ebook img

Social Encounters Between Male Brown Spiders, Loxosceles gaucho (Araneae, Sicariidae) PDF

2007·7 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Social Encounters Between Male Brown Spiders, Loxosceles gaucho (Araneae, Sicariidae)

2007 (2008). The Journal ofArachnology 35:493^98 SOCIAL ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN MALE BROWN SPIDERS, LOXOSCELES GAUCHO (ARANEAE, SICARIIDAE) Andre Augusto Stropa: Rua Sargo, 84, Vinhedo, SP, CEP:13280-000, Brazil. E-mail: astropa@gmaiLcom ABSTRACT. Twenty-two interactions between males ofLoxoscelesgaucho Gertsch 1967 were investigated in order to study its intrasexual interactions and level ofaggressiveness. Aggression by lunges or bites was observedinjust22.7% ofthetrialsandthreebehaviorswereidentifiedasaggression-attenuatingmechanisms: a hug; fleeing, and a postural pattern (POS). Interactions took place in 59.1% of the trials and the pairs interacted using one or two behavioral patterns (vibratory and/or postural). The vibratory pattern (VIB) consisted offorelegvibration, palpal drumming, and abdominal pulsation and wasused byboth residentand intruder opponents. The postural pattern (POS) was used exclusively by resident males and it was similar to the behavioral pattern of sexually receptive L. gaucho females; in these cases the intruder male responded using the VIB. In conclusion, the interaction between adult L. gaucho males is usually non-aggressive. The behaviors described in this study possibly promote group-living and help to explain the gregarious populations of recluse spiders. Intra-specific sexual mimicry can occur in these interactions, but this hypothesis requires further investigation. Keywords: Aggression, gregariousness, male-male interaction, sexual mimicry Aggression takes place when an animal animal model for the study of aggression- attacks or threatens an opponent. Findings in attenuating mechanisms. This is the case of Game Theory have shown that aggressive or the recluse spiders that are generally solitary agonistic encounters between conspecifics usu- but can aggregate around and inside buildings ally minimize and/or delay aggression, improv- (Biicherl 1961; Horner & Stewart 1967; Fischer ing the individual fitness of the opponents & Vasconcellos-Neto 2005; Marques-da-Silva (Maynard Smith & Price 1973; Maynard Smith et al. 2006). & Parker 1976; Whitehouse 1997). In male- Individuals of the recluse spider Loxosceles male spider interactions, some particular char- gaucho Gertsch 1967 (Araneae, Sicariidae) are acteristics or behaviors can act as aggression- usually solitary in their natural habitat, as in attenuating mechanisms, such as differences in the Butantan Institute woods (Japyassu et al. weight (Suter & Keyley 1984) or size (White- 2003). However, like other recluse spiders they house 1997; Bridge et al. 2000; Taylor & aggregate in manmade environments or in Jackson 2003), and ritualized behaviors (Lubin disturbed natural habitats. For instance Stropa 1986). Even the presence/absence ofdetermined & Pinhal (2005) found adult L. gaucho aggre- elements in the contest area can affect oppo- gating in brick piles deposited on the ground; nent aggressiveness, as shown by Wells (1988) and Stropa (2004) reported that two males of for male Triteparvula (Bryant 1935) (Araneae, this speciesmay share asmall retreatin thefield Salticidae), which escalate contests in the during the day. At night, however, males presence ofa female model. commonly wander searching for females. The In addition, aggressiveness and tolerance are silk produced by both males and females is key factors to understand the evolution of easily recognized in the field and is abundant, social behavior in spiders (see Uetz & Hieber at least in the Botanic Garden from Botucatu, 1997). Most spiders are essentially solitary, but Brazil. The silk covers portions of the spiders’ a few species have different degrees of socia- retreats which are mainly in crevices and the bility that range from aggregations of individ- cavities of the litter. The web of L. gaucho is ual webs to cooperative brood care (Aviles thin, white, and irregular and covers the sub- 1997). There are species that exhibit social strate like a thin sheet. L. gaucho also occurs in plasticity, i.e., that do not display obligatory house yards but there is no evidence that it social behavior. These species are a primary prefers this habitat (Stropa & Pinhal 2005). It is 493 494 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY endemicfrom southwestern Brazil and it occurs balance (160 g; 0.01 mg) one day before mainly in the states of Sao Paulo and Parana experiments. The avg. weight of the specimens (Marques-da-Silva & Fischer 2005). was 55.23 ± 15.42 mg (mean ± SD). Each In this study, a resident-intruder paradigm spider was tested only once. was used to examine interactions between male One week before the encounter, one spider of L. gaucho in order to study its intrasexual each pair was marked with a nail polish dot on aggressiveness and to explore the possible the abdomen to facilitate individual recogni- influences of the male-male interactions on tion. No toxic effects of this product were the lifestyle of recluse spiders. Voucher speci- observed. Temperature and relative air humid- mens are deposited at the Colegao de Aranhas ity were kept at approximately 25° C and 70% do Departamento de Zoologia, UNESP, Cam- inside the arenas. pus de Botucatu, UBTU. The encounters were tape recorded (VHS METHODS system) from above the arenas. Each encounter — ended when a “losing” spider was identified Test animals and holding conditions. Forty- (e.g., when either one of the opponents ran four adult male L. gaucho were hand-collected away from the rival or abandoned the in- from stalk crevices of Eucalyptus sp. at the teraction by moving backwards). — Botanic Garden from IB, UNESP, Botucatu, Data analyses, The behavioral sequences Brazil (22°59'S, 48°26'W). These animals were were qualitatively and quantitatively described m(8a5inmtaminXed25inmminidnitveirdnuaalldigalmaestser)tefsotr atbuobuets pinatahwfalyosw dthiaatgreanmde(dFigi.n 1a)ggsroestshiaotnbaehnadvinoorna-l 30 days before the experiments, and fed once aggression could be identified. Aggressive a week on insects collected by sweeping. About behaviors included lunges or bites (Table 1). 3 days before the experiment, the spiders were Encounters without occurrence of these lunges fed in excess (5 Musca domestica per spider) to or bites were defined as non-aggressive en- balance satiation level. The forty-four spiders counters. The predominance ofthese aggressive were used for twe—nty-two pairwise encounters. and non-aggressive encounters was tested using The encounters. Twenty-two encounters be- the Chi-square goodness-of-fit test with Yates tween males were carried out using an intruder- correction. resident paradigm. One spider, designated as RESULTS the resident, was placed inside the arena (a transparent plastic cage, 110 mm diameter X The general pattern of encounters between 70 mm high). This area was about 30-50% male L. gaucho began with the intruders bigger than the retreats of L. gaucho in the walking into the arena and touching the field. One week after this, time enough for the residents’ web {n = 21). In one instance, the resident to spin its irregular web, the external resident moved first. After these first move- transparent tube (60 mm long X 40 mm di- ments, in all cases, (n = 22), the intruders ameter) attached to the arena was disconnect- vibrated their body appendices; a pattern des- ed. Another spider, designated as the intruder, ignated as “VIB” (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Fol- was introduced in the tube that was recon- lowing this, the residents responded by fleeing nected to the arena. At this point, both the {n = 9) or interacted usingthe VIB pattern, i.e., resident and the intruder were allowed to similar to the intruders’ behavior {n = 8). The encounter each other. other residents interacted using a postural Spider pairs were selected in order to balance performance rather than movements, a pattern the relative weight between the opponents. designated as “POS” {n ~ 5) (Table 1 and Thus, in 11 encounters weight difference was Fig. 1). The duration of the VIB-VIB encoun- higher than 10% while in the other 11 ters was of 3-8 min while the duration of the encounters weight difference was lower than VIB-POS encounters was much longer, 18- 10%. In the trials with either high or low 37 min. In both types ofencounters, the spiders relative weight, the frequency of residents and of each pair approached and touched each intruders with higherweight was also balanced, otherwith their forelegs (Fig. 1). With theVIB- i.e., residents were heavier in five trials and VIB interaction, when the opponents reached intruders were heavier in the other six trials. the face-to-face position, they overlapped their Spiders were weighed with a Mettler H20T forelegs (behavior named “hug” -Table 1) and — STROPA—MALE-MALE INTERACTION OF LOXOSCELES GAUCHO 495 Intrudermale (insidethetube) Residentmale from 16 to 22 trials from4 to 6 trials from 7 to 9 trials from 10 to 15 trials from 1 to 3 trials Figure 1. Flow diagram of the male-male interaction of L. gaucho {n = 22). Dashed lines delimit the context. Dotted lines indicate the determined behavioral patterns (movements and/or postures of specific portions ofthe spider’s body). The gray line delimits the period ofaggression (area below it). Thickness of arrows indicates the frequency with which the behaviors were observed. one spider ofthe paireither fled orlunged at its abandoned the interaction {n = 3), or fled {n = opponent. On the other hand, when VIB-POS 2). In these last two cases the interaction was interaction took place, the intruder advanced longer than 30 min and the residents became under the resident’s prosoma and then either aggressive, i.e., they changed from POS into 496 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY — Table 1. Behavioral patterns and conspicuous behaviors ofthe male-male interaction ofL. gaucho. Patterns Behaviors Description VIB Foreleg vibration Simultaneous vertical movement ofthe pairs oflegs whose tarsi touch the resident’s silk. Palpal drumming Alternate vertical palp movements Abdominal pulsation 1 Vertical and horizontal abdomen movements POS Abdominal pulsation 2 Just vertical movements and slower than the abdominal pulsation 1 Motionless Stop walking Legs sideways Extension ofall legs sideways Hug Opponentsoverlaptheirforelegs(opponents’ forelegstouchandbeat each other) Lunge One spiderjumps abruptly towards its opponent Bite Cheliceraeholdapartofthebodyofaspiderandthefangspiercethe cuticle VIB pattern and immediately the opponents This is expected because male spiders may not hugged each other and the residents lunged establish residence in the natural habitat since against the intruders. they move while searching for females (Foelix Non-aggressive encounters were preponder- 1982). Moreover, they are not likely to defend ant (77.3%) (n = 17: x\ = 5.500, P < 0.025). empty territories (e.g., without females or other Aggression (occurrence oflunges or bites) took resources). The present study indicates that place in just five encounters (22.7%) (Fig. 1), intruder males were always interested in inter- always after the VIB-VIB interaction, even actingwith residents displaying theVIB pattern when the residents started their interaction (Fig. 1). However, this interaction was also using the POS pattern. In a single aggressive expected since information about habitat qual- encounter there was physical injury; the injured ity can be obtained from other spiders or spider autotomized the bitten leg (Fig. 1). simply from silk (Hodge & Storfer-Isser 1997; Schuck-Paim & Alonso 2001; Bilde et al. 2002). DISCUSSION An unexpected aggression-attenuating mech- The present study indicates that interactions anism observed in this study is the POS pattern between male L. gaucho are predominantly displayed by five of the 22 residents. In these non-aggressive, at least in the resident-intruder trials the resident was nearly motionless with paradigm. When aggression (lunges or bites) the legs stretched sideways, pulsating its abdo- took place, it occurred only after the hug. But men slower than the intruders, and had its in this species, the hug does not necessarily prosoma lifted by the intruder advancement. trigger aggression since it also occurred in non- According to Rinaldi & Stropa (1998), when aggressive male-male (Fig. 1) and female-fe- female L. gaucho are sexually receptive, they male encounters (Stropa & Rinaldi 2001). The allow males to lift their prosoma to copulate. hug is possibly used by adult L. gaucho spiders Males use their own prosoma to lift females, to evaluate fighting ability and/or the size of such as the intruders did in the present study. their opponents, allowing for a decision be- This may not be a simple case of mistaken tween fleeing or fighting. Ifthis is true; the hug sexual identity because there were differences in is an aggression-attenuating mechanism since it the male-male interaction observed here and delays aggression and, as a consequence, im- themale-female interaction reported by Rinaldi proves individual fitness. This situation is and Stropa (1998). Males interact with females predicted in asymmetric animal contests (May- onlybypalpal drumming, forelegvibration and nard Smith & Price 1973; Maynard Smith & abdomen pulsation (Rinaldi & Stropa 1998); Parker 1976; Whitehouse 1997). e.g., the VIB pattern seen here. Female L. Two more conspicuous aggression-attenuat- gaucho become receptive for mating only by ing mechanisms were found: the fleeing and the stretching their legs sideways, pulsating their POS pattern. Residents fled in 9 ofthe 22 trials abdomen slowly and keeping themselves nearly & without further interaction with the intruders. motionless (Rinaldi Stropa 1998); i.e., these STROPA—MALE-MALE INTERACTION OF LOXOSCELES GAUCHO 497 females use only the POS pattern in the sexual infestation in manmade environments where interaction. In the present study, male L. Loxosceles can become a public health prob- gaucho used both the VIB and POS patterns lem. However, interaction is only one factor to in the male-male interaction. be considered and it is certainly linked to other It is possible that the male intruders were variables such as resource availability and courting and trying to copulate with the male habitat architecture. residents as ifthey were receptive females. For spiders, this may be an instance ofintraspecific ACKNOWLEDGMENTS sexual mimicry, which is when an animal gets I am grateful to Dr. L. C. Jordao and Dr. B. some advantage over its conspecific opponent D. Roitberg for valuable criticism and sugges- by present itself as if it is an individual of the tions on the several drafts ofthis manuscript. I opposite sex. Further investigation is needed to am also very grateful to the editor Dr. G. corroborate this hypothesis since only fivecases Stratton and anonymous referees for their are described in the present study. Sexual suggestions to improve this paper. This study mimicry in spiders has been reported only in was supported by a fellowship to A.A.S. by the interspecific interactions such as the bolas Fundagao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de spider Mastophora sp. attracting prey (Eber- Sao Paulo (FAPESP: 96/09389-0). hard 1977; Stowe et al. 1987; Yeargan 1994) and Portiafimbriata Doleschall 1859 mimick- LITERATURE CITED ing a male of Euryattus sp. (Salticidae) to attack the female hiding in a leaf (Jackson & Aviles, L. 1997. Causes and consequences of co- Wilcox 1990). operation and permanent-sociality in spiders. useTdhePOtwSofeonlcloouwnetderbsyiVnIwBhiacrhe irnetsriidgeunitngmaalneds iPnp.I4n7se6c^t9s8.anIdn TAhreacEhvnoildustion(J.oCf.SoCchiaoleBe&havBi.oJr. Crespi, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cam- possibly indicate that male L. gaucho has some bridge, UK. behavioral plasticity. In both cases, the contest Bilde, T., A.A. Markalov, P.W. Taylor & Y. Lubin. escalated to aggressive behaviors after the 2002. State-dependent decisions in nest site resident displayed VIB, and the resident won selection by a web-building spider. Animal Be- the contest. According to Horel et al. (1996), haviour 64:447-452. behavioral plasticity is a pre-adaptation for Bridge, A.P., R.W. Elwood & J.T.A. Dick. 2000. social life in spiders since it amplifies the Imperfect assessment and limited information intraspecific tolerance. This hypothesis may preclude optimal strategies in male-male fights in explain male pairs of this species sharing theorb-weavingspider Metellinamengei. Proceed- retreats in the field during the day (Stropa ings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267:273-279. 2004). Biicherl, W. 1961. Aranhas do genero Loxosceles e In conclusion, the intraspecific interaction of Loxoscelismo na America. Ciencia e Cultura 13: male L. gaucho in the resident-intruder para- 213-224. digm is usually non-aggressive. This profile is Eberhard, W.G. 1977. Aggressive chemical mimicry a result of the three aggression-attenuating by a bolas spider. Science 198:1173-1175. mechanisms identified: the hug, the fleeing Fischer, M.L. & J. Vasconcellos-Neto. 2005. Micro- and the POS pattern. These mechanisms may habitats occupied by Loxosceles intermedia and facilitate group living. Recluse spiders have Loxosceles laeta. Journal ofMedical Entomology been classified as solitary and territorial (Bii- 42:756-765. cherl 1961; Weens & Whitcomb 1975; Japyassu Foelix, R.F. 1982. Biology of Spiders. Harvard et al. 2003), but according to several reports University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. they also live in conspecific aggregations and 306 pp. infest manmade environments (Biicherl 1961; Hodge, M.A. & A. Storfer-Isser. 1997. Conspecific Levi & Spielman 1964; Howner & Stewart and heterospecific attraction: a mechanism of 1967; Waldron et al. 1975; Fischer & Vascon- wtieobn-sibtyewseebl-ebcutiiolndilnegadsipnigdertso.aEgtghroelgaotgiyon10f3o:r8m1a5-- cellos-Neto 2005; Marques-da-Silva et al. 826. 2006). The investigation of the causes of these Horel, A., B. Krafft & S. Aron. 1996. Processes de aggregations might reveal the main factors socialisation et preadaptations comportementales modulating the lifestyle of recluse spiders and chez les araignees. Bulletin de la Societe Zoologi- might elucidate mechanisms that minimize que de France 121:31-37. 498 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Horner, N.V. & K.W. Stewart. 1967. Life history of Stropa, A.A. 2004. Seiegao de arquitetura de micro- the brown spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch and habitat pela aranha-marrom Loxosceles gaucho Mulaik. TheTexasJournalofScience 19:333-347. (Gertsch 1967). Tese de doutorado, Instituto de Jackson, R.R. & R.S. Wilcox. 1990. Aggressive Biodendas de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual mimicry, prey-specific predatory behaviour and Paulista, Sao Paulo, Brazil 47 p. predator-recognition in the predator-prey interac- Stropa, A.A. &D. Pinhal. 2005. Habitatarchitecture tions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., affects the aggregation level among adult brown jumping spiders from Queensland. Behavioral spiders: evidence from a case study. Newsletter of Ecology and Sociobiology 26:111-119. the British Arachnological Society 104:4-6. Japyassu, H.F., C.R. Macagnan & L Knysak. 2003. Stropa, A.A. & I.M.P. Rinaldi. 2001. Relative Eggsac recognition in Loxosceles gaucho (Ara- tolerance and communication in agonistic behav- neae, Sicariidae) and the evolution of maternal iour between females ofLoxosceles gaucho (Ara- care in spiders. Journal of Arachnology 31:90- neae, Sicariidae). Bulletin ofthe British Arachno- 104. logical Society 12:41M5. Levi, H.W. & A. Spielman. 1964. The biology and Suter, R.B. & M. Keyley. 1984. Agonistic interac- control of the South American brown spider, tions between male Frontinella pyramitela (Ara- Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet), in a North American neae, Linyphiidae). Behavioral Ecology and So- focus. American Journal ofTropical Medicine & dobioiogy 15:1-7. Hygiene 13:132-136. Taylor, P.W. & R.R. Jackson. 2003. Interacting Lubin, Y.D. 1986. Courtship and alternative mating effects of size and prior injury injumping spider tactics in a social spider. Journal ofArachnology conflicts. Animal Behaviour 65:787-794. 14:239-257. Uetz, G.W. & G.S. Hieber. 1997. Colonial web- Marques-da-Silva, E. & M.L. Fischer. 2005, Dis- building spiders: balancing the costs and benefits tribuigao das especies do genero Loxosceles ofgroup-living. Pp. 458-^75. In The Evolution of Heinecken &Lowe, 1835 (Araneae; Sicariidae) no Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids (J.C. Estado do Parana. Revista da Sociedade Brasi- Choe & B.J. Crespi, eds.). Cambridge University leira de Medidna Tropical 38:331-335. Press, Cambridge, UK. Marques-da-Silva, E., R. Souza-Santos, M.L. Waldron, W.G., M.B. Madon & T. Suddarth. 1975. Fischer & G.B.G. Rubio. 2006. Loxosceles spider Observations on the occurrence and ecology of bites in the state of Parana, Brazil: 1993-2000. Loxosceles laeta (Araneae, Scytodidae) in Los Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins in- Angeles, California. California Vector Views 22: 29-36. cluding Tropical Diseases 12:110-123. Maynard Smith,J. &G.A. Parker. 1976. Thelogicof Weens, H.V., Jr. & W.H. Whitcomb. 1975. The asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour 24:159- brown recluse spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch andMulaik(Araneae: Loxoscelidae). Entomology 175. Maynard Smith, J. & G.R. Price. 1973. The logic of Circular 158. Florida Department of Agriculture animal conflict. Nature 246:15-18. and Consumer Services, Division of Plant In- Rinaldi, I.M.P. & A.A. Stropa. 1998. Sexual dustry, Gainesville, Florida. 2 pp. Wells, M.S. 1988. Effects ofbody size and resource behaviourinLoxoscelesgauchoGertsch(Araneae, value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Sicariidae). Bulletin ofthe British Arachnological Animal Behaviour 36:321-326. Society 11:57-61. Schuck-Paim, C. & W.J. Alonso. 2001. Deciding Whitehouse, M.E.A. 1997. Experience influences male-male contests in the spider Argyrodes anti- whereto settle: conspecificattraction andweb site podiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Animal Behav- selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys iour 53:913-923. cruentata. Animal Behaviour 62:1007-1012. Stowe, M.K., J.H. Tumlinson & R.R. Heath. 1987. YeaArngnauna,l KR.eVv.iew19o9f4.EntBoimoloolgoygyo3f9:b8o1l-a9s9. spiders. Chemicalmimicry: bolas spidersemitcomponents of moth prey species sex pheromones. Science Manuscript received 26 July 2006, revised 9 August 236:964-967. 2007.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.