SUMMA TECHNOLOGIAE ELECTRONIC MEDIATIONS Katherine Hayles, Mark Poster, and Samuel Weber, Series Editors 40 SUMMA TECHNOLOGIAE Stanisław Lem 39 DIGITAL MEMORY AND THE ARCHIVE Wolfgang Ernst 38 HOW TO DO THINGS WITH VIDEOGAMES Ian Bogost 37 NOISE CHANNELS: GLITCH AND ERROR IN DIGITAL CULTURE Peter Krapp 36 GAMEPLAY MODE: WAR, SIMULATION, AND TECHNOCULTURE Patrick Crogan 35 DIGITAL ART AND MEANING: READING KINETIC POETRY, TEXT MACHINES, MAPPING ART, AND INTERACTIVE INSTALLATIONS Roberto Simanowski 34 VILÉM FLUSSER: AN INTRODUCTION Anke Finger, Rainer Guldin, and Gustavo Bernardo 33 DOES WRITING HAVE A FUTURE? Vilém Flusser 32 INTO THE UNIVERSE OF TECHNICAL IMAGES Vilém Flusser 31 HYPERTEXT AND THE FEMALE IMAGINARY Jaishree K. Odin 30 SCREENS: VIEWING MEDIA INSTALLATION ART Kate Mondloch 29 GAMES OF EMPIRE: GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND VIDEO GAMES Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter 28 TACTICAL MEDIA Rita Raley 27 RETICULATIONS: JEAN-LUC NANCY AND THE NETWORKS OF THE POLITICAL Philip Armstrong (continued on page 411) SUMMA TECHNOLOGIAE Stanisław Lem translated by Joanna Zylinska Electronic Mediations Volume 40 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London Originally published in Polish in 1964 as Summa technologiae by Wydawnictwo Literackie. Copyright 2000 Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków. Copyright 2010 Barbara Lem and Tomasz Lem. http://www.lem.pl. English translation and Translator’s Introduction copyright 2013 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu A Cataloging-in-Publication record is available from the Library of Congress. isbn 978-0-8166-7576-0 (hc) isbn 978-0-8166-7577-7 (pb) Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper The University of Minnesota is an equal- opportunity educator and employer. 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS TRANSLATOR’S INTRODUCTION Evolution May Be Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts, but It’s Not All That Great: On Lem’s Summa Technologiae ix Joanna Zylinska SUMMA TECHNOLOGIAE 1. DILEMMAS 3 2. TWO EVOLUTIONS 11 Similarities 14 Differences 19 The First Cause 31 Several Naïve Questions 37 3. CIVILIZATIONS IN THE UNIVERSE 41 The Formulation of the Problem 41 The Formulation of the Method 43 The Statistics of Civilizations in the Universe 47 A Catastrophic Theory of the Universe 50 A Metatheory of Miracles 53 Man’s Uniqueness 57 Intelligence: An Accident or a Necessity? 60 Hypotheses 64 Votum Separatum 67 Future Prospects 71 4. INTELECTRONICS 77 Return to Earth 77 A Megabyte Bomb 81 The Big Game 85 Scientific Myths 89 The Intelligence Amplifier 93 The Black Box 96 The Morality of Homeostats 99 The Dangers of Electrocracy 103 Cybernetics and Sociology 107 Belief and Information 111 Experimental Metaphysics 118 The Beliefs of Electric Brains 125 The Ghost in the Machine 129 The Trouble with Information 132 Doubts and Antinomies 137 5. PROLEGOMENA TO OMNIPOTENCE 155 Before Chaos 155 Chaos and Order 159 Scylla and Charybdis: On Restraint 164 The Silence of the Designer 168 Methodological Madness 171 A New Linnaeus: About Systematics 176 Models and Reality 179 Plagiarism and Creation 183 On Imitology 186 6. PHANTOMOLOGY 191 The Fundamentals of Phantomatics 191 The Phantomatic Machine 195 Peripheral and Central Phantomatics 203 The Limits of Phantomatics 206 Cerebromatics 211 Teletaxy and Phantoplication 217 Personality and Information 221 7. THE CREATION OF WORLDS 235 Information Farming 237 Linguistic Engineering 267 The Engineering of Transcendence 282 Cosmogonic Engineering 288 8. A LAMPOON OF EVOLUTION 297 Reconstructing the Species 300 Constructing Life 307 Constructing Death 319 Constructing Consciousness 322 Error-based Constructs 327 Bionics and Biocybernetics 331 In the Eyes of the Designer 335 Reconstructing Man 346 Cyborgization 348 The Autoevolutionary Machine 351 Extrasensory Phenomena 354 CONCLUSION 359 NOTES 363 BIBLIOGRAPHY 401 INDEX 405 TRANSLATOR’S INTRODUCTION EVOLUTION MAY BE GREATER THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS, BUT IT’S NOT ALL THAT GREAT: ON LEM’S SUMMA TECHNOLOGIAE JOANNA ZYLINSKA Is the human a typical phenomenon in the Universe or an exceptional one? Is there a limit to the expansion of a civilization? Would plagiariz- ing Nature count as fraud? Is consciousness a necessary component of human agency? Should we rather trust our thoughts or our perceptions? Do we control the development of technology, or is technology control- ling us? Should we make machines moral? What do human societies and colonies of bacteria have in common? What can we learn from insects? For answers to all these questions and more, Stanisław Lem’s Summa Technologiae is undoubtedly the place to go. Lem (1921–2006) is best known to English-speaking readers as the author of the novel Solaris (1961), the film versions of which were directed by Andrei Tarkovsky (Grand Prix at the 1972 Cannes Film Festival) and Steven Soderbergh (2002). However, science fiction afi- cionados all over the world have been reading Lem’s original and often surprising novels—translated into over forty languages—for years. Be that as it may, the Polish writer’s attitude to science fiction was not unproblematic. Witness his spat with the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America association, which was incensed by Lem’s unabashed critique of the majority of the works within the genre as unimaginative, predictable, and focused on a rather narrow idea of the future. Lem’s own novels take a rather different approach. Drawing on scientific research, they are deeply philosophical speculations about technology, time, evolution, and the nature (and culture) of humankind. What makes Lem’s writings particularly distinct is his ironic writing style, which is full of puns, jokes, and clever asides. Yet, on another level, his gripping stories about space travel, alien life, and human enhancement are also complex philosophical parables about human and nonhuman life in its past, present, and future forms. The philosophical ambition of Lem’s fiction is carried through to what is probably his most accomplished and mature work: a treatise on futurology, technology, and science called Summa Technologiae (1964). With a title that is a pastiche of Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae, Lem erects a secular edifice of knowledge aimed at rivaling that of his scholastic predecessor. His Summa sets out to investigate the premises and assumptions behind the scientific concepts of the day and, in par- ticular, the idea of technology that underpins them. As Lem writes in the book’s opening pages: “I shall focus here on various aspects of our civilization that can be guessed and deduced from the premises known to us today, no matter how improbable their actualization. What lies at the foundation of our hypothetical constructions are technologies, i.e., means of bringing about certain collectively determined goals that have been conditioned by the state of our knowledge and our social aptitude—and also those goals that no one has identified at the outset.” Despite having been written nearly fifty years ago, Summa has lost none of its intellectual vigor or critical significance. Some specific scien- tific debates may have advanced or been corrected since Lem published Summa in 1964, yet it is actually surprising to see how many things he did get right, or even managed to predict—from the limitations of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) program through to artificial in- telligence, bionics, the theory of search engines (Lem’s “ariadnology”), virtual reality (which he terms “phantomatics”), and nanotechnology. However, it is in the multiple layers of its philosophical argument that the ongoing importance of his book lies. Biophysicist Peter Butko, who published an explicatory essay on Summa in 2006, describes the book as “an all-encompassing philosophical discourse on evolution: not only evolution of science and technology . . . but also evolution of life, human- ity, consciousness, culture, and civilization.”1 Lem’s investigation into the parallel processes involved in biological and technical evolution, and his exploration of the consequences of such parallelism, provides an important philosophical and empirical founda- tion for concepts that many media theorists use somewhat loosely today, x TRANSLATOR’S INTRODUCTION