ebook img

Specification Framework for Communication Utilities and Estimation of Utility Adjustment Costs PDF

208 Pages·2008·1.65 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Specification Framework for Communication Utilities and Estimation of Utility Adjustment Costs

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-08/0-4998-3 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date SPECIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNICATION October 2007 UTILITIES AND ESTIMATION OF UTILITY ADJUSTMENT Published: December 2007 COSTS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Cesar Quiroga, David Ford, Timothy Taylor, Stanley Kranc, Edgar Report 0-4998-3 Kraus, and Eun Sug Park 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-4998 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2006 – August 2007 P. O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Standardization of Special Provisions and Determination of Unit Costs for Utility Installations URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-4998-3.pdf 16. Abstract Report 0-4998-1, “A Unit Cost and Construction Specification Framework for Utility Installations,” described a prototype framework of construction specifications and corresponding unit cost work items for utility installations at TxDOT and recommendations on how to implement that framework in Texas. That report focused on water and sanitary sewer installations. Report 0-4998-2, “Construction Specification Requirements for Water and Sanitary Sewer Installations,” provided a detailed description of the corresponding specification requirements for water and sanitary sewer utility installations that could be used to prepare the construction specifications. This report is a follow up to the 0-4998-1 and 0-4998-2 reports. It describes a prototype framework of specification requirements and corresponding unit cost work items for communication utilities. The requirements for each specification include a summary table outlining the main characteristics of the proposed specification and provide a listing of bid items, subsidiary items, and units of measurement, followed by a list of specification requirements. This report also summarizes a methodology to develop utility adjustment cost estimates during the early stages of the project development process and a procedure for estimating the uncertainty and likelihood of exceedance of those estimates. The need for that methodology became apparent after realizing the limitations of traditional approaches that simply estimate utility adjustment costs as percentages of the highway construction costs without providing a measure of uncertainty for those estimates. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Utility Accommodation, Utility Relocation, Utility No restrictions. This document is available to the Adjustment, Utility Reimbursement, Unit Costs, public through NTIS: Standard Specifications, Communication, National Technical Information Service Communication Utilities, Cost Estimate Springfield, Virginia 22161 http://www.ntis.gov 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 208 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized SPECIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNICATION UTILITIES AND ESTIMATION OF UTILITY ADJUSTMENT COSTS by Cesar Quiroga, P.E. Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute David Ford, P.E. Associate Professor, Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University Timothy Taylor, P.E. Graduate Research Assistant Texas Transportation Institute Stanley Kranc, P.E. Professor Emeritus, Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South Florida Edgar Kraus, P.E. Assistant Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute and Eun Sug Park Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute Report 0-4998-3 Project 0-4998 Project Title: Standardization of Special Provisions and Determination of Unit Costs for Utility Installations Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration October 2007 Published: December 2007 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this document reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation, nor is it intended for construction, bidding, or permit purposes. The engineer in charge of the project was Cesar Quiroga, P.E. (Texas Registration #84274). The United States Government and the State of Texas do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was conducted in cooperation with TxDOT and FHWA. The researchers would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance provided by TxDOT officials, in particular the following: • Jeff Masek, Houston District (project director); • John Campbell, Right of Way Division (program coordinator); • Peggy Chandler, Design Division; • Gary Ray, formerly at the Houston District; • Jesse Cooper, Right of Way Division; • Tom Yarbrough, Research and Technology Implementation Office; and • Sylvia Medina, Research and Technology Implementation Office. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................ix LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................................xi LIST OF ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND TERMS.....................................................xii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2. COMMUNICATION UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS............................................3 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................3 SPECIAL SPECIFICATION SAMPLE.....................................................................................3 Special Specification Style Issues...........................................................................................8 Special Specification Content, Measurement, and Payment Issues......................................10 TXDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.............................................................................14 PROPOSED SPECIFICATION FRAMEWORK....................................................................16 SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.....................................................................................29 Excavation and Backfill for Structures.................................................................................32 Select Backfill for Structures................................................................................................36 Trench Excavation Protection...............................................................................................38 Open-Trench Conduit Structures..........................................................................................39 Aboveground Conduit Structures.........................................................................................46 Trenchless Pipes, Conduit Structures, and Box Culverts.....................................................51 Open-Trench Pipe and Conduit Structure Encasement........................................................61 Communication Cable..........................................................................................................65 Removing and Relocating Conduit Structures......................................................................72 Adjusting, or Removing and Relocating Communication Cable..........................................75 Manholes and Inlets..............................................................................................................78 Ground Boxes.......................................................................................................................80 Cable Vaults..........................................................................................................................84 Communication Buildings and Cabinets..............................................................................88 Pole Assemblies....................................................................................................................93 Removing and Relocating Ground Boxes...........................................................................101 Removing and Relocating Cable Vaults.............................................................................103 Removing and Relocating Communication Buildings and Cabinets..................................106 Adjusting, or Removing and Relocating Pole Assemblies.................................................109 Removing Structures...........................................................................................................112 Abandoning Structures........................................................................................................114 Temporary Utility Adjustments..........................................................................................117 CHAPTER 3. IMPACT OF UTILITY ADJUSTMENT COSTS ON HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATION.................................................................................119 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................119 LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................................................120 vii SAMPLE DATA ASSEMBLY..............................................................................................126 ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE DATA.................................................................................129 General Observations..........................................................................................................129 Statistical Analysis..............................................................................................................138 CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................159 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS..................................................................................................159 Communication Infrastructure Construction Specifications...............................................159 Utility Adjustment Cost Estimation....................................................................................162 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION..........................................................163 Utility Installation Construction Specifications..................................................................163 Utility Adjustment Cost Estimation....................................................................................166 Other Recommendations.....................................................................................................168 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................171 APPENDIX. PROCEDURE TO DEVELOP THE SAMPLE DATASET................................177 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Lighting and Signal-Related Standard Specifications—Year 2004 Specifications.....14 Figure 2. Proposed Water Installation Specification Framework ( 6, 7)......................................17 Figure 3. Proposed Sanitary Sewer Specification Framework ( 6, 7)...........................................18 Figure 4. Proposed Drainage-Related Specification Framework ( 6, 7).......................................19 Figure 5. Prototype Communication Utility Specification Framework.......................................20 Figure 6. Current Project Development Process at TxDOT (adapted from [2 9])......................119 Figure 7. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost – 476 Records.........................133 Figure 8. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “BR” (Bridge Replacement) – 36 Records.....................................................................................134 Figure 9. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “CNF” (Convert Non-Freeway to Freeway) – 20 Records...............................................................134 Figure 10. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “INC” (Interchange) – 28 Records...................................................................................................135 Figure 11. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “MSC” (Miscellaneous Construction) – 62 Records.........................................................................135 Figure 12. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Types “NNF” (New Location Non-Freeway) and “NLF” (New Location Freeway) – 32 Records............136 Figure 13. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “RER” (Rehabilitate Existing Road) – 60 Records...........................................................................136 Figure 14. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “WF” (Widen Freeway) – 60 Records............................................................................................137 Figure 15. Total Utility Cost versus Non-Utility Highway Cost for Project Type “WNF” (Widen Non-Freeway) – 132 Records..................................................................................137 Figure 16. Total Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio – 476 Records....................141 Figure 17. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio – 476 Records..............................................................................................................144 Figure 18. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “BR” (Bridge Replacement) – 36 Records......................................145 Figure 19. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “CNF” (Convert Non-Freeway to Freeway) – 20 Records..............146 Figure 20. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “INC” (Interchange) – 28 Records...................................................147 Figure 21. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “MSC” (Miscellaneous Construction) – 62 Records.......................148 Figure 22. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Types “NNF” (New Location Non-Freeway) and “NLF” (New Location Freeway) – 32 Records..........................................................................................149 Figure 23. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “RER” (Rehabilitate Existing Road) – 60 Records.........................150 Figure 24. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “WF” (Widen Freeway) – 60 Records.............................................151 ix Figure 25. Proportion of Projects Exceeding Utility Cost to Non-Utility Highway Cost Ratio for Project Type “WNF” (Widen Non-Freeway) – 132 Records................................152 Figure 26. General Progression of Procedures to Estimate Utility Adjustment Costs (Summary View)...................................................................................................................158 Figure 27. Query to Obtain Winning Bid Unit Cost Data.........................................................177 Figure 28. Query to Obtain Total Highway Construction Costs...............................................178 Figure 29. Highlighting Utility-Related Special Specifications................................................179 Figure 30. Query to Produce a Listing of Utility-Related Special Specifications and their Corresponding Construction Unit Items...............................................................................180 Figure 31. Query to Obtain Unit Cost Data for Utility-Related Special Specifications............181 Figure 32. Query to Obtain Total Utility Costs in Highway Construction Projects..................182 Figure 33. Query to Obtain Relevant Data from the ROW Division’s Utility Agreement Database................................................................................................................................183 Figure 34. First Query to Compare Utility Adjustment Costs and Highway Costs...................184 Figure 35. Second Query to Compare Utility Adjustment Costs and Highway Costs..............186 Figure 36. Query to Express Costs in 2006 Dollars...................................................................187 x

Description:
Associate Professor, Zachry Department of Civil Engineering. Texas A&M .. Figure 5. Prototype Communication Utility Specification Framework. The tables also include some electric installation specifications that have relevance
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.