• SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY KHAIRPUR OFFICE OF THE PROJECT COORDINATOR (SAF) P.C(SAF)/SALU/KI-IP/37 Dated:- 22-03-2017 To, The Director (C.B), Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority, Karachi Subject:(cid:9) AWARD OF WORK. With reference to our N.I.T No.P.C(SAF)/SALU/KHP/15, Dated:-26-01-2017, Published on your website (SPPRA S.No.31412, Dated:-30-01-2017), in Newspaper Daily Kawish, Daily Jang & The Nation, on 27-01-2017. The Tenders for 04 Nos: Buildings work of Project Titled "Strengthening of Academic Facilities" at Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, was invited and responded as under:- S.No: Name of Work Remarks PACKAGE # 1 01. Responded CONSTRUCTION OF ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE. PACKAGE # 2 02 CONSTRUCTION OF HOSTEL FOR 200 BOYS AND COURT YARD WALL Responded FOR HOSTEL. PACKAGE # 3 03 CONSTRUCTION OF EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATION BLOCK & Not Responded EXTENSION OF DPRI BUILDING. PACKAGE # 4 04 CONSTRUCTION OF MAIN ENTRANCE GATE WITH BOL NDARY WALL Responded ALONG NATIONAL HIGHWAY FOR MAIN CAMPUS. Hence, the necessary document of above works is attached herewith for further hosting on SPPRA website. Thanking you in anticipation. PROJECT COORDINATOR (SAF) D.A 1. Copies of NIT published in news paper (3 Nos:). (Photocopy) 2. Copy of SPPRA website hosting paper. (Photocopy) 3. Copies of list purchased documents by the bidders (Package # I, 2. 3. & 4) (Original) 4. Attendance Sheet of the Contractors & Members. (Package # I, 2, 3, & 4) (Original) 5. Bid opening Statement. (Package # 1, 2, 3, & 4) (Original) 6. Result of detailed Evaluation Report of Bidders. (Package # 1, 2, & 4) (Original) 7. Bid Evaluation Report. (Package # I, 2, & 4) (Original) 8. Minutes of l's. 2". & 3'd Meeting of Procurement Committee (Package # I. 2. & 4) (Original) 9. Form of Contract / Contract Evaluation Form (Package # 1. 2. & 4) (Original) , cc— (,n Copy F.WCs for Information to the: (`( I .(cid:9) Secretary to Vice Chancellor Shah Abdul I.atif Jniversity, Khairpur. 2.(cid:9) Registrar/Convener of the Procurement Committee for project (SAF) Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur. ,SINDH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY CONTRACT EVALUATION FORM TO BE FILLED IN BY ALL PROCURING AGENCIES FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS OF WORKS, SERVICES & GOODS I) NAME OF THE ORGANIZATION / DEPTF. SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY, KHAIRPUR 2) PROVINCIAL / LOCAL GOVT./ OTHER PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 3) TITLE OF CONTRACT 4) TENDER NUMBER PID (H) 9851 5) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT Package tt 1, coast action of Acadmic infrastructure 6) FORUM THAT APPROVED THE SCHEME PSDP Islamabad 7) TENDER ESTIMATED VALUE(cid:9) 228.219. Millions 8) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 232,394 Millions (For civil works only) Twelve Months (12) 9) ESTIMATED CONII'l etION PERIOD (AS PER CONTRACT) 10) TENDER OPENtD t )N (DA I r(cid:9) 15.02-2017 at 12:30 pm 11) NUMBER OF TENDER DOCi 'MENTS LD Four (4) (Attach list of buyers) e (03) 12) NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED 13) NUMBER OF BIDDERS PRESENT AT ' IL TIME V. OPINING t1F BIDS 1°3) (cid:9) 14) 1311) EVALUATION REPORT AtiaChetl (Enclose a copy) Enterprises JV Kings Enterprises 10) NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE SUCCESSFU (cid:9) 11) CONTRACT AWARD PRICE 228.219 12) RANKING OF SUCCESS3t1 131DDER IN EVALI:ATIO. (i.e. l', 2". 3rd EVALUATION 1311)). 1st lowest Evaluation BIO 15) METHOD OF PROCUREMENT USED : - (Tick one) a) SINGLE STAGE—ONE ENVELOPE PROCEDURE Domestic) Local b) SINGLE STAGE — TWO ENVELOPE PROCEDURE c) TWO STAGE BIDDING PROCEDURE (cid:9) d) TWO STAGE — TWO ENVELOPE BIDDING PROCEDURE PLEASE SPECIFY IF ANY OTHER METHOD OF PROCUREMENT WAS ADOPTED 1.c, EMERGENCY. DIRECT CONTRACTING ETC, WITH BRIEF 2EASONS: I/3 Vice Chancellor Shah Abdul Lab( University Khaii pur 19) APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR AWARI) OF CONTRACT _ 20) WHETHER THE PROCUREMENT WAS INCLUDED IN ANNUAL PROCUREMENT PLA\? Yes No 21) ADVERTISEMENT : Yes i) SPPRA Website on 30-01-2017,S:NO, 31412 (If yes, give date and SPPRA Identification No.) No ii) News Papers Yes Daily Kawish, Daily Jang ,The Nation on (If yes, give na f newspapers and dates) 27.01-2017 :No 22) NATURE OF CO Int . 23) WHETHER QUALIFICA N CR WAS INCLUDED IN BIDDING / TENDE(cid:9) ENTS? (If yes. enclose a copy) 24) WHETHER BID EVALUATION CRITERIA WAS INCLUDED IN BIDDING / TENDER DOCU (If yes, enclose a copy) 25) WHETHER APPROVAL OF COMPETENT AUTHORI METHOD OTHER THAN OPEN COMPETITIVE BID 26) WAS BID SECURITY OBTAINED FROM ALL THE BIDDERS? Yes No 27) WHETHER THE SUCCESSFUL. BID WAS LOWEST EVALUAT D Yes 1-11 No BID BEST EVALUATED BID (in case of Consultancies) 28) WHETHER THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER WAS TECHNICALLY Yes No COMPLIANT? 29) WHETHER NAMES OF THE BIDDERS AND THEIR QUOTEE PRICES WERE READ OUT AT THE TIME OF OPENING OF BIDS? Yes No 30) WHETHER EVALUATION REPORT GIVEN TO BIDDERS BEFORE THE AWARI) OF CONTRACT? (Attach copy of the bid evaluation report) Yes No 2/3 31) ANY COMPLAINTS RECEIVED Yes (If yes, result thereof) No 32) ANY DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATIONS GIVEN IN THE IL NDER NOTICE / DOCUMENTS (If yes, give details)(cid:9) Yes No 33) WAS THE EXTENSION MADE IN RESPONSE TIME? (If yes, give reasons) Yes No 34) DEVIATION F TION CRITERIA (If yes, give deta 1'es No 35) WAS IT ASSURED BY THE PRO CY THAT THE SELECTED FIRM ISn NOT BLACK LISTED? (cid:9) Yes No 6.*• 36) WAS A VISIT MADE BY ANY OFFICER/OF Al PROCURING AGENCY TO THE pR•• SUPPLIER'S PREMISES IN CONNECTION WIT RINIENT? IF SO, DETAILS TO BE ASCERTAINED REGARDING FINANCING T. IF ROAD: D (If yes, enclose a copy) PI Yes No 37) WERE PROPER SAFEGUARDS PROVIDED ON M i (LI- 1VANCE PAYMENT IN THE CONTRACT (BANK GUARANTEE ETC.)? 41Y es El No E] 38) SPECIAL CONDITIONS, IF ANY Yes (If yes, give Brief Description) No Signature & Official Stamp of Project Coordinator (SAF) Authorized Officer(cid:9) KHAIRPUR FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SPPRA, Block. No.8, Sindh Secretariat No.4-A, Court Road, Karachi Tele: 021-9205355; 021-9205369 & Fax: 021-9206291 Print Save Reset 3/3 SINDH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY CONTRACT EVALUATION FORM TO BE FILLED IN BY ALL PROCURING AGENCIES FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS OF WORKS, SERVICES & GOODS I) NAME OF THE ORGANIZATION / DEPTT. SHAH ABDUL LATF UNIVERSITY, KHAIRPUR 2) PROVINCIAL / LOCAL GOVT./ OTHER PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 3) TITLE OF CONTRACT 4) TENDER NUMBER PID (H) 98531 5) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT(cid:9) Package a 2, Cons ruction of Hostel for 200 Boys 6) FORUM THAT APPROVED THE SCHEME PSDP Islamabad 7) TENDER ESTIMATED VALUE 126.400Millions 8) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 126,892 Millions (For civil works only) Twelve Months (12) 9) ESTIMATED C• PI(cid:9) RIOD (AS PER CONTRACT) (cid:9) 10) TENDER OPE 20.10-2016 at 1:00 pm 11) NUMBER OF TE(cid:9) LD Four (04) (Attach list of buyers) 12) NUMBER OF BIDS RECE VED 13) NUMBER OF BIDDERS PRESENT AT THE TIM!: 01 OPENING OF BIDS 02(Two Nos.) (cid:9) 14) BID EVALUATION REPORT Ai«.ichec (Enclose a copy) 15) NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER m/s Kasnif Constructor JV Crystal Eneronses 16) CONTRACT AWARD PRICE 126 400 millions 17) RANKING OF SUCCESSFUL BIDDER IN EVALUA FIONArPORT (i.e. I",(cid:9) 3rd EVALUATION BID). if Lowest Evalution BID 18) METHOD OF PROCUREMENT(cid:9) : - (Tick one) a) SINGLE STAGE—ONE ENVELOPE PROCEDURE (cid:9) Domestic/ Local b) SINGLE STAGE — TWO ENVELOPE PROCEDURE (cid:9) el(cid:9) TWO STAGE BIDDING PROCEDURE d)(cid:9) TWO STAGE — TWO ENVELOPE BIDDING PROCLIN /RE PLEASE SPECIFY IF ANY OTHER METHOD OF 'ROCUREMENT WAS ADOPTED i.e. EMERGENCY, DIRECT CONTRACTING ETC WITH BRIEF REASONS 1/3 Vice Chancellor Shah Abdul Latif University Kh4 irpur 19) APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT (cid:9) 20) WHETHER THE PROCUREMENT WAS INCLUDED IN ANNI, AL PROCUREMENT PLAN?n Yes No 21) ADVERTISEMENT : Yes i)(cid:9) SPPRA Website on 30.01-2017, S.NO # 31412 (If yes. give date and SPPRA Identification No ) No ii)(cid:9) News Papers Yes Daily Kawish on 4-10-2016. Daily Express (If yes, give na f newspapers and dates) en 04-10-2016, The Nation 04-10-2016 No 22) NATURE OF CO -711- Int. 1 23) WHETHER QUALIFICA N CR RIA WAS INCLUDED IN BIDDING / I I )1 DOCUMENTS? (If yes, enclose a copy) I 24) WHETHER BID EVALUATION CRITERIA WAS INCLUDED IN BIDDING / TENDER DOCU (If yes, enclose a copy) 25) WHETHER APPROVAL OF COMPETENT AUTHOR!(cid:9) D FOR 1:SING A METHOD OTHER TIIAN OPEN COMPETITIVE BID 26) WAS BID SECURITY OBTAINED FROM ALL THE BIDDERS,? 27) WHETHER THE SUCCESSFUL BID WAS LOWEST EVALUATED Yes I El I No 13ID / BEST EVALUATED BID (in case of Consultancies) Li1No 111 28) WHETHER THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER WAS TECUNICALL Yes COMPLIANT? 29) WHETHER NAMES OF THE BIDDERS AND THEIR QUOTE D PRICES WERE READ OUT AT THE TIME OF OPENING OF BIDS? Yes I I No I 30) WHETHER EVALUATION REPORT GIVEN TO BIDDE (S BEFORE THE AWARD OF CONTRACT? (Attach copy of the bid evaluation report) pi Yes No 2/3 31) ANY COMPLAINTS RL(TIVED (If yes. result thereof) 32) ANY DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATIONS GIVEN IN THE T iNDER NOTICE / DOCUMENTS (If yes, give details) Yes No 33) WAS THE EXTENSION MADE IN RESPONSE TIME? (If yes, give reasons) Yes No 34) DEVIATION F(cid:9) TioN CRITERIA (If yes, give dcta 35) WAS IT ASSURED BY THE PROC RI(cid:9) CY THAT THE SELECTED FIRM IS NOT BLACK LISTED? Ycs pl No 36) WAS A VISIT MADE BY ANY OF • ICER/OE PROCURING AGENCY TO II IL SUPPLIER'S PREMISES IN CONNECTION WIT JREMENT? IF SO, DETAILS TO BE ASCERTAINED REGARDING FINANCING ROAD: (If yes, enclose a copy) Fi DI 37) WERE PROPER SAFEGUARDS PROVIDED ON M VANCI.(cid:9) YMLN I IN THE CONTRACT (BANK GUARANTEE ETC.)? No ID 38) SPECIAL CONDITIONS, IF ANY (If yes, give Brief Description) Signature & Official Stamp of(cid:9) Project Coordinator (SAF) Authorized Officer ______,sLhahAbduilatithniversity_ KHAIRPUR FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SPPRA, Block. No.8, Sindh Secretariat No.4-A, Court Road, Karachi Tele: 021-9205350; 021-9205369 & Fax: 021-9206291 Print Save Reset 3/3 04 SINDH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY CONTRACT EVALUATION FORM TO BE FILLED IN BY ALL PROCURING AGENCIES FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS OF WORKS, SERVICES & GOODS 1) NAME OF THE ORGANIZATION / DEprr. SHAH ABDUL LATIF L NWERSITY, KHAIRPUR 2) PROVINCIAL / LOCAL GOVT./ OTHER PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 3) TITLE OF CONTRACT 4) TENDER NUMBER PID (H) 98531 5) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT Package # 4,Const:ot Main Entrance Gate with Boundary wall 6) FORUM THAT APPROVED TI SCHEME PSDP Islamabad 7) TENDER ESTIMATED VALUE 43.405 Millions 8) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 43,376 Millions (For civil works only) Ten Months (10) 9) ESTIMATED COMP I EIyION RIOD (AS PER CONTRACT) 10) TENDER OPENED(cid:9) I'DAT(cid:9) .4(cid:9) 15-02-2017 at 12:30 pm 11) NUMBER OF TENDER DOC (Attach list of buyers) 12) NUMBER OF BIDS RECE VED 13) NUMBER OF BIDDERS PRESENT AT 14) 131D EVALUA HON REPORT (Enclose a copy) 15) NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE SUCCESSFU 16) CONTRACT AWARD PRICE 17) RANKING OF St ICCESSFUL BIDDER IN EVALl. A 1 ION REPOR I (i.e. 151, L2 nd, 3rd EVALUATION BID). 1st Lowest Evaluation BID F 18) METHOD OF PROCUREMENT USED : - (Tick one) a)(cid:9) SINGLE STAGE — ONE ENVELOPE PROCEDURE (cid:9) Domestic/ Local b) SINGLE STAGE — TWO ENVELOPE PROCEDURE (cid:9) c) TWO STAGE BIDDING PROCEDURE (cid:9) d) TWO STAGE — TWO ENVELOPE BIDDING PROCEDUR PLEASE SPECIFY IF ANY OTHER METHOD OF PROCUREMENT WAS ADOPTED i.e. EMERGENCY, DIRECT CONTRACTING ETC. WITH BRIEF REA.iONS: I/3 Vice Chancellor Shah Abdul Latit University Khairpur 19) APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT (cid:9) 20) WHETHER THE PROCUREMENT WAS INCLUDED IN ANNUA., PROCUREMENT PLAN? Yes No Ivj 21) ADVERTISEMENT: Yes i)(cid:9) SPPRA Wcbsite on ni-01-2017,S:NO, 31412 (If yes, give date and SPPRA Identification No.) No ii)(cid:9) News Papers Yes Dal y Kawish. Daily Jang .The Nation on (If yes, give na f newspapers and dates) 27-01-2017 No 22) NATURE OF CO Int . 23) WHETHER QUALIFI('ATih \ ('Ft(cid:9) . WAS INCLUDI-.1) I\ 1111)1)1M, TENDER DOC1 (If yes, enclose a copy) 24) WHETHER BID EVALUATION CRITERIA WAS INCLUDED IN BIDDING / TENDER DOCU (If yes, enclose a copy) 25) WHETHER APPROVAL OF COMPETENT AUTHOR!(cid:9) FOR USING A METHOD OTHER THAN OPEN COMPETITIVE BID 26) WAS BID SECURITY OBTAINED FROM ALL THE BIDDERS? 21) WHITHER HIE SVCCESSITI. BID WAS LOWEST EVALUA FED Yes No BID i BEST EVALUATED 1311) (in case of Consultancies) L 22) WHETHER THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER WAS TECHNICALLY Yes Ni COMPLIANT? 23) WHETHER NAMES OF TT IF BIDDERS AND THEIR QUOTED PRICES WERE READ Onil A I THE TIME OF OPENING OF BIDS? (cid:9) Yes No 30) WHETHER EVALUATION REPORT GIVEN TO BIDDERS BEFORE THE AWARD OF CONTRACT? (Attach copy of the bid evaluation report) Yes I v No 31) ANY COMPLAINTS RECEIVED (If yes. result thereof) No 32) ANY DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATIONS GIVEN IN THE TENDER NOTICE / DOCUMENTS (If yes, give details) Yes No 33) WAS THE EXTENSION MADE IN RESPONSE TIME? (If yes, give reasons) Yes No 34) DEVIATION FRWI QLIF3ATION CRITERIA (If yes, give deta Yes No 35) WAS IT ASSURED BY THE PRO NCY TI IA F EDI SELECTED FIRM IS Nal PI BLACK LISTED? Yes No 36) WAS A VISIT MADE BY ANY OFFICER/0 E PROCURING AGENCY TO THE SUPPLIER'S PREMISES IN CONNECTION WITI- J CEMENT? IF SO, DETAILS TO BE ASCERTAINED REGARDING FINANCING WAD: (If yes, enclose a copy) 37) WERE PROPER SAFEGUARDS PROVIDED ON M VANCE PAYMENT IN THE CONTRACT (BANK GUARANTEE ETC.)? 38) SPECIAL CONDITIONS, IF ANY (If yes, give Brief Description) Signature & Official Stamp of Authorized Officer (cid:9)Project Coordinato(cid:9)r (SA ShifilibclaIRINversity FOR OFFICE USE ONLY KHAIRPUR SPPR I, Block. No.8, Sindh Secretariat No.4-A, Court Road, Karachi Tele: 021-9205356; 921-9205369 & Fax: 021-9206291 Print Save Reset 3/3
Description: