PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 108(3), 2006, pp. 543-549 SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF FLEA BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) ASSOCIATED WITH MOIST HABITATS IN ISPARTA AND BURDUR PROVINCES, TURKEY ALI GOK AND EBRU GUL ASLAN Stileyman Demirel University, Science and Art Faculty, Biology Department, 32260 Isparta, Turkey(e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract.4An one-year survey was conducted on flea beetles associated with moist habitats in Isparta and Burdur provinces in the central part of the 8Lake District9 in Turkey. Specimens were collected from various humid habitats divided into five major groups: moist meadows, marshes, moist pastures, lake sides, and stream banks. A total of 4,443 individuals belonging to 45 species were found, some of which are important pests of several wild plants. Habitat preference and relative abundance data are provided for each species. Among the genera collected in the study, Chaetocnema Stephens was the most abundant genus typically occurring in moist habitats. There was no significant difference in flea beetle species composition among the different habitat types. The highest species abundance and composition occurred in stream banks and moist meadows, whereas marshes have the lowest species abundance and composition. Key Words: Flea beetles, moist habitats, species composition, abundance, Turkey Alticinae is the largest subfamily of weeds belonging to Euphorbiaceae Chrysomelidae and can be distinguished (Konstantinov 1998, Jonsen et al. 2001, from other Chrysomelidae by _ their Konstantinov et al. 2001). greatly enlarged hind femora (Furth Flea beetles are common in almost all 1988). It as represented: by. 59. genera types of habitats. The richest flea beetle and more than 1,000 species in the communities occur in open areas near Palearctic Region (Konstantinov and forests or scrublands often associated Vandenberg 1996). with rivers or lakes and in various kinds Alticines are highly specialized phy- of meadows (Konstantinov and Vanden- tophagous insects and often follow their berg 1996). Although most alticines are host plant distributions (Furth 1979, terrestrial, several of them, e.g., Altica, Jolivet 1988). Some of them are serious Chaetocnema Stephens and Longitarsus, economic pests, causing direct damage are attracted by subaquatic plants along and transmitting viruses; however, sev- streams (Jolivet and Verma 2002). eral, including species of Longitarsus The Turkish Alticinae fauna consists Berthold and A/tica Muller have been of more than 250 species with recent used successfully in the biological control contributions by Aslan et al. (1999, 2002) of weeds (Booth et al. 1990). Some and Gok et al. (2002, 2003, 2004). Most species of Aphthona Chevrolat are also of these works are faunistic studies. The commonly used in biological control of Alticinae in Turkey are relatively poorly 544 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON studied from the ecological point of view There are also some other plants belong- including habitat use and host plant ing to Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, and associations (Cilbiroglu and Gok 2004). Brassicaceae. Therefore, we regard this study as a pre- Moist pastures (MP): These are open liminary step for future ecological studies areas located at moist, high elevations on on the Alticinae of Turkey. cool mountain slopes at an average of Burdur and Isparta are located in the 1,000-1,500 m. The areas are divided central part of the 8Lake District9, which with small springs, and mainly include is one of the most important wetland annual herbaceaus plant communities. areas of Turkey. This region includes Other parts away from the springs, are a series of lakes of different sizes and relatively drier. Dominant plants are ecological conditions. Its topography 1s species of Brassicaceae and rarely Ra- composed of narrow and long mountain nunculaceae. ranges, and depression areas in between Lake sides (LS): Includes humid areas (Yildirim and Kebapg1 2004). adjacent to lakes, often surrounded by This work is part of the authors9 agricultural lands, especially wheat studies on the Alticinae of Isparta and fields. Asteraceae and Poaceae are the Burdur provinces, and the purpose is to dominant plant families. There are also assess flea beetle composition and abun- orchards in surroundings. dance in habitats close to water. Stream banks (SB): These areas have the most diverse vegetation compared MATERIALS AND METHODS with other groups. There is a wide di- Site description.4The study was con- versity of plants, with many _ species ducted in Isparta and Burdur provinces coexisting in a small area. The areas are (between 29°339 and 31°20'E and 37-03" characterized by woodshrub vegetation and 38°059'N), which are in the central and their undergrowth of herbaceous part of the Lake District in Turkey, at plants. The dominant woodshrub cover the average altitude of 1,000 m. The area consists of the following families: Faga- is located between central Anatolia and ceae, Betulaceae, Salicaceae, and Rosa- the Mediterrenean region of Turkey; ceae. The herbaceous cover is represent- therefore, both arid and temperate cli- ed by plants of the Lamiaceae, Fabaceae, matic conditions are present. The sam- Asteraceae, Convolvulaceae, Scrophu- pled moist habitats are categorized into lariaceae, and Boraginaceae. five groups as follows: Sampling.4Fieldwork included sur- Moist meadows (MM): Includes nat- vey of two representative stations for ural areas along or near a watercourse each of the five habitats (Fig. 1). The ten dominated by gramineous vegetation stations were sampled biweekly from and scattered small shrubs. These areas March through September 2003 when are drier than marshes with many more the adult flea beetles are active. The plant species. Plants from Lamiaceae, stations were sampled by collecting at Asteraceae, Rosaceae, and Salicaceae are each site for 60 minutes with a sweep net. common. Sampling was made randomly from all Marshes9 (MA): Consists of open existing plants. A total of 4,443 beetles swampy areas that are closely associated were collected and identified using the with water, with rushes and sedges as the keys by Warchalowski (2003). The num- dominate plants. Plant species include ber of adult individuals was counted for Phragmites spp. (Poaceae), Typha spp. each species. The relative abundance of (Typhaceae), Bolboschoenus spp. (Cyper- each species was determined by using aceae), and Carex spp. (Cyperaceae). the sample formula nj/Ny- < 100 (nj = VOLUME 108, NUMBER 3 Nn£ Nn 5 @ Yalvag TURKEY > 4 Cee.) $.Karaagag KR6ivperri i Tefenni@ ARikvseur D HB @ Settlements A Stations Korkuteli @ MP1 @ Alnnyayla Fig. 1. The study area with stations: MM1, MM2, moist meadows; MA1, MA2, marshes; MP1, MP2, moist pastures; LS1, LS2, lake sides; SB1, SB2, stream banks. individuals of species 1; Nr = _ total genera with one species each. Although individuals of all species). The specimens Longitarsus has the highest number of are deposited in the Department of species, Chaetocnema was the most Biology, Faculty of Art and Science, abundant genus, representing 36.3% of Suleyman Demirel University. the total number of individuals captured during the study period. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The number of species found in each In the study, forty-five species from habitat are as follows, in descending ten genera of flea beetles were found order: stream banks (SB) 32, moist associated with the five moist habitat meadows (MM) 28, moist pastures types. Species associations with selected (MP) 21, lake sides (LS) 20, and marshes habitats are in Table 1. A list of flea (MA) 19. The species richness did not beetle species collected is in Table 2, vary significantly from habitat to habi- together with their number and relative tat. More species were found in SB and abundance. Longitarsus and Chaetoc- MM, probably because these two habi- nema were the largest genera with 12 tats have the most diverse vegetation and 10 species, respectively. Podagrica with many species of Lamiaceae, Aster- and Dibolia were the least species-rich aceae, Salicaceae, and Graminae, which 546 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Table 1. Flea beetles associated with moist habitats. MM, moist meadows; MA, marshes: MP, moist pastures; LS, lake sides; SB, stream banks. Species MM MA MP LS SB Altica ancyrensis (Weise) Altica carduorum Guérin-Meéneville Altica deserticola (Weise) Altica lythri Aubé Altica oleracea (Linnaeus) Aphthona flaviceps Allard Aphthona nigriceps (Redtenbacher) Aphthona pygmaea Kutschera Chaetocnema concinna Marsham Chaetocnema conducta (Motschulsky) Chaetocnema coyei (Allard) Chaetocnema hortensis (Geoffroy) ++~ +4 4 ++++ t+¢4t Chaetocnema major (Jacquelin du Val) +++ t+t++¢+4++ Chaetocnema mannerheimi (Gyllenhal) Chaetocnema montenegrina Heikertinger ¢+¢t4++¢++4++ ¢ Chaetocnema sahlbergi (Gyllenhal) ++ +t++4 Chaetocnema scheffleri (Kutschera) Chaetocnema tibialis (Mliger) Crepidodera aurata (Marsham) Crepidodera aurea (Geoffroy) Crepidodera lamina (Bedel) Dibolia occultans (Koch) +++4 4 Longitarsus bertii Leonardi Longitarsus kutschera Rye Longitarsus longipennis Kutschera Longitarsus luridus (Scopoli) ++ ++4 ++ Longitarsus lycopi (Foudras) 4+4++ + 444++4+++ + +4 +4 Longitarsus melanocephalus (De Geer) Longitarsus parvulus (Paykull) Longitarsus pellucidus (Foudras) Longitarsus pratensis (Panzer) Longitarsus scutellaris (Rey) +++4+ Longitarsus solaris Gruev Longitarsus succineus Foudras Neocrepidodera ferruginea (Scopoli) 4++++ +++ + + Neocrepidodera impressa obtusangula (J. Daniel) Phyllotreta aerea Allard ++ ++ Phyllotreta diademata (Foudras) Phyllotreta vittula (Redtenbacher) Podagrica menetriesi (Faldermann) Psylliodes anatolicus G6k and Cilbiroglu Psylliodes circumdatus (Redtenbacher) Psylliodes cupreus (Koch) Psylliodes magnificus Gruev Psylliodes reitteri Weise are characteristic food plant families of of phytophagous insect communities. most Alticinae (Cilbiroglu and Gok The species numbers found in_ other 2004). According to Lawton (1983), three habitats (MP, LS, MA) were very changes of plant species composition similar (Fig. 2). and diversity influence the habitat com- As shown in Table 1, eight species are plexity, hence the diversity and richness found in all habitats: Longitarsus long- VOLUME 108, NUMBER 3 547 Table 2. Numbers and percent abundance of flea beetles collected. Species Number Collected Relative Abundance (%) Altica oleracea (Linnaeus) 585 SSF Chaetocnema coyei (Allard) 542 1222. Chaetocnema tibialis (Iliger) 379 8.53 Altica deserticola (Weise) Dif 6.12 Chaetocnema concinna Marsham 214 4.82 Longitarsus lycopi (Foudras) 180 4.05 Longitarsus pratensis (Panzer) WS 3.94 Neocrepidodera ferruginea (Scopoli) 174 592 Crepidodera aurata (Marsham) 163 3.67 Chaetocnema mannerheimi (Gyllenhal) 151 3.4 Chaetocnema major (Jacquelin du Val) 141 3)I1 7/ Longitarsus parvulus (Paykull) 122 2.74 Chaetocnema conducta (Motschulsky) 104 2.34 Longitarsus longipennis Kutschera 102 Z29 Neocrepidodera impressa obtusangula (J. Daniel) 87 1.96 Longitarsus pellucidus (Foudras) 82 1.85 Longitarsus melanocephalus (De Geer) 81 1.82 Dibolia occultans (Koch) 81 1.82 Psylliodes cupreus (Koch) 76 el Aphthona pygmaea Kutschera AZ 1.62 Phyllotreta aerea Allard Tz 1.62 Phyllotreta vittula (Redtenbacher) 62 139 Longitarsus succineus Foudras 51 WES Longitarsus luridus (Scopoli) 48 1.08 Phyllotreta diademata (Foudras) 48 1.08 Podagrica menetriesi (Faldermann) 32 Oz Aphthona flaviceps Allard 3] 0.7 Psylliodes anatolicus G6k and Cilbiroglu 30 0.67 Chaetocnema hortensis (Geoffroy) 28 0.63 Psylliodes magnificus Gruev Dy 0.61 Longitarsus bertii Leonardi Dil 0.61 Crepidodera lamina (Bedel) 24 0.54 Chaetocnema scheffleri (Kutschera) 24 0.54 Chaetocnema sahlbergi (Gyllenhal) 2p) 0.5 Longitarsus scutellaris (Rey) 22 0.5 Psylliodes circumdatus (Redtenbacher) 21 0.47 Crepidodera aurea (Geoffroy) 18 0.41 Altica carduorum Guérin-Meéneville 7 0.38 Altica ancyrensis (Weise) 13 0.29 Longitarsus kutschera Rye 12 O27 Aphthona nigriceps (Redtenbacher) 1] 0.25 Chaetocnema montenegrina Heikertinger 8 0.18 Longitarsus solaris Gruev 6 0.14 Altica lythri Aubé 5) 0.11 Psylliodes reitteri Weise ] 0.02 ipennis, Longitarsus luridus, Altica oler- the genus Phyllotreta, and two in Psy- acea, Chaetocnema concinna, Chaetoc- lliodes: Phyllotreta diademata, Phyllo- nema conducta, Chaetocnema_ coyel, treta vittula, Psylliodes circumdatus and Chaetocnema tibialis, and Psylliodes cu- Psylliodes reitteri. preus. Four species were found in only Phyllotreta mainly prefer plants from one habitat type; of which two were in Brassicaceae and Resedaceae which grow 548 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON dale MM MA MP LS 3B Fig. 2. Species percentage of the five habitats studied. MM, moist meadows; MA, marshes; MP, moist pastures; LS, lake sides; SB, stream banks. in cultivated areas, roadsides, orchards, LITERATURE CITED and shrubs (Mohr 1966; Furth 1979; Aslan, I., B. Gruev, and H. Ozbek. 1999. A Matsuda 1988, Nielsen 1988). The low preliminary review of the subfamily Alticinae density of Brassicaceae in moist habitats (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Turkey. Turk- may be the reason for limited habitat ish Journal of Zoology 23: 373-414. Aslan, I., R. Beenen, and H. Ozbek. 2002. New occurrence of Phyllotreta. Many species records of leaf beetles from Turkey (Coleop- of Psylliodes are also Brassicaceae feed- tera, Chrysomelidae). Entomologische Blatter ers (Furth 1983). The restriction of each 98: 231-235. Psylliodes species to one habitat may be Booth, R. G., M. L. Cox, and R. B. Madge. 1990. Gui- temporary or accidental. des to Insects of Importance to Man 3. Coleop- tera. University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 384 pp. The most abundant species in number Cilbiroglu, E. G. and A. Gok. 2004. Flea beetles of individuals were Altica oleracea, (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Isparta, Tur- Chaetocnema_ coyei, and Chaetocnema key, with habitat use and host plant associa- ribialis*with t379o, 12:29; and 8.53%, tions. Proceedings of the Entomological Soci- respectively. Psylliodes reitteri was the ety of Washington 106: 858-864. rarest species, represented by a single Furth, D. G. 1979. Zoogeography and host plant ecology of the Alticinae of Israel, especially individual. Phyllotreta; with descriptions of three new Density and species composition of species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Israel phytophagous beetles are affected by Journal of Zoology 28(1): 1437. many factors, such as vegetation, humid- 1983. Alticinae of Israel: Psy/liodes (Co- ity, temperature and host plants (Gillott leoptera: Chrysomelidae). Israel Journal of Entomology 17: 37-58. 1995). Our studies revealed that moist 1988. The jumping apparatus of flea habitats are preferred by a large number beetles (Alticinae)4The metafemoral spring. of moisture-loving flea beetles. pp. 285-297. In Jolivet, P., E. Petitpierre, and VOLUME 108, NUMBER 3 549 T. H. Hsiao, eds. Biology of Chrysomelidae. Konstantinov, A. S. and N. J. Vandenberg. 1996. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Handbook of Palearctic Flea Beetles (Coleop- Netherlands. 615 pp. tera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae). Contributions Gillott, C. 1995. Entomology. Plenum Press, New on Entomology, International 1(3): 237-439. York. 798 pp. Konstantinov, A. S., M. G. Volkovitsh, and M. Gok, A., E. G. GCilbiroglu, and Y. Ayvaz. 2003. Cristofaro. 2001. New data on Palearctic New contribution to the Turkish flea beetle Aphthona (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with fauna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae). description of a new species: Taxonomic and Israel Journal of Zoology 49: 319-320. faunistic results of biological control explora- . 2004. New records of flea beetles (Co- tion. Entomological News 112: 31-41. leoptera: Chrysomelidae) from Turkey. Phyto- Lawton, J. H. 1983. Plant architecture and the parasitica 32: 360-362. diversity of phytophagous insects. Annual Gok, A., E. G. Cilbiroglu, Y. Ayvaz, and M. Z. Review of Entomology 28: 23-39. Yildirrm. 2002. Two new records for the Matsuda, K. 1988. Feeding stimulants of leaf Turkish flea beetle fauna: Phyllotreta reitteri beetles, pp. 41456. Jn Jolivet, P., E. Petitpierre, Heik., 1911 and £&pitrix dieckmanni Mohr, and T. H. Hsiao, eds. Biology of Chrysome- 1968 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Alticinae). lidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dor- Israel Journal of Zoology 48: 254-255. drecht, The Netherlands. 615 pp. Jolivet, P. 1988. Food habits and food selection of Mohr, K. H. 1966. Chrysomelidae, pp. 95-299. In Chrysomelidae. Bionomic and evolutionary Freude, H., K. Harde, and G. A. Lohse, eds. perspectives, pp. 1-24. Jn Jolivet, P., E. Die Kafer Mitteleuropas, Krefeld. 299 pp. Petitpierre, and T. H. Hsiao, eds. Biology of Nielsen, J. K. 1988. Crucifer-feeding Chrysome- Chrysomelidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, lidae: Mechanism of host plant finding and Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 615 pp. acceptance, pp. 25-40. Jn Jolivet, P., E. Jolivet, P. and K. K. Verma. 2002. Biology of Leaf Petitpierre, and T. H. Hsiao, eds. Biology of Beetles. Intercept Publishers, UK. 332 pp. Chrysomelidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Jonsen, I. D., R. S. Bourchier, and J. Roland. 2001. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 615 pp. The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona Warchalowski, A. 2003. Chrysomelidae: The Leaf flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches. Beetles of Europe and the Mediterranean Oecologia 127: 287-294. Area. Natura optima dux Foundation, Wars- Konstantinov, A. S. 1998. Revision of the Palearc- zawa. 600 pp. tic Species of Aphthona Chevrolat and Cladis- Yildirim, M. Z. and U. Kebapgi. 2004. Slugs tic Classification of the Aphthonini (Coleop- (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) of the Lakes Region tera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae). Associated (GOoller Bélgesi) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Publishers, Gainesville, Florida. 429 pp. Zoology 28: 155-160.