Studies in the History of Old English Literature PDF
Preview Studies in the History of Old English Literature
STU D IES IN THE HISTORY OF OLD EN GLISH LIT ER A T U R E STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF OLD ENGLISH LITERATURE BY K EN N ETH SISAM OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E.C.4 GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE WELLINGTON BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI LAHORE DACCA CAPE TOWN SALISBURY NAIROBI IBADAN ACCRA KUALA LUMPUR HONG KONG FIRST PUBLISHED 1953 REPRINTED LITHOGRAPHICALLY IN GREAT BRITAIN AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, OXFORD FROM CORRECTED SHEETS OF THE FIRST EDITION 1962 PREFACE A P A R T from their general subject, these papers have a certain unity in that most of them are concerned with problems of A. textual transmission. In the Anglo-Saxon period this field has not had much attention. It does not promise quick, regular, or wholly satisfactory results. Yet, until it is better explored, writers on Old English literary history or textual criticism or language must often do without significant facts that are discoverable. I foresee two just criticisms. One is that insufficient account has been taken of recent work on Old English. In a technical subject which has been intensively studied in many countries, the know ledge of what has been done is an essential part of the equipment of a professional scholar. But for more than thirty unquiet years of administrative work, I have not been able to watch the flow of articles and monographs, or to keep in touch with specialists at home and abroad. So I have not attempted to revise the pieces that have been published already, beyond correcting a slip here and there and adding in brackets an occasional reference or clarification. The other fault—the rambling nature of many of these studies and their notes—is partly due to the same cause. They are not syste matic studies, but the result of following some idea or observation wherever it might lead, with the books and materials that were at hand. For such weaknesses I hope to have the grace that is allowed to amateurs. I would even claim that the amateur, work ing outside the main trend, has still a certain usefulness. He is less likely to be over-influenced by current fashions, especially those simplifying assumptions and generalizations which, in an historical subject, are convenient for teaching but unfavourable to research. My acknowledgements of help that cannot be specified include some very old debts: to my master Arthur Napier, whose know ledge of Early English was exquisite; to Henry Bradley; to Sir William Craigie, happily still with us. For guidance in subjects outside my competence I owe a great deal to Edmund Bishop, André Wilmart, and, latterly, to Professor Paul Maas. Mrs. J. E. VI PREFACE Heseltine, Miss Celia Sisam, and Mr. Neil Ker have reported on books and manuscripts that are beyond my reach. Miss Dorothy Whitelock and Professor Norman Davis have helped generously in the proof stages. Finally my thanks are due to the Delegates of the Clarendon Press and my former colleagues of their staff who have made this book practicable. K.S. St. Mary's, Scilly Isles
The list of books you might like
