Standard Model Higgs Combination from CMS with up to 1.7 fb 1 of data − MichałBluja,bfortheCMSCollaboration CNRS-IN2P3/LLR-E´colePolytechnique,Palaiseau,France Abstract. The combination is presented of searches for a standard model (SM) Higgs boson in eight de- 2 cay modes: H γγ, H ττ, H bb, H WW 2ℓ2ν, H ZZ 4ℓ, H ZZ 2ℓ2τ, H ZZ 2ℓ2ν, and ∗ ∗ 1 H ZZ 2ℓ2q→.Thesea→rchesw→ereperfo→rmedby→theCMSC→ollabo→rationus→ing1.1→–1.7fb 1o→finte→gratedlumi- − 0 → → nosity,dependingontheanalysis.NoexcesscompatiblewithaSMHiggssignalhasbeenobserved;thelargest 2 excursionoftheobserveddatafromtheexpectedbackgroundhasaprobabilityof0.4aftertakingintoaccount n thelook-elsewhereeffect.TheSMHiggsbosonisexcludedat95%C.L.inthreemassranges145–216,226–288, a and310–400GeV/c2,whiletheexpectedexclusionrangeis130–440GeV/c2. J 7 2 1 Introduction Table 1. Summary information on the analyses included in the combination. ] Understandingof the mechanism of electroweak symme- x e trybreakingisoneofthemaingoalsoftheCMSphysics channel massrange lumi. no.of typeof - program.Inthestandardmodel(SM)theelectroweaksym- [GeV/c2] [fb−1] sub-chan. analysis p H γγ 110–150 1.7 8 massshape(unbinned) e metrybreakingisdescribedbyso-calledHiggsmechanism H→ττ 110–140 1.1 6 massshape(binned) [h wbthohissiocpnhar(lteHica)lde[s1ht,ao2v,pe3r,g4ei,dv5ie,c6nt]ino.enSgooaftfiavoren,reeexsspcuealtrlsaimralpelonawrtatiilcnslgeeta-orcaehxHecsliugfdgoesr HHH→→WHZZW→Z→Z∗∗b→→b2ℓ242ℓℓτ2ν 111181110000––––616603000500 1111....1175 8535 mmaassssccsshhuuaattpp&&eecc((uuoonnuubbnniittnnnneedd)) 1 itsmassbelowm <114.4GeV/c2(LEPexperiments[7]) H→ZZ→2ℓ2ν 250–600 1.6 2 cut&count 8v andformH ∈100H–108GeV/c2andmH ∈156–177GeV/c2 H→→ZZ→→2ℓ2q 226–600 1.6 6 massshape(unbinned) (Tevatronexperiments[8]). Indirectsearchesusing fits to 5 8 precisemeasurementspredictrelativelylightHiggsboson 5 withmH <158GeV/c2[9]. ground.Itisthemostsensitivechannelatlowmassesde- . In this report combination is presented of searches for spiteasmallbranchingfraction(Br(H γγ) 1 2 10 3). 1 − the Higgs boson in eight decay modes: H γγ, H ττ, → ∼ − × 0 Alleventsaredividedintoeightcategoriesbasedonwhether → → 2 H bb,H WW∗ 2ℓ2ν,H ZZ∗ 4ℓ,H ZZ 2ℓ2τ, the transverse momentum of the di-photon system → → → → → → → 1 H ZZ 2ℓ2ν,andH ZZ 2ℓ2q. pγγ > 40 GeV/c, whether both photons are in the cen- : T→hecro→sssectionsfor→Higg→sbosonproduction,itsdecay trTal part of the CMS detector, and whether both photons v branchingfractions,andtheiruncertaintiesaretakenfrom i areunconverted(havecompactelectromagneticshowers). X thereportpreparedbyLHCHiggsCrossSectiongroup[10]. The categorisation is motivated by different resolution in r In Section 2 an overview of all eight analysis used in eachcategory(1-3%). a the combination is provided, then in Section 3 a statisti- The background under the expected signal peak is de- calmethodologyusedinthisworkisbrieflydescribed,and rivedfromsidebandswithoutuseofMonteCarlosimula- finallyinSection4thecombinedresultispresented. tion. 2 Channels used in the combined search 2.2 H ττchannel[12] → The combination presented in this report bases on eight analysescorrespondingtomaindecaymodesoftheHiggs In this analysis a broad excess in the visible di-tau mass boson as summarised in Table 1. In the following sub- mvis distributionislookedfor(resolutionofmvis 20%). sectionsabriefdescriptionis providedof eachindividual Tττhreedi-taufinalstatesareused:eµ,eτ ,µτττ(∼τ stands h h h analysis. foraτdecayinghadronically).Eachofofthesethreecat- egoriesisfurtherdividedintotwomutuallyexclusivesub- categories: events with the Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) 2.1 H γγchannel[11] → signature(twojetsseparatedinpseudorapiditywithnoad- ditionaljetsinbetween),andeventswithlessthantwojets TheH γγanalysisisasearchforanarrowpeakinthedi- → orwithexactlytwojetsthatfailVBFrequirements. photonmassm distributionontopofalargefallingback- γγ ThemainirreduciblebackgroundisZ ττwithnormal- → a OnleavefromNCBJ,Warsaw,Poland isation taken from the Z ℓℓ cross section measurement b e-mail:[email protected] and shape of mvis model→led using simulated events. The ττ EPJWebofConferences reduciblebackgrounds(W+jets,QCD,t¯t,Z ℓℓ)areeval- 2.6 H ZZ 2ℓ2τchannel[16] → → → uatedbasingondata. In the H ZZ 2ℓ2τ search, the presence is required of → → onedi-leptonpair(eeorµµ)forminganon-shellZboson. 2.3 H bbchannel[13] ThenasecondZbosonisrequiredtodecaytoτ-pair,with → oneofthefollowingfourdecaymodes:eµ,eτ ,µτ ,τ τ h h h h The H bb search exploits the Higgs boson production (τh stands for a τ decaying hadronically). It makes eight in assoc→iation with W or Z bosons(V). The followingW exclusive sub-channels. In the analysis, the mass of two and Z boson decay modes are considered: W ℓν and leptonsandvisibleproductsoftwotaudecays(withoutac- Z ℓℓ,νν(ℓ=e,µ).Itisrequiredthatthesyste→moftwo countingformissingneutrinos)isafinalobservable. b-t→aggedjets (a Higgs boson decay candidate) is boosted ThedominantbackgroundistheelectroweakZZproduc- inthetransverseplane,whichreducesbackgroundandim- tionwhichistakenfromsimulationandnormalisedusing provesthedi-jetmassresolution. the measured yield of Z ℓℓ events scaled by the ratio → The result of the analysis bases on event count in sig- ofZZandZcrosssections.Thesub-leadingbackgrounds nalregionsdefinedbytheoutputofamultivariateanalysis withjetsfakingtaucomefromZ+jets(includingZW)and classifier (MVA). The classifier was trained for a number t¯t,areevaluatedfromdatausingfake-ratemethod. ofHiggsbosonmasses. TheratesofthemainbackgroundsV+jets,Vbb¯,andt¯tare estimated from control samples and then applied to sim- 2.7 H ZZ 2ℓ2νchannel[17] ulation. The WZ and ZZ backgrounds with Z bb¯, and → → → thesingle-topbackgroundaremodelledwithMonteCarlo In the H ZZ 2ℓ2ν analysis, events with one di-lepton simulation. pair (ee o→r µµ)→consistent with an on-shell Z boson, and significantEmissareselected.Thenthetransversemassm T T from the di-leptonpair momentaand Emiss is constructed T 2.4 H WW∗ 2ℓ2νchannel[14] assumingthatEmissarisesfromtheZ ννdecay1.Finally, → → T → events are counted in a m dependent window in the m H T The signatureof the H WW∗ 2ℓ2νsignal is the pres- distribution. → → enceofexactlytwooppositesign,isolatedleptonsandsig- ThemainZZandWZbackgroundsaretakenfromsimu- nificantEmiss.Thereisnosignalmasspickduetoescaping lation,whileallotherbackgroundsareevaluatedfromcon- T energy due to presence of two neutrinos from W decays. trolsamples. Thesearchisbasedoneventcounting. Eventsaresplitintothreecategoriesbasingonajetmul- tiplicityintheevent(0,1or2jets)withdifferentsignal-to- 2.8 H ZZ 2ℓ2qchannel[18] background ratios. For the 0-jet category the main back- → → ground is the electroweak WW production; for the 1-jet The H ZZ 2ℓ2q analysis is a search fora peak in the category the WW and t¯t processes. Both the 0- and 1-jet → → massofthedi-leptonplusdi-jetsystem(m ).Thereare categoriesarefurthersplitintosame-flavourandopposite- 2ℓ2j sixexclusivefinalstatesusedinthesearchwiththelepton flavourdi-leptonsub-channels,sincedifferentcontribution pair inoneof twopossible flavours(eeor µµ) andthe jet of the Drell-Yan background. The 2-jet category is opti- pairwith0,1or2b-tags.Bothleptonandjetpairsarere- mised to take advantageof the VBF productionsignature quiredtobeconsistentwiththeZbosonmass.Background (jets separation in pseudorapidity).The main background isfurthersuppressedbyemployingamultivariateangular forthiscategoryist¯t. likelihoodconstructedfromthekinematicvariablesofthe To separate the H WW signal from the electroweak → twoleptonsandthetwojets. WW background the scalar nature of the Higgs boson is Thebackgroundm distributionisobtainedusingcon- explored. 2ℓ2j trolregionsindata. Contributions from all main backgroundsare estimated basingondata. 3 Statisticalmethodology 2.5 H ZZ 4ℓchannel[15] ∗ → → ThemodifiedfrequentistconstructionCLs[19,20]isused for calculations of exclusion limits presented in this re- The H ZZ 4ℓ analysis is a search for a four-lepton ∗ → → port.Tocompletelydefinethemethod,oneneedstomake masspeakoverthecontinuumbackground.Threefinalstates achoiceofteststatisticandoftreatmentofthesystematic 4e,4µ,2e2µareconsideredseparately,aseachofthemhas uncertaintiesintheconstructionoftheteststatisticandin adifferentresolutionofm andadifferentcompositionof 4ℓ generatingpseudo-data.HeretheLHCHiggsCombination backgroundwithjetsfakingleptons. Groupprescription[21]isfollowed. Thedominantirreduciblebackgroundistheelectroweak The likelihood (data µ,θ) used to construct the test ZZproduction.Itscontributionismodelledusingsimula- L | statisticisdefinedasfollows: tion and normalised using the measured yield of Z ℓℓ → eventsscaledbytheratioofZZandZcrosssections.The reduciblebackgroundswithjetsfakingleptons(Z+jets,Zbb¯, L(data|µ,θ)=Poisson(data|µ·s(θ)+b(θ))·p(θ˜|θ), (1) t¯t) are evaluated from data using control regions. Their 2 miss 2 contributionwasfoundtobesmall. 1 m2T=(cid:18)qp2T,Z+MZ2+ q(ETmiss)2+MZ2(cid:19) −(cid:18)→−pT,Z+→−ET (cid:19) The2011HadronColliderPhysicssymposium(HCP-2011),Paris,France,November14-182011 where Poisson(dataµ s(θ)+b(θ)) is the Poisson proba- 4 Result of combined search | · bility to observe“data”, assumingsignal andbackground models, s(θ) and b(θ), that depend on some nuisance pa- ThecombinedresultofthesearchfortheSMbosonispre- rametersθ.Thefreeparameterµisacommonsignalstrength sented in Figure 1 which shows the combined 95% C.L. modifieraffectingsignaleventyieldsinallproductionmodes upperlimitsonthe signalstrengthmodifier(σ/σ ) asa SM (σ/σSM).Nuisanceparametersθcorrespondwithindepen- functionoftheHiggsbosonmass.Thedashedlinestands dentsourcesofsystematicuncertainties.Theprobabilityof for the median expected results for the background-only “measuring”θ˜ whichisbestknownestimateoftruevalue hypothesis, while the green (yellow) bands indicate the θisp(θ˜θ)anddescribesthescaleofthesystematicuncer- range of 68% (95%) deviation from the median. The ob- | tainty. servedlimitisindicatedbythesolidlinewithpoints.The Then,theteststatisticsisdefiniedas: SM Higgs boson is excluded at 95% C.L. in three mass ranges145–216,226–288,and310–400GeV/c2,whilethe (dataµ,θˆ ) q = 2lnL | µ , where0 µˆ µ, (2) expectedexclusionrangeis130–440GeV/c2. µ − (dataµˆ,θˆ) ≤ ≤ L | where“data”standseitherfortherealobservationorpseudo- data.Boththedenominatorandnumeratoraremaximized. Inthenumerator,µisfixedandonlythenuisanceparame- tersθcanfloat.Theirvaluesatwhich reachesthemax- imumaredenotedasθˆ .InthedenomLinator,bothµandθ µ are allowed to float in the fit, and µˆ and θˆ are parameters at which reaches its global maximum. The lower con- L straint on µˆ (0 µˆ) is imposed as the signal rate cannot ≤ be negative; the upper constraint (µˆ µ) forces the limit ≤ to be one-sided.Thevalueof the test statistic forthe real observationisdenotedasq . obs Inthenextstep,thevaluesofthenuisanceparametersθˆobs 0 andθˆobs bestdescribingtheobserveddata(maximizing ) µ L areobtainedforthebackground-onlyandsignal+background hypotheses,respectively.Usingthesebest-fitvaluesofthe nuisanceparameters,toyMonteCarlopseudo-dataisgen- Fig. 1. The 95% C.L. upper limit on the signal cross section eratedtoconstructthetest statistic samplingdistributions σ/σSM fortheSMHiggsbosonhypothesis asafunctionofthe for the both signal+background hypothesis (with signal SM Higgs boson mass. The observed values are shown by the solidline.Thedashed blacklineindicatesthemedianexpected strengthµ)andforthebackground-onlyhypothesis(µ=0). The“measurements”θ˜arealsorandomizedineachpseudo- resultsforthebackground-onlyhypothesis,whilethegreen(yel- low)bandsindicatetherangeof68%(95%)deviationfromthe data. median. Withsignal+backgroundandbackground-onlysampling distributionsfortheteststatisticq onecanfindtheprob- µ ability to obtaina test statistic valueashighas, orhigher A contribution of each individual Higgs decay mode to than,theoneobservedindata,underthesignal+background thecombinedresultisillustratedinFigure2.Forhighmasses hypothesis,andobtainCLs(µ)fromtheratio (m >200GeV/c2)theexclusionisdrivenbytheH ZZ H decaychannels,foranintermediaterange130–200Ge→V/c2 P q qobs µ s(θˆobs)+b(θˆobs) CLs(µ)= (cid:16) µ ≥P qµ | q·obs µb(θˆobs) µ (cid:17). (3) wthheielexcfloursiloonwismdoasmseinsa(tmedHb<y1th3e0HG→eVW/cW2)∗H→2ℓγ2γνmisotdhee, µ ≥ µ | 0 mostsignificantcontributor. → (cid:16) (cid:17) TheCLs αforagivenµmeansthatthesignalwithstrenthµ Thedifferencesbetweentheobservedandexpectedlimits isexclude≤datthe(1 α)confidencelevel(C.L.).Toquote areconsistentwithstatisticalfluctuations,astheobserved the95%C.L.upper−limitonµ,weadjustµuntilwereach limitsliewithinthe68%and95%bands.ForthelowHiggs CLs=1 0.95. boson mass range,we observe an excess of eventswhich Toquan−tifyanexcessofeventsthealternativeteststatis- leads to weaker observed limit than expected in the ab- ticq0isused: senceoftheSMHiggsboson.Theobservedlocalp-valuep0 whichquantifiestheconsistencyoftheobservedexcesses q = 2lnL(data|0,θˆ0) andµˆ 0. (4) withthebackground-onlyhypothesis,isshowninFigure3 0 − (data µˆ,θˆ) ≥ (top panel) for the combined search, and split into indi- L | vidual decay modes in Figure 4. A broad offset for low This test statistic allows to evaluate significances(Z) and masses, of about1σ, correspondsto the excesses seen in p-values(p )fromtheasymptoticformula: 0 theH WW 2ℓ2νchannelcharacterisedbypoormass ∗ → → resolution.TheexcessesobservedintheH ZZ 4ℓand Z = qqo0bs, (5) the H→γγ channels result two narrow mi→nima→of the p- value. The minimal p-value is p 0.01, but after ac- min p =P(q qobs)= ∞ e−x2/2 dx= 1 1 erf Z/√2 , countingforthe look-elsewhereeffec∼twhichis important 0 0 ≥ 0 ZZ √2π 2h − (cid:16) (cid:17)i forthisstudy,itisreducedtoaglobalprobabilitypglobal∼0.4. (6) Thelook-elsewhereeffectwasesimetedforthewholeex- whereqobsistheobservedteststatisticforµ=0. ploredmassrange110–600GeV/c2. 0 EPJWebofConferences Fig. 2. The observed 95% C.L. upper limit on the signal cross Fig.4.Theobservedlocalp-valueasafunctionoftheSMHiggs sectionσ/σ fortheSMHiggsbosonhypothesisasafunction bosonmassforeightdecaymodesandtheircombination. SM of the SM Higgs boson mass for eight decay modes and their combination. hasaprobabilityof0.4aftertakingintoaccountthelook- elsewhereeffectforthewholeexploredmassrange(110– Thebest-fitvalueofσ/σSM isalsopresentedinFigure3 600GeV/c2). (bottompanel).Thebest-fitvalueisafactorbywhichthe SMHiggsbosoncrosssectionhastoberescaledtobestde- scribe observeddata. In the mass range between 115 and References 125 GeV/c2 the best-fit value agrees within uncertainty with1(σ=σ ),butasdiscussedabove,withtheanalysed SM 1. F.EnglertandR.Brout,Phys.Rev.Lett.13(1964)321. amountofdatatheexcessisnotsignificant.Moredatawill 2. P.W.Higgs,Phys.Lett.12(1964)132. increasethestatisticalaccuracyofthesearchthusimprove 3. P.W.Higgs,Phys.Rev.Lett.13(1964)508. itssensitivity. 4. G.S.Guralnik,C.R.HagenandT.W.B.Kibble,Phys. Rev.Lett.13(1964)585. 5. P.W.Higgs,Phys.Rev.145(1966)1156. 6. T.W.B.Kibble,Phys.Rev.155(1967)1554. 7. R. Barate etal.[LEPWorkingGroupforHiggsboson searches and ALEPH and DELPHI and L3 and OPAL Collaborations],Phys.Lett.B565(2003)61 8. [TEVNPH (Tevatron New Phenomina and Higgs Working Group) and CDF and D0 Collaborations], arXiv:1107.5518[hep-ex]. 9. [ALEPH and CDF and D0 and DELPHI and L3 and OPAL and SLD and LEP Electroweak Working Group and Tevatron Electroweak Working Group and SLD ElectroweakandHeavyFlavourGroupsCollaborations], arXiv:1012.2367[hep-ex] 10. S.Dittmaieretal.[LHCHiggsCrossSectionWorking GroupCollaboration],arXiv:1101.0593[hep-ph]. Fig.3.Theobservedlocalp-valuep (toppanel)andσ/σ of 0 SM 11. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-021(2011) thebest-fit(bottompanel)asafunctionoftheSMHiggsboson 12. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-009(2011) mass.Themaximalobservedexcess(minimallocalp-value)cor- 13. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-012(2011) respondswithaglobalprobabilityforbackground-onlyhypothe- 14. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-014(2011) sisequalto0.4afteraccountingforthelook-elsewhereeffectfor 15. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-015(2011) m =110–600GeV/c2. H 16. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-013(2011) 17. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-016(2011) 18. CMSCollaboration,CMSPASHIG-11-017(2011) 19. A.L.Read,In*Geneva2000,Confidencelimits*81- 5 Conclusions 101 20. T. Junk, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 [hep-ex/9902006] ThecombinedsearchforthestandardmodelHiggsboson performedby the CMS Collaborationwith up to 1.7 fb 1 21. ATLAS and CMS Collaborations and LHC Higgs − Combination Group, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, ofdatawaspresented.Theexpectedexclusionmassrange is130–440GeV/c2.Theobserveddataallowedtoexclude CMSNOTE-2011/005(2011) theSMHiggsbosonat95%C.L.inthreemassranges145– 216, 226–288, and 310–400 GeV/c2. The largest excur- sion of the observed data from the expected background