System of Systems Engineering

19 Pages·2008·5.47 MB·English

UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
NDIA 11th Annual Systems Engineering Conference
ESTABLISHNG A
SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
ORGANIZATION IN THE ARMY
ROSS R. GUCKERT
Assistant Deputy for Acquisition and Systems Integration
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology
[email protected]
21 October 2008
1
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
Challenges for the Army
• No System of Systems (SoS) Systems Engineering capability at the Enterprise level
– Stove-pipe product development
– Many interdependencies
– Path from Current to Future?
– SE critical to LandWarNet Battle Command and operational GWOT rotations
• No “Integrator” for Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs) and support Brigades
• Institutionalizing Reliability Programs
Army systems are becoming more interdependent and required
operational capability is not provided by a single system, but rather a
combination of systems
2
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
ASA(ALT) SoS SE Organization
MISSION
Provide Systems Engineering capability at
System of Systems level across the Army enterprise to
deliver integrated and interoperable weapon systems that
provide optimized and affordable capability
FUNCTIONS
• Develop, evolve, and maintain a detailed, interoperable SoS design baseline - Enterprise Systems Architecture
• Address technical, operational and cost aspects to frame issues for decision making
• Leverage experimentation and M&S tools as part of engineering analysis/operational assessment
• Establish and evolve an SoS vision over time, and translate into capability attributes
• Translate emerging requirements into implied system attributes for technology insertion solutions
• Lead targeted technical assessments to enable cost/capability trades within and across system boundaries
• Maintain visibility into individual system architectures, specifications & performance
• Coordinate technically with SEs in related programs (Army, Joint)
3
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
SoS SE and PEO Relationship
COORDINATION/SUPPORT:
TRADOC
ARSTAFF
OSD/Joint Programs
RDECs
Ground Combat Ammo Portfolio ISR Portfolio Soldier Portfolio
Portfolio
Lead –PEO GCS Lead –PEO Ammo Lead –PEO IEW&S Lead –PEO Soldier
Enterprise
Current BC Portfolio Simulation Portfolio Systems Portfolio
Lead –PEO C3T Lead –PEO STRI Lead –PEO EIS
Aviation Portfolio Future Combat System Missile Portfolio Tactical Mobility
Portfolio
Lead –PEO Aviation Lead –PM FCS Lead –PEO M&S Lead –PEO CS/CSS
Chem Bio Portfolio
Lead –JPEO CBD
ASA (AL&T) SoS Systems Engineering PEO Portfolio SoS Engineering
• Policy • Oversight of POR
• Oversight • Portfolio level architecture (to include cross-portfolio
• Enterprise level system architectures requirements)
• Enterprise level analysis, evaluations, trade • Portfolio level analysis, evaluations, and trade studies
studies –End-to-end performance • SoS responsibilities -Works to resolve cross-domain
• Synchronize enterprise level development issues
• Identify and resolve cross-portfolio issues • PEO - Lead
• RDEC, FFRDC, SETA - Support
4
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
SoS SE Governance
AAE/MILDEP/DASA(A&SM)
Evolve vision, establish policy
Synchronize w/ARSTAFF Leadership
Vision, direction,
Oversight & decisions
Tier 1
policy
SoS SE Org
Maintain Enterprise Systems Arch
SoS Baseline/
Facilitate cross-portfolio issue resolution
Execution plan/ SoS trade studies/engineering analysis
Tier 2
Resolution Synchronize enterprise level development
(LWN, SWB, C2 Conv, UBC)
Implementation/ PEOs
Execution
Tier 3 Technical Execution/Implementation
SoS Eng & Arch
Support trades
5
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
Example: IBCT Snapshots
6
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
Synchronization with
LandWarNet
7
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
LWN/BC Capability Set Management Process
What can be provided when at affordable price?
•SoS Engineering Analysis/Trades
“Capability Set Life-Cycle”
•SoS Synchronization
•Technical Feasibility
DEFINE & DEVELOP •Inform decisions
•“Bang for the Buck”
G3 G3 STEP 4
FOCUS ON CAPABILITY SEGMENTS
STEP 1 ESTABLISH
CABILITY NEEDS ANALYSIS PRIORITIZE CAPA`BILITY STEP 2 INTEGRATE STEP3
Does CVaalpidaabteiAl Cistayspe Sasbsei tlDi tsOy tTGaManLpdPs Fu a pSno dtl ouRt eiOoqnupsiererm Aenntaslysis? CANPAEEBDILSITY PARASMEETTERS ARCHITECTURES Fiscal Analysis
(OPN, TECH, FISCAL)
•Exercise Cap Set through Oper Analysis - R-7 Years SCREEN & ID SOLUTION SET
leverage analytic tool suite
•Adjust to changes (funding, rqmt, force changes, etc.) REFINE APPROVE
STEP5
•Assess changes on SoS perf & synchronization Develop
•Re-assess “Bang for the BSuTcEkP”6 COAs ACCOUNT FOR CHANGE ENVIRONMENT “BASELINE”
INTEGRATED
( AVAILABLE FUNDING, NEW TECHNOLOGY, ONS/JUONS, FORCE SIZING) CAPABILITY
Approve SET
“Baseline”
PRODUCE / SOSE ANALYSIS OF CAP. SET 15-16 FOR
SELECT PRIORITIZE CAPABILITY SETS REFINEMENT
CAPABILITY SET COAS
COA LWN GOSC
R-6 Years
Understood Operational Effects Through Operational Analysis (M&S)
LWN GOSC
R-36 months
SYNCH FIELD
BOIP Lock
ONS/JUONS
“80% Solution” ARFORGEN RESET
SCHEDULE
Near Term Trades APPFiRnaOlVE STEP7 SYNCH Begin SGWo B/ J F M A M RE2JJS0ET11J AA SSURENSETCOLASSNN –1ST( BDNCTo, 4tTiHo IJNnFAaNlT RDYF aD1IVtS Ta(H B)BCMCTT, )25TH INAAFANTRYMM DIV (SBCJJT 23)012J RAESETSS OO NNRESETD
CAPABILITY Reset RESET 1ST BCT, 82ND AIRBORNE DIV (ABN IBCT) RESET
CAPABILITY SET No Go RESET 2ND BCT, 2ND INFANTRY DIV (IBCT)
Synched w ARFORGEN Testing &S CETertification 11TH ARMORED CAVALRY REGIMENT RESETRREESSEETT 3RD1 BSCT TB, D8E2N, 21DNS TAD I ARBRBDMOEOR, 1RNSEETD DI NIDVFI AV(NABTRNY I BDCIVT)
4TH BCT, 3RD INFANTRY DIV (HBCT) RESET 3RD BCT, 1ST CAVALRY DIV (HBCT)
LWN GOSC 3R2DN DB CBTC, T2,5 1T0HT HIN MFAONUTNRTYA IND IVD (IVIB (CIBTC)T) RESREETSET 4TH B2NCDT ,B 8C2NT,D 8 A2NIRDB OAIRRNBEO RDNIVE (DABIVN ( AIBBCNT I)BCT)
R-18 Months Force Validation Conference 2ND 3CR3ADDV AABRLDMREYO, 1RRSETED GA IRCMMAEVONARTL ER(DSY B DCRITVG M2)T RESERRTEESSEETT 23NRDD BB4TCCHTT ,,B 12CSNTTD, CI1NASFVTAA CNLATRVRYAY L DRDIYVIV ( DH(SIBVBC C(THT)B 1C)T)
RESET 2ND BCT, 101ST AIRBORNE DIV (IBCT) RESET 173RD BCT (ABN IBCT)
“Good Idea” Army Sourcing Conferences Issue MTOE RESETRESET 2ND 3BRDDE ,B 1CSTT, A1R0TMHO MROEDU NDTIAVIN DIV (IBCT) RESERTESET 1ST BC2TN, D1S BTC CTA, V2A5LTRHY IN FDAIVN T(HRBYC DT)IV (SBCT 5)
Cut-Off MTOE Lock Army Equipping Conferences RESERTESET RESERTESET 2ND BCT, 34RTDH BINC4FTTAH, N4 4BTTTCHRHT Y BI,N C2DF5TAITV, NH 4(TT HIRNHBYF ICN ATDNF)AITVNR (TYHR BDYC IVTD )(IVA B(HNB ICBTC)T) RESETRESERRTEESSEETT 13SRTD B BCCTT1, S,1 T100 1B1S4SDTTTE HA ,A IB1RIRSCBTBTO O,I NR1RFN0N1AESEN T DTD RIAVIVIY R( I(BBDIBOCIVCRTTN))E DIV (IBCT)
RESETRESET 4TH BCT, 10TH1 MSTO BUCNTT,A 2INN DD IINVF (AIBNCTTR)Y DIV (HBCT) RESET RESET4TH BCT, 1ST INFANTRY DIV (IBCT)
8
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
Army Reliability Initiatives
9
UNCLASSIFIED
ASA (AL&T)
Army Reliability Policy
• Mandates development and demonstration of a mid-SDD reliability test
threshold for all pre-Milestone B programs with a JPD of JROC Interest1:
– Default value is 70% of CDD reliability requirement
– Must be demonstrated with at least 50% statistical confidence by end of the first full-up,
system-level developmental test event of SDD
– Threshold value must be approved as a part of the TEMP, and recorded in the SDD contract
and APB at Milestone B
– Requires review of material developer’s reliability case documentation
• AMSAA and AEC to apply Reliability Scorecard
• ATEC to perform threshold assessment, and lead IPR in event of a breach:
– PEO/PM develops corrective action plan
– AEC performs assessment of PM’s plan and projected reliability
– AMSAA/AEC estimates ownership cost impacts
– TRADOC assesses utility of system given current reliability maturity level
– ATEC CG provides recommendation to ASA(ALT) thru Army T&E Executive, with PEO
coordination in advance
ASA(ALT) policy expands the Army’s current T&E mission
1. Per CJCSI 3170.01F, JROC “Interest” refers to programs that have a potentially significant impact on joint warfighting.