Edited bp Cheryl Brown Travis and Jacquelyn W. a t e American Psychological Association Washington, DC CONTENTS List of Contributors ........................................... vii Introduction .................................................. 3 I. EPISTEMOLOGY, THEORY, AND METHODS .............. 9 Chapter 1 Social Constructions of Sexuality: Unpacking Hidden Meanings ........................................ 11 Jacquelyn W. White, Bam'e Bondurant, and Cheryl Brown Travis Chapter 2 Biological Models and Sexual Politics .............. 35 Danny S. Moore and Cheryl Brown Travis Chapter 3 Gender Differences in Sexuality: Results from Meta- Analysis ......................................... 5 7 Janet Shibky Hyde and Mary Beth Oliver Chapter The Social Construction and Social Effects of Sex 4 Research: The Sexological Model of Sexuality ...... 79 Leonore Xefer 11. LIFE COURSE DEVELOPMENT ........................... 109 Chapter 5 A Normative Perspective of Adolescent Girls' Developing Sexuality ............................. 11 1 Deborah P. Welsh, Sharon S. Rostosky, and Myra Christen Kawaguchi Chapter 6 Sexual Roles of Girls and Women: An Ethnocultural Lifespan Perspective .............................. 141 PameIa Trotman Reid and Vanessa M.B ing Chapter 7 Sexuality During Pregnancy and the Year Postpartum ...................................... 167 Janet Shibky Hyde and John DeLamater Chapter 8 Menopause and Sexuality: Ageism and Sexism Unite ........................................... 181 Sharon S. Rostosky and Cheryl Brown Travis III. MEANING AND FUNCTION ............................ 211 Chapter 9 Only Joking: Humor and Sexuality ................. 213 Mary Crawford Chapter 10 Beauty, Sexuality, and Identity: The Social Control of Women ......................................... 237 Cheryl Brown Travis, Kayce L. Meginnis, and Kristin M. Barhri Chapter 11 Dangerousness, Impotence, Silence, and Invisibility: Heterosexism in the Construction of Women’s Sexuality ........................................ 273 Laura S. Brown Chapter 12 A Cultural Context for Sexual Assertiveness in Women ......................................... 299 Patricia J Morokoff , IV. SEXUALITY AND THE SOCIAL ORDER ................. 321 Chapter 13 Consent, Power, and Sexual Scripts: Deconstructing Sexual Harassment ............................... 323 Suzanne B. Kurth, Bethany B. Spilkr, and Cheryl Brown Travis Chapter 14 Re-Examining the Issue of Nonconsent in Acquaintance Rape ............................... 355 Patricia L. N. Donut and Jacquelyn W. White Chapter 15 Understanding the Unacknowledged Rape Victim ... 377 Arnold S. Kahn and Virginia Andreoli Mathie Author Index ................................................. 405 Subject Index ................................................. 421 About the Editors ............................................. 431 vi CONTENTS CONTRIBUTORS Kristin M. Bardari, Private Practice, Pawleys Island, South Carolina Vanessa M. Bing, Women’s Center, Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York Barrie Bondurant, Psychology Department, Lyon College, Batesville, Arkansas Laura S. Brown, Private Practice, Seattle, Washington Mary Crawford, Psychology Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs John DeLamater, Sociology Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison Patria L. N. Donat, Division of Education & Human Sciences, Mississippi University for Women, Columbus Janet Shibley Hyde, Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison Arnold S. Kahn, Psychology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia Myra Christen Kawaguchi, The Guidance Center, Murfreesboro, Tennessee Suzanne B. Kurth, Sociology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Virginia Andreoli Mathie, Psychology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia Kayce L. Meginnis, Psychology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Danny S. Moore, Psychology Department, St. Leo’s College, St. Leo, Florida Patricia J. Morokoff, Psychology Department, University of Rhode Island, Kingston Mary Beth Oliver, Department of Communication Studies, Penn State, University Park vii Pamela Trotman Reid, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Sharon S. Rostosky, Counseling Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington Bethany B. Spiller, Psychology Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee Leonore Tiefer, Private Practice, New York City Cheryl Brown Travis, Psychology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Deborah I? Welsh, Psychology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jacquelyn W. White, Psychology Department, University of North Carolina, Greensboro ... eflll CONTRIBUTORS Sexuality, Sociew, and Femi&m INTRODUCTION Issues relating to sexuality are constantly in the headlines, are the topic of heated controversies, and are the focus of national policy decisions. A perusal of almost any forum of our society underscores the highly volatile nature of these issues. Recent jury verdicts have awarded millions for a woman sexually harassed by a law firm. A Supreme Court decision on a case originating in Nashville, TN, held that plaintiffs did not have to demonstrate psychological harm in order to prove sexual harassment. Re- searchers have found their study protocols debated on the floor of Congress. The former Speaker of the House, in an oblique allusion to the menstrual cycle, stated that women could not serve in combat trenches. And even the former Surgeon General of the United States, Jocelyn Elders, was re- moved from her position following her endorsement of the idea of includ- ing information about masturbation in sex education. Beyond these ex- amples, we find that the meaning and experience of sexuality is changing for individuals. For example, a new survey found that approximately 37% of teen females have first intercourse primarily because of peer pressure rather than out of affection for their partners. Furthermore, there are dif- ferences of opinion regarding what behaviors are included in having sex. Clearly, cultural notions of what constitutes sexuality and the elements deemed acceptable affect not only individuals, but also aspects of larger social agendas. Women’s sexuality is a topic of increasing importance for several rea- 3 sons. First, psychology as a science has only recently begun to include women as primary participants, rather than as comparisons to a male stan- dard. For this reason, research on women’s sexuality is in need of a careful reflection with regard to epistemology, life course development, and the social order. Second, political economics and social changes in society have affected women’s lives tremendously. It is important to determine the ex- tent to which these forces have affected women’s personal development and interpersonal experiences, especially with respect to sexuality. The intent of this volume on sexuality, society, and feminism is not to provide advice about how to have more and better sex, but rather to transform our understanding of sexuality: how it is negotiated, developed, and evoked; and what it means in a contemporary social framework. The role of society in women’s sexuality has been to suppress and deny, and, more important to set the framework and rules by which sexuality is ne- gotiated and thus has determined the forms of sexuality that are possible. For example, Sue Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger (1993) have suggested that a hidden assumption of heterosexuality frames all relationships. Fur- ther, the assumption is not only that the framework is heterosexual but that it is between women and masculine men, thus implicitly reproducing issues of dominance and subordinance. For this volume, we have followed a number of guidelines similar to those outlined by Judith Wore11 and Claire Etaugh (1994) as key compo- nents in transforming knowledge, including 1. challenging traditional knowledge; 2. focusing on the experience of women’s lives; 3. acknowledging power as a basis for social arrangements; 4. recognizing gender as having multiple conceptions that are socially constructed; 5. attending to language and creating a public awareness of hid- den phenomena; and 6. promoting social activism. We take a pluralistic position with respect to methodology. We do not look for the uniquely best form of feminist methodology. We suggest that it is better to ask whether or how epistemology operates in the service of feminism. We assume that language is particularly important in the process of conceptualizing sexuality and that examination of language can highlight contradictions that reveal hidden meanings and assumptions. Our general approach to sexuality follows the idea others have applied to gender (Crawford, 1995; Crawford 6r Unger, 1995; West & Zimmerman, 1977). Specifically, sexuality is a meaning system that organizes interactions and governs access to power and resources. Sexuality is not so much an attribute of persons, but rather exists in transactions between people. We further agree with Mary Jacobus and her colleagues, E. F. Keller and 4 lNTRODUCTION S. Shuttleworth (1990), that the arena of the body (masculine or feminine) is often a battlefield where a variety of struggles, not all having to do with gender or sexuality, are played out and that the body reflects the matrices of power at all levels. It is the purpose of this volume to contribute to contemporary fem- inism by extending the discourse of constructionist accounts in psychology. In a sense, this entire volume is a way of going forward to new understand- ing of sexuality. We adopt the view that sexuality is actively constructed and emergent within contexts. In other words, sexuality is repeatedly ne- gotiated and redefined; sexuality changes developmentally over the life span (explored in section 11); it has various meanings and manifestations (as exemplified in section 111); and it can be used in a larger sense to reinforce violence against women (see section IV). We also believe that new constructions of sexuality have the potential to transform the way women themselves think, feel, and behave. SECTION I: EPISTEMOLOGY Chapters in this section focus on aspects of epistemology, especially chapter 1, and other chapters review evolutionary and biological ap- proaches to sex and gender, meta-analytic approaches to human sex dif- ferences in sexuality, and feminist considerations of sexology and the med- icalization of sexuality. In chapter 2, Danny Moore and Cheryl Travis point out that even when standard criteria of logical positivism are applied, much of the gender-focused work in neuroanatomy and sociobiology is deeply flawed in both logic and methodology. The fact that gender-biased facts remain a favorite topic of science journals and popular media reveals the social and political nature of these constructions. In chapter 3, Janet Hyde and Mary Beth Oliver review a number of other theoretical models of gender including the perspectives of the neoanalytic theorist Nancy Cho- dorow, social learning theory, social role theory and script theory, and fem- inist theory. Hyde and Oliver then apply empiricist methods of meta- analysis to gender differences in sexuality as a way of clarifying their extent and relative size. A major conclusion of this review is that sociobiological models of gender are driving the research agenda and that feminist re- searchers must consider how to recapture it. In chapter 4, Leonore Tiefer points out that the contemporary public tends to rely on sex experts who are assumed to be professional and neutral with regard to sexual values. Thus, in some ways the experts create frameworks of meaning and reality for the public. In contrast, she proposes that it is naive to believe that sex experts have no particular ax to grind and instead illustrates how theory and research formulations actively promote particular constructions of sex- uality. This sexological model is not simply a “mirror held up to nature” lNTKODUCTION 5