OOlldd DDoommiinniioonn UUnniivveerrssiittyy OODDUU DDiiggiittaall CCoommmmoonnss Marketing Theses & Dissertations Department of Marketing Fall 2015 SSppiilllloovveerr EEffffeeccttss ooff BBrraanndd AAlllliiaannccee aanndd SSeerrvviiccee EExxppeerriieennccee oonn HHoosstt BBrraannddss iinn LLooyyaallttyy PPrrooggrraamm PPaarrttnneerrsshhiippss Gulfem Cigdem Kutlu Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/marketing_etds Part of the Marketing Commons RReeccoommmmeennddeedd CCiittaattiioonn Kutlu, Gulfem C.. "Spillover Effects of Brand Alliance and Service Experience on Host Brands in Loyalty Program Partnerships" (2015). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Marketing, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/3b9e-0k19 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/marketing_etds/2 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marketing at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marketing Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPILLOVER EFFECTS OF BRAND ALLIANCE AND SERVICE EXPERIENCE ON HOST BRANDS IN LOYALTY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIPS By: Gulfem Cigdem Kutlu B.A. July 2000, Marmara University, Turkey M.B.A. May 2005, Radford University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION – MARKETING OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 2015 Approved by: _______________________ Yuping Liu-Thompkins (Chair) ______________________ John B. Ford (Member) _______________________ Edward P. Markowski (Member) ii ABSTRACT Three studies explored the consequences of loyalty program partnership on individual brands. The first study sought to determine what kinds of brand equity and category similarity would result in customers’ higher perceived attractiveness of and intention to join the loyalty program partnership. The study finds that higher category similarity increases both perceived attractiveness and joining intention towards a loyalty program partnership. When loyalty program partnership consisted of similar category businesses, individual brands also experienced changes to their brand equity levels. Low equity brands when partnered with high equity brands experienced a significant improvement in their brand equity levels. A high-high pairing increased the brand equity for the both host and partner brands while a low-low pairing increased the brand equity for the host brand. The second study investigated if participation in a loyalty program partnership affected the brand identity distinctiveness of the host brand. Contrary to expectations, host brand did not experience any loss in brand identity distinctiveness after a loyalty program partnership. The third study examined the possible effects of negative spillover in a loyalty program partnership in a partner service failure situation. In line with predictions, this study found that host brands were not immune to service failures by the partner brand. Even though the host brand did not cause the service failure, they were negatively affected by the service failure due to their association with the partner brand through loyalty program partnership. Negative effects on the host brand included decline in brand equity and lessened future behavioral intentions towards the host brand. Category similarity was again a significant factor in determining the effects of the negative spillover among the partner brands. Decline in the host brand equity was significant iii when the partner brand causing the service failure was a similar brand. Findings of these studies are helpful in understanding the pros and cons of loyalty program partnerships and can help managers select the best partners for their loyalty programs. iv Copyright, 2015, by Gulfem Cigdem Kutlu, All Rights Reserved. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It’s a great pleasure to thank those who made this dissertation possible. It was a hard and a long journey. I offer my gratitude to all of those who supported me throughout this dissertation. First, I would like to thank my doctoral committee advisor, Dr. Yuping Liu-Thompkins for the time she spent in helping me create, refine and complete this dissertation. She encouraged me whenever I doubted myself and guided me through the challenges of this dissertation. I am deeply indebted to her. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. John B. Ford and Dr. Edward P. Markowski, for their valuable expertise and their commitment to the improvement of this dissertation. I’m grateful to my mentor Dr. Lynn Saubert and my colleagues and friends at Roanoke College for all their encouragement and emotional support. I would also like to thank my friend Susan for seeing me through my highs and lows, and listening to me each day as I completed this dissertation. Above all, I’m grateful to my parents, my brother and my grandmother for being my biggest supporters. Although they did not know exactly what I went through, their unconditional love, emotional support and never ending encouragement helped me through this journey. I couldn’t have done this without them. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ x CHAPTER I ........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER II ....................................................................................................................... 6 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 6 BRAND EQUITY – DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT ........................................... 6 What is Brand Equity? ................................................................................................................. 6 Measuring Brand Equity ............................................................................................................ 12 Benefits from Brand Equity ....................................................................................................... 14 BRAND ALLIANCE - DEFINITION AND ITS EFFECTS ON BRAND EQUITY ...... 16 Potential Benefits and Problems Associated with Brand Alliance ............................................ 16 Determinants of Brand Alliance Success and Failure ................................................................ 17 RESEARCH CONTEXT – LOYALTY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIPS ........................ 20 Loyalty Program Definition ....................................................................................................... 21 Consequences of Loyalty Program Partnership ......................................................................... 23 Summary of the Key Gaps and Research Questions .................................................................. 25 CHAPTER III ................................................................................................................... 28 PRELIMINARY QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS............................................................... 28 CHAPTER IV ................................................................................................................... 33 STUDY 1 .......................................................................................................................... 33 HYPOTHESES FORMULATION ................................................................................... 33 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 39 Design ........................................................................................................................................ 39 Pretests ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Pretest 1 .................................................................................................................................. 40 vii Pretest 2 .................................................................................................................................. 42 Pretest 3 .................................................................................................................................. 42 Main Study Procedure ................................................................................................................ 43 Measurements ............................................................................................................................ 45 Manipulation Checks ................................................................................................................. 46 Tests of Hypotheses and Results ................................................................................................ 47 CHAPTER V .................................................................................................................... 56 STUDY 2 .......................................................................................................................... 56 HYPOTHESES FORMULATION ................................................................................... 56 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 60 Design ........................................................................................................................................ 60 Main Study Procedure ................................................................................................................ 60 Measurements ............................................................................................................................ 62 Manipulation checks .................................................................................................................. 62 Tests of Hypotheses and Results ................................................................................................ 63 Study 2b (United Airlines) ......................................................................................................... 65 Main Study Procedure ................................................................................................................ 65 Measurements ............................................................................................................................ 66 Manipulation checks .................................................................................................................. 66 Tests of Hypotheses and Results ................................................................................................ 67 CHAPTER VI ................................................................................................................... 70 STUDY 3 .......................................................................................................................... 70 HYPOTHESES FORMULATION ................................................................................... 70 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 76 Design ........................................................................................................................................ 76 Pretest ......................................................................................................................................... 76 Main Study Procedure ................................................................................................................ 77 Measurements ............................................................................................................................ 79 Manipulation Checks ................................................................................................................. 79 Tests of Hypotheses and Results ................................................................................................ 79 CHAPTER VII .................................................................................................................. 83 viii DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 83 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................................................ 83 LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH ................................................................. 85 MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS .................................................................................. 87 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 90 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................. 99 Appendix 1: Pretest 1 Questionnaire ......................................................................................... 99 Appendix 2: Pretest 2 Questionnaire . ..................................................................................... 104 Appendix 3: Pretest 3 Questionnaire . ..................................................................................... 107 Appendix 4: Study 1 Questionnaire ......................................................................................... 111 Appendix 5: Study 1 Control Groups Questionnaire ............................................................... 116 Appendix 6 - Study 2 Questionnaire ........................................................................................ 118 Appendix 7 – Study 2 Control Group Questionnaire ............................................................... 123 Appendix 8 - Pretest 4 .............................................................................................................. 125 Appendix 9 - Study 3 Questionnaire ........................................................................................ 126 VITA …………………………………………………………………………………...131 ix LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Brand Equity Dimensions ………………………………………………………10 2. Preliminary Airline Analysis …………………………………………………....30 3. Study 1 Sample Characteristics …………………………………………………44 4. Study 1 Scales …………………………………………………………………...46 5. Study 1 Mean Joining Intention …………………………………………………48 6. Study 1 ANOVA for Joining Intention ………………………………………….49 7. Study 1 Mean Perceived Attractiveness ………………………………………...50 8. Study 1 ANOVA for Perceived Attractiveness …………………………………51 9. Study 1 ANOVA for Host Brand Equity Change ……………………………….53 10. Pre and Post Partnership Host and Partner Brand Equity Measures …………….55 11. Study 2 Sample Characteristics …………………………………………………61 12. Brand Identity Distinctiveness Scale …………………………………………....62 13. Study 2 Pre and Post Partnership Host Brand Identity Distinctiveness …………64 14. Study 2 ANOVA for Host Brand Identity Distinctiveness Change ……………..64 15. Study 2b Sample Characteristics ……………………………………………..…66 16. Study 2b Pre and Post Partnership Host Brand Identity Distinctiveness ……..…68 17. Study 2b ANOVA for Host Brand Identity Distinctiveness Change ………...….69 18. Study 3 Sample Characteristics …………………..……………………………..78 19. Study 3 Pre and Post Service Failure Host Brand Equity Measures ………...…..80 20. Study 3 Pre and Post Service Failure Host Brand Behavioral Intentions……..…81 21. Study 3 ANOVA for Host Brand Equity Change ……………...………………..82
Description: