SUBSEQUENCE, PROPHECY AND CHURCH ORDER IN THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH, NEW ZEALAND by W. Luke Worsfold A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies Victoria University of Wellington 2004 ii To my father, James Evans Worsfold iii ABSTRACT SUBSEQUENCE, PROPHECY AND CHURCH ORDER IN THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH, NEW ZEALAND The Apostolic Church of New Zealand forms a distinct group within the pentecostal movement on account of its practice of “divine government.” The revelation of the restoration of apostle and prophet ministry, which originally came to the founders in the UK, served to establish a denomination which espoused prophetic guidance in matters of praxis and doctrine. The purpose of this thesis has been to critique the Apostolic Church’s understanding of not only the doctrine of subsequence (i.e. Spirit-baptism is logically distinct from and subsequent to salvation) but the function of the prophetic and its effect on the organisational structure and operation of the church. A major focus of the early Apostolic churchmen was a defence of subsequence. Widespread mainstream opposition ensured pentecostals endured an isolation which served to reinforce their determination to validate the empowerment that they had experienced. As the need for polemic reduced, the emphasis shifted to promoting the gift of the Spirit as a missionary endowment. Methodist-Holiness teaching formed the basis for the early influences on pentecostal theology and as such promoted a verifiable work of the Spirit given in response to seeking. The challenge and influence from the Latter Rain and Charismatic movements saw the bestowal of the gift without an attendant period of tarrying. While this brought a universality to the experience, it did so at the expense of depth or intensity, with a resulting weakening in the expression of prophecy. iv An assessment of the view of prophecy held by the early Apostolic churchmen shows that too high a level of inspiration was often credited to prophetic utterance. The possibility of human frailty corrupting the purposes of God was not countenanced to any great degree, with the result that flawed or outright erroneous decisions proceeded unchallenged: in this the role of the apostle was under-exercised. The combination of a high view of prophecy and a decreasing quality of utterance over time affected the level of guidance available to the movement. The operation of the apostle necessarily changed: previously concerned with outworking the “Word of the Lord,” the function of the apostle became limited to that of superintendent minister. The inability of the first and second generation Apostolics to recognise their schismatic origins perpetuated the rigid adherence to centralism, believing it to be the divine pattern. Centralised control manifested in two spheres: finance and personnel. Initially, when the movement was small, centralism was an expedient philosophy; however, its usefulness was soon outgrown. A retarding factor for the Apostolic Church has been the lack of autonomy afforded local assemblies and the ineptitude of the centralised government, which frequently mismatched men and their roles. Currently, there exists a trend towards relationship-based apostleship, utilising the concept of networks. A particular subset of this system is the church plant where a natural line of authority exists between it and the parent church. Prophecy operating in this situation confines itself to expansion, and avoids the problem, evident in previous years, of centralised revelation initiating the relocation of personnel. The Apostolic Church will survive the 21st century by allowing greater autonomy, with the apostolic function and the prophetic voice finding expression primarily through the local assembly. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the opportunity to have completed this study in a Religious Studies Department on account of the greater freedom afforded to investigate the issue, as compared to the constraints inherent in pursuing such a topic in a purely theological discipline. This work would not have been possible without the support of many. In particular I would like to thank: The Julian Literature Trust for supplying a scholarship; Dr Mark Hutchinson for direction early in the project; Associate Professor James Veitch for his supervision; the many Apostolic Church pastors and lay people who willingly provided interviews and loaned their written resources; my wife, Renée, who read and corrected the entire work; and my mother, who kept me focussed on the end goal. Lastly, I owe a debt to my late father, who first stimulated my thinking on the topic. vi CONTENTS ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v INTRODUCTION ix Background to the Term ‘Spirit-baptism’ Pentecostal Proof Texts Subsequence Prophecy Apostolic Function Purpose Methodology Author’s Position CHAPTER ONE APOSTOLIC CHURCH ORIGINS 1 W. O. Hutchinson and the Apostolic Faith Church D. P. Williams and the Apostolic Faith Church Factors in the Formation of the Apostolic Church The Secession The Apostolic Church in New Zealand Summary CHAPTER TWO SUBSEQUENCE 38 Opposition to Pentecostalism Pentecostal Apologetic Apostolic Doctrine Premillenialism Tarrying Summary vii CHAPTER THREE CRITIQUE OF SUBSEQUENCE 86 An Issue of Theology “With” / “In’’ Schema Differentiation of the Spirit of Christ from the Holy Spirit A Related Problem Tarrying Latter Rain The Charismatic Movement The Present Position Summary CHAPTER FOUR PROPHECY 139 The Nature of Prophecy The Function of Prophecy Shifts in the Practice of Prophecy The Process of Prophecy Summary CHAPTER FIVE CRITIQUE OF PROPHECY 175 Form of Prophecy Content of Prophecy Functioning of Prophecy Weberian Analysis Conclusion CHAPTER SIX CHURCH ORDER 213 Finance Centralism’s Other Arm Restructuring the Movement Maori Issues Summary CHAPTER SEVEN SYNTHESIS AND PATHWAY FOR 260 THE FUTURE Origins to the Present viii Specific Findings The Way Ahead APPENDIX “BAPTISM IN THE SPIRIT” SURVEY 280 SOURCES CONSULTED 281 INTRODUCTION A distinguishing feature of pentecostalism is that its pneumatology predicates a post-conversion filling with the Spirit. In fact, it has been rightly observed that the pentecostal doctrine of the Holy Spirit is essentially the experience of the Spirit.1 One is not generally referred to as a Pentecostal because of a belief in, but rather an experience of, the Spirit. Given that an experience is the fundamental essence of being pentecostal it requires that an understanding of the event be achieved. In attempting a definition, however, one is immediately faced with the theological difficulty of postulating an “additional” work of God in the life of the believer. A first approach to the task may consist of examining the label and biblical material upon which this experience is posited. Background to the Term ‘Spirit-baptism’ The Greek concept of pneu/ma is primarily one of a corporeal reality, which stands in contrast to the strict spiritual connotation of the NT. In both worlds, however, there is a parallel understanding of the action of pneu/ma in that it “as a du,namij fills, generates, catches away, inspires and discloses. It gives the power to say and do extraordinary things.”2 Secular Greek regards pneu/ma as a thing, never the persona of the Spirit present in Christian thinking.3 In the NT the 1 F.D. Bruner, A Theology of the Holy Spirit: The Pentecostal Experience and The New Testament Witness (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1970), 57. 2 H. Kleinknecht, “pneum/ a,” Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) (1968), 6:357. 3 Kleinknecht, “pneu/ma,” TDNT (1968), 6:359. essence of pneu/ma is found in the Hebrew equivalent tW; r (ruach) for which a variety of meanings are evidenced in the OT:4 i. Breath of the Mouth “My breath is offensive to my wife” (Job 19:17). Another literal use is hard breathing in anger by man (Is 25:4). Anthropomorphically, Eliphaz has God breathing angrily (Job 4:9), and the Psalmist has God exercising divine fiat by the breath of his mouth (Ps 33:6). Metaphorically there is the sense of empty words as mere breath (Jer 5:13) and breath as the symbol of life (Gen 6:17). ii. Wind or Breath of Air “And God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters subsided” (Gen 8:1b). In directional terms, wind can be from the east (Ex 10:13), north (Pr 25:23), west (Ex 10:19), the absence of a specific southerly wind being covered by reference to the four winds (Jer 49:36). In a figurative sense wind connotes futility (Job 7:7), a striving or grasping for the wind (Ecc 1:14). iii. Life Principle “And behold, I myself am bringing the flood of waters on the earth, to destroy from under heaven all flesh which is the breath of life” (Gen 6:17). Idols lack the breath of life (Hab 2:19), the entry of which into the bones in Ezekiel's vision brought life (Ez 37:6). If God takes this life principle away (Ps 104:29) or if it otherwise returns to him (Ecc 12:17) then men die. The animating action of tW; r is displayed in personal courage (Ps 76:13), temper (Jud 9:23), impatience (Mic 2:7), bitter disposition (Is 54:6), jealousy (Nu 5:14), and prophetic enablement (Nu 27:18). 4 The semantic divisions used here follow, with some modification, those used in F. Brown, S. R. Driver, C. A. Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1979), 924-926. Cf. Yves Congar, I Believe in the Holy Spirit, trans. David Smith (London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1983), 2:3, who finds that ruach can be divided into “three roughly equal groups” viz. (i) wind or breath of air, (ii) principle of life, (iii) life of God, “the force by which he acts and causes actions.”
Description: