ebook img

Similar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Epithelium microRNA Expression in Never Smokers and Ever ... PDF

16 Pages·2015·1.27 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Similar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Epithelium microRNA Expression in Never Smokers and Ever ...

RESEARCHARTICLE Similar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Epithelium microRNA Expression in Never Smokers and Ever Smokers AntoniaKolokythas1,YaluZhou2,JoelL.Schwartz2,GuyR.Adami3* 1 DepartmentofOralandMaxillofacialSurgery,CollegeofDentistry,UniversityofIllinoisatChicago,801 SouthPaulinaStreet,Chicago,Illinois,60610,UnitedStatesofAmerica,2 ArphionLtd,2242W.Harrison Street,Chicago,Illinois,60612,UnitedStatesofAmerica,3 DepartmentofOralMedicineandOral Diagnostics,CenterforMolecularBiologyofOralDiseases,UniversityofIllinoisatChicago,801South PaulinaStreet,Chicago,Illinois,60610,UnitedStatesofAmerica *[email protected] Abstract Theincidenceoforaltumorsinpatientswhoneverusedmutagenicagentssuchastobacco OPENACCESS isincreasing.InanefforttobetterunderstandthesetumorswestudiedmicroRNA(miRNA) Citation:KolokythasA,ZhouY,SchwartzJL,Adami expressionintumorepitheliumofnevertobaccousers,tumorepitheliumofevertobacco GR(2015)SimilarSquamousCellCarcinoma EpitheliummicroRNAExpressioninNeverSmokers users,andnonpathologicalcontroloralepithelium.Acomparisonoflevelsamong372miR- andEverSmokers.PLoSONE10(11):e0141695. NAsin12nevertobaccouserswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma(OSCC)versus10 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 healthycontrolswasmadeusingthereversetranscriptionquantitativepolymerasechain Editor:Pei-YiChu,SchoolofMedicine,FuJen reaction.Asimilaranalysiswasdonewith8evertobaccouserswithOSCC.Thesecompari- CatholicUniversity,TAIWAN sonsrevealedmiR-10b-5p,miR-196a-5p,andmiR-31-5pasenrichedinthetumorepithe- Received:July28,2015 liuminOSCCofbothneverandevertobaccousers.ExaminationofTheCancerGenome Accepted:October11,2015 Atlas(TCGA)projectmiRNAdataon305OSCCsand30controlsrevealed100%ofthose miRNAsenrichedinneversmokerOSCCsinthispatientgroupwerealsoenrichedinever Published:November6,2015 smokerOSCCs.NonsupervisedclusteringofTCGAOSCCswassuggestiveoftwoorfour Copyright:©2015Kolokythasetal.Thisisanopen subgroupsoftumorsbasedonmiRNAlevelswithlimitedevidencefordifferencesin accessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermits tobaccoexposureamongthegroups.Resultsfrombothpatientgroupstogetherstressthe unrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninany importanceofmiR196a-5pinOSCCmalignancyinbothneverandeversmokers,and medium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourceare emphasizetheoverallsimilarityofmiRNAexpressioninOSCCsinthesetworiskgroups.It credited. impliesthattheremaybegreatsimilarityinetiologyofOSCCinneverandeversmokers DataAvailabilityStatement:Allrelevantdataare andthatclassifyingOSCCbasedontobaccoexposuremaynotbehelpfulintheclinic. withinthepaperanditsSupportingInformationfiles. Addtionaldataareavailableathttps://tcga-data.nci. nih.gov/tcga/. Funding:Thefunderprovidedsupportintheformof salaryforauthor[Y.Z.],butdidnothaveany additionalroleinthestudydesign,datacollectionand Introduction analysis,decisiontopublish,orpreparationofthe manuscript.Thespecificroleofthisauthoris MicroRNAs(miRNAs)inmatureformarenoncodingRNAs,19to25nucleotidesinlength, articulatedinthe‘authorcontributions’section. withtheabilitytoinhibitthetranslationandshortenthehalf-lifeofmRNAs[1].MiRNAscan directlyregulatemultiplemRNAs,whichencodetheproteinsthatcontrolimportantcellular CompetingInterests:Y.Z.andJ.S.areaffiliated withArphionLtd.acompanythatseekstodevelop processes.Manyoftheseregulatedpathways,includingapoptosis,cellproliferation,andcell PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 1/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer cancertreatmentsanddiagnostics.Thismanuscript migration,canalsocontributetocancer[2–4].Thereareover2000knownmiRNAs,asubset doesnotrelatetoanyproductorproductin ofwhichhavebeenshowntoshowchangesinlevelsthatcorrelatewithvariouscancers[5,6] developmentatArphionLtd.Thisrelationshipwiththe (http://mirbase.org/).GlobalexpressionanalysisofthesemiRNAsindifferentcancershas sponsordoesnotaltertheauthors'adherenceto identifiedmiRNAsthatfunctionasoncomirs,likemiR-21-5p,andareconsistentlyupregulated PLOSONEpoliciesonsharingdataandmaterials. insomecancertypes,whileothermiRNAsarereducedincertaintumortypesandappeartobe tumorsuppressors[7].Varioustumortypeshavebeencharacterizedtoshowasignatureof miRNAlevelsassociatedwiththesetumorsandtheirprogression,whichmayaidindiagnosis andprognosis[5,6].ThesmallsizeandregulatoryfunctionofmiRNAshavealsomadethem thefocusofresearchusingthemorsimilarmoleculestochangetumorcellpropertiesandthus treatcancer[8–10]. MuchefforthasgoneintodescribingasetofmiRNAsthatshowconsistentchangesinlev- els,firstwithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomas(HNSCCs)[11–13]andmorerecently withsubsetsofthesecancerssuchasoralsquamouscellcarcinoma(OSCC)[14].Theresultsof theseanalyseshaveshownsomeconsistencies,suchasfairlyuniversalupregulationofmiR-21- 5p,andsomewhatlowerconsensusonotherpotentialoncomirs,probablyduetothevariable amountofmixedepithelium/stromainsamplesanddiversityofetiologyofthetumorsubtypes. Forexample,oralpharyngealcancer,unlikeOSCCeveninnonsmokers,isoftenassociatedeti- ologicallywithtransformingHPV,specificallyHPV16[15–17].Recentworkhasbroughtto lighttwodistinctetiologiesofOSCC,thoseassociatedwiththemainriskfactorknown,tobacco usage,andthosenot[18–20].Likesmall-celllungcancerinneversmokers,OSCCsinnever tobaccousersseemtobedistinct[14].Hereafter,inthisreport,wewillabbreviatethisgroup whodonotusetobacco,orothermutagenicproductssuchasbetelnut,to“neversmokers”. OSCCinneversmokers,whichisontheincreaseintheUnitedStates,seemstostrikeonaver- agebotholderandyoungerpatientsthanthoseassociatedwithtobaccousage.Italsotendsto presentinearlierstage,andoccursmostfrequentlyinthetongueandgingivanotthefloor-of- mouthwheretobacco-associatedOSCCsoccur.Molecularly,OSCCsinneversmokersshow lowerratesofp53genemutations,andthereissomeevidenceofdifferencesingeneexpression [19–22].Liketobacco-relatedOSCCstheyarerarelyassociatedwithtransformingHPVor enrichmentofthep16tumorsuppressor[23–26].Fewerthan10%oforalcancersareHPV geneexpressionpositiveeveninpatientswithnohistoryoftobaccouse[24,26].Overalllittleis knownabouttheetiologyorthechangesinmRNAormiRNAassociatedwiththissubtypeof OSCC[24] Wequantifiedlevelsof372miRNAsin12OSCCepithelialsamplesfromneversmokers versus10samplesfromacontrolgroupofsubjectswithapparentlynormaloralmucosa.We alsotestedlevelsofthesemiRNAsinatestgroupofOSCCsassociatedwithtobaccousage. Next,wedidsimilarcomparisonsusingthemiRNAexpressiondataofthe344controland OSCCsamplesfromTheCancerGenomeAtlas(TGCA)HNSCCcohort.Tumorsamplesof thisstudyweredissectedsurgicallyandcontainsomestromaltissue.Togetherweusedthese datasetstocomparemiRNAexpressioninneverandeversmokerswiththegoalofstartingto gaininsightonetiologyofOSCCinthesetwodifferentOSCCriskgroups. MaterialsandMethods Clinicalsampling Twobrushcytologysampleseachwerecollectedfrom12subjectswhoneverusedtobacco,or othermutagenicagentslikebetelnut,andwhopresentedwithorallesionsthatwerebiopsy- provenOSCC.ThesepatientswereseenintheOralandMaxillofacialSurgeryClinicinthe UniversityofIllinoisMedicalCenter.Samplesfromnormalcontrolswerefrom10never tobaccousersfromoralsitesthatwerenormalonclinicalexaminationbytheoralsurgeon.The PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 2/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer secondgroupofbrushcytologysampleswastakenfrom18currentorformertobaccousersat lesionsitesofeitherOSCCornonmalignantdiseasewithintactmucosa.Benignsamples includedmucosallesionssuchasleukoplakia,allwithoutdysplasia.Alldiagnoseswereverified byhistopathologicexaminationofsurgicallyobtainedtumortissueforOSCCsandscalpel biopsymaterialfornon-malignantlesions.Allsubjectsinallgroupsprovidedwrittenconsent toparticipateinaccordancewithguidelinesoftheOfficefortheProtectionofResearchSub- jectsoftheUniversityofIllinoisatChicago,thelocalInstitutionalReviewBoardthatformally approvedofthisresearch. Brushcytology Brushcytologywasperformedonpatientsastheypresentedintheclinicjustpriortobiopsyas describedearlier,takingcaretosampleareaswithintactepithelium[27].Sampleswereimme- diatelyplacedinTrizol(LifeTechnologies,Carlsbad,CA,USA),mixed,andfrozen.Weuseda cervicalcytologybrushwithRNApurificationasdescribedinSchwartzetal.[27]. RNA RecentpublicationshavestressedtheproblemswithusageofTrizoltoisolatemiRNAwitheth- anolorisopropanolprecipitationswhenRNAlevelsshowawiderange[28].Whilecellswere storedinTrizol,weusedamethodologysimilartothatrecommendedbyKimetal.andimme- diatelyfollowingphaseseparationallsamplesweresubjectedtosilicate-basedbindingpurifica- tiontopreventselectivemiRNAloss(S1Fig).WeusedRNeasychromatography(Qiagen, Germantown,MD,USA)toremovemRNAfollowedbyethanoladditionandRNeasyMinE- lutechromatography(Qiagen)tobindthenelutesmallRNAs,includingmaturemiRNA. Therewasa6-foldrangeinsampleRNAlevelsbasedonRT-PCRwithsimilaraveragelevelsin themalignantandnonmalignantgroups. QuantitativeRT-PCR 10ngRNAwasreversetranscribedin5ulreactionsusingthemiRCURYLNAUniversalRT microRNAPCR,PolyadenylationandcDNAsynthesiskit(Exiqon,Woburn,MA,USA). cDNAwasdiluted20foldandassayedin10ulPCRreactionsaccordingtotheprotocolfor miRCURYLNAUniversalRTmicroRNAPCRagainstapanelof4miRNAsandaspike-in controlforcDNAsynthesis.Ofeachsamplepairfromasinglesubject,thesamplewiththe higheryieldbasedonreversetranscriptionquantitativepolymerasechainreaction(RT-qPCR) wassubjectedtoascaledupcDNAsynthesisandwasassayedoncebyRT-qPCRonthemicro- RNAReady-to-UsePCR,HumanpanelI(Exiqon),whichincludes372miRNAprimersets. Negativecontrols,excludingtemplatefromthereversetranscriptionreaction,weretestedand profiledlikethesampleswithindividualprimerpairs.Theamplificationwasperformedinan AppliedBiosystemsViia7RT-qPCRSystem(LifeTechnologies,Carlsbad,CA,USA)in384 wellplates.TheamplificationcurveswereanalyzedforCtvaluesusingthebuilt-insoftware, withasinglebaselineandthresholdsetmanuallyforeachplate.ResultswithmiRNAsshown tobedifferentiallyexpressedintheinitialscreenwerecorroboratedusingasimilarRT-PCR assayminimallyinduplicate(Exiqon). miRNAdataanalysis ForRT-qPCRdataanalysis,40miRNAswereselectedasstandardstonormalizeCtvaluesfor eachplate.ThesereferenceswerechosenbecausetheywereamongalargesubgroupofmiRNAs expressedinallsamples.WeusedthedeltadeltaCtmethodtocalculateexpressionvalues.All PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 3/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer CtvalueswereimportedintotheRankProductprogram,whichrankslevelsforeachmiRNA withinasample,multipliesthevaluesforallsamplesinonegrouptogettherankproduct,and thencalculatesacombinedprobabilityofthedistributionforeachRNAinthetwogroupsto determinetheprobabilityofdifferentialexpression[29,30].Acutoffforthepercentage(pro- portion)offalsepositivesof0.05istakenassignificantfordifferentialexpression.TCGARNA- seqdatafor314OSCCsamplesand30controls,weredownloadedformtheTCGADataPortal (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga)asnormalizedmiRNAquantificationfilesalongwithaccom- panyingpatientclinicalinformationfiles.TheexactnamesforTCGA-derivedmiRNAswere obtainedbyexaminingasubsetof5individualsampleisoformquantificationfilestoidentify eachdifferentiallyexpressedmiRNAbasedonitsmappedgenomicsiteasthe3por5pisoform. Whenambiguousthisdesignationwasnotgiven.NormalizedmiRNAlevelcountswereloaded directlyintotheRankProditProgramtoperformrankproductsanalysis[29,30].Nonnegative MatrixFactorizationConsensusClusteringwasusedtoidentifytheoptimalnumberofdistinct samplesclustersamongthe305OSCCsintheTCGAdatasetwithknownsmokingstatus accessedthroughtheGenePatternportalwww.broadinstitute.org/.Itwasusedtoidentifythe optimalnumberofdistinctsamplesclustersamongthe305OSCCsintheTCGAdataset[31– 33].First,allmiRNAswithmorethan50%sampleswithzerovalueswerefilteredout.Clustering wasthendonebasedonthelevelsofthe238miRNAswhichshowedthegreatestvariationin expressionlevels(normalizedstandarddeviation>1).Thecopheneticcoefficientderivedserved asameasureofcorrelationbetweenthesampledistanceinducedbytheconsensusmatrix. HeatmapsforvisualpresentationofthemiRNAexpressiondataweregeneratedusingBRB Arraytools[34].FortherepresentationofRNAfrombrushcytologydatasetweusedhierar- chicalclusteringwith1-correlationandaveragelinkageoftheexpressionlevelsof50miRNAs showntobedifferentiallyexpressedbetweenOSCCandnonOSCCsbasedonclasscomparison usingBRBArraytools.FortherepresentationofTCGAexpressiondatanonnegativematrix factorizationwasusedtoclustersamplesbasedontheexpressionlevelsof228mostvariably expressedmiRNAs. Results miRNAexpressioninOSCCineversmokers ThisworkusesRNAfromoralmucosalcellsobtainedbybrushcytology[27,35]sowefirst soughttoverifythisapproachtomeasuremiRNAlevelsbyexaminingmiRNAsassociated withOSCCintobaccousers.Tofocusonmalignancy-specificpathologicchanges,wecom- paredexpressionofmiRNAsinOSCCsofeversmokersversusthatinnonmalignantlesionsin asimilarpopulation.WecomparedepithelialmiRNAfromOSCClesionsin8patients,and nonmalignantorallesions/conditionsof9tobaccousers,asoutlinedinTable1.Theseincluded agranularcelltumor,mucosalaberrationssuchasfibroushyperplasiaandhyperkeratosis,and asofttissueameloblastomaofthegingiva.Theselesionsoftenshowincreasedcellproliferation andpossiblyinflammation,butnototherpropertiessuchasblockstoapoptosisandthe increasedtissueinvasionthatcanoccurwithmalignancy.Weusedtherankproductmethodol- ogy,anonparametricstatisticaltool,todeterminedifferentiallyexpressedmiRNAs[29,30]. ThistestformiRNAdifferentialexpressionwithOSCCineversmokersrevealedonemiRNA thatwasinducedspecificallywithOSCCusingthecriteriaof>2-foldchangeandatp<0.05 fortherankproducttest(Table2A).ThisinducedmiRNAwasmiR-196a-5p,amiRNAassoci- atedwithoralcancerinmanystudies.NomiRNAsshowedadecreaseinexpression. Manypublishedstudiesonoralcancerlargelyfocusonbetel-ortobacco-associatedcancers andcompareRNAintumorsversusnormalnonpathologicaltissue.WealsocomparedmiR- NAsenrichedwithtobaccoassociatedOSCCversusmiRNAsinnormaloraltissue.Withthis PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 4/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer Table1. EverSmokerPatientdata. Sample Sitea Sex Age Tobacco/Betelb Ethanolc Path.Stage Graded ImmuneState OSCC110 T M 50 Bet+Tob None T2N0M0 WellDiff Norm OSCC129 LG M 52 F-Tob L/M T1N0M0 WellDiff Norm OSCC329 LG M 59 F-Tob None T4aN0M0 PoorlyDiff Norm OSCC359 T M 61 Tob Heavy T4N2cM0 ModDiff Norm OSCC416 T M 61 Tob L/M TcisN0M0 N/A Norm OSCC449 LG F 62 Tob None T4NoM0 ModDiff Norm OSCC466 T M 64 Tob Heavy T2N0M0 PoorlyDiff HIVpositive OSCC485 FOM M 56 Tob None T4aN2bM0 ModDiff Norm Sample Site Sex Age Tobacco/Betel Ethanol Path.Finding ImmuneState BL117 LM F 46 Tob L/M CanicularAdenoma Norm BL129 Bu M 27 Tob None Ameloblastoma Norm BL149 LG F 54 F-Tob None Hyperkeratosis Norm BL319 T F 33 Tob L/M GranularCellTumor Norm BL367 Bu M 44 ST None Hyperkeratosis,Mucositis Norm BL474 LG F 77 F-Tob L/M Fibroushyperplasia Norm BL482 T M 58 Tob L/M Hyperkeratosis Norm BL490 UG M 51 Tob L/M FibrousHyperplasia Norm BL495 UG M 60 Tob None Hyperkeratosis Norm aT,tongue;LG/UGlower/uppergingiva;FOM,floorofmouth;Bu,buccalmucosa,LM,lipmucosa. bTob,Tobaccouser;ifformeruserthanF-Tob.;Bet,beteluse;ST,smokelesstobaccouser cL/M,lighttomoderateintakeofethanolupto50gramsperday,Heavy,intakeofethanol>50g/day. dwelldifferentiated,WellDiff;moderatelydifferentiated,ModDiff;Poorlydifferentiated,PoorlyDiff doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695.t001 approachwesawinductionof8miRNAsincludingmiR196a-5p,miR-10b-5p,miR-31-5p, miR-451aandmiR-144-3p(Table2B).Ofthese,besidesmiR-196a-5p,miR-10b-5pandmiR- 31-5phavebeenshowntobeenrichedinearlierstudiesofheadandneckcancerusingsurgi- callyobtainedwholemucosa,andmiR144-5pandmiR-451awereshowntobeinducedinthe salivaofthosewithheadandneckcancer[36–38]. miRNAexpressioninOSCCinneversmokers NeversmokerpatientfeaturesaresummarizedinTable3.Therewere12patients,7females and5males,withagesrangingfrom37to90years,withtheaverageageof67.Thecontrol groupofsubjectsrangedinagefrom28to77;withanaverageof61.Therewere6femalesand fourmales.MiRNAlevelsintheseneversmokerOSCCswerecomparedtothatinnonpatholo- gicmucosainneversmokers. Among372miRNAsanalyzedseven,miR-196a-5p,miR-10b-5p,miR-503-5p,miR-451a, miR-144-3p,miR-187-3pandmiR-31-5p,showedincreasedexpressionintheOSCCsamples oftheneversmokers,againusingtherankproductmethodology(Table2c)[29,30].Fig1 showsaheatmapwithrelativeexpressionofthedifferentmiRNAsinsamplesfromever smokerOSCC,neversmokerOSCC,andneversmokercontrols.Again,nomiRNAsshowed downregulation.Thismaybebecausethetumorsamplesareoftenamixtureoftumorand normalepitheliumwhilecontrolsamplesarepurenormalepitheliummakingalossofexpres- sionintumorhardtodetect. ConfirmationofsimilarOSSCmiRNAexpressionchangesineversmokersandnever smokers. TheTCGAdatasetofglobalmiRNAexpressiondataof305OSCCandcontrol PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 5/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer Table2. MicroRNAsenrichedinOSCCandbenignorallesions. A.EversmokerOSCCversuseversmokerbenignpathology MicroRNA FoldinductionwithOSCC PValueb Pfpb miR-196a-5p 8.7 0.000104 0.008 miR-144-3pa 7.9 0.000104 0.01 B.EversmokerOSCCversusneversmokernormal MicroRNA FoldinductionwithOSCC PValue Pfp miR-196a-5p 61.0 0.000 0.000 miR-144-3pa 103.9 0.000 0.000 miR-451aa 92.9 0.000 0.000 miR-10b-5p 32.8 7.81E-05 0.006 miR-31-5p 16.1 0.000234 0.015 C.NeversmokerOSCCversusneversmokernormal MicroRNA FoldinductionwithOSCC PValue Pfp miR-196a-5p 19.2 2.60E-05 0.005 miR-10b-5p 15.0 2.60E-05 0.010 miR-503-5p 15.0 0.000156 0.012 miR-451aa 11.7 0.000391 0.025 miR-144-3pa 9.6 0.000859 0.033 miR-187-3p 10.0 0.000859 0.037 miR-31-5p 6.7 0.001250 0.040 amicroRNAhighlyexpressedinblood, brankproductprobability cpfpisfortherankproducttest:percentagefalsepositivepredictions doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695.t002 Table3. NeverSmokerOSCCPatientdata. Sample Sitea Sex Age Ethanolb PathologicStage Gradec ImmuneState OSCC231 T M 55 None T1N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC305 T M 78 L/M T1N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC308 T F 74 L/M T1N0M0 ModDiff RheumatoiArthritisd OSCC3553 LG F 84 None T1N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC357 T F 74 None T4N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC413 T F 63 None T3N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC453 Bu F 37 L/M T2N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC463 LG F 69 None T2N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC4231 LG M 65 None T4N0M0 ModDiff Renaltransplante OSCC4281 LG F 58 None T2N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC4291 T M 90 None T3N0M0 ModDiff Norm. OSCC5271 LG M 54 None T4N0M0 ModDiff Renaltransplante aT,tongue;LG,lowergingiva;Bu,buccalmucosa. bL/M,lighttomoderateintakeofethanolupto50gramsperday,Heavy,intakeofethanol>50g/day. cwelldifferentiated,WellDiff;moderatelydifferentiated,ModDiff;Poorlydifferentiated,PoorlyDiff dtreatedwithanti-inflammatoryandTumorNecrosisFactorinhibitor,etanercept etreatedwithstandardpost-transplantimmunosuppressivemedications doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695.t003 PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 6/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer Fig1.DifferentiallyexpressedmiRNAsexpressedincontrolsandOSCCsfromneversmokersandeversmokers.Supervizedhierarchicalclustering of50differentiallyexpressedmiRNAswithfoldchangesabove2,among9controls,12neversmokerOSCCs,and8eversmokerOSCCs.Epithelialsamples arelistedinthecolumnsandmiRNAsareinrows.Redindicateshigherexpressionthanaverageandblueindicateslowerthanaverage. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695.g001 mucosasamplesallpreparedunderstandardmethodslinkedtoclinicaldatawasusedtofurther exploremiRNAsineversmokersversusneversmokers.Thesetconfirmedtheobservationthat eversmokersandneversmokersOSCCsshowsimilarmiRNAlevels.Weperformedclasscom- parisonamongthe217eversmokerOSCCsamplesversusthe20eversmokercontrols (Table4a,S5Table).Wethendidthesamebetweenthe88neversmokerOSCCsamplesversus the10neversmokercontrols(Table4b,S6Table).All10miRNAsenrichedintheneversmoker OSCCsbyrankproductwerecontainedinthelistofmiRNAsenrichedwiththeeversmoker group.TheeversmokergroupshowedmoremiRNAsdifferentiallyexpressedbutthatmaybe duetothelargersizeoftheeversmokerdatasets.NomiRNAsshowedreducedlevelsinthe neversmokerstumorthoughthreeweredepressedintheeversmokertumorgroupversuscon- trol,miR-375,miR-1-2-3p,andmiR-99a(Table4c).Whenadirectcomparisonbetweenever smokerandneversmokerOSCCmiRNAexpressiondatawasdonewesawonlyonemiRNA wasdifferentiallyexpressed,miR-637,confirminghowsimilarthetwogroupsare(Table4d). ItwasshownsometimeagothatHNSCCfallinto4subtypesbasedonglobalmiRNA expression,thoughoneofthegroupsisheavilyweightedtooralpharyngealtumors[39–41]. Weperformedunsupervisedclusteringusingnonnegativematrixfactorization(NMF),which identifiescommongene/RNAexpressionpatterns,ormetagenes,amongsamples[31].Itcalcu- latesacopheneticcoefficientforeachvalueofK(numberofclusters)whichismaximalwhen PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 7/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer Table4. miRNAsdifferentiallyexpressedinOSCCandcontrolsinTCGAdataset. A.EversmokerOSCCversuseversmokernormal MicroRNA FoldinductionwithOSCC PValuea Pfpb miR-196b-5p 16.5 0 0 miR-503-5p 8.0 0 0 miR-196a-5p 21.0 0 0 miR-1293 12.1 0 0 miR-196a-5p 10.9 0 0 miR-937-3p 8.5 0 0 miR-210-3p 7.2 0 0 miR-31 11.1 0 0 miR-105-2 35.4 0 0 miR-1269a 52.7 0 0 miR-767 29.3 0 0 miR455 6.2 9.56E-06 0.000714 miR-615-3p 6.7 9.56E-06 0.000769 miR-105-1 25.9 9.56E-06 0.000833 miR-548f 14.0 0.000153 0.010667 miR-1910 7.8 0.000315 0.020625 miR-3648 4.7 0.000478 0.029412 miR-4326 4.9 0.000602 0.035000 miR-224 4.8 0.000746 0.041053 B.NeversmokerOSCCversusneversmokernormal MicroRNA FoldinductionwithOSCC PValue Pfp miR-105-1 75.8 0 0 miR-105-2 87.3 0 0 miR-196a-5p 11.1 0 0 miR-196b-5p 16.4 0 0 miR-210-3p 5.1 0 0 miR-503-5p 9.2 0 0 miR-767 69.5 3.82E-05 0.00571 miR-31 4.9 4.78E-05 0.00625 miR-1269a 14.5 5.73E-05 0.00667 miR-455 6.7 0.000421 0.04400 C.DepressedineversmokerOSCCversuseversmokernormal MicroRNA FoldinductionwithNormal PValue Pfp miR-375 0.085 0 0 miR-1-3p 0.14 6.69E-05 0.0175 miR-99a 0.23 0.000182 0.038 D.EversmokerOSCCversusneversmokerOSCC MicroRNA Foldinductionwitheversmokers PValue Pfp miR-637 3.4 0 0 arankproductprobability bpfpisfortherankproducttest:percentagefalsepositivepredictions doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695.t004 PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 8/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer Fig2.DiscoveryofOSCCsubtypesbasedonmiRNAexpressionamong305OSCCsintheTCGAdataset.A)Nonnegatiivematrixfactorization consensusclusteringshowedsupportfortwoandfourOSCCsubtypesbasedonthemaximalcopheneticvalueatK=2and4.B)Consensusmatricesfor thesampleswerecalculatedatk=2,3,4,5,6,7,8.Acomparisonofthevisualizedconsensusmatricesallowedavisualassessmentofthebestrank.Clear blockpatternsalongthediagonaloftheconsensusmatricesindicatedrobustnessoftheclustering.C)Analysisoftheeversmokersandneversmokersin bothmiRNAbasedsubclassrevealedalackofadifferenceintheproportionsofthetworiskgroupsbasedonsmokingexperience,p<0.059byFisherExact TestD)Analysisoftheeversmokersandneversmokersineachof4miRNAbasedsubclassesrevealednosignificantdifferenceinproportionsofeverand neversmokersinanygroup. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695.g002 theclustersshowmaximalseparation.Usingthe238miRNAsmostvariablyexpressedamong the305OSCCsamplesK=2–7producedthehighestcopheneticcoefficientatK=2and4 indicatingtwoorfourclustersofsamples(Fig2)[32].Aheatmapreveasdifferentialexpres- sionofasubsetofthemiRNAsusedtoseparatethecasesintotwosubtypesorclusters(S2Fig). GiventhesetwoOSCCgroups,weexaminedtobaccousageamongthesubjectsandfoundit waspossibleonegroupshowedaslightlyhighernumberofsmokersbutthisdidnotreach PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 9/16 MicroRNAExpressionSimilarinSmokerandNonsmokerOralCancer significance(Fig2C).Whenwecomparedpackyearexposurebetweenthesetwogroupswe foundthefirstgroupshowedalmost40%lowerexposure626¼2.6packyearsversusthesecond 100+4.4witht<0.036.SuggestingtobaccoexposuremayindeedhavesomeeffectonmiRNA expression. When4OSCCsubclasseswereexaminedfortobaccousagetherewasnosignificantdiffer- enceinproportionofeverandneversmokersbasedontheChiSquaretestthoughsomegroups weresmallmakingstatisticalanalysisdifficult(Fig2Aand2D). Discussion TheetiologyofOSCCofneversmokersisunknown.IfOSCCinneversmokersisadistinctsub- typeofthiscancerthenregulatoryRNAsinthetumorepitheliummaybedifferentthanthoseof tobacco-associatedOSCCs.Tumorsfrombothcohortsaregenerallynotassociatedwithp16 enrichmentortransformingHPVgeneexpressionandthatwasthecaseherewithonesubject positiveforp16andonepositiveforHPV16RNA(S2Table)[24,26].Thisstudysoughtto examineOSCCepitheliumtodiscernmiRNAmisexpressionwiththisdiseaseinneversmokers. WemeasuredmiRNAsenrichedinOSCCepitheliumofneversmokersandineversmokers bothcomparedtonormaltissue.WefoundthatmiR-144-3p,miR-451a,miR-10b-5p,mir-31- 5p,andmiR-196a-5pwereenrichedwithtumorformationwhetherthesubjectwasanever smokerorneversmoker.ExaminationoftheTCGAOSCCsandmiRNAexpressionalsosug- geststhatoveralltherewasmuchalikeinOSCCsfromeverandneversmokers(S3Table). ItwaspossibletobaccoplayedaroleinchangingmiRNAexpressioninasubgroupof OSCCs;howeverithasbeennotedthatthe“classical”subtypeofHNSCCs,associatedwith heavytobaccousage,isonlyaminorcomponentofOSCCs.IndeedaspublishedtheTCGA groupshowedonly11.2%ofgroupof178oraltumorsshowedthe“classical”mRNAexpres- sionprofile[39].WhenweseparatedtheOSCCsbasedonmiRNAexpressionwefoundtwoor foursubclasses(Fig2).Thetwosubclassclustersshowedthemaximalagreementwiththe mRNAbasedsubclassificationswithgrouponehavingmostofthe“atypical”mRNAexpres- sionpatternandgrouptwohavingmostofthe“classicalpattern”[40,41].Curiouslygrouptwo ofthetwosubclassesshowedanominallyhigherpercentageofsmokersthatdidnotreachsta- tisticalsignificance,buttherewasa40%increaseincigarettepackyearexposure62±2.6versus 100±4.4,t<0.0389.ThesefindingsshowtobaccousagemayhavesomeeffectonmiRNA expression,butotherunknownfactorshavelargereffects,andthatrelyingontobaccoexposure toassigntumortypeisnotwise. Thisstudyinpartfocusesononecelltype,epithelium,obtainedbybrushcytology,making itmoresensitivetochangesinexpressionofmiRNAsfoundmainlyinthisspecificcelltype [27].MiRNAsenrichedinstromaandnotepithlieumoftumorswouldnotbeapparent.Itis importanttonotethatanythingthatcausesthebrushtoacquirecellsnormallynotpresentin theepithelium,suchastheepithelialinvasionoflymphocytesthatcanoccurininflamed OSCC,canalsoresultinchangesinRNAsinthesample.Somesamplesmayalsohaveblood contaminationwhileothersdonot.Inparticular,malignantlesionscanbemorehighlyvascu- larizedwithbloodvesselsnexttoepithelialcells,whichcangreatlyincreasethemixofblood cellsexposedtothebrush.WesawelevatedlevelsofmiR-451ainbothtumorgroupscompared tonormaltissue.ThisRNAishighlyexpressedinredbloodcells(RBCs)andisawell-known indicatorofRBCRNAcontaminationinplasmasamples[42,43].MiR-451alevelswerehigh- estinOSCCsamplesofeversmokersandlowestinnormalsamplesofneversmokers.Inthe samples,levelsofmiR-451acorrelatedwithasecondblood-linkedmiRNA,miR-144-3p,witha correlationcoefficientof0.91[36,37,44],datanotshown.WhileweshowedbothmiR-451a andmiR-144-3paremarkersforOSCC,thispropertyisalmostcertainlyindirectandthereis PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141695 November6,2015 10/16

Description:
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801. South Paulina Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States of America, 3 Department of Oral Medicine and Oral. Diagnostics . sponsor does not alter the authors' adherence to. PLOS ONE
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.