate; slash indicates borderline designations. P/E Sculpturing Polar axis itim) Equatori al axis (jrni) ratio Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Colpi Columellae Upper Lower Figures Species Subfamily Lamioideae Achyrospermum aethiopicum 21.3 (20-22) 18.5 (18-20) 1.16 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc 1,2 Achyrospermum carvalhl 26.9 (22-31) 23.9 (20-29) 1.13 (0.8-1.3) 3 Su Sc/Mi 3 Achyrospermum cryptanthum 24.0 (22-31) 19.1 (18-22) 1.25 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc 4 Achyrospermum densijiorum 24.5 (22-26) 18.4 (15-22) 1.34 (1.0-1.7) 3 Su Sc 5 Achyrospermum parvijiorum 23.3 (22-24) 18.9 (18-20) 1.24 (1.1-1.3) 3 Su Sc 6,7 Achyrospermum schimperi 28.0 (22-33) 20.9 (20-22) 1.34 (1.1-1.5) 3 Su Sc 8,9 Acrotome 20.2 (20-22) 18.0 (17-20) 1.13 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc 10, 11 angustifolia ? ? Acrotome 20.7 (20-22) 22.0 (20-24) 0.94 (0.8-1.1) 3 fleckii • • Acrotome hispida 20.0 (-) 21.6 (20-22) 0.92 (0.9-1.0) 3 ? * • Acrotome 22.9 (22-24) 22.9 (22-24) 1.00 (0.9-1.1) 3 ? inflata • Ajugoides humilis 31.9 (31-35) 23.5 (22-26) 1.36 (1.2-1.6) 3 Su Sc/Mi 12, 13 Alajja rhomboidea 30.1 (29-33) 28.4 (26-31) 1.06 (0.9-1.3) 3 Su Sc 14, 15 Ballota africana 22.7 (22-24) 20.7 (20-22) 1.10 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc 16 Ballota andreuzziana 23.5 (22-24) 20.9 (20-22) 1.13 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc/Mi 3 C/> Ballota hirsuta 22.0 (-) 18.0 (17-20) 1.22 (1.1-1.3) 3 Su Sc 17, 18 o & Ballota integrifolia 21.6 (20-24) 21.3 (20-24) 1.01 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Mi 19 o 3. Ballota nigra 23.8 (22-26) 20.9 (18-24) 1.14 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc 20 CD ~Z O ZJ Su Sc/Mi 21,22 Ballota pseudodictamnus 29.3 (26-31) 20.5 (18-22) 1.43 (1.3-1.6) 3 Ballota rupestris 21.2 (20-22) 23.4 (22-24) 0.90 (-) 3 Su Sc o Brazoria arenaria 35.2 (33-40) 32.3 (31-33) 1.09 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc 23 O Brazoria pulcherrima 37.0 (35-42) 31.7 (29-33) 1.17 (1.1-1.5) 3 Su Sc 24 Brazoria scutellarioides 32.5 (29-35) 33.0 (29-35) 0.99 (0.8-1.2) 3 Su 9 25 m Brazoria truncata 39.2 (37-42) 32.6 (29-35) 1.21 (1.1-1.5) 3 Su Sc 26,27 arden Chaiturus marrubiastrum 21.2 (20-23) 20.5 (18-22) 1.04 (0.9-1.2) 3 Su Sc 28,29 Chamaesphacos 30.4 (24-33) 24.0 (20-26) 1.27 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc 30 ilicifolius Chelonopsis lichiangensis 28.4 (24-31) 27.3 (24-31) 1.04 (0.9-1.2) 3 Branched? Su Sc/Mi 31,32 Chelonopsis odontochila 28.0 (26-29) 26.4 (24-29) 1.06 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc/Mi 33,34 Colquhounia coccinea 27.7 (26-31) 26.6 (26-29) 1.04 (0.9-1.2) 3 Su Sc Colquhounia 23.3 (22-26) 21.6 (20-24) 1.09 (0.9-1.3) 3 Su Sc 35, 36 seguinii 37-39 Craniotonir furrnta 16.6 (15-18) 14.9 (13-15) 1.12 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc Kremostuchys 33.4 (31-37) 29.5 (24-33) 1.14 (0.9-1.6) 3 Su Sc fetissovii Krrmontachys UierwU 31.7 (.31-33) 27.1 (24-29) 1.17 (1.1-1.3) 3 Su Sc 40, 41 11 Table 2. Continued. o CO ~- CD P/E Polar axis (/mi) Equatorial axis (/mi) ratio Sculpturing ^cl 09 Species Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Colpi Columellae Upper Lower Figures Z Eremostachys rotata 34.5 (29-37) 32.3 (29-35) 1.07 (0.8-1.2) 3 Su Sc 42 c 3 Eremostachys speciosa 35.9 (33-37) 29.5 (26-33) 1.23 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc 43 Eriophyton wallichianum 28.6 (26-31) 23.5 (22-26) 1.22 (1.0-1.4) 3 Su Sc 44,45 % Galeopsis bifida 38.7 (33-46) 32.1 (26-37) 1.22 (0.9-1.4) 3 Su Sc 46,47 *» Galeopsis ladanum 34.9 (31-40) 26.7 (24-31) 1.31 (1.2-1.5) 3 Su Sc Galeopsis pubescens 32.1 (26-35) 26.0 (22-31) 1.24 (1.0-1.4) 3 Su Sc 48 Galeopsis segetum 35.2 (31-40) 26.8 (24-31) 1.32 (1.0-1.6) 3 Su ? 1 Galeopsis speciosa 37.8 (35-40) 27.3 (26-29) 1.39 (1.2-1.5) 3 Su Sc 49 Galeopsis tetrahit 38.5 (35-42) 29.0 (26-31) 1.33 (1.1-1.5) 3 Su Sc 50 Gomphoslemma chinense 33.7 (31-35) 33.4 (33-35) 1.01 (0.9-1.1) 3 Gr Sc/Mi 62,63 Gomphostemma intermedium 32.1 (31-35) 32.6 (31-33) 0.99 (0.9-1.0) 3 Branched Ps Mi 64-66 Gomphoslemma javanicum 29.7 (26-31) 30.8 (29-33) 0.97 (0.9-1.0) 3 Ru Sc 69,70 Gomphostemma leptodon 33.2 (29-40) 35.4 (29-42) 0.94 (0.9-1.2) 3 Ps Sc 67,68 Gomphostemma lucidum 32.3 (29-37) 32.6 (31-33) 0.99 (0.8-1.1) 3 Branched Ps Sc 71,72 Gomphostemma parviflorum 26.6 (24-29) 25.7 (24-29) 1.04 (0.9-1.1) 3 Gr Sc 73, 74 Gomphostemma wallichii 29.9 (29-31) 31.7 (31-33) 0.95 (0.9-1.0) 3 Su Sc 75, 76 > ~0 TJ fiE? Haplostachys haplostachya 51.0 (44-57) 48.4 (46-51) 1.06 (0.9-1.2) 3,4 Su Sc 51,52 Haplostachys linearifolia 49.7 (46-55) 46.2 (44-48) 1.08 (1.0-1.2) 3,4 Su Sc 53,54 8 S > Hypogomphia turkestana 33.4 (29-40) 27.4 (24-29) 1.22 (1.0-1.5) 3 Simple Su Sc 55-57 ^ CD o) 3 o o- Lagochilus aucheri 25.5 (24-26) 24.2 (22-26) 1.06 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su 58,59 • 3 0° T3 Lagochilus diacanthophyllus 28.2 (26-29) 22.7 (20-24) 1.25 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc 60,61 O o 9. Lagochilus hirtus 25.5 (22-29) 21.1 (20-24) 1.22 (0.9-1.3) 3 Su Sc ^ D CD Ru+Ps Lagopsis marrubiastrum 21.2 (20-23) 19.6 (18-21) 1.08 (0.9-1.2) 3 Np? 77 r Lagopsis supina 21.1 (20-22) 21.8 (20-24) 0.97 (0.9-1.1) 3 ? ? o 5" • Lamiophlomis rotata 24.2 (22-26) 20.0 (18-22) 1.21 (1.1-1.3) 3 Ps Sc 78,79 ^K » Lamium album 25.1 (22-29) 23.8 (22-26) 1.06 (0.8-1.3) 3 Gr Sc 80,81 3 Lamium o fiexuosum 23.5 (22-26) 21.8 (18-24) 1.09 (0.9-1.3) 3 Simple Su Sc 82,83 Lamium 5. galeobdolon 30.8 (29-33) 22.9 (20-26) 1.36 (1.1-1.6) 3 Su Sc 86,87 CD Lamium garganicum 28.6 (26-33) 26.8 (24-29) 1.07 (1.0-1.2) 3 Simple Su Mi 84,85 0) CD Lamium moluccellifolium 34.1 (33-35) 30.1 (26-33) 1.14 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su 9 0> • —J Lamium moschatum 21.2 (20-22) 20.6 (20-22) 1.03 (0.9-1.1) 3 Gr Sc 88,89 Q. Lamium purpureum 3 Su Sc 90,91 Leonotis bequaertii 30.7 (29-33) 29.9 (28-33) 1.02 (0.8-1.2) 3 Su Sc 92,93 Leonotis leonitis 28.6 (26-31) 24.9 (24-26) 1.15 (1.1-1.3) 3 Simple Su Sc 94-96 III Leonotis mollissima 31.9 (29-35) 28.6 (22-33) 1.13 (0.9-1.5) 3 Simple Su Sc 97 ^4 Table Continued. 2. 658 P/E Sculpturing Polar axis (/mi) Equatorial axis (/mi) ratio Species Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Colpi Columellae Upper Lower Figures Su Sc 98,99 Leonurus cardiaca 22.7 (22-24) 21.1 (20-24) 1.08 (1.0-1.1) 3 Leonurus 25.5 (22-29) 21.3 (20-24) 1.20 (1.0-1.4) 3 Su Sc 100 sibiricus Leucas abyssinica 20.5 (18-22) 19.1 (18-20) 1.07 (1.0-1.1) 3 Su Sc 107, 108 Leucas alluaudii 26.0 (22-31) 22.9 (20-26) 1.14 (1.0-1.4) 3 Su Sc 109 Leucas aspera 24.0 (22-26) 19.6 (18-22) 1.23 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc/Mi 110, 111 Leucas 29.3 (26-31) 23.1 (22-26) 1.27 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc biflora Leucas calostachys 25.3 (24-26) 22.4 (20-24) 1.14 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc 112, 113 Leucas 23.3 (22-24) 22.7 (22-24) 1.03 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc ciliata Su Mi 114 Leucas eriostoma 20.9 (20-22) 17.6 (15-20) 1.20 (1.1-1.4) 3 Leucas hirta 20.5 (20-22) 16.7 (15-20) 1.24 (1.0-1.4) 3 Su Sc 115 Leucas 20.0 (-) 18.1 (17-20) 1.10 (1.0-1.1) 3 Su? ? 116 inflata i Leucas javanica 26.4 (22-31) 24.2 (22-26) 1.09 (0.9-1.3) 3 Su Sc/Mi 117 Leucas lanata 27.3 (26-29) 20.5 (18-22) 1.34 (1.2-1.5) 3 Su Sc Leucas lavandulifolia 26.4 (24-29) 22.7 (20-24) 1.17 (1.1-1.3) 3 Su Sc Leucas marrubioides 22.9 (20-24) 17.8 (15-20) 1.29 (1.0-1.4) 3 9 ? 1 Leucas martinicensis 22.6 (22-24) 20.1 (19-22) 1.13 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc Leucas mollissima 29.6 (29-31) 23.0 (22-24) 1.29 (1.2-1.4) 3 ? ? • * 3 at Leucas rosmarinifolia 22.2 (20-24) 18.5 (18-20) 1.21 (1.1-1.4) 3 Simple Su 9 118 8 • i. Leucas stelligera 21.1 (20-24) 18.9 (18-20) 1.12 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc Loxocalyx ambiguus 23.8 (22-26) 21.3 (20-22) 1.12 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc/Mi 101 ~ 03 O Loxocalyx 24.0 (22-26) 20.9 (20-24) 1.16 (0.9-1.3) 3 Su Sc 102, 103 17 urticifolius IT?" ft) Mac bridea alba 47.3 (42-53) 34.5 (31-37) 1.37 (1.2-1.5) 3 Su Sc 104 3 o' Macbridea caroliniana 38.1 (35-42) 40.5 (40-42) 0.94 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc 105, 106 9L Marrubium anisodon 27.5 (24-31) 29.0 (26-31) 0.95 (0.8-1.1) 4 Ps Sc 122, 123 O if Marrubium cuneatum 24.9 (24-26) 26.8 (24-29) 0.93 (0.8-1.1) 3 Ps Sc 0) s. Marrubium heterodon 26.4 (24-29) 27.7 (26-29) 0.95 (0.8-1.1) 3 Ps Sc/Pu 124, 125 CD 3 Marrubium incanum 52.3 (51-55) 46.9 (44-51) 1.12 (1.1-1.2) 3 Ps Sc/Pu Marrubium supinum 24.0 (-) 25.9 (24-26) 0.93 (0.9-1.0) 3 Simple Ps Sc 126-128 Melittis melissophyllum 45.8 (40-51) 35.6 (31-40) 1.29 (1.2-1.5) 3 Su Sc 119, 120 Metastachydium sagittatum 22.2 (22-24) 23.1 (22-24) 0.96 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc 121 Microtoena delavayi 3 Simple Su Sc/Mi 129-131 Microtoena insuavis 3 Su Mi 132 Microtoena robusta 32.8 (29-37) 28.8 (24-33) 1.15 (0.9-1.4) 3 Su Mi 133, 134 Microtoena 24.6 (22-26) 28.2 (24-31) 0.88 (0.8-0.9) 3 Su Mi 135, 136 urticifblia Su Sc/Mi 137 34.8 (33-40) 28.2 (26-31) 1.24 (1.1-1.5) 3 iYfofui-i t'f/u laei i i J 994 olume Table Continued. oo 2. Polar axis (/mi) Equatorial axis (/mi) P/E ratio Sculpt uring '. Species Mean Range Mean Range Mean dumber Range Colpi Colun Upper Lower nellae Figures * Moluccella spinosa 29.5 (29-31) 30.4 (29-31) 0.97 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc 138, 139 Notochaete hamosa 30.1 (26-33) 29.3 (26-31) 1.03 (0.8-1.2) 3 Ps Sc 140, 141 Utostegia fruticosa 21.8 (20-22) 21 (20-22) 1.04 (1.0-1.1) 3 Su Sc 142, 143 Utostegia integrifolia 29.0 (26-33) 23.8 (22-26) 1.23 (1.0-1.4) 3 Su Sc/Mi 144 Utostegia minuccu 24.2 (22-26) 21.1 (20-22) 1.15 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc Utostegia refxinda 20.9 (20-22) 17.2 (15-18) 1.22 (1.1-1.4) 3 Su Sc 145 Utostegia tomentosa 21.1 (18-22) 18.3 (18-20) 1.16 (1.0-1.3) 3 Simple Su Sc 146, 147 ! anzenna lanata / 23.3 (22-26) 19.4 (18-22) 1.21 (1.0-1.5) 3 Su Sc 148-150 aralammm gracile / 16.3 (15-20) 15.0 (13-18) 1.10 (0.9-1.5) 3 Su Sc 151 araphlomis javanica / 30.1 (29-33) 32.8 (29-35) 0.92 (0.8-1.0) 3 Sr Sc 152, 153 arapfuonus / lanceolala 26.8 (26-29) 26.0 (24-29) 1.04 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc/Mi 154, 155 It 1 Iaraphlomifst rugosa 9 / 30.0 (26-37) 31.2 (29-37) 0.96 (0.8-1.1) 3 Su Sc 156 Phlomidoschema parvijlorum 24.2 (22-26) 21.6 (18-26) 1.14 (1.0-1.4) 3 Ps Sc 157, 158 V h 1 onus agraria / til 29.5 (29-31) 25.7 (24-29) 1.15 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su Sc 160 Pollen 159, Pogost Abu-As hlomis / crinita 33.9 (33-35) 25.1 (22-26) 1.36 (1.3-1.5) 3 Su ? ^ • I'hlomis hcrfm-i enti 34.1 (31-37) 28.4 (26-31) 1.20 (1.1-1.4) 3 ? ? CD 0) 3 o • * o- I*hlomis lanata 40.3 (37-44) 29.0 (26-33) 1.39 (1.2-1.6) 3 Su Sc 161, 162 / hlomis maximoviczii 20.9 (20-22) 18.9 (18-20) 1.11 (1.0-1.3) 3 Gr o O Sc 163 2. / hlomis tuberosa 27.3 (24-29) 25.5 (24-26) 1.07 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su logy Sc 164 deae hlomis umbrosa antin / 19.6 (18-22) 16.1 (15-18) 1.22 (1.1-1.3) 3 Gr Sc/Mi 165, 166 — ^ o -^^ ^^- y -^^- -^h^- 5" rhyllt'Strgia grandiflora 42.5 (40-44) 45.8 (44-48) 0.93 (0.8-1.0) 3 Ps Re 167, 168 Ph yllostegia hirsuta 39.8 (37-44) 41.1 (35-46) 0.97 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc 170 169, to 3 I'hvllostrgia hispida 35 (33-37) 36.3 (35-37) 0.96 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc 171, 172 o Ph yllostegia lantanoides 36.3 (35-37) 38.1 (37-40) 0.95 (0.9-1.0) 3 Su Sc 173 Pkyllostegia ra< emosa 33.2 (33-35) 36.1 (33-37) 0.92 (0.8-1.0) 3 Su CD Sc 174 0) Ph\ sostrgia longisepala 55.9 (53-59) 48.4 (46-52) 1.16 (1.1-1.3) 3 Su CD Sc 175,*i1i76 » \^ v^ Ph • 0) vsostcgia pnlt hclla 45.8 (43-48) 42.3 (36-46) 1.09 (1.0-1.3) 3 Su 3 Sc Q. Pro sium majus 35.9 (33-40) 30.6 (26-44) 1.19 (0.9-1.4) 3 Su Sc 177 659 o Table Continued. 2. Polar axis (jim) Equatorial axis 0*m) P/E ratio Sculpturing Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Colpi Columellae Up,>er Lower Figures Species 179 Su Sc 178, Pseuderemostachys sewertzowii 37.0 (31-42) 29.0 (26-31) 1.28 (1.0-1.5) 3 3 Su Sc/Mi 180, 181 Roylea cinerea 22.2 (20-24) 22.0 (20-24) 1.02 (0.8-1.2) 183 31.7 (31-33) 35.0 (33-37) 0.91 (0.8-1.0) 4 Ps Sc 182, canariensis Sideritis 184 4 Ps Sc 44.0 (42-46) 40.3 (35-44) 1.10 (1.0-1.3) candicans Sideritis 192 (-) 6 Ps Sc 191, 30.4 (29-33) 30.4 (29-33) 1.00 Sideritis chlorostegia 185 4 Ps Sc 26.6 (24-29) 22.2 (20-24) 1.20 (1.1-1.3) curvidens Sideritis 193 (-) 6 Ps Sc euboea 31.7 (29-33) 31.7 (29-33) 1.00 Sideritis 4 Ps Sc gomerae 36.3 (35-40) 33.9 (31-37) 1.08 (0.9-1.2) Sideritis 4 Ps Sc 31.9 (31-33) 29.7 (26-33) 1.08 (1.0-1.2) Sideritis hirsuta 194 (-) 6 Ps Sc Sideritis hololeuca 31.5 (29-33) 31.5 (29-33) 1.00 27.5 (24-31) 25.5 (22-29) 1.09 (0.9-1.4) 4 Ps Sc 186 Sideritis hyssopifolia Sc/Pu 187 4 Ps 32.8 (31-35) 24.9 (22-29) 1.33 (1.2-1.5) Sideritis folia ilici incana 26.2 (24-29) 24.6 (24-26) 1.06 (1.0-1.2) 4 Ps Sc Sideritis 188 lagascana 31.2 (29-33) 24.0 (22-26) 1.31 (1.1-1.4) 4 Simple Ps Sc Sideritis lanata 29.7 (29-33) 28 (26-31) 1.07 (0.9-1.6) 4 Ps Sc Sideritis o =. 28.6 (26-31) 28.6 (26-31) 1.00 (-) 6 Ps Sc Sideritis libanotica O marshchalliana 30.5 (29-33) 30.5 (29-33) 1.00 (-) 6 Ps Sc Sideritis CD 0) montana 26.4 (24-29) 25.7 (20-29) 1.03 (0.9-1.3) 3 Ps Sc+Fo 195, 196 3 Sideritis O 6 Ps Sc pullulans 35.2 (31-40) 35.2 (33-37) 1.00 (0.9-1.1) Sideritis 189 romana 26.0 (24-29) 21.3 (20-24) 1.22 (1.1-1.3) 4 Ps Sc Sideritis 30.7 (29-33) 28.4 (26-31) 1.07 (0.9-1.2) 4 Ps Sc 190 Sideritis villosa 2. 197-199 Stachyopsis oblongata 23.3 (22-24) 21.6 (20-24) 1.09 (0.9-1.2) 3 Simple Su Sc CD 3 3 Su Sc 200, 201 Stachys riddellii 202-204 Stachys sylvatica 28.2 (26-31) 24.4 (24-26) 1.15 (1.1-1.3) 3 Simple Su Sc 206 Stenogyne haliakalae 39.6 (35-44) 36.5 (33-42) 1.09 (1.0-1.2) 3 Branched? Su Sc 205, 208 Stenosyne kamehamehae 45.8 (44-48) 41.4 (40-44) 1.11 (1.0-1.2) 3 Su Sc 207, Su Sc 209, 210 Stenogyne purpurea 38.5 (33-44) 31.7 (28-35) 1.22 (1.0-1.4) 3 Simple 21.6 (20-22) 20.0 (19-22) 1.08 (0.9-1.1) 3 Su Sc 211 Sulaimarua otostcgioides » 2 c 3 Tahlk Continued. CD 2. 00 Polar axis (jim) Equatorial axis (/*m) P/E ratio Sculpturing Species Mean Range Mean 3 Range Mean Range Colp Columellae Upper Lower i Figures Suzukm luchuensU 27.1 (24-29) 24.2 (22-26) 1.12 (1.0 -1.3) 3 Su Sc 212,213 Synandra hispidula 40.3 (39-42) 30.8 (29-33) 1.31 (1.2 -1.4) 3 Simple Su Sc 214,215 Thuspananta persica 39.6 (33-42) 29.7 (24-35) 1.35 (1.0 -1.6) 3 Su Sc 216,217 m a iede a 11 itni orientttiis 25.1 (24-29) 18.0 (15-20) 1.40 (1.2 -1.7) 3 Su Sc 218,219 Subfamily Pogostemonoideae CoUbrookta oppositifblia 18.7 (18- 22) 18.9 (15 20) 0.99 (0.9 1.3) 3 Simple Su Sc 240, 241 Comanthosphace japonica 23.5 (22- 26) 19.4 (18- 22) 1.22 (1.0 1-4) 3 Su Sc 242-244 Comanthosphace stcllipila 24.2 (20- 26) 20.0 (18 22) 1.23 (0.9 1.5) 3 Su Sc Comanthosphact subianceoiata 22.0 (20- 24) 18.5 (15 22) 1.20 (1.0 1.4) 3 Su Sc Leucosccptrum canum 27.1 (24- 29) 24.9 (24 26) 1.09 (1.0 1.2) 3 Simple Su Sc 246 245, Pogostcmon brachystach vus 26.0 (24 29) 23.1 (22 24) 1.12 (1.1 1.3) 3 Su Sc 228 227, Pogostcmon vablin 26.0 (- ") 24.2 (22 26) 1.09 (1.0 1.2) 3 Su Sc 229, 230 > Pogostcmon CTUCJatUS 24.9 (24 26) 26.4 (24 29) 0.95 (0.9 1.0) 3 Su Mi 231 O & cr Pogostcmon c giaber 24.9 (20 29) 19.4 (18 22) 1.30 (0.9 1.5) 3 Su Mi 232, 233 o 5 > Pogostcmon hevneanus 27.3 (26 29) 20.2 (18 22) 1.35 (1.2 1.6) 3 Su Sc m c/> Pogostemon vosuroulcs 23.8 (20 24) 17.4 (15 20) 1.37 (1.1 1.6) 3 Su Mi 234, 235 C3D o a- Pogostcmon plcctrantlioulcs 27.1 (24 29) 23.5 (20 26) 1.16 9-3 (1.1 1.2) 3 Su Mi 237 236, Pogostcmon sampsonii 24.0 (- -) 22.0 (- -) 1.10 (- 3 Su O ? ) Pogostcmon n stcHut us 18.7 (15 22) 16.5 (15 18) 1.15 (0.9 1.4) 3 Su ? 9- 0*)» Pifg < Uetnon yatn hen n us 24.2 (22 26) 18.7 (15 22) 1.31 (1.0 1.7) 3 Su Mi 238, 239 "< O Rostrtnm dependms uln 23.1 (22 26) 21.8 (20 22) 1.06 (1.0 1.2) 3 Su Sc 247 Genera of uncertain affinities 3 Anisomeles h<\ neana 27.0 (24-29) o 25.1 (22 29) 1.09 (0.9 1.3) 3 Su Mi 220 a Anisomeles indica 31.2 (29-35) 32.1 (29 35) 0.98 (0.8 1.2) 3 Su Mi 221,222 CD Anisomeles main horn a 35.2 (33-40) 34.1 (31 37) 1.04 (0.9 1.3) 3 Su Mi 223 Q> CD Anisomeles suliu folia 28.2 (26-31) 25.5 (24 26) 1.11 (1.0 1.3) 3 Su Mi 224, 225 Eur\ tolen gracilis 23.8 (22-26) 18.9 (18 20) 1.26 (1.1 1.5) 3 Simple Su Sc 226 CJ) 662 Annals of the Garden Missouri Botanical rest of the grain scrobiculate); columellae simple reticulate sculpturing and simple columellae. All of 1976). the Pogostemonoideae, most Lamioideae, and (Nabli, the two genera of uncertain affinities exhibit these ple- POGOSTEMONOIDEAE siomorphic conditions, but the following derived occur some Lamioideae: states in tetracolpate and Pollen of subfamily Pogostemonoideae (Figs. 6-pantocolpate pollen, branched columellae, and 227-247) oblate spheroidal to euprolate, with is four forms of sculpturing (psilate, granulate, ru- 15-29 and the polar axis Jim the equatorial axis and gulate, suprareticulate-rugulate). 15-29 The and /im. grains are tricolpate inoper- The culate. exine scrobiculate or microreticulate, is NUMBER OF APERTURES with suprareticulate sculpturing (poorly developed in Rostrinucula, approaching a psilate condition). Within the study group, hexapantocolpate pol- In some species of Pogostemon (Figs. 231, 235; len (Figs. 191, 194) was found in Sideritis sect. Pozhidaev, 1989), the lumina contain one or more Empedoclea. Elsewhere in the family, this feature large central perforations surrounded by small ones. has been reported in only three species (tradition- The columellae are unbranched. ally assigned to the Verbenaceae but treated here Car as Labiatae, following Cantino et 1992): al., Discussion yopteris nepalensis Moldenke, Clerodendrum a- & trinum and Huxleya Ewart B. Ridley, linifolia Pollen morphology provides no distinction be- Rees (Abu-Asab 1993). These species are et al., tween subfamilies Lamioideae and Pogostemonoi- Lamioideae only distantly related to subfamily deae, the variation within the former encompassing (Cantino, 1992a). Because 6-pantocolpate pollen that found in the latter. At a lower taxonomic level, can be 1992a), a derived condition (Cantino, it is similar pollen features suggest relationships within synapomorphy of Sideritis treated as a putative and between certain genera. In some cases, these congruence Empedoclea pending a for sect. test similarities are thought to be derived, based on a we examined only Although with other characters. previous more cladistic analysis of a inclusive study many others Huynh (1972) studied five species, group (Cantino, 1992a; see below), and can there- within the and found this feature to be constant fore be cited as putative synapomorphies (de Pinna, genus. section and absent elsewhere in the 1991) until they are tested for congruence with were ob- derived state) Tetracolpate grains (a other characters through a parsimony analysis. Marrubium anisodon, served Haplostachys, in Other features are not clearly ancestral or derived Haplostachys, many and species of Sideritis. In and therefore contribute only to an assessment of where- the colpi are arranged in two pairs (Fig. 53), phenetic relationship. (rigs. spaced Sideritis as the colpi are equally in Based on outgroup comparison to the Scroph- Mar arrangement in 182, 186, 189); the colpal we & ulariales, argued (Abu-Asab Cantino, 1992) In rubium anisodon unclear (Fig. 122). is that the following pollen character states are ple- com- a clade tetracolpate pollen delimits eritis, siomorphic in the Labiatae: three apertures, ab- 1972). (Huynh, prising four of the six sections sence of operculum, simple columellae, psilate ex- tricolpate Haplostachys, We both examined species of ine. further hypothesized that suprareticulate sam the and tetracolpate grains were found in sculpturing a synapomorphy is of a large clade may be a relia not presence flower, thus their comprising the gynobasic -styled Labiatae (includ- feature of the genus. ing all taxa under study here), some of the genera of Labiatae that lack a gynobasic style, and a few COLUMELLAR STRUCTURE genera traditionally assigned to the Verbenaceae. foun^ and This hypothesis was corroborated by plesiomorphic a cladistic Simple columellae are 85 (Abu-Asa analysis of characters (Cantino, 1992a), five of in most gynobasic -styled Labiatae ^ which pertained to pollen. Within the clade marked Cantino, 992). The only apparent excePt,on^ 1 ^^e. by suprareticulate pollen, subfamilies Lamioideae are aware of within the Lamioideae or and o Pogostemonoideae occupy Gomphostemma a relatively derived monoideae are (Figs, , Chelonop^ position. Therefore, although suprareticulate sculp- Bostrychanthera (Pozhidaev, 1989), Stea0&^ turing apomorphic is in the Labiatae as a whole, and perhaps lichiangensis (Fig. 32), it is plesiomorphic within the groups of concern haliakalae Wawra 206). In the lalter ^ (Fig. efS here (Cantino, 1992a). Thus, the plesiomorphic seem branch apically while ° ^ columellae to e pollen type from in subfamilies Lamioideae and unclear Pogoste- appear to be simple. It is * trUC. monoideae branched s r is tricolpate, inoperculate, with supra- available photographs whether the

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.