ShakeSpeare and the VerSification of engliSh drama, 1561–1642 In memory of M. L. Gasparov Shakespeare and the Versification of English Drama, 1561–1642 marina tarlinSkaja University of Washington, USA © Marina Tarlinskaja 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Marina Tarlinskaja has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East 110 Cherry Street Union Road Suite 3-1 Farnham Burlington, VT 05401-3818 Surrey, GU9 7PT USA England www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library The Library of Congress has cataloged the printed edition as follows: Tarlinskaja, Marina. Shakespeare and the versification of English drama, 1561–1642 / by Marina Tarlinskaja. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4724-3028-1 (hardcover : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-4724-3029-8 (ebook) 1. Shakespeare, William, 1564–1616—Versification. 2. Verse drama, English—History and criticism. 3. English drama—Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500–1600—History and criticism. I. Title. PR3085.T35 2014 822.3’3—dc23 2014008234 ISBN: 9781472430281 (hbk) ISBN: 9781472430298 (ebk – PDF) V contents List of Tables vii List of Figures ix Acknowledgements xi 1 Why Study Versification? Versification Analysis; Tests 1 2 How It All Began: from Surrey’s Aeneid to Marlowe’s Tamburlaine 33 3 Early Elizabethan Playwrights: Kyd, Marlowe, Greene, Peele, Early Shakespeare. 2, 3 Henry VI and Arden of Faversham. 69 4 Shakespeare’s Versification: Evolution. Co-authored Plays. The Poem A Lover’s Complaint 123 5 Jacobean and Caroline Playwrights: From Shakespeare to Shirley 193 6 Conclusions: Shakespeare and Versification, 1540s–1640s 257 Appendix A: Verse Form and Meaning: Rhythmical Italics 267 Appendix B: General Tables B.1–B.16 287 Glossary 377 References 383 Index 401 This page has been left blank intentionally list of tables B.1 general table: frequency of Stresses 288 B.2 general table: frequency of Word Boundaries 306 B.3 general table: frequency of Strong Syntactic Breaks 315 B.4 general table: additional points that help attribution 324 B.5 general table: lines Split Between personages 347 B.6 A Lover’s Complaint compared to other Works: frequency of Stresses 349 B.7 A Lover’s Complaint compared to other Works: frequency of Word Boundaries 351 B.8 A Lover’s Complaint compared to other Works: frequency of Strong Syntactic Breaks 354 B.9 A Lover’s Complaint compared to other Works: additional points that help attribution 356 B.10 Sir Thomas More compared to other Works: frequency of Stresses 359 B.11 Sir Thomas More compared to other Works: frequency of Word Boundaries 363 B.12 Sir Thomas More compared to other Works: frequency of Strong Syntactic Breaks 367 B.13 Double Falsehood compared to other Works: frequency of Stresses 371 B.14 Double Falsehood compared to other Works: frequency of Word Boundaries 372 B.15 Double Falsehood compared to other Works: frequency of Strong Syntactic Breaks 373 B.16 Double Falsehood compared to other Works: additional points that help attribution 374 This page has been left blank intentionally list of figures 1.1 constrained and loose iambic pentameter: Stressing on Strong (even) Syllabic positions 19 1.2 constrained and loose iambic pentameter: Strong Syntactic Breaks after Syllables 2–11 25 3.1 kyd compared to contemporaries: Stressing on Strong (even) Syllabic positions 95 3.2 kyd and marlowe compared to Hieronimo: Strong Syntactic Breaks after Syllables 2–11 98 4.1 Shakespeare’s periods: Stressing on Strong (even) Syllabic positions 127 4.2 Shakespeare’s periods: Strong Syntactic Breaks after Syllables 2–11 131 4.3 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in Henry VIII: Strong Syntactic Breaks after Syllables 2–11 144 4.4 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in Henry VIII: masculine line endings: losses of Stress on position 10 caused by monosyllables and polysyllables 146 4.5 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in Henry VIII: feminine line endings created by polysyllables (Simple endings) and by monosyllables (compound endings), compound light (monosyllables on 11 are Unstressed), or compound heavy (monosyllables on 11 are Stressed 147 4.6 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in Henry VIII: run-on lines 148 4.7 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in The Two Noble Kinsmen: feminine line endings 150 4.8 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in The Two Noble Kinsmen: masculine line endings: loss of Stress on Syllabic position 10 151 4.9 Shakespeare compared to fletcher in The Two Noble Kinsmen: run-on lines 152
Description: