SUFFERING AND RESISTANCE IN THE APOCALYPSE: A CULTURAL STUDIES APPROACH TO APOCALYPTIC CRISIS By Chul Heum Han Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion August, 2014 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Fernando F. Segovia Daniel M. Patte Herbert R. Marbury Paul C. H. Lim © Copyright 2014 by Chul Heum Han All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have come to fruition without the invaluable help of many dedicated people. First of all, I feel greatly indebted to my parents, Ghi Seok Han and Ghil Ho Kwon, whose lives have demonstrated to me what it means to live a good Christian life. In particular, I would like to thank you for all the sacrifices you have made for your children. Thank you for always being there for me. Words cannot express how grateful I am to all of my family members. I am honored and privileged to have written this dissertation under the supervision of Professor Fernando F. Segovia, whose academic achievement is only surpassed by his exemplary life. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. Segovia for his help and guidance throughout my Ph.D. studies. Without your patience and encouragement, this dissertation would not have been possible. In particular, I would like to thank you for your careful reading of the drafts and your detailed and insightful feedback, which have made this a far better work than it otherwise would have been. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Professor Daniel Patte, Professor Herbert Marbury, and Professor Paul Lim for their time and expertise. I have learned much from each of them. I want to thank you all for sharpening my critical thinking and close reading skills. I am particularly grateful for your generous comments and valuable suggestions. Special thanks are due to Dr. Patte, who helped me broaden my horizons of biblical interpretation. Last but not least, I wish to extend my sincere gratitude to all those who have been a source of inspiration and support on my academic journey. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... vii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 Survey of Suffering and Resistance in Revelation Studies ............................................................... 6 Historical Criticism ....................................................................................................................... 7 Literary Criticism ........................................................................................................................ 10 Sociocultural Criticism ............................................................................................................... 12 Multimethodological Readings ................................................................................................... 15 Ideological Criticism ................................................................................................................... 23 New Critical Approach ................................................................................................................... 36 Cultural Studies Criticism ........................................................................................................... 37 Postcolonial Criticism ................................................................................................................. 43 Resistance Hermeneutics ............................................................................................................ 64 II. INTERTEXTUALITY OF REVELATION: SUFFERING AND RESISTANCE IN APOCALYPTIC LITERATURE ....................................................................................................... 69 Intertextuality of Revelation’s Resistance Language ...................................................................... 70 Pacifism in Jewish Apocalyptic Writings ................................................................................... 71 Violent Resistance in Jewish Apocalyptic Writings ................................................................... 74 Violence in the New Testament .................................................................................................. 83 Justice and Anthropodicy in the Apocalypse .............................................................................. 92 The Book of Revelation as Apocalyptic Genre............................................................................... 96 Apocalypse as Genre ................................................................................................................... 96 Leitmotif of the Apocalypse: Resistance .................................................................................. 113 Suffering and Resistance: Real and Perceived .......................................................................... 115 Revelation and Ordinary Readers ............................................................................................. 120 iv III. ARTS OF DOMINATION AND ARTS OF RESISTANCE .......................................................... 126 James Scott, Public Transcripts, and Hidden Transcripts ............................................................. 130 Transcripts: Public and Hidden ................................................................................................. 130 Hegemony and False Consciousness ........................................................................................ 134 Injuries and Insults .................................................................................................................... 139 Revelation and Resistance Tactics ................................................................................................ 143 Ideological Resistance............................................................................................................... 143 Resistance between Passive Endurance and Active Resistance ................................................ 150 Imitators of the Author .............................................................................................................. 173 Humor and Resistance .............................................................................................................. 176 IV. ECONOMIC RESISTANCE IN REVELATION 18 ...................................................................... 183 Previous Interpretations of Revelation 18 ..................................................................................... 184 Symbolic Interpretations ........................................................................................................... 185 Economic Interpretations .......................................................................................................... 193 Suggested Interpretation of Revelation 18 .................................................................................... 202 Another Angel’s Prophetic Judgment (18.1-8) ......................................................................... 203 The Lament of the Kings (18.9-10) .......................................................................................... 209 The Lament of the Merchants (18.11-17a) ............................................................................... 210 The Lament of the Mariners (18.17b-20) .................................................................................. 212 The Prophetic Pronouncement of the Mighty Angel (18.21-24) .............................................. 222 John’s Adaptation of Prophetic Antecedents ............................................................................ 227 Beyond Economics ................................................................................................................... 230 V. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 235 Summary of Findings and Insights ............................................................................................... 235 Apocalypse Then .......................................................................................................................... 241 Suffering, Resistance, and Identity Formation .......................................................................... 241 Third Camp: New Ideology in the New Order.......................................................................... 242 Apocalypse Now ........................................................................................................................... 253 Liberation Theology .................................................................................................................. 253 Global Capitalism ..................................................................................................................... 257 v Suggestions for Further Studies .................................................................................................. 262 Extent of Aggressive Resistance ............................................................................................... 262 Role of Intellectuals .................................................................................................................. 263 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 267 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Diagram of Apocalyptic Worldview .................................................................................... 109 vii SUFFERING AND RESISTANCE IN THE APOCALYPSE: A CULTURAL STUDIES APPROACH TO APOCALYPTIC CRISIS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The theme of suffering permeates the Apocalypse. According to a leading scholar on the Apocalypse, Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, there is general consensus only as to the purpose of the book: “The author seeks to give courage and perseverance to Christians threatened by persecution insofar as he refers to the nearness of the final eschatological salvation.”1 This dissertation problematizes this very assumption by trying to reclaim under-defined meanings of resistance in the Apocalypse. Against the grain of the reductionist reading of the Apocalypse as offering pacifism or passive resistance against oppression or persecution, this study intends to argue that the hermeneutical meaning of resistance requires more activist interpretations of the text on the part of those who are suffering. To my mind, the popular assertion that the Apocalypse encourages the people of God to persevere through suffering rather than actively deal with evil in the world is theological and ideological. It is theological in the sense that the relation of suffering to resistance envisioned in Revelation is reconfigured by reference to other New Testament books. It should be noted that the Apocalypse may represent a minority opinion in the NT regarding the relation between Christian and society, insofar as most of the later NT writings counsel quiet adaptation to Greco-Roman society.2 I seek to undermine theological agendas that lie behind attempts to explain away Revelation’s resistance language. In this regard, I attempt to reconstruct the meaning of resistance on a theological level. It is ideological in the sense that it may 1 Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, The Book of Revelation: Justice and Judgment, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998), 36. 2 Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, Revelation: Vision of a Just World (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991), 133. 1 represent the concerns of a particular social group. Purporting to read the Book of Revelation as non- involved observers, interpreters may end up serving the interests of the dominant power. In particular, we have to underscore the shadow of empire in the production of modern readings of the ancient texts.3 The correlation between power dynamics and biblical interpretation should be brought to the fore. I seek to undercut political agendas that lie behind attempts to explain away Revelation’s resistance language. In this sense, I attempt to reconstruct the meaning of resistance on an ideological level. In order to construct the meaning of resistance from the Book of Revelation over against traditional interpretations, I seek to approach the text from the perspective of those who suffer to such a subhuman extent as to elicit the will to resist. Reclaiming the Apocalypse as resistance literature assumes that the book was written, and should be read, from the point of view of the oppressed. This assumption might be vulnerable to the argument that the Apocalypse’s portrayal of the Roman Empire is not only one-sided but also distorted, to the extent that it speaks for the vengeance and envy of those facing crisis.4 This criticism presupposes that authors can and must transcend their own relationship with the world. On the contrary, the text of Revelation may be ineluctably informed by the author’s religious construction of the world, which draws on his own life experiences. The question to ask is what socioreligious agenda lies behind John’s writing. Again, we may have to highlight the shadow of empire in the production of ancient writings.5 Along these lines, I would like to view the Apocalypse as an example of how marginal Christians reacted to the oppressive realities of the Roman Empire. A warrant for approaching the Apocalypse from below lies in the fact that it was written from below. Previous work on Revelation scarcely speaks on behalf of real readers who are suffering, because, from their point of view, the ways of resistance are not fully reconstructed from the text. I would highlight two cases where the Apocalypse has been marginalized: first, from resistance literature to peace literature 3 Fernando F. Segovia, “Biblical Criticism and Postcolonial Studies: Toward a Postcolonial Optic,” in Decolonizing Biblical Studies: A View from the Margins (Maryknoll: Orbis, 2000), 128. 4 Adela Yarbro Collins, “Persecution and Vengeance in the Book of Revelation,” in Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Apocalypticism, Uppsala, August 12-17, 1979, ed. David Hellholm (Tübingen: Mohr, 1989), 747. 5 Segovia, “Toward a Postcolonial Optic,” 126. 2 by those who overemphasize its supernatural characteristics; second, from resistance literature to violent literature by those who overstress its disturbing imagery. First, the Apocalypse is marginalized from resistance to peace literature by, for example, fundamentalists who fail to see the exigency of suffering in apocalypticism, let alone the sociohistorical matrix of the book. In contrast with genuine apocalypticism, which is never a theological program self- consciously constructed in security and repose but arises within a setting of alienation, P. D. Hanson characterizes pseudo-apocalyptic movements, especially during the medieval period, as movements which do not generate alternative universes of meaning in response to alienation, but which take the symbolic universe of an earlier movement and exploit it programmatically, often for nationalistic, racist, or dogmatic purposes. This phenomenon does not represent genuine apocalypticism, but is blind imitation bereft of the pain and struggle of attempting to relate faith to the experience of a disintegrating social and cosmic universe.6 If the question is posed whether apocalypticism arises from the experience of suffering or mechanically uses earlier apocalypticism in service of selfish interests,7 it is likely that much of modern apocalypticism will lose its apocalyptic force. The popular assumption that apocalyptic language concerns the introduction of the new world, aloof from the realities at the time of writing is undercut by the historical-critical method, which has called attention to the sociohistorical context of the original readers. Some rightly ascribe the main political impact of apocalyptic literature not to any program it may imply for the future but to its rejection and condemnation of the present order as represented by an evil empire, such as the Roman Empire in the Apocalypse.8 The apocalyptic vision draws its enduring vitality from its insight into the temporality of all human existence, rather than the illusory certainty of a new kingdom.9 Thus, the Apocalypse is no less a revelation of human relations than a revelation of the supernatural. In view of the explicit political criticism of apocalyptic works, it is no surprise that in the time of Justin Martyr the reading and dissemination of Jewish apocalyptic literature was considered a crime and that under Japanese colonialism 6 The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, ed. Keith R. Crim. Supplementary Volume (Nashville: Abingdon, 1976), s.v. “Apocalypticism.” 7 Ibid., 34. 8 John J. Collins, “Temporality and Politics in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature,” in Apocalyptic in History and Tradition, ed. Christopher Rowland and John Barton (London: Sheffield Academic, 2002), 40-41. 9 Ibid., 43. 3
Description: