START-UP OF A LABORATORY-SCALE ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TREATING GLUCOSE Ioannis Sbizris A tbesis su bmitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applieà Science Graduate Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto @ Copyright by Ioannis Shizas, 2000 1+1 National Library Bibliithéque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wdlingtm O(Mwa0N KlAûN4 OttawaûN K 1 A W cana& canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des exnaits substantiels may be p ~ t e odr otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Start-Up of a Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Sequcacing Batch Reactor Treating Glucose Ioannis Shizris Master of Applid Science, 2000 Graduate Department of C ME ngineering University of Toronto A laboratory-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ANSBR) treating glucose at 2 1O C w as started-up and loaded to an organic loading rate (OLR)o f 3 kg-m-3-d-'. Higher loadings were not achieved due to acid accumulation and pH inhibition. Operational parameters such as influent concentration, total cycle tirne, and fill-to-cycle tirne (WC) ratios were identified that could be modined to improve the reactor's pefiormance without the need for extemal pH control. In addition, a straightfoward experimental methad was described that could determine substrate-specific kinetic parameters and active biomass hctions necessary for use in mathematical models of the ANSBR process. Low levels of aceticlastic methanogens (0.48 %) and total active biomass ( 17 .4 %) were measured in the microcosm studies likely due to solids washout and temperature "shock". Mode1 predictions of the five sets of ANSBR oprational conditions shidied in the labonitory generally agreed with experimental results for 6000 mg& glucose influent, but dBered for 3000 mg/L. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1t hank my supervisor, Prof. David M. Bagley, for his comments and suggestions which were key to developing and complethg this thesis and research work. Without bis guidance this work would not have been possible. Also, 1t hank my second reader, Prof. Robert C. Andrews for his comments and suggestions regarding this thesis. 1 thank my feiiow students, Jerry, Mike, Yale, and Chi, for their help and fiiendship which made working towards my Master's degree less troublesome thaa 1 initially thought. 1 must also thank Russell D'Souza and the other snidents in the lab for helping me with analytical and laboratory procedures. Finally, 1 wish to thank my family and friends who supported me throughout this research work. 1 would not have been able to make it without you. This work was financiaily assisted by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Ontario Ministry of Energy, Science, and Technology: Singapore - Ontario Joint Research Programme, and the Centre for Research in Earth and Space Technology. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Anaerobic Bidegradation of Glucose 2.2 The Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor (ANSBR) 2.3 AUcalinity and pH Issues 2.4 Modelling the Anaerobic Treatment Process 2.5 Substrate-Specifïc Kinetic Parameters and Active Biomass 2.6 Biomass Granulation 3. M A T E W S AND METHODS 3.1 Lab-Scale ANSBR Set-Up 3.2 Lab-Scale Reactor Operation 3.3 Lab-Scale Basal Medium 3.4 Measurement of Volatile Fatty Acids V A S ) 3.5 Measurement of Hydrogen 3.6 Measurement of Glucose 3.7 Bottle Study Methods 3.8 Measurement of Aikalinity, pH, Soluble COD,a nd Suspended Solids 4. INITIAL OPERATION 4.1 Summary of Lab-Scale Operation 4.2 Phase 1 - Initial Set-Up 4.3 Phase 2 - First Addition of Granulated Sludge to the Reactor 4.4 Phase 3 - Final Configuration TABLE OF CONTENTS, coat. Section Page 5. MODIFMNG OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS 5.1 Experimental Plan 5.2 Soluble COD vs. Tirne 5.3 pH vs. Time 5.4 Glucose and VFAs vs. Time 5.5 Summary 6. SUBSTRATE-SPECIFIC KINETIC PARAMETERS AM)B IOMASS 6.1 Motivation for Mcasuring Suôstrate-Specific Parameters 6.2 Method for Measuring Substrate-Specinc Parameters 6.3 Experimental Protoc01 6.4 Resuits Obtained 6.5 Summary 7. COMPUTER MODEL SIMULATIONS 7.1 Simulation Methodology 7.2 Simulation Results for pH 7.3 Simulation Results for VFAs 7.4 Siunmaly 8. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 10 . REFERENCES LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Typical Acidogenic Pathways 2.2 Typical Acetogenic Pathways 2.3 Summary of ANSBR Experimental Work 3.1 Lab-Scale Measurements Taken and Average Frequency 3 -2 Initial Basal Medium Composition 3 -3 Modified Basal Medium Composition 4.1 Summary of Phases of Lab-Scale ANSBR Operation 4.2 Soiids Profile for the ANSBR on Day 28 4.3 pH and Effluent SCOD and VFAs for Days 206 and 207 5.1 Experimental Parameters 5.2 SCOD Removal Efficiencies 6.1 Su bstrate-Specific Khetic Parameters and Active Biomass 6.2 Cornparison of k Values for Anaerobic Bidegradation 7.1 Substrate-Specific Parameters Used in the Simulations LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 3.1 Lab-Scale Reactor Set-Up 3.2 IC Eluent Profiles 4.1 Effluent SCOD Concentrations Measured for Days O Through 227 4.2 Initial SCOD Removal 4.3 Initial VFA Results 4.4 Effluent SCOD From Days 71 to 100 4.5 Effluent SCOD After First Addition of Granulated Sludge 4.6 Effluent SCOD and VFAs From Days 178 to 181 4.7 Glucose Concentration vs. Time for 5 hr and 10 hr Fil1 Times on Day 185 4.8 Effluent SCOD and Propionate From Days 185 to 188 4.9 influent Feed Titration Curve 4.10 Reactor Efnuent Titration Curve 5.1 SCOD and Sun of Individual Components vs. Time for Run 1 5.2 SCOD vs. Tirne for Runs 2 Through 5 5.3 Distribution of Products vs. Thef or Run 1 5.4 pH vs. Time for Al1 Runs 5.5 Relationship Between pH and Total Acids for Run 1 5.6 Glucose Concentration vs. Time for AU Runs 5.7 Lactate Concentration vs. Time for All Runs 5.8 Propionate Concentration vs. Time for Al1 Runs 5 -9 Acetate Concentration vs. Time for Al1 Runs 6.1 Glucose Degradation Curves 6.2 Hydrogen Degradation Curves 6.3 Lactate Degradation Curves 6.4 Acetate Degradation Curves 6.5 Propionate Degradation Curves 6.6 Butyrate Degradation Curves vii LIST OF FIGURES, cont. Figure Page 7.1 pH vs. Time for AU 5 Runs Using Parameters From Brodkorb (1998) 60 7.2 pH vs. Time for Ail 5 Runs Using Parameters From This Work 61 7.3 pH Cornparisons for Run 1 61 7.4 pH Cornparisons for Run 2 62 7.5 pH Cornparisons for Run 3 63 7.6 Lactate vs. Time for AI1 5 Runs Using Parameters From Brodkorb (1998) 64 7.7 Propionate vs. Time for Al1 5 Runs Using Parameters From Brodkorb (1998) 64 7.8 Acetate vs. T h e f or Al1 5 Runs Using Parameters From This Work 65 7.9 ExpeNnental and Simulation Results for Run 1 Using Parameters fiom Brodkorb (1 998) 65 7.10 Experimental and Simulation Results for Run 1 Using Parameters fkom This Work 66 7.1 1 Experimental and Simulation Resdts for Run 3 Using Parameters fiom Brodkorb (1 998) 66 7.1 2 Experimental and Simulation Results for Run 3 Using Parameters fiom This Work 67 LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SymboV Ab breviation Definition ADP adenosine diphosphate Alk carbonate alkaiinity ANSBR anaerobic sequencing batch reactor ATP adenosine triphosphate COD chemical oxygen demand ECP extracelluiar polymer F/C fill-to-cycle time ratio FIM food-to-microorganism ratio AG Gibb's k ee nergy change GC gas chmatograph HRT hydraulic retention the WWQ International Association on Water Quality IC ion chromatograph ka maximum specific substrate utilization rate (based on X.) kt maximum specific substrate utilization rate (based on X,) Ks half-saturation constant K w dissociation constant for water (10-l4a t 25°C2 3. KI;K 1; KH. carbonate system equilibrium constants (1 0 , 10-10.3. , 1O -'.', respectively) NAD nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide NADH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced form) NFDM non-fat dry milk OLR organic loading rate PA partial pressure of gas A S substrate concentration SCOD soluble chemical oxygen demand TCD thermal conductivity detector TMS trace metal solution TSS total suspended solids UASB upflow anaerobic sludge blanket VFA volatile fatty acid VSS volatile suspended solids Xa active biomass concentration xt total biomass concentration Y microbial growth yield
Description: