Study plan, Hennigan Orchard Study, 1994 : evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis to control peach twig borer

130 Pages·1994·6.8 MB·English

Historic, Archive Document
Do not assume content reflects current
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices.

17
Reserve
aSB608 STUDY PLAN -
-AS15s89
1994
N Hennigan Orchard
Treatment Plot Study, 1994 -
Evaluation of
Bacillus thuringiensis
to Control Peach
Twig Borer
STraemepsl e
Mean canopy 25 ft
15 ft
above
ground
Top View -
10 ft
Pole
wi
United States
DY=Yor-Tataal=/almeyi
Agriculture
NPEWHLO)NTNE
AGRICULTURAL
LIBRARY
Advancing Access to
Global Information for
Agriculture
Pesticides used improperly can be injurious to human beings, animals,
and plants. Follow the directions and heed all precautions on labels. Store
pesticides in original containers under lock and key—out of the reach of
children and animals—and away from food and feed.
Apply pesticides so that they do not endanger humans, livestock, crops,
beneficial insects, fish, and wildlife. Do not apply pesticides where there
is danger of drift when honey bees or other pollinating insects are visiting
plants, or in ways that may contaminate water or leave illegal residues.
Avoid prolonged inhalation of pesticide sprays or dusts; wear protective
clothing and equipment, if specified on the label.
If your hands become contaminated with a pesticide, do not eat or drink
until you have washed. In case a pesticide is swallowed or gets in the eyes,
follow the first aid treatment given on the label, and get prompt medical
attention. If a pesticide is spilled on your skin or clothing, remove clothing
immediately and wash skin thoroughly.
NOTE: Some States have restrictions on the use of
certain pesticides. Check your State and local regulations.
Also, because registrations of pesticides are under constant
review by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency,
consult your local forest pathologist, county agriculture
agent, or State extension specialist to be sure the intended
use is still registered.
FPM 94-4
February 1994
Study Plan
Hennigan Orchard Study
1994 - Evaluation of
Bacillus thuringiensis
to Control Peach Twig
Borer
Prepared by:
Frank Zalom
Bob Hennigan
Joe Connell
Gary Kirfman
Jim Conley
Cliff Kitayana
Harold Thistle
Jack Barry
Cooperating Agencies:
USDA Forest Service
Missoula Technology Development
Center
Washington Office - FPM
University of California Extension
Hennigan Orchards, Inc.
Entotech, Inc.
USDA Forest Service
Forest Pest Management
2121C Second Street
Davis, CA 95616
[phone]
FAX [phone]
ae
LOMTy 7
~—
wei yiaindst
cust vbuwsd ee
he
‘bute baie Sah FRG! oo i ay ;
te 4 wi iz bi. (Oa ae
7 70N01 eae in Fick eee
° | ~- * ; 7 ores : * . -
aw + - in ps
fis ™ . c et 7 FP" is
_ eee
ms: 225. I
gine * =? ee
My 4 :
my ia a :
de haves ie ©
5 * MPa .9~ ye . : .
~4 s ° <@ r :
. \ a e- nf
* eee
a Mie, Cie #
* Wan, a c be
1 ;h as as ae ark i 7 =
(ano oil. im
anevet A ref a,
s|te aeti GMaealt
mes“h8 Je¥uou l rn = = —
- 7
ax 2 OPP eer
§
- ri ty mn ey .) , 9 Se@iae fevers, 5@@ A416
Hn a ‘ ee omy tn bie, © aie
° --/- > thie eel @ Ga oa’of .
i 7 = and Kew
suifiar, what AGA oe vkeege- tomaeen, Gtheinal, erage,
‘ a et i‘ m mls ~ conta vines thowe
MmsengQosvs. » Sowa ost dt eal a Axe pati, cette -
oe : — oA o« nape a poe liye pee =
’ i“ » Ma edo ee mE oFa , ON
. 7 ° ° & al
pat “9 0 abe tiie ?w a ; te aaa ate, “ewwnlw o 6
nao n sine ps I wateF im3) . 6) bie cof a dh aaha = gpnum @ Mae ,
ie,
at Pi a fh cnaee es og ere ‘
y ; oul. soso = ne cage »a s a :
atirAe«:5 . hears rn «ham - &
Pocael ew = a
: Abe ~ Ie rm tom *B yte ta 4
‘Siete gi a AIR ft eea. eo d eeies j
Ԥ Jas tae t a ee
pe bagis® D cit. oe
i
ire reer ry v3a
LAL
sth ‘y
gD
Table of Contents
Page
INTRODUCTION
Background 3
Scope 4
Objectives and tasks 4
METHODS
Study design 5
Biological sampling and assessment 6
Spray deposit sampling and assessment i
Aerial application 7
Meteorology 8
ANALYSES
Task 1 - Efficacy 9
Task 2 - Spray deposition 9
Task 3 - Operational prescription 9
Task 4 - FSCBG models predictions to observed deposition 9
RESPONSIBILITIES 10
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1G
. ot hielo}
” ast ‘ }
7 : jon 7
a .
- et
A 7 ° i | _ ye > {teaf 7 7 }= - Fi Pe
+ ‘a thens -a' eviioetdo; © sae ro
* ecgnran 4
Ratesd vhusz bs
jnameratan brie gatiqais (aatgelola &
Terese tae galiguar dlesqeh «sxq? >7
aetyeoriggs febtes
Vee loroera) ~~
c- _—
egavAus
¥onos282 - { danT
ndlsteoqab ysrg? - S$ dent ‘a
goliqiioceng lavotganeg® - & aeaT
nai ideqeh bovresds 4° enertsiberg alsbel OBN8T
Page
FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1 - Plot diagram (map) 12
Figure 2 - Arrangement of sample trees 14
Figure 2a- Spray deposit sampling equipment l7a
Table i Study matrix uD
Table 2 Card/can marking method iV
Table Application parameters Phase A 18
Table Application parameters Phase B oo
Table Application parameters Phase C 20
Table Application parameters Phase D oe
Table Tank mix and Bt requirements /i
APPENDICES
A. BT LABELS
B. FRANK ZALOM MEMORANDUM
C. CP NOZZLE FLOWRATE TABLE
D. DYES - SPECIFICATIONS AND MSDS
E. METHODS FOR ASSESSING DROP STAINS
F. GENERAL SITE MAP
eReBi : '
67
(qam) wewgald +
at aso7? olqmae to a a
Josgivps galiquae Jteoqebh yarge at :
ei xlafeat ebur8 -
Cl barisem ani idiegd awa\hra) -
el A #2001 etadgemniey oviiesiiggh - € si¢ a
er «2 aegtl sreietstsq nobdaodfiqgé -
Os anil stetomwisy aobktaoliqgh-- 2 sider
2 .
ik G eten! sye)eeaqzag mortiastlqga - 3 sider : =
a$ F2cemer.pat PI bos zla dse®y- ~ \ olde -
tiGEAI TH
MQMAHOMNM MOTAS AMAR oa
Lat ST Asie: BINeGh ds Ae
202M GMA OHOTPADIUIog@e - anya -& ‘eo
amlare TMD AuteeserA #O% 2doHT RK ~ 8
qaM orre sAgaKaa