ebook img

Sleeping aggregations of bees in relation to the risk of fire at their roosting sites in a forested, suburban landscape in eastern Australia PDF

2013·4.4 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Sleeping aggregations of bees in relation to the risk of fire at their roosting sites in a forested, suburban landscape in eastern Australia

Research Reports Sleeping aggregations ofbees in relation to the riskoffire at their roosting sites in a forested, suburban landscape in eastern Australia PJ Kubiak POBox439,Ryde,NSW1680,Australia Abstract Sleeping aggregations ofat least 13 bee species (from the families Halictidae, Apidae, Colletidae and Meg- achilidae)wereobservedintheforestedandfire-pronelandscapeoftheLaneCoveRivervalley,insuburban, northernSydney,NSW,Australia,duringtheyears2002-2012.Beeswereoftenfoundroostingatsitessubjec- tivelyassessedashavingalowerrisk ofbeingburnt. Thefireriskoftheobservedsleepingaggregation sites mayhavebeenreducedbybees: 1.roostinginsmallervegetationpatches,separatedbyaclearingfromlarger, nearbyareasofvegetation;or2.roostinginareasofvegetationrecentlyburntbyfireandthereforeatareduced riskofburning;or3.roostingatorneartheedgesofvegetation,givingthemachancetoescapeintoadjacent clearedareas, ifafirearrivedwhentherewasenoughlightforthebeestoseeandflyaway; or4. roostingat orneartheedgesof tracks ortrails,whichmightactasfirebreaksintheeventoflowerintensityfires;or5. using combinations ofsome ofthe above four ‘strategies’. This study suggests that sleeping aggregations of beesinthisfire-proneareagenerallyappearedtohaveatendencytooccupyroostingsitesthatwereatalower riskofbeingburnt,orsitesthatprobablyprovidedmoreopportunitiesforthebeestoescapeanapproaching fire.Thereareafewindicationsinthepublishedliteraturethatsomebeeandwaspspeciesinotherfire-prone regionsoftheworldmayalsohaveatendencytooccupylowerfireriskroostingsites. (TheVictorianNaturalist 130(1)2013,22-36). Keywords:bee, fire,sleepingaggregation, communalroost,wasp Introduction Communal roosting has been observed in a O’Neill 2001; Evans and O’Neill 2007). The number of insect groups (reviewed by Yackel term generally applied to communal roosting Adams 1999), including butterflies (Lepidop- inbeesandwaspsis sleepingaggregation’. Male tera) (Mallet 1986; Finkbeiner et al. 2012), bees can formlooseordense sleepingaggrega- bees andwasps (Hymenoptera) (see references tions, occasionally consisting of several spe- below), dragonflies (Odonata) (Corbet 1999), cies and ranging from a few bees to hundreds beetles (Coleoptera) (Pearson and Anderson ofindividuals (Rayment 1935; Michener 1974; 1985; Webb 1994), flies (Diptera) (Allee 1927) O’Toole and Raw 1991). Sometimes female andowlflies(Neuroptera) (Gomes-Filho2000). beesmayalsobefoundsleepingnearthemales Communal roosting has also been recorded (Rayment 1935; Linsley 1962; Michener 1974). for harvestmen (Opiliones) (Donaldson and Typically,however,thefemalesofmostsolitary Grether2007). bee species spend the night in nests, whereas The males (and occasionally females) ofsoli- the males ofvarious species sleep together in tarybeespecieshavebeenobservedoftengath- communalroosts(Linsley1958;EvansandLin- ering in the evening to sleep together at night, sley 1960). inbothAustraliaandworldwide (Rauand Rau Bee sleeping aggregations tend to form to- 1916; Rayment 1935; Linsley 1958; Evans and wards the end ofthe dayand, weatherpermit- Linsley 1960; Linsley 1962; Michener 1974; ting, disband again the next morning (Evans Houston 1984; O’Toole and Raw 1991; Dollin and Linsley 1960; Linsley 1962; Alcock 1998). etal.2000;Alves-dos-Santosetal.2009;andsee Roosting sites maybe used by groups ofmale images posted on the internet, e.g. www.aus- beesonsuccessivenightsforprolongedperiods traliannativebees.com). Similar behaviour has and the same sites are sometimes used by fol- also often been observed in male and female lowing generations ofmale bees in subsequent wasps (Banks 1902;Bradley1908;Rauand Rau years (Evans and Linsley 1960; Linsley 1962; 1916; Rau 1938; Evans and Linsley 1960; Lins- Alcock 1998;Wcislo2003). ley1962;EvansandGillaspy 1964; Callan 1984; 22 TheVictorianNaturalist Research Reports The most common type of sleeping aggre- ternally organised and do not involve co-op- gation probably involves male bees attaching erative behaviour. However, it is possible that themselves, either by the jaws and/or with such aggregations mightbean earlystep along their legs, to the stems or leaves of living or thepathtowardsthemoreco-operative behav- dead plants. Less commonly, males ofvarious iourofcomplexinsectsocieties,asindicatedby bee species may form sleeping aggregations in Rau and Rau (1916) and Rayment (1956). Ag- flowers, in communal burrows, under bark, in gregation pheromones may be involved in the crevices or cracks, on seed pods and in bird formation ofsleepingaggregations inbees and nests (Rayment 1935; Linsley 1958; Cazierand wasps (seeFreeman andJohnston 1978;Alcock Linsley 1963; Linsley and Cazier 1972; Raw 1998; Wcislo 2003; Silva etal. 2011). Aggrega- 1976; Maynard 1991; O’Toole and Raw 1991; tion pheromones have been reported for a di- Azevedo and Faria 2007). In denser aggrega- verserangeofnon-socialarthropods,including tions some ofthebees mayrest ontop ofeach afewspecies ofHymenoptera (Wertheim etal. other,withoutcontactingthesubstrate (Cazier 2005). andLinsley1963).Oneoftheintriguingaspects Fire is important in shaping manyterrestrial of these sleeping aggregations is that, whilst ecosystems in Australia and worldwide. Some somemalebeesmaycompeteaggressivelywith researchers have studied the effects offire on each other for mates during the daytime, the bee communities (Potts et al. 2003; Moretti et same individuals can be capable ofpeacefully al. 2009;Grundeletal. 2010) andonindividual roosting together at night (Raw 1976; O’Toole beespecies(Stowetal. 2007;MaynardandRao andRaw 1991). 2010;CaneandNeff2011). The reason(s) for the formation of bee and The aim of this current study is to explore wasp sleeping aggregations have apparently whetherthere mightbearelationship between notbeen well understood (Rau and Rau 1916; the roosting sites ofbee sleeping aggregations Evans and Linsley 1960; Michener 1974; Dol- andtheriskoffireatthosesitesinthebushland lin et al 2000; Wcislo 2003; Alves-dos-Santos ofnorthernSydney. et al. 2009; Matthews and Matthews 2010). A Studyarea number ofresearchers have put forward pos- Observations for this study were made in the sible explanations for this phenomenon, often Lane Cove River valley ofsuburban northern focusing on protection from predators and/or Sydney,NSW, Australia. Survivingnaturalveg- on thermoregulatory benefits (Rayment 1935; etation in the study area includes open-forest, Rayment 1956;EvansandLinsley1960;Linsley and Cazier 1972; Freeman and Johnston 1978; tall forest, woodland, heathland, rainforest, Callan 1984; Alcock 1998; Silva etal. 2011). A arinpdarsiaalntmsahrrsuhbl(aCnlda,rkmeanagnrdovBeenfsoorenst1,9r87u;shBleann-d socialfunctionwassuggestedasapossiblerea- sonandHowell1990;BensonandHowell1994; son for sleeping aggregations in Steniolia obli- Martyn 2010). Muchofthesurvivingbushland quawasps(Crabronidae)byEvansandGillaspy t(h1e9s64e).exHpolwaenavteiro,nsithwaosulbdeeanppdeeafirnitthealtynpornoeveonf iisnstihteuaLtaedneonCosvaendRsitvoenreaarneda ihsasscbleereonphbyrlolaoduls,y describedbyKeith(2004) astheSydneyCoast- (seeYackelAdams 1999, foradiscussionofthe al Dry Sclerophyll Forests. This bushland has possiblefunction(s)andadaptivesignificanceof undergone varying degrees of fragmentation communal roosting in beesandother insects). andthemajorityoftheLane CoveRivercatch- Similar and additional explanations have been ments naturalvegetation has been cleared, for suggested toaccountforaggregativebehaviour timber, agriculture and subsequently for sub- in a wide range ofanimal species (Allee 1927; Ward and Zahavi 1973; Stephens and Suther- ruercbeannt ydeeavresl.oApmemnotr,ewohriclehsshacsontinitgeunosuisfiebdanidn land 1999; Stephens etal. 1999; Marzluffetal. of bushland survives along the course of the 1996; Bell et al. 2007; Grether and Donaldson river and some of its tributaries. The largest 2007; Finkbeineretal. 2012). areas of native vegetation occur in the upper Matthews and Matthews (2010) considered reaches. Introduced weed species frequently that sleeping aggregations ofbees are not in- Vol 130 (1) 2013 23 Research Reports dominatethestudyareaswatercoursesandalso gregations were tentatively identified (without disturbedplaces, such asbushlandedges. Even capturing the bees) by consulting Dollin etal. so,thestudyareastillhasahighdiversityofna- (2000) and by referring to the identifications, tiveplantspecies. provided by Michael Batley, ofsimilar looking Muchofthevegetationinthisstudyareacould bees. Some bees were not identified and these be described as ‘fire-prone’, in the sense that it are grouped together as ‘unidentified species’ islikelytobeburntquitefrequently.Thesclero- in Table 1. The number ofbees in the smaller phyllousvegetation isthemost ‘fire-prone’, but aggregationswas counted, whilstbee numbers areascontaining rainforestspecies, mangroves, wereestimatedforlargeraggregations. rushland and saltmarsh may also be burnt The fire riskofeachroosting sitewassubjec- under extreme weather conditions. However, tively assessed, taking into account character- somepatchesofsclerophyllousbushlandinthe istics such as the proximity and density ofad- studyareamayescapebeingburntforrelatively jacentvegetation, the amount ofleaflitter and long periods oftime. Arson and planned fires otherfuelspresentandthelengthoftimesince setbybushland managers (forthe purposes of thelastfire. Otherfactorsthatcouldpotentially hazard reduction and ecological management) have modified the risk offire to the bees were are probably the two most common causes of also noted, including whether the sleeping ag- bushfire in the Lane Cove River area in recent gregationwassituatedontheedgeofthebush- times. Occasionally, large wildfires have swept land area, or next to a service trail or walking through the valley, e.g. in January 1994. Such track.Roostingsitesweregivenasubjectivefire fires can reach high intensities, depending on riskrating,rangingfromverylowtoveryhigh. fuel levels in the bushland andweather condi- Evenwhenrainhadrecentlyfallenataroosting tions at the time ofburning. Smaller bushfires site, the fire risk was assessed on the basis of occur fairly frequently in the Lane Cove River whattheriskwouldhavebeen atthesiteunder valley. dryconditions. Itwas considered that, even in wetter periods, bushland could dry out quite Methods quicklyin the event ofa run ofsuccessive hot, In the years 2002-2012 some bushland areas drydayswithoutrainfall. in the Lane Cove River valley were searched for sleeping aggregations of bees. Generally, Results searches were conducted in thelate afternoon. Observations of bee sleeping aggregations The first aggregation was found by chance in made during this study are summarised in 2002,whenIwasnotlookingforroostingbees. Table1.Atleast13beespecies(fromthefamilies The pattern of searching tended to be biased Halictidae, Apidae, Colletidae and Megachili- towards looking along walking tracks, serv- dae) wereobserved formingcommunalroosts. ice trails and the edges of bushland because In someyears moreeffort wasput into search- such places are easierto search. I attempted to ingforsleepingaggregationsthaninotheryears counteractthisbiasbyalsosearchingbushland and this may largely account for variations in awayfromtracksandtrails.Narrowtracks sur- thenumbersofaggregations found in different roundedbythick, unburnt bushlandwere also years. Generally, the number ofbees found in searchedandthesewereconsideredtobeavery roosts tended to peakin late springto earlyor high fire risk situation for anybees that might mid-summer.Sometimessleepingaggregations have been found roosting along them. Several persisted into late summer or autumn, butthe aggregationswere found in asuburban garden numbers ofbees aggregating at those times of in the vicinity ofthe Lane Cove River, located the year were generally smaller. Of the small wellawayfromthenearestbushland.Afewbees numberofbeestakenforidentification,allwere (from eightspecies)weretaken fromahandful found to be males (M. Batley pers. comms.). oftheobservedaggregationsandsentforiden- Species from all ofthe bee families occurring tificationtoMichaelBatley,whoalsoidentified inthestudyareawereobserved formingsleep- some bees from photographs. However, the ing aggregations. Communal roosts ofbees in bee species in the majority ofthe sleeping ag- the familyHalictidaewere themostfrequently 24 TheVictorianNaturalist j. I Research Reports ^ x5.’(«eOo5>tS--«-«6<-P'iTX'‘SO<WG^o1O<ccSV"33CC/u3-Uu>5»')xxXOO(+£SOc<CA<§rp»_-Nlu-*>1h_--^XJ,«d-oo=O<G*„-u-;v~-"~io<<OOboO2*_duui-fn1j*„^JxdoCX5ccG2j''ojGP*_IG"Ij- ^•.4<*oo*cc«-—a-//u•55*X..'j2c«cc3«C//bu55'c-^^J^os«2GSs d<>C0^s-U/<dG<<>^»-UU>-orc£^2-Ax-bGC J^«Ci2-t£%2r£I$OW5 <LcOeT£j)cLOOsT£5'^£|ci/5’odGs<gVaJ-5otOCdSGo|'«£^GPdowGO6gco-woGGOsG-x.gO>iG'^,giLg_sG' XGGG5Xo>*oXb«>> _^2««-^cS<,/««u5gX£uaG^h<u-3-./.—S8^^*&|f|2lSgdOCG/5,‘->>bcpO*2u3-Ox—"O*<Ju3-.«o(0G2U3 1 o° o •uS s2oo r^Gt32(UPO5_l a> 2£^<n12 g£ X<5-*~Nco3—ii %oc/5"°Od 455-/5r 3dd •c5ova.X>u. d- *2X_1*ofc-_Cgdg3-l<-«d5J«m&cW2Jug.)-s.^(«w5lHsNIj'j-un-ig-uoMi.WX^WHOc".3p'GOoi1q2i1-oTx|<^GcvGl3l.ni*»u>-<4 Xs^i »dcW3<G"Suo5.h>cc<c3DSuj3^.h_.Cgdq§Cp~bSi5o.-3Ctdrq§cbSsUo 3Scdf*uc^Vbcowc/h«i5odwjQ>1C51U •“3£owQ| naG2wQXdccsuu >§^03-0-Q<CduU x~g3I <3IC2bf/3l5O*c2dn11-;XIGG«D,J=-^*d3- Go cOuHxC0£o/335X£oCo/335 •2G“ 2•0>3-<£dy iG0!O3s'.£^1-8 S3 5 | IC/©0^OS,sll o&a&s;S*g<U-oitg-irwb02I3‘-(J bbXej*4Nctr X£cu_S£2rVn£G£cXuX££<3u 0V£35 c£Ct/f5 c1>Bu/u5rEc^t>urXs3G5xO£S« £c>>C/—U5i ^£5CC>/—U5< >£CJC/—U5< 3Gr5-< I|1X<CUUXCcUu £C.b/5—CC9/U5 j'»(GGsd-IU> G£1bsP>/--5'—CrCGt/*35 c o 5 <U |>«O<C’UU;-^§40a<ddcdLG/>3>5,xhSiG53*sG.1"3/j!3X-qo0P5Sr|—|32-^^^">vWc^dO-32»‘-,GcE<xrM^Ui>-J^oOGbW1-I3-IdHr5>^v.^O(VOa-93.jh ^'-OM *O£83>*<^*S5 CU o <U G P2<cuuS2O—.0Zo> ’oof1ohNI32iooC'U0NnI32CO2‘uOq^"dC^SN:„OSc<coNOcRnOc;rc9CcNoj:_<o<<c^qNN|1uo1o~Gbju"^couno-c.N,o:COxo:N x&P<<GdUQoO(LNDoZo(xON 'cbabOSd3Oe*p^^GdXGPOdMo)^cp0W3Dd’Jtggu/d"5-G3"x0<(312>>^«*£1o^u-, *bcbCsLeoip5p^/5 b<n0»^U33-o~-Oop3 811 28^g'?1 g£ 3^_‘bG3o-.'3&u> i S £•f^<C^-lul],U-11<U<Gd?UuXxi1c0ctuu1XxicUc?uuXxiCOcUunX1d?c0cJuu </)(/)(/) V3) V35 V3) —3“&£GsxrPGC>otSO3^.:«urG>5c^-tu>e2,j—:ptGg.figCO~mJ~s£go,Xs.juCu iTCwWO«3Dt>^2b3-yl^coVv3i..Xcoc^vlu.p——slpusd dS^AcSu'P5d^uXpVn-Sd2uRR*--i §5^PPft. '<WSh<cS.u^^£P£ytd2\-}uPdC£d3/5PddoC£3/3J3d£dC2/53d£dC3/53£dDC2/5h->dKs T^3^rgS3i' I' 3^H.+H23^~(.X3£CVC3O.U,^"(.C3£CVCd/X-U),*(£.3C3£Vcd/.u5, Vol 130 (1) 2013 25 D , 3 : Research Reports w site factors assessed); Io roFriiosfrosket(subjectivelyrmoidisfyking -«ao<OsD_o«<OQsU^bb=<C<£=dNQN|!> ^£5°>-h £ <iIvt £ di|>twsbO5--G-gW3)oc>i2-<.« S^ CioisQ-j, 82<ad>__8=ds__S_>_s<8=_1Us<8o=!U_ad28d_3_>sagcdja<w=8__$D_s<w__38_U_swd8d^>wad=8_>S_^b^,D<j"2|aDS?;bwsO__;<^£sot9o,wf spa Td 2] T3 c _ hJhJhJ ; 'figa V) 7) (/) VJ V) V) sRuobsotsrattieng _Jca(0!CaOBXofS>oASJlI,0M«ca(JaO6n>5oSSJ33"-+^Jovt§“HJsJo.33-Cfp5bv~£2X.?l, “o3a333C3SOo’au3333V3^)o'oq333303K0o7^v£^«vc3.jj_"o33c-333So-^<3£^tc3;.- ^<-C•0S -P 8 .=^^3o:.^033b3^30o3HSC3g3|dO"^.c3PSO3qj•-5—b»*<3"3833C33O3~~3ogd3C33oOJ3~33dcS3C333JuO""33CSd3£C33UOi~"33CSd£33UJ33~-gd£33i^-~SO33333S3“3«cdg3fo>3*S3^<c£3uo,uof^.3sc:£P Aggregation ab ab os a a c ^ size aCaOs Vaasi h£ir>*^ Ia0C3^a^X)"a^<SUi cS ^b&lba> C0a/33 Ca0/33 -5a3<35ad33^ u ^33=d<i&»U3o-(JbiU5C>'5--C§2cU33—C«C§\S^>»^^-Pr-th>Wo0/)o-ii(bQ1os_»JsUoo-wa<Lo(hu-sU:o—533 Doatfe(s)aggregation(y&meoanrth) looo2l2 Q0o<bON)J0Qo(<DN-)QO—UUcc.3Qo•icUDc——.3iQI<oUCNQJ5UUo>,s.!:r<o-iN( Ij52s,0P<1h U^r-t.o|oC^SL|aC=SnQ<O|u^hdoG»!QVcCbcO3.off^>OObvZ<N^OlDou"|QC<v^OlOu|>QoCasOlUv>CQ|.><o^OUlCUQI>vUC^OloQ0I>J^C>-o‘ZiOo|H',>OoZoOslC^C_^,N-,O>ZQ(U<N-Dop25_7—n ,3 k3. 33*wdV3.3"wd3J"3d3i"d333 -obbC23_Ocv>3u~P33:d-33~-“3~3~;P~C3C3O~3CC3O~3CCO>3C-CO33C-O33C~3O~3C3O~3CCO3~3CCO33C~O3 3 K K 3 Cd>IhCd3X -=9s oc 3 o V. V- Species 5 S / ^O3CCOOOC3COO C^,O_-C2O^3CCoo-23CCoor5C3Coo -CC32oorCC39Oo C£3CoO CCg3OO S3CO C53O tt„oott^oott^oott^ootot^toot^toot^toot^too^too’C-Uo^v^'U) Family Ir S3 53 Ir ^•^b^~p<3tVSo.oo~c3Svt.ooO~>^~—^,IOG(Vt.oOC<tvoO.G(OtVo.aO<tvo. '(t3OVKo.o’3O(^tVro.i ~>--bb—d3)-bo-—-3]a'b(ocVSo.oo~b-K~o--3Jb^--~S^^(^VcbO.o<')<ObVc-o<SO)cbv<'.0O<)S<bOvt.<o')O<b<v3<.0O)'(bV<2<O.o)'<bOvc:<2.o)O(b3Vc<.o})b<3Vc<-.o)3<-v<b.0o!-1^o-b3-ck-.q-L3Pc^>-C-L3qo 26 TheVictorianNaturalist . Research Reports w^ wswswl.„s2s2 s<-ius -<*u-Xo) w £7io5"%6O3o§O3aIiofl ^>-X3£Sk->XP£0£J>p>op>">oo3££33>"<£oo3£33-D<O'<£7£oiU-LP£3gJ„--lS3a.'P-o0><a£i0LCOp^>£sQ$Nlo£>Cc'—-Q*I,£o>CefSQN*-£o>Cf(itQO2£<^£tUxg£Q£-l'jOo3.C£SX)-gJ"l£”oO3<£p£3LX>)CSw^Q<O£11>X'W°:,OWnJ)W©£•--£<3uTr33!--3O<2JNtOXOaJi'£3 j:'3p.£<£5ju2._—".o£<££33Su,P2>3332^. ':PbJ£b-3.o£<£25u'-.£°oa££32>c.a£g>iZwOfX)’§£C£dJ’3£g£dc2>^° o -3 B £ p<O-us s3 3 -.^«330O3|33>O33>-j%^n)>o3o U —.>-§ 3^3s 3 £ <cCS32o.P3p^ve3K».-+"’32D3C3Cag2!>S>--2^3*Q3«<SCH1U3933•3«3o3§°H.i33M§a3v3i:,.r-^>0s334O33)-3s>3O3k33OQ-3y3£.-^P-3-2^-S333s3335n-fSe ,„“3y3s33K-^^J°353333a3,-J32S.O733§3s)-sQ^X^_l~3 X•2sI~*-c3«-> X3S\sOxX93Q:{x£2-->lw^Q5!3h9^'l“QO^35^l,r&!_othrtXJ,<T«3Sx?,i|f*3§35S* o3x),—1§^£3J_^oo3x2;c^„3><OvXb)_2m^23?*£2£33,£3•5£3?£—32j^—£3^21 J£oX3££5i_fe£f_3ej>5>5-J=wS)2£X£32 _33CX£33ff 3Cct>euo'sO3X3-33O2X)33-33I^s-0c>CCe^O.o o3x)2£ —3Io'.c—3gS.£jSMrJS£oir).££X23X.££23X.3££2c"—I3 Q(°NO30ONQNOO30OMQ-NO30O1A.^°g£3) >OOS>2o^0p3o£3,^<£2^o^3£3O£T'oocs3sS'3s2^^<•°nS2£O1^3—-s4m*^^r°O-n\3-o*.j"^>r°nO!3-31o»';,-^o(ry3NooOni£nOOMLn }<Os oOL3O§^.a^pj.Q^Loo(330OTNI*lO^N^83OQzoLo(O36TNI, Noo<33ON J33>Z3o O£O034rtOO<3Oi„Ni,otO<O3ooNi_^XgOno0oZO>aO0OoZO>a0QooXZ33>N,3o^0<Qos Os 33333.3 33^CoXCoXCOXCOXCO Co CO XX X.coX.coXco XCOXCO XCOXCOXCOXcoXCOXCOXCOX'-o U U U Cj 3 3 3 3 3 OOOOOO73O73 3>o_o>3'ov2Ho_3o'>21!o'_>3o’_v>!o_’3> 33V) 3c3o 33CO 3C3o 3CO 3co 3Co 33CO 3co a2 3co 33co 3> 3> 3> o>3 o>3 ^o>33o>3^o>3 3O>3^3O>3^ 33333333 -.C3L33O-.C3L33O-_CL333O-_C3L33O -3c33Oo~O3c33oO-333c:oO3-3c3Oo3-c33Co•3u>L~c»3.o(C^_c-iJOL3oJJcO-o33CcO3U3o:Oc3~3o3O3c~33o3Oc33-3Oo;3c3-Oo£3:c3O-3o3 3c33£o-c333o -333-333-333 3C33O3C33O .CO3O.CO3O.CO3OCO.3OCO.3OCO_3OCO_O3CO_O3 o o o o ^ K.-g)sK.jgs.^sK.gPs .CLs.Cn,.Cc,.cx, .Cp.CP,.£s_9s.a,.o,.o, .o. x•2-*--)^ 3•S1-'-.PS-’3.]S- 3.f)ts .3^s.3Ss 3•2-3-2-3-2-3-2<3-2^3-23*-S'3.2« Vol 130 (1) 2013 27 x j Research Reports S’* o ±•*Ot<oo~a-oD<1.XXTc2t$™2£3T31Sjo'^,""•52Cbfg©K£33t>.o -PJ2•xw.^h5_P2lXw_^g2Sod^Sox.?^<a2.DSx.^Cf2Ue'oJ>c3bIo•c^.^w£o>S^£<xx-f2>xJ2g^2|x|w xuC22£J^xxH5®0030_'X^g?S<^o2HD3d-Xw.fgI^22xXwDOg3x^l'xwDxC xXXx7b~p""j<aau©u3xx..+O22£2-2>P2X.(£°•>22U>XxX.42<obS-2D>bxx.^°^o<gE-2U-Xx.H<X£bgo-gD*bXb£) xx_££02Xbb0£XwbO Oh xx ^ C 3X >o>. XX £ 3 >x^d XOoosS xQ£<<dDQx<<Dujv• 2 .K>2-o~*•So2§*cQq*bq*iOi*X£>«.«~3rr*rX^o.^oa-rh;xrta«s*ut„"/~:*ya3S03i3i1.C2a2SyTxiagaxia§a!g3S•l§cP<^ubr"bt$aps>x22sa- J•3OcSoh;-,~(§5c023oJ2o'.hS^is—(3Q3auy\ qHg<-dohn^XXsa^~,:X"kC(aOSxU"v\TX^toO8*<x•oD2^Qts«?a!<o-.* ;^33Cto^/O\-. bbfei"Nat)o S£?S£PpS,e£Pgs23e23£»££»£ • 5gc-Jo 2232x23fsr’c§—o1 > co op5>E-3cE^oS>-3c c(cc-SoHP,2c3-oHXQaC—|J-^ o3 o3 V'2toS?SobcsisGsj*4«^gc-b*3 QNoO(O<NuQoO(N<DNu^2Sg_C$QOo(O<UNOuZOo<oo>NNQ20Oa(Ni,>J^oO33?O™3(V«NH2QOCJQO<L>QO<UQc<jDQCaJ>QCcJu QXX<o<<NDDXX0O(<oc4ND3XX0O00c<443DXX0O00G<443DXXO00So44-3(XX0O044XX<’O00XC44 O£o0OoO>4N1 Ooo0>oN4XSo0oUoV443JQOO0(<4JDTQ0cu<G4SDTQ0ou(G43DOr0GC\413)0G043 XXMo<DXX<<-IDXXo(CND bcpobcpobcXo)cbopcbopcbofc)bopcbopcbopcbopcbopcbopcbpobcfo)cbop bpbpbpbpbpbf)bp XcoX_COXCOXCOXCOXCOXCOX'-oXCOXCOXCOXCOXCOXCOXCO XcCoO^XcCoOX'cCoo^XCcOoX^CCOO-XcCoOXcCoO^ XX X X.3CoC0JOXC3o0tXOOC3o0VC.XOJC3o0V-.UOC3ob0U3^iOU-C3o0-3VUb-OU-C3o0-3t:'OXC3o0O-VvO."CXC3o0VoO--CC3o03VOj.C3o0~tb3VO-jC3o3--3cOboC3o0--3O'hC3o0O--sOb;'C3o0--OO3h -3.bO3Cwos3u^^-o.3XO3Cco^>3ooi3XOC3co^>3ooi3X.CO3o>tqooi3X.>Co>O3v^.oo3-.XCwVo>O3vXo-o,X3vVo>O3Cw3o-oi HaC->»X03- Xp3jr51XX<<•DDXX<<•DDXXQIi-JD>XX<CS-DDcXX5I<-DD1 ^X<(uD^X<<23DD £ x•2sx-2s*•x2<X•2-11-—2s-2^^‘-—2jsx-2sx-2j^>-x2s>-2x-1x•j2h>-—2j^x2-j'x-2s •x2’-x2'-x2-.x2^.x2h.x2--xc^ §X £1/3 2C/3 2C/3 C2/D 2C/3 C2/3 28 TheVictorianNaturalist Research Reports observed and, within this family, bees of the grassy area. Other similar examples included Lipotrichesflavoviridis species group (probably the aggregation of Lipotriches fortior found CL. excellent) weremostoften seen aggregating roostingonanexoticconiferinJanuary/Febru- toroosttogetheratnight. ary2011, separatedfrombushlandbyacleared Bees were found roosting mostly on veg- areaandalsoseveralaggregationsof?Lasioglos- etation, including living grasses, sedges, herbs, sum peraustrale (Halictidae) that roosted on shrubs and trees. Also, some bees roosted on treesseparatefromnearbybushland. the skeletons ofdead plants or on dead twigs Bees sometimes roosted in areas of recently attached to living plants. One aggregation of burnt vegetation located close to areas of un- Lipotriches australica spent some time roost- burnt bushland. For example, in November / ing on a wire mesh fence. Bees roosted mostly December 2002 an aggregation of Megachile at a height ofless than two metres and often ferox (Megachilidae) bees roosted on the edge less than one metre above ground level. A few ofanareaofopen-forestthathadbeenburntby mixedaggregations,comprisingseveralspecies, asmallfireapproximatelyseven monthsearlier. were observed, but most ofthe sleeping aggre- The fire risk ofthis roosting site was relatively gationsconsistedofasinglespecies.Themajor- low because sufficient time had not elapsed ity ofthe observed sleeping aggregations were since the recent fire for fuel loads to build up compactordense,thatistosaythatmostofthe again.WhileM.feroxwereroostingatthissite,a beesineachaggregationsleptincloseproximity wildfireburntalargerareaofthenearbyadjoin- to each other, often restingin contact with one ing forest, much ofwhich had not been burnt ormore oftheother beesatthe roost. Some of foralongtime. Thisfireburnttowithinseveral the sleeping aggregations apparently lasted for hundred metres ofwhere the bees were roost- a longer time than others. However, some ag- ing. Megachileferox continued to roost at the gregationswere observed foronly one ora few samesiteforseveralweeksaftertheoccurrence days, so the actual duration ofthose aggrega- ofthenearbywildfire. tions was not determined. Also, the initial for- When bees roosted in places of higher fire mation ofan aggregation was rarely observed, risktheywere often found at ornearthe edges somostoftheaggregationsprobablyexistedfor ofthebushland.Thispositioningmayhavegiv- sometimebeforetheywerefirstdetected. enthem thechanceto escape into the adjacent Bees often roosted in places thatwere appar- cleared areas in the event of a fire, provided entlyata lower risk ofbeingburnt than many that such a bushfire occurred when there was other potential roosting sites in the surround- sufficientlightavailableandthebeeswerealert inglandscape.Someofthebeesformedsleeping enough to fly away. Bees sometimes roosted aggregations in smaller patches of vegetation on ornearthe edge ofwalkingtracks. Some of that were separated by a clearing from larger, these tracks could have acted as fire breaks in nearby areas of denser bushland. For exam- theevent oflowerintensityfires. ple, in December 2006 a sleeping aggregation The apparent tendency to roost in lower fire ofLipotriches australica (Halictidae) (see front risk locations may have varied somewhat be- cover) wasfound on a relativelysmall patch of tweenspecies. Forexample, someofthesmall- herbaceous weeds (Fig. 1) that was separated erbeespecies apparentlytendedto roost more from the nearby larger area ofbushland by a frequentlyinplaceswitharelativelyhigherrisk mowed,grassyclearing.Thenearbyopen-forest of being burnt. However, more observations hadnotbeenburntformanyyearsandnobees would be required to confirm whether this is could be found roosting in this relativelyhigh generallythecase.Nobeeswereobservedform- fire risk bushland. Another example occurred ing sleeping aggregations at sites considered in December 2007 when a small aggregation to be at a very high risk ofbeing burnt, even ofLipotrichesflavoviridis (species group) bees though narrowtracks that had thick bushland (Fig.2)roostedonPlantagolanceolata,nearthe growing on either side ofthem were searched base ofa remnant eucalypt (Fig. 3), separated and some areas within denservegetation were from the nearby, dense bushland by a mowed alsosearched. Vol 130 (1) 2013 29 Research Reports Fig. 1.Lipotrichesaustralicaroostingsite, December2006 (bees areonbandofweedsintheright foreground). Discussion These observations of sleeping aggregations over a period ofa decade indicate that, in this fire-prone study area in south-eastern Aus- tralia,beesgenerallyappeartooccupyroosting sites with a lower risk ofburning. Many other researchers have observed sleeping aggrega- tions ofbees and wasps. Some ofthese studies were conducted in fire-prone landscapes and provide a few indications that bees and wasps inotherpartsoftheworldmayalsotendtooc- cupylower fire risk roosting sites in fire-prone regions. Bees and wasps roosting in sites possibly protectedfromfire Bradley (1908) found a large concentration of sleeping aggregations, mostly ofwasps, but in- cluding three bee species, in California, USA. Hisobservationsweremadeduringsummerin Fig. 2.Lipotrichesflavoviridis(s.g.)sleepingaggrega- theSanJoaquinValley,whenthevegetationhad tion,December2007. beenparchedbymorethanamonthofhot,dry conditions. The largenumbers ofwasps (and a few bees) were aggregated at intervals along a road for ‘perhaps amile or more’. The roosting 30 TheVictorianNaturalist Research Reports Fig. 3. Lipotrichesflavoviridis (s.g.) roosting site, December 2007 (bees are in bottom righthandpartofphoto). groups ofwasps andbees were scattered along gathered together in a concentration ofsleep- a narrowstrip ofdriedvegetation between the ingaggregations inthe Chiricahua Mountains, road and a recently harvested grain field. On inArizona, USA. Thesiteoftheseaggregations m m the other side of the road from the sleeping wasameadow,approximately30 x90 (ca. aggregations ofwasps and bees, thevegetation 100 x 300 feet), situated opposite a building, had been recently burnt by extensive prairie acrossanaccessroad andcarparkingarea, ata fires’. Bradley searched the sagebrush and fox- research station. Thebriefsitedescription pro- tailgrassontheplains‘twelvemilesdistant’,but videdbytheauthors suggests thatthe meadow was unable to find anyothersleeping aggrega- may have been somewhat protected from fire, tions ofwasps. This suggests that these wasps atleast on oneside. This meadowroosting site andbeesmayhaveselectivelyoccupiedaroost- occupied by these bees and wasps may have ingsitethatwasatalowerriskofburning,com- served as a refuge from fires, when compared paredwith alternativesitesontheplains. with the woodlands surrounding the research In thispresent studysleepingaggregationsof station, which may have been more likely to beeswere sometimes found on smaller vegeta- be burnt than the meadow. The vegetation of tion patches, separatedbyaclearingfromlarg- theChiricahuaMountainsisproneto fires and er, nearby areas ofvegetation. This behaviour therewasrecentlyamajorwildfireinthearea. may have protected the bees from the greater Beesroostinginrecentlyburntareas riskoffireinvolved inroostinginthelargerar- Rau and Rau (1916) foundtwo sleeping aggre- eas ofvegetation, just as the wasps (and bees) gations ofmale Svastra obliqua (as Melissodes thatBradleyobservedintheSanJoaquinValley mayhavereceivedsomeprotectionbyroosting obliqua) (Apidae) bees roosting on scorched in a narrowroadside strip ofvegetation. Some leaves in recently burnt areas in open fields in ofthebees observed in mystudy roosted at or Missouri, USA, but they were unable to find neartheedgesoftracksortrails.Thismaypos- beesofthisspecies roosting in nearbyunburnt sibly have given them some protection from vegetation. Frankieetal (1980)studiedthebee fire, as some ofthese tracks could potentially Centris adani (Apidae) at a site, consisting of farmland interspersed with patches ofregrow- have acted as fire breaks in the event oflower intensity fires. However, this would probably ing dry forest, in Costa Rica. Their study site notapplytoverynarrowtracks surroundedby included areasofunburnttallgrassand‘brush’, but the onlysleeping aggregation ofmale bees thick, fire-prone vegetation. Price and Brad- stock (2010) found evidence to indicate that thattheyfound waslocated in arecentlyburnt roadsmaystopsomefiresinthedrysclerophyll area. In this present study, an aggregation of Megachileferox (Megachilidae), some aggrega- forestsoftheSydneyregion. Evans and Linsley (1960) and Linsley (1962) tions ofLipotrichesflavoviridis (species group) studied adiversearrayofbeeandwaspspecies (Halictidae) and one aggregation of Amegilla Vol 130 (1) 2013 31

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.