Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page i Space and Social Theory Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page ii The British Sociological Association is publishing a series of books to review the state of the discipline at the beginning of the millennium. New Horizons in Sociology also seeks to locate the contribution of British scholarship to the wider development of sociology. Sociology is taught in all the major institutions of higher education in the United Kingdom as well as throughout North America and the Europe of the former western bloc. Sociology is now establishing itself in the former eastern bloc. But it was only in the second half of the twentieth century that sociology moved from the fringes of UK academic life into the mainstream. British sociology has also provided a home for movements that have renewed and challenged the discipline; the revival of academic Marxism, the renaissance in feminist theory, the rise of cultural studies, for example. Some of these developments have become sub-disciplines whilst yet others have challenged the very basis of the sociological enterprise. Each has left their mark. Now therefore is a good time both to take stock and to scan the horizon, looking back and looking forward. Series Editor: Bridget Fowler, University of Glasgow Published titles include: Nationalism and Soical Theory Gerard Delanty and Patrick O’Mahoney Interactionism Paul Atkinson and William Housley Feminist Sociology Sara Delamont The New Sociology of Economic Behaviour Ralph Fevre The Sociology of Religion Grace Davie Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page iii Space and Social Theory Andrzej Zieleniec Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page iv © Andrzej Zieleniec 2007 First published 2007 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. SAGE Publications Ltd 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London EC1Y1SP SAGE Publications Inc. 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320 SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road New Delhi 110 044 SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd 33 Pekin Street #02-01 Far East Square Singapore 048763 Library of Congress Control Number:2006940062 British Library Cataloguing in Publication data Acatalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978–0–7619–4447–8 Typeset by Newgen Imaging System (P) Ltd, Chennai, India Printed in India at Replika Press Pvt. Ltd. Printed on paper from sustainable resources Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page v For Kasia, Rowan and Audrey Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page vi Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page vii contents Preface viii Acknowledgements xviii Chapter 1 Karl Marx: the implicit spatiality of historical materialism 1 Chapter 2 Georg Simmel: the space of formal sociology 34 Chapter 3 Henri Lefebvre: the production of space 60 Chapter 4 David Harvey: the political economy of space 98 Chapter 5 Michel Foucault: space, knowledge and power 125 Chapter 6 Legacies and prospects: spatialising contemporary modernity 150 Bibliography 182 Index 197 Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page viii preface Space is or has been all too often taken for granted and assumed as a relatively unacknowledged aspect or backdrop to life. It is just there to be filled up, used, crossed over or negotiated in everyday life. In this it is much the same with much social theory. There is or has been an apparent neglect of the detailed consideration of space as an issue or a factor worthy of systematic analysis at least that is, until the last quarter of the twentieth century. Since then and with the publication of a number of influential texts and studies, particularly in the realm of a re-imagined human or cultural geography, space has become increasingly acknowledged as a fundamental and crucial area for social enquiry and analysis. Space and spatial analysis are now increasingly being considered as an essential element in the development of theoretical knowledge and understanding as well as empirical investigations in a range of social scientific disciplines. No longer is the consideration and analysis of space deemed the preserve of geographical perspectives on the interplay between the human and ‘natural’ environments. Human-made environments and the social relations that made them as well as the interactions that occur in and through them is now the subject of critical and detailed analysis. Due credit then must be given to human and social geographers for their role in promoting and furthering the reprioritisation of space as a fundamental element for a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of social relations. However, in this new climate of inter-disciplinary activ- ity there is the potential for an expansion in distinctly spatial analyses that should provide not only new horizons but also new directions for a vari- ety of disciplines. Such a fecund future is premised on the recognition of the development and applicability of theories of space and spatial theories. The aim of this book is to present some of these theoretical perspectives and to highlight their importance for the development of a more inclusive and accepted social theory of space. In this the intention is not to present a comprehensive overview of all the contributions to the corpus of knowledge that constitutes the field of social theories of space. Instead the objective is to be necessarily selective and approach the development of ‘thinking on space’ in a somewhat chronological manner. Similarly, the impacts and influence of such theories and analyses are to provide an indication of the fruitfulness of incorporating a social Ziele-FM.qxd 5/6/07 9:40 PM Page ix preface theory of space into empirical and theoretical investigations of the complex social relations that constitutes, in various forms, the investi- gation of social reality. In particular, but not exclusively, these theories are important for providing an understanding of the city and the urban which has and continues to be the focus of much social analysis of modernity. It is perhaps instructive to give some personal details of my own ‘coming to terms’ with space as a fundamental importance for social analysis and investigation. As an undergraduate I was encouraged in the development of my own ‘sociological imagination’ through instruction in the classical theoretical foundations of the discipline (of Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Simmel, Comte, Saint Simon, Tonnies, etc.) and the development of contemporary theoretical approaches, perspectives, paradigms (from C. W. Mills, Williams, Elias, E. P. Thompson, Goffman, Popper, Kuhn, Bauman, Bourdieu, Foucault, Giddens, Beck, the post-modern debates of Jameson, Lyotard, Baudrillard, etc.). These provided the epistemological and ontological foundations of the discipline as well as its subsequent development and which informed the study of substantive areas including the urban, modernity, mass media, culture, consumption, stratification, work, literature and informed the detailed exploration of the methodological practice of sociology as well as its intellectual ix framework. In retrospect, it is perhaps easier to identify omissions than accentuate the positive aspects of my own foundation in sociology. In this, I could highlight the lack of an appreciation of the importance of a sociological analysis and understanding of the spatial dimension of the structure, organisation and experience of social relations and activities in the various ‘specialisms’ that were covered. This relative lack of focus on space in sociological analysis and in my own knowledge only became apparent when conducting doctoral thesis research necessitated understanding of the problematics of space. Mythesis research involved the analysis of the origins and development of urban public parks as inherent features of the social and physical landscape of the city of modernity. What was revealed in my research was that public parks, as fairly universal and ubiquitous urban spaces, are composed of a complex interaction of physical features, dominant representations and everyday uses and experiences that all combined to ‘define’ them as social spaces with the network of spaces and spatial arrangements that constituted the social landscape of the city. This complexity required a comprehensive understanding and analysis of existing social theories of space and spatial social theory to provide a theoretical framework for the empirical analysis of their origins and development within the historical, social, economic, political and spatial
Description: