SHAKESPEARE'S LOVE MYTHOLOGY IN VENUS AND ADONIS, . ' A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT S DMAM AND ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA by Dorothy Anne Hungerford B.A. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., 1968 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS I n the Department of English DOROTHY ANNE HUNGERFORQ 1975 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY March, 1975 Approval Name : Anne Hunger ford Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: ~hakespeare'sL ove Mythology in Venus and Adonis, A Midsummer-Night's Dream and Antony and Cleopatra. Examining Committee: Chairman : Jared R. Curtis J. W, Lever Senior Supervisor G. Newman E. Lambert myStockhol der External Examiner Associate Professor University of Britis.h .C olumbia Vancouver, B C Pate Approved: March 7, 1975 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to usere of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response t o a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of ~hesis/~issertation: A ~hakespeare's Love Mythology in Venus and Adonis, Midsummer- Night's Dream and Antony -and Cleopatra. - Author : (signature) Anne Hungerford (name ) Ifarch 7, 1975 (date) ABSTRACT In all three works which I will consider, Venus and Adonis, A Midsummer-~ight's Dream and Antony and Cleopatra, Shakespeare's theme of love is informed, in varying degrees, by the figures of classical mythology. The gods and goddesses of pagan myth underwent many transformations from their original antique forms to their revival in Renaissance literature and art. A major portion of this study is concerned with establishing,Shakespeare's mythological figures in a Renaissance context. I have attempted to trace the development of Shakespeare's use of love mythology from its earliest forms in Venus and Adonis and A Midsummer-Night's Dream to its fullest expression iri Antony and Cleopatra. Venus and Adonis shows us, within a mythological framework, the fall of the world. A Midsummer-Night's Dream reverses the process, rebuilding through divine influence a mythic paradise. Antony and Cleopatra transcends the relative simplicity of the two earlier works. The negative aspects of love in Venus and Adonis and the positive aspects portrayed in A Midsummer-Night's Dream are placed in the context of a world no longer sheltered by gods and goddesses. In Antony and Cleopatra the world neither falls nor rises; it stays locked i n a stasis under the dominance of Fortune's wheel. The divine content of mythology is present only on the edges of this world, where it struggles, unsuccessfully, t o achieve recognition. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S page INTRODUCTION VENUS AND ADONIS A MIDSUMP4ER-NIGHT'S DREAM ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA BIBLIOGRAPHY P L A T E S ' Michelangelo (after) , "Ganymede ," Chalk Drawing, Fr. 18, for Tomasm-Cavalieri, 1532, from Erwin Panofsky, Studies i n (London: Oxford Univ. Pr., 1939, LXXXIV, 158. Gustave DO^, Illustration f a r The Divine Comedy, Paradise canto 9, from The Divine C -r oamn-e td*v w ohfi tDe a(nNteew A YliOa;h^:i eprai.i thteraonns .B kLs a.w, r1e9nc4e8 ) . 62 Paolo Veronese, "Mars and Venus," Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, from Edgar Wind, Pagan Mysteries i n the Renaissance (London: Faber & Faber, 1958), illus. 76. 120 Francesco Cossa, "The Triumph of Venus, " '(detail), Palazzo Schifanoia, Ferrara, from Edgar wind, Pagan Mysteries i n the Renaissance (1958), illus. 77. 121 ," Botticelli, "Mars and Venus National Gallery, London, from Edgar Wind, Pagan Mysteries i n the Rena'issance (1958) , illus. 74. 122 INTRODUCTION. The Renaissance, as its name implies, was a t i m e of extraordinary reawakening, After centuries of semi-neglect the achievements of the Greek and Roman civilizations were restored t o a position of central importance and the influx of rediscovered classical thought stimulated the great 1 artistic flowering for which this period is so renowned. Classical literature, i n particular, captured and inspired the imagination of the Renaissance world and since much of it was found expressed through mythology, Renaissance artists celebrated a renewed interest i n the classical portrayal of the pagan gods and goddesses. Moreover, the new humanism of the period provided a fresh interpretation of mythological figures, Not only were classical myths freed from the Christianizing influence which had dominated them during the Middle Ages, for instance, Gelding's departure from the moralized tradition i n his Elizabethan translation of Ovid's Metamorphoses, but they were further informed by a renewed 2 interest i n philosophy, primarily the tradition of ~eoplatonism. Paul 0. Kristeller, Renaissance Thought (New York : Harper, 1961), p. 7. Jean Seznec, The Survival of the Pagan Gods. The Mythological , Tradition and Its Place i n Renaissance Humanism (1940) trans. Barbara F. Sessions, Bollingen Series XXXVIII (princeton, N.J., Princeton Univ. Pr., 1953, 1972), pp. 96ff. Thus figures taken from classical mythology, infused with philosophical meaning and reinterpreted i n the light of the new humanism, appear i n the works of Botticelli and Michel- ange lo. The Renaissance fascination with pagan mythology also appears i n Shakespeare's work. H i s use of classical icon- ography i n several of the sonnets and many of the plays and his familiarity with at least the basic premises of the surrounding philosophical tradition, show that he parti- cipated i n the general movement toward mythological expression i n the arts. Richard Cody and David P. Young have attempted i n their individual works t o place Shakespeare i n this tra- d i t i ~ n w, ~hi le Erwin Panofsky, Jean Seznec and Edgar Wind make reference to Shakespeare when discussing the Renaissance revival i n the plastic arts,5 but on the whole this is an area of Shakespeare criticism which is only now beginning t o receive scholarly attention. I have therefore chosen t o examine certain aspects of Shakespeare's myth structure. Since 30n Shakespeare and Neoplatonism, see John Vyvyan, Shakespeare and Platonic Beauty (London: Chatto & Windus, 1970); Walter C. Curry, Shakespeare's Philosophical Patterns (Louisiana State Univ. Pr., 1937, 1959). , 4~ichardC ody, The Landscape of the Mind (London: Clarendon Pr. 1969); David P. Young, Something of Great Constancy (New Haven: Yale Univ. Pr., 1966). 'I3dgar Wind, Pagan Mysteries i n the Renaissance (London: Faber & Faber, 1958); Erwin Panofsky, Studies i n Iconology (London: Oxford Univ. Pr., 1939, 1967). Shakespeare's use of Renaissance mythology is a topic too large for the confines of this paper and too expansive for the l i m i t s of my knowledge, I w i l l concentrate on the myth- ological aspects of love in three works which have this theme in common: the narrative poem Venus and Adonis and the plays A Midsummer-Night's Dream and Antony and Cleopatra. In each instance the Love theme is explored through mythological backgrounds which demonstrate Shakespeare's indebtedness t o the revival of pagan mysteries i n the Renaissance. I shall open with a study of Venus and Adonis because it is clearly the best example of an Ovidian mythology interpreted and t~ some extent transformed by the new Renai- ssance humanism. The universal treatment accorded t o love i n this early mythological poem points toward Shakespeare's lifelong exploration of the power of Eros i n the world, a theme which is further explored in A Midsummer-Night's Dream where, amidst fairies and lovers, the descent of the winged god into the play's world and its consequent metamorphosis, is charted. Finally, in Antony and Cleopatra, which shares a pagan setting with the earlier works and their concern with the universality of love, Shakespeare departs from the recog- nizable figures of classical mythology and instills a l l mytholo- gical potency into the dramatic characterization, through
Description: