ebook img

Sponge distribution and coral reef community structure off Mactan Island, Cebu, Philippines PDF

6 Pages·1999·1.6 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Sponge distribution and coral reef community structure off Mactan Island, Cebu, Philippines

SPONGE DISTRIBUTION AND CORAL REEF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OFF MACTAN ISLAND, CEBU, PHILIPPINES G.J. BAKUS AND G.K.NISHIYAMA Bakus, G.J. &Nishiyama, G.K. 19990630: Spongedistributionandcoral reefcommunity structure offMactan Island, Cebu, Philippines. Memoirs ofthe QueenslandMuseum 44: 45-50. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Coralreefcommunitystructurewasstudiedduring 1994-95atMactanIsland,offCebuCity, Cebu,Philippines.Threetransectlinesperpendiculartotheshoreweresurveyedfromdepths of 7-32m. Transect slack line distances were 55-68m long. Live hard coral represented 29-42%(mean=36%)ofcategoriesinterceptedandsponges 1-5%(mean=3%),representing the two most abundant groups ofbenthic organisms. All remaining benthic taxa together comprised only an average of 1% of the intercept distance. The number of sponges intercepted along each line ranged from 4-19 (mean=12). Approximate sponge densities from lineinterceptdatarangedfrom I/20m2to l/250m2(mean=l/40m2)andweretypically large specimens. Sponge densities offMactan Island were considerably lowerand species richness much higher than that of the Caribbean. A transition frequency matrix was calculated for all line intercepts and a test for a Markov chain was conducted. The most frequently encountered sequence was coral rubble followed by live hard coral (11% sequencefrequency). Livehardcoralfollowedbyspongeswas5%andspongesfollowedby livehardcoral was 5%. Inasimilarstudyofthebenthoswithfive line interceptsparallel to theshoreatdepthsof7-12m,themostfrequentlyencounteredsequencewaslivehardcoral tospongeandspongetolivehardcoral(36%).Spongetospongetransitionsrepresented4%. None ofthe sequences were significant at P=0.05; i.e. the succession ofsubstratum types were independentofeach other, supportingthenull hypothesis. O Porifera, Philippines, coralreef, communityecology, benthic, densities, Markov Chains, transects. G.J. Bakus (email: [email protected]) & G.K. Nishiyama, DepartmentofBiological Sciences, UniversityofSouthernCalifornia, LosAngeles, CA 90089-0371 USA; 4January 1999. ospue„Frcig.ierel.osdu.sopt,fuh.das.vpeesonbogeneesnspowonenargoeeisnfgm.ousAtinlhndecet„Po.h1i9.bl9..ei4p.ptSio.enxevisecr.batylo o?fr*fr^t£,h„e*x,?Tgakm*m«bVu&l1i,7?Rm«es£o?r&tQ, Pa'tt^y.PM..Paciltfn.aalensIs(,lF«a.ingdr.ee(ja/I)n') fishesandhardcoralsand researchonthe effects (1 17 N, 124 E). This site is located approx- ofthree species of allomone-secreting subtidal imate|y 400m N ot the University ofSan Carlos sponges on adjacent corals are continuuing Manbago Marine Station. The Hilutangan (Nishiyama, 1999, this volume). Sponges and Channel betweenMactanandOlangoIslandsisa other marine taxa ofthe Philippines are poorly 300mdeeptrench(vonBodungenetal., 1985).A known. Gomez (1980) lists 16 publications on gently sloping reefextends to a depth of10m on marine sponges forthe Philippines and fewhave each side ofthe channel then typically, abruptly appeared since that time (e.g., Raymundo & plunges steeply downward. The slope off the Harper, 1995). No quantitative studies on Tambuli resort is considerably less steep. spongeshavebeencarried outinthe Philippines, ^Oceanographic characteristics ofchannel waters osbojefcatriveass oits tkhinsoswtnudyThweerree:for1)e,totdheetemramjionre (l99f1oau,mbj) ainndvolnlanBood&unDgaeclneset(a1L99(41)9.g5) Anon. sponge distribution and abundance and compare v it with similar data from other tropical regions, Three line intercepts perpendicular to the and 2) to characterise coral reef community shoreline were surveved 10m apart from 7-32m structureasabasicframeworkforourcontinuing depth with slack line distances of55-68m. Five research on toxic sponges. additional line intercepts were surveyed parallel MATERIALS AND METHODS totheshoreatdepthsof7,8,10,11 and 12m,with slack line distances of 100m, excepting the 12m Coral reef community structure and sponge line,whichwas 70m in slacklength (slacklength distributions were studied between 1994-1996 partially follows the reefcontour and the tape is 46 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM 10°20' reef community structure (after Licuanan & —7'"' Bakus, 1992), so far as is known. There do not IVlactan ^<$ appear to be null models developed for island-/ Markov-type chain analyses dealing with sequences ofsubstratum types wherethe species )• V ^1> / { : are unidentified (Gotelli & Graves, 1996). Approximate spongedensitieswerecalculated using a modified Strong's equation (Cox, 1996), as follows: 10°00' w D=(2 l/M)(A/T) 123°53' 124°04' where D=density of sponges (no./m M= ); maximum animal or plant orthogonal width (m) 10*18'" ofan organism interceptingthe transect line; A= Mactan island unit area (lm2); T=total transect length (m). RESULTS Univ. ofSanCarios Marine Station Line intercept or line transect surveys are recognisedasoneofthebestmethodsofstudying Maribago study site coral reeforganisms (e.g. Lova, 1978; Marsh et 10°17' al., 1984; Reichelt et ah, 1986). We compared different sampling methods inthe field in Kenya Agus ( and found that line intercepts gave us density / estimates closest to those of actual counts. For example,thedensities(no./m2)ofPadina(?)ona reef near Mombasa in 1997 and Ipomoea (I) ^Ns? leaves on a flat berm at Malindi in 1998 were as follows: actual count (P-10, 1-14), point-center 10°16' quarter (P-2, 1-32), stratified random sampling 123°59' 124°00' 124°01 (P-20, 1-19) and line intercept (P-16, 1-14). The FIG. 1. Mactan Island, Cebu, Philippines, showing major advantage of using intercept width studysite. measurements for density estimates is that the technique is about an order ofmagnitude more easy to deploy formeasurements; see Reichelt et rapid than are direct counts or quadrat studies of al., 1986, for methodology on reeftransects). organisms underwater. One advantage of using transects both perpendicular and parallel to the Organisms and substrata encountered along shore is that allelochemical effects can be transects were recorded as line intercept directional (i.e. directional currents) and using distances. Most organisms were individuals or only one transect orientation might overlook single colonies rather than conspecific patches. transitions resulting from such chemicals. Toxic sponges reported by Nishyamand Bakus (1999, this volume) were most abundant at TRANSECTS PERPENDICULAR TO depths of 7-12m. The number of transitions SHORELINE. Live hard coral represented between sequences of organisms and substrata 29-42% (mean=36%) of categories intercepted was tallied. The null hypothesis was that the and sponges 1-5% (mean=3%), representing the sequence of occurrences of benthic organisms two most abundant groups ofbenthic organisms and substratum types along transect lines (depth (Table 1). The standard errors (SE) of the gradients)arerandom.Theresultsweretested for percentage intercept ofcommon categories were a Markov chain (i.e. tendency ofone thing to be relatively small whereas those of the least followed by another, as in repeated textile abundant categories were considerable, due patterns) by the non-parametric chi-square mostly to small numbers. Obviously, increased statistic. Markovchainanalysesofsequences are sample size would improve the results. All commonlyusedinstratigraphy(Davis, 1986)and remaining large benthic taxa togethercomprised in the prediction ofplant succession after fires only an average of 1% ofthe intercept distance. (Isagi & Nakagoshi, 1990). The present study is The number of sponges along each intercept the second use ofMarkov chainanalysis in coral ranged from 4-19 (mean=12). Sponge MACTAN ISLAND SPONGES 47 TABLE 1.MactanIslandtransects,perpendiculartoshoreline(7-32mdepthregime),showingpercentageoftotal interceptdistance(^seagrass was avoided afterthe firsttransect). Category Line 1 Line2 Line3 Mean%±SE LiveCoral 35 42 29 36±4 Sand 19 24 32 25±4 CoralRubhle 25 22 22 23i 1 DeadCoral 7 6 15 9±3 Seagrass1 9 - . 3±3 Sponges 3 5 I 3±I OtherOrganisms : 1 1 1 ±0.03 % Total 100 100 100 100 SlackLineDistance(m) 55 62 68 62 No.SpongesMeasured 14 19 4 12 TotalSpongeWidth(cm) 111 323 33 156 SpongeDensity(No./m') 0.02 0.05 0.004 0.025 SpongeDensity Converted(No./nr) 1/50 1/20 1/250 1/40 approximate density from line intercept data percentagebetween sponges and live hardcorals ranged from I/20m2 to l/250m2 (mean=l/40m2) was 10%fordepthsof7-32mand36%fordepths and were typically large specimens (Table 1). of7-12m. The dominance ofsponges (afterhard The most frequently encountered sequence was corals) is typical ofthe Caribbean but sponge coral rubble followed by live hard cora! (11% abundance can be considerably greater in the sequence frequency)(Table2A). Livehardcoral Caribbean than in the Philippines (Table 3). For followed by sponges was 5% and sponges example,Zea(1994)foundthatspongesofSanta followedby livehard coral was 5%. None ofthe Marta, Colombia, were an average ofabout four sequences were significantat P=0.05 (calculated times as abundant as the sponges of Mactan X"=0.19; DF=24); i.e. the succession of organ- Island. The species richness and irregular isms and substrata were independent of each distribution of individual sponges at Mactan other. This supports the null hypothesis. Island, however, were considerably greaterthan at Santa Marta. Species richness can be high in TRANSECTS PARALLEL TO SHORELINE. the Caribbean. Alcolado (1979) reported 47 The sponge percentage of the total transitions species of sponges at depths of 11-16m in increases rapidly from 7-10m depth, then Havana, Cuba. This rough inverse relationship changes rapidly again between 11-12m depth between species richness and abundance was (Table 2B). The most frequently encountered expected (Krebs, 1994). sequence was live hard coral to sponge and sponge to live hard coral (total combined=36%) As in the Caribbean, the sponges of Mactan (Table 2C). Sponge to sponge transitions Islandrepresentthe secondmostimportanttaxon represented 4%. Sponges were most frequently of benthic invertebrates after hard corals. associated with live coral, dead coral and coral Although there is no universally recognised rubble. Again, the sequence of organisms and system of classifying coral reefs based on substrata were independent of each other at percentage cover, one frequently used rule of P=0.05 (calculated x2=^\2.9\ DF-25). This thumb would consider that a 36% coverage (the supports the null hypothesis. MactanIslandstudysite)representsamoderately rich coral reef DISCUSSION The reefs at Mactan Island are probablynot as rich as they were 20 years ago because ofdense Beyondtheshallowwaterseagrasscommunity development ofcoastal resorts and concomitant (0-8m depth; principally Thalassia hemprichii), anthropogenic effects (principally sewage sponges represented the second most dominant effluents).The 1997-98ElNinomayhavecaused invertebratetaxon(afterhardcorals),comprising the death ofmany hard corals andthe disappear- 1-5% (mean=3%) of intercept distances (depth anceofnumeroustoxicspongesinourstudyarea 7-32m) and 5-28% oftransitions. The transition (Nishiyama, unpublished data). 48 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM TABLE 2. Mactan Island transects. A, transects increase in sponges. The marked increase in perpendicularto shoreline, running from onshore to sponge transitions at a depth of 10-12m was offshore, showing transition frequencies similar to that recorded by Alcolado (1979) for (,=unbroken dead coral substratum). B, transects sponges at depths of 1 l-16m offHavana, Cuba parallel to shoreline, showing sponge transitions by (Table 3). Presumably this depth is optimal dtreapntshec(t2w=h1ic0h0mwassla7c0kmlleonnggt)h.eCx,cterpatnsfeocrts1p2armaldleelpttho bpheoctaousysnetheitsipsirnogvisdyemsbiosnutfsfiacnidenits blieglhotw ftohre shoreline, showingspongetransition frequencies. depth of major destruction by hurricanes and %Totaltransition typhoons. A. Category frequencies None ofthe transitional sequence patterns of CoralRubbletoLiveCoral 11 organisms or substrata at Mactan Island were LiveCoraltoCoralRubble *> statistically significant, thus the null hypothesis LiveCoraltoSand 8 is supported. This was because species richness SandtoLiveCoral 8 wasveryhighandindividualdistributionshighly LiveCoraltoLiveCoral 8 irregular. Tropical island forests show the same DeadCoral'toLiveCoral 6 patterns (e.g. Fiji Islands, Bakus, pers. obs.). LiveCoraltoSponges 5 Significant sequential patterns of the benthos SpongestoLiveCoral 5 would be expected to occur only at larger scales LiveCoraltoDeadCoral 5 (e.g. community scale changes s&uch as trans- itionsfromcoraltoseagrass)(Isagi Nakagoshi, Others(numeroustransitioncategories) 35 1990). Total 100 Bradbury& Young(1983)concludedthathard coraldistributionsontheGreatBarrierReefwere B. Totalno. Sponge%of Mean random. This was based on the fact that only 5 Depth(m) transoitfions" trantsoitatlions No.sponges (iSB) species pairs out of 545 species pairs were not 7 256 5 6 random. They concluded that coral interactions on a small scale do not produce random neigh- 8 371 11 16 bours. They also concluded that random 10 426 15 32 27±7 neighbours express the combined workings of 11 396 16 31 many effects but did not specify what those 12 165 28 48 factors were. Licuanan & Bakus (1992) found random distributions of Philippine reef C. Category Percentageoftotal organismsatadepth of12m atPuertoGaierabut transitions a significant non-random unidirectional pattern LiveCoraltoSponge 18 at 6m depth, possibly the result ofstrong long- SpongetoLiveCoral 18 shore currents. The possible reasons for the SpongetoDeadCoral 12 random distributions of benthic organisms are CoralRubbletoSponge 10 complex and include high species richness SandtoSponge 8 (Bakus & Ormsby, 1994), fish predation and grazing on benthic organisms (Bakus, 1964, SpongetoSand 8 1967, 1969), predation on planktonic stages of DeadCoraltoSponge 6 benthic species (Gili & Coma, 1998), perhaps SpongetoCoralRubble 6 allelochemical defenses (Bakus et al., 1986, SpongetoAlgae 5 1989/90) and other factors such as currents SpongetoSponge 4 (Licuanan& Bakus, 1992). Adiscussionofthese AlgaetoSponge 3 topics is beyond the scope ofthe present paper. Others 2 Total 100 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The somewhat abrupt change in sponge per- We greatly appreciate the help ofFilapina B. Sotto, Head,MarineBiology Section, University centage oftotal transitions (Table 2B) between ofSan Carlos, Cebu City, wrho made our studies depths of7-10m was the result ofthe disappear- possible. Thanks to the following people who ance ofseagrass (i.e. it is the edge ofthe shallow aided us in the laboratory and field: Mike Cusi, water seagrass community) with a concomitant Jason Young, Benny Pangatungan, Jimmy and MACTAN ISLAND SPONGES 49 TABLE3. Comparisonsofspongedensities(aspercentageofinterceptdistance,TD)between Indo-Pacificand Caribbean localities (?=densities could notbedeterminedfrom the published data). Location Depth(m) Method Density(range) Density(mean) Sourceofdata Indo-Pacific 1-5%ID 3%ID Cebu,Philippines 7-32 Lineintercept 1/50-1/250m2 1/40m" thisstudy CFloirnadlerSseaR,eAeufstflraatlsi,a 1-4 Quadrats 7.3%ID 9 WiDlakniinelsoent(al1.98in7) Caribbean SantaMarta, Colomia 17-22 Chaintransects 5-24%ID 13%ID Zea(1994) RPaorqku,eVseNnaetziuoenlaal 1-35 Quadrats 7 1/2m2 Alvarezetal.(1990) BiscayneNational Park,FloridaKeys, 1-18 Quadrats 3-18/m2 8/m2 Schmahl(1990) USA 1-17 Quadrats 0-lVnr 6/m2 Havana,Cuba AIcoIado(1979) 11-16 Quadrats 15/nr 9 Tonette de la Victoria, Chona Sister, Jonathan Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Papers Apurado, Frances Friere, Terence Dacles, Dave (27): 1-29. Valles, Kathrin Meyer and Cynthia Nishiyama. 1967. The feeding habits of fishes and primary Jason Young kindly sent us information on and production at Eniwetok, Marshall Islands. figures of Mactan Island, and Chona Sister Micronesica 3: 135-149. constructedthefinalfiguresofMactanIslandand 1969. Energetics and feeding in shallow marine waters. International Revue of General and profile ofthe study site. Fortheir reviews ofthe mOcahnauvsiclrliop,tWwilefrtehdaonkLiCcuhaonnaan,SiPsatuelr,SDaommmianrgcoo BAKUESx,peGriJm.en&taOlRZMooSlBoYg,y4B:.271599-43.69C.omparison of speciesrichnessanddominanceinnorthernPapua and two anonymous reviewers. Rob van Soest New Guinea and Northern Gulf ofAlaska. Pp. and John Hooper assisted with sponge 169-174.InSoest.R.W.M. Van, Kempen,T.M.G. identifications. van& Braekman,J.C.(eds)Sponges inTimeand Space. (Balkema: Rotterdam). LITERATURE CITED BAKUS, G.J., TARGETT, N.M. & SCHULTE, B. 1986. Chemical ecology ofmarineorganisms: an ALCOLADO, P.M. 1979. Ecological Structure ofthe overview. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12(5): sponge fauna in a reef profile of Cuba. Pp. 951-987. 297-302. In Levi, C. & Boury-Esnault, N. (eds) BAKUS, G.J., STEBBINS, T.D., LLOYD, K., Sponge Biology. Editions du Centre National de CHANEY. H., WRIGHT, M.T., BAKUS, G.J., ALVAlRaERZe,cheBr.,chDeISAcZie,ntiMf.iCq.ue&(29L1A)U(CGNHRLSI:NP,ariRs.).A. PAODNAZMICNZIE,SKIC,. ME.ID&. CCR,EWHSU,NTP.E1R9,89/9L0.., 1990.Thespongefaunaonafringingcoralreefin Unpalatabilityanddominanceoncoralreefsinthe Venezuela, I: composition, distribution, and Fiji and Maldive Islands. Indian Journal of abundance. Pp.358-366. InRutzler, K.(ed.)New Zoology andAquatic Biology 1&2(1): 34-53. Perspectives in Sponge Biology. (Smithsonian BODUNGEN, R. VON, BALZER, W., BOLTER, M., Institution Press: Washington DC). GR^vF, G., LIEBEZEIT, G. & POLLEHNE, F. ANONYMOUS 1991a. PacificCebu Report. Baseline 1985. Chemical and biological investigations of MarineResourceAssessment. Final Report,July. the pelagic system of the Hilutangan Channel Pp. 1-56. (University of San Carlos, Marine (Cebu, Philippines). The Philippine Scientist 22: Biology Section: Cebu, Philippines). 4-24. 1991b. Environmental Impact Study of proposed BRADBURY, R.H. & YOUNG, P.C. 1983. Coral reclamations in the Municipalities of Lapulapa interactionsandcommunitystructure:ananalysis City,CordovaandConsolacion.Part2.Cordova. ofspatialpattern.MarineEcology ProgressSeries AreaResearchandTrainingCenter. Department 11:265-271. of Marine Biology, Water Resources Center. COX, G. W. 1996. Laboratory Manual of General (University of San Carlos, Marine Biology Ecology. 7th Edition. (William C. Brown: Section: Cebu, Philippines). Dubuque). BAKUS, GJ. 1964. The effects of fish grazing on DAVIS, J.C. 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in invertebrateevolution in shallowtropical waters. Geology. (John Wiley& Sons: NewYork). 50 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM GIL1, J-M. & COMA, R. 1998. Benthic suspension LOYA, Y. 1978. Plotless and transect methods. Pp. & feeders: their paramount role in littoral marine 197-218.InStoddart,D.R. Johannes,R.E.(eds) food webs. TREE 13(8): 316-321. Coralreefs:researchmethods.(UNESCO:Paris). GOMEZ, E.D. 1980. SectionK, Porifera. Pp. 35-36. In MARSH,M.,BRADBURY,R.H.& REICHELT, R.E. 984.Determinationofthephysicalparametersof BibliographyofPhilippinemarinescience- 1978. 1 coral distributions using line transect data. Coral (Filipinas Foundation, Inc. and Marine Sciences Reefs2: 175-180. Center, University ofthe Philippines: Manila). RAYMUNDO, L.J.H. & HARPER, M.K. 1995. Notes GOTELLI,N.J. & GRAVES, G.R. 1996. Null Models onthe ecologyand distribution ofsponge genera in Ecology. (Smithsonian Institution Press: (Porifera: Demospongiae) ofthecentral Visayas, Washington, DC). Philippines. Pp. 39-52. In Proceedings ofthe 3rd National Symposium on Marine Science. II \NO,A.S.& DACLES,T.P.U. 1994.Environmental Philippine Scientist, Special Issue (1995). kPpe.y p1a5-r1a8m.eteInrs,Sclhirghatm,mt,emWpe.ra&turDey,anDd.Ts.ali(neidtsy.) REICHELT, R.E., LOYA, Y. & BRADBURY, R.H. 1986. Patterns in the use of space by benthic sfErnuiemnrgmgiyengrfrleoecfwo.uaRrenssdee,anurt4crhiAePnpatpreierlx,cFhtIoanMg4FeSMiCnaoyan,storro1pti9ic9ua4m! SCHMcBAaormHrmLiue,nriRtGei.eefPs..Coo1nr9a9l0t.wRoeCeocfomsrma5ul(2n)ri:ete7yf3s-8so0tf.ructthuereGraenadt (University of San Carlos, Marine Biology ecologyofspongesassociatedwithfoursouthern Section: Cebu, Philippines) Florida coral reefs. Pp. 376-383. In Rutzler, K. ISAGI, Y. & NAKAGOSH1, N. 1990. A Markov (ed.) New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. approach for describing post-fire succession of (SmithsonianInstitutionPress:WashingtonDC). vegetation. Ecological Research5: 163-171. WILKINSON,C.R. 1987. Productivityandabundance KREBS, C.J. 1994. Ecology. 4th Edition. (Harper oflargespongepopulationsonFlindersReefHats, Collins College Publishers: NewYork). ZEA,CSo.ra1l99S4e.a.PaCtotrearnlsRoefecfosra5:l a1n83d-s1p88o.ngeabundance LICUANAN,W.Y.&BAKUS,G.J. 1992.Coralspatial instressedcoral reefsatSanta Marta, Colombian distributions: the ghost of competition past Caribbean. Pp. 257-264. In Soest, R.W.M., Van roused? Pp. 545-549. In Proceedings ofthe 7th Kempen, T.M.G. & Braekman. J.C. (eds) International Coral Reef Symposium. Vol. 1 Sponges in Time and Space. (Balkema: (University ofGuam: Agana, Guam). Rotterdam). SPONGES, INDICATORS OF MARINE responses to sediment disruption from trawling and ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. Memoirs of the sand mining, and responses to water quality change QueenslandMuseum44: 50. 1999:-Thereisanurgent duringalgal bloom events. need for marine ecosystem indicators to facilitate Marine environmental indicators are likely to take management aimed at either ameliorating impacts or the form of well-defined ecotypes described by guiding sustainable utilisation of marine resources. characterising species presence. These species have We propose that qualitative and quantitative knownrangesoftolerancetoenvironmental variables examination of marine benthic communities will Suchaslight,current, foodsupply,turbidity,BOD,and provide robust indication of responses to short and sediment regime. They are by their very nature, long term environmental conditions, and further relevantataregionallevelandwillbesetinthecontext suggest that information exists which permits the ofabiogeographicclassificationforanycoastorshelf. creation ofa hierarchy ofindicators for establishing Theycanbefurtherrefinedby interrogationofmodels ecosystemhealthinaregionalcontext.Theseareinthe relating population structure of key species to form ofidentifiable marine community assemblages, biological and physical attributes oftheenvironment. togetherwith biomass and growth indicesdetermined O Porifera, growth, morphology, indicators, from morphological parameters associated with the environmental health, marine resources, benthic characterisingspecies foreachassemblage. Examples communities. are provided to demonstrate the sensitivity of such indicatorsbyfocusingonspongecharacterisedcomm- CM Battershill* (email: c.battershill@/iiwa.cri.nz) & R. unities. The composition ofassemblages and popul- Abraham, National Institute ofWater andAtmospheric ationstatisticsofkeyspeciesreflectecosystemdisturb- Research, P.O. Box J4-901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New ances following catastrophic sediment deposition Zealand; *Presentaddress:AustralianInstituteof'Marine followingcyclones,and inresponsetomorerecentand Science, PMB3, TownsvilleMC, Old, 4SI0,Australia; 1 relatively short-term impacts. The latter include June 199S.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.