ebook img

Sexual offences, child abduction and kidnapping PDF

38 Pages·2005·0.46 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Sexual offences, child abduction and kidnapping

CHAPTER 33 Sexual offences, child abduction and kidnapping SEXUALOFFENCES:INTRODUCTION Thelawinrelationtosexualoffenceswasthoroughlyoverhauledandmodernisedby theSexualOffencesAct2003(SOA2003).TheonlypartofthepreviousprincipalAct, theSexualOffencesAct1956,whichsurvivesareahandfulofsectionsconcernedwith brothels.Wedealwiththesesectionsinthenextchapter. Althoughtheoffenderisoftenreferredtoas‘he’intheoffencesintheSOA2003,it mustnotbeforgottenthat,withtheexceptionofrapeandtheoffenceofintercourse withananimal,contrarytoSOA2003,s69(1),alltheoffencesunderthatActcanbe committedbyafemaleperson,aswellasbyamaleperson. Sexual ForthepurposesofthevariousoffencesinSOA2003,s78providesthat,exceptsexual activityinapubliclavatory,penetration,touchingoranyotheractivityissexualifa reasonablepersonwouldconsiderthat: (a) whateveritscircumstancesoranyperson’spurposeinrelationtoit,itisbecause ofitsnaturesexual;or (b) becauseofitsnatureitmaybesexualandbecauseofitscircumstancesorthepur- poseofanypersoninrelationtoit(orboth)itissexual. Consent ‘Consent’isdefinedforthepurposesoftheoffencesundertheSOA2003involving theabsenceofconsentbySOA2003,s74asfollows:apersonconsentsifheagreesby choice,andhasthefreedomandcapacitytomakethatchoice. The Sexual Offences Act 2003, ss75 and 76 lay down some evidential and conclusivepresumptionsastotheabsenceofconsentinrespectofrapeandsimilar non-consensual sexual offences described in this chapter. These presumptions are dealtwithattherelevantpoints. 866 Sexualoffences,childabductionandkidnapping Undertheabovedefinition,apersonwhoisasleeporotherwiseunconsciousatthe timeoftherelevantactwillnotnormallyconsentbecausehewillnotnormallyagree towhatisdone.Ifthereappearstobeanagreement,itmaybevitiatedasfollows. Incapacitytomakeachoice Apersonmay,forexample,lackthecapacitytomakeachoiceaboutwhetherornot toagreebecauseofmentaldisorder,becauseheisdruggedorintoxicatedorbecause heissemi-comatose.Apersonwilllackcapacitytoconsentifatthetimehehasnoreal understandingofwhatisinvolved,or(inotherwords)hehassuchlimitedknowledge orunderstandingasnottobeinapositiontodecidewhetherornottoagree. Lackoffreedomtochoose Apersonmaynothaveafreedomtomakeachoicewhetherornottoagreeifviolence isbeingusedagainsthim,orheiscausedtofearthatitisbeingusedagainstanother, atthetimeoftherelevantconductorimmediatelybeforehand.Thesameisthecaseif heiscausedtofearatthetimeoftherelevantactorbeforehandthatviolencewould beusedagainsthimoranotherperson.Apersonmayalsolackfreedomofchoicefor otherreasons,aswheresomeoneagreesbecauseheisunlawfullydetainedorwhere therewastheuse,orthreat,ofviolencetodestroypropertywhichwasofspecialvalue, financiallyoremotionally,orthreatofdismissalbyanemployertoanemployee,or athreattoremovechildren.Itwouldalldependonthenatureofthethreatandthe othercircumstances,andtheperceptionofthecomplainant,andwhetherinthelight ofthesefactorsthecomplainantwasnotinrealityfreetoagreeordisagree. Bymistake Somemistakesmayvitiateanapparentagreement.Thiswillcertainlybetheeffectofa mistakenbeliefastothenatureoftheactorthattheaccusedissomeoneknownper- sonallytothecomplainant.Inneithercasedoesthecomplainantagreetowhatisdone. Thesameistrue,itwouldseem,wherethereisamistakeastothepurposeoftheact. Itremainstobeseenwhetherthejudgeswillrecognisethatamistakeastoanyqual- ityofanact,otherthanitspurpose,oramistakenbeliefofidentitynotinvolvinga beliefastosomeoneknownpersonallycanprevent‘agreementbychoice’forthepur- posesofthelawofsexualoffences. Penetrationandpartsofthebody BySOA2003,s79,‘penetration’isacontinuingactfromentrytowithdrawal.Ithas longbeenestablishedbythecourtsthattheslightestdegreeofpenetrationisenough. Section79alsoprovidesthatreferencestoapartofthebodyincludereferencestoa partsurgicallyconstructed(inparticularthroughgenderreassignmentsurgery);that ‘vagina’includesvulva(externalfemalegenitalorgans);andthat‘touching’includes touchingwithanypartofthebody,orwithanythingelse,orthroughanything,andin Non-consensualsexualoffences 867 particularincludestouchingthroughpenetration.Anexampleofatouchingbysome- thingotherthanapartofanyone’sbodywouldbeholdingasextoyagainstaprivate partofthevictim’sbody.Sincethetouchingcanbethroughanything,itwouldbe irrelevantthatBwasfullydressedatthetime,providedthattherewassomephysical contact,howeverslight,withB’sbodythroughtheclothing. Arrestableoffences AlloffencesunderSOA2003arearrestableoffences,besidestheoffencesofsexwithan adultrelativeunderss64and65. NON-CONSENSUALSEXUALOFFENCES Rape BySOA2003,s1(1),aperson(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallypenetratesthevagina,anusormouthofanotherperson(B)with hispenis; (b) Bdoesnotconsenttothepenetration;and (c) AdoesnotreasonablybelievethatBconsents. Theabsenceofconsentdoesnothavetobedemonstratedbyofferingresistanceor bycommunicatingittotheaccused. SOA 2003, s1(2) provides that whether a belief in consent is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A (the accused)hastakentoascertainwhetherB(thevictim)consents.Thewords‘allthe circumstances’mustrefertothosewhichmightberelevanttotheissue,includingany characteristicoftheaccused,permanentortransient,whichmightaffecthisabilityto perceiveorunderstandwhetherornotthevictimisconsenting.Exampleswouldbe alearningdisability,mentalillness,deafness,blindness,maturity,extremeyouthand sexualinexperience. Proofoflackofconsentandofthefaultelementrelatingtoitisassistedbyspecial provisions,whichalsoapplytotheoffencesofassaultbypenetration,sexualassault andcausingapersontoengageinsexualactivitywithoutconsent.Boththeseprovi- sionsrefertotheaccusedhavingdone‘therelevantact’.Forthepurposesofrape,‘the relevantact’isthattheaccusedintentionallypenetrated,withhispenis,thevagina, anusormouthofanotherperson(‘thecomplainant’). Thefirstprovision(SOA2003,s75)isthatifinproceedingsforanoffencetowhich thissectionappliesitisproved: (a) thattheaccuseddidtherelevantact; (b) thatanyofthecircumstancesspecifiedbelowexisted;and (c) thattheaccusedknewthatthosecircumstancesexisted, thecomplainantistobetakennottohaveconsentedtotherelevantactunlesssuffi- cientevidenceisadducedtoraiseanissueastowhetherheconsented,andtheaccused istobetakennottohavereasonablybelievedthatthecomplainantconsentedunless sufficientevidenceisadducedtoraiseanissueastowhetherhereasonablybelievedit. 868 Sexualoffences,childabductionandkidnapping Thespecifiedcircumstancesarethat: (a) anypersonwas,atthetimeoftherelevantactorimmediatelybeforeitbegan, usingviolenceagainstthecomplainantorcausingthecomplainanttofearthat immediateviolencewouldbeusedagainsthim; (b) anypersonwas,atthetimeoftherelevantactorimmediatelybeforeitbegan, causingthecomplainanttofearthatviolencewasbeingused,orthatimmediate violencewouldbeused,againstanotherperson; (c) thecomplainantwas,andtheaccusedwasnot,unlawfullydetainedatthetimeof therelevantact; (d) the complainant was asleep or otherwise unconscious at the time of the relevantact; (e) becauseofthecomplainant’sphysicaldisability,thecomplainantwouldnothave beenableatthetimeoftherelevantacttocommunicatetotheaccusedwhether thecomplainantconsented; (f) anypersonhadadministeredtoorcausedtobetakenbythecomplainant,without the complainant’s consent, a substance which, having regard to when it was administeredortaken,wascapableofcausingorenablingthecomplainanttobe stupefiedoroverpoweredatthetimeoftherelevantact. Thesecondprovision(SOA2003,s76)isthatifinproceedingsforanoffenceto whichthissectionappliesitisprovedthattheaccuseddidtherelevantactandthat eitherofthecircumstancesspecifiedbelowexisted,itistobeconclusivelypresumed: (a) thatthecomplainantdidnotconsenttotherelevantact;and (b) thattheaccuseddidnotbelievethatthecomplainantconsentedtotherelevantact. Thespecifiedcircumstancesarethat:theaccusedintentionallydeceivedthecom- plainantastothenatureorpurposeoftherelevantact;andthattheaccusedintention- allyinducedthecomplainanttoconsenttotherelevantactbyimpersonatingaperson knownpersonallytothecomplainant. Rapeofachildunderthirteen BySOA2003,s5(1),apersoncommitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallypenetratesthevagina,anusormouthofanotherpersonwithhis penis;and (b) theotherpersonisunderthirteen. Whetherornottheotherpersonconsentstothepenetrationisirrelevant;achild underthirteenislegallyincapableofgivingalegallysignificantconsent. Theoffenceisoneoftheoffencesinrespectofwhichthereareexceptionsfromcrim- inalliabilityunderSOA2003,s73,onthebasisofaiding,abettingorcounsellingthe commissionoftheoffenceifapersonactsforthepurposeof: (a) protectingthechildfromsexuallytransmittedinfection; (b) protectingthephysicalsafetyofthechild; (c) preventingthechildfrombecomingpregnant;or (d) promotingthechild’semotionalwell-beingbythegivingofadvice, Non-consensualsexualoffences 869 andnotforthepurposeofobtainingsexualgratificationorforthepurposeofcausing orencouragingtheactivityconstitutingtheoffenceorthechild’sparticipationinit. Assaultbypenetration BySOA2003,s2(1),aperson(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallypenetratesthevaginaoranusofanotherperson(B)withapartof hisbodyoranythingelse; (b) thepenetrationissexual; (c) Bdoesnotconsenttothepenetration;and (d) AdoesnotreasonablybelievethatBconsents. SOA2003,s2(2)providesthatwhetherabeliefisreasonablemustbedetermined havingregardtoallthecircumstances,includingwhethertheaccusedhastakentreas- onablestepstoascertainwhetherthecomplainantconsents. Ifitisprovedthattheaccusedintentionallypenetrated,withapartofhisbody(eg afingerortongue)oranythingelse(egadildoorbottle),thevaginaoranusofB(‘the complainant’) in circumstances where the penetration was sexual, and that (as the accusedknew)oneofthespecifiedcircumstancesreferredtoinSOA2003,s75existed, theevidentialpresumptionsabouttheabsenceofconsentandofareasonablebeliefin consentreferredtoinrelationtorapealsoapplytothepresentoffence. Ifitisprovedthattheaccused(A)intentionallypenetrated,withapartofhisbody oranythingelse,thevaginaoranusofanotherperson(B,‘thecomplainant’)incir- cumstanceswherethepenetrationwassexual,andthatAintentionallydeceivedBasto thenatureorpurposeofthatact,orthatAintentionallyinducedBtoconsenttothat actbyimpersonatingsomeoneknowntoB,itistobeconclusivelypresumedunder SOA2003,s76thatBdidnotconsenttothatactandthatAdidnotbelievethatthe complainantconsentedtotherelevantact. Assaultofachildunderthirteenbypenetration BySOA2003,s6(1),apersoncommitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallypenetratesthevaginaoranusofanotherpersonwithapartofhis bodyoranythingelse; (b) thepenetrationissexual;and (c) theotherpersonisunderthirteen. Theabsenceofconsentbytheotherpersonisnotanelementofthisoffence.The exceptionsunderSOA2003,s73fromliabilityforaiding,abettingorcounsellingapply tothisoffence. Sexualassault BySOA2003,s3(1),aperson(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallytouchesanotherperson(B); 870 Sexualoffences,childabductionandkidnapping (b) thetouchingissexual; (c) Bdoesnotconsenttothetouching;and (d) AdoesnotreasonablybelievethatBconsents. SOA2003,s3(2)providesthatwhetherabeliefisreasonablemustbedetermined withregardtoallthecircumstances,includinganystepstheaccusedhastakentoascer- tainwhetherthecomplainantconsents. In terms of the requirement of the absence of consent by the complainant and ‘noreasonablebelief’inconsentontheaccused’spart,theprosecutionisassistedby theevidentialandconclusivepresumptionsreferredtoonp867,whichalsoapplyto thepresentoffence.Forthepurposesofthepresentoffence,the‘relevantact’isthat theaccusedintentionallytouchedthecomplainant,wherethetouchingwassexual. Sexualassaultofachildunderthirteen BySOA2003,s7(1),apersoncommitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallytouchesanotherperson; (b) thetouchingissexual;and (c) theotherpersonisunderthirteen. The absence of the other person’s consent is not an elementof the offence. The exceptions under SOA 2003, s73 from liability for aiding, abetting or counselling applytothisoffence. Causingapersontoengageinsexualactivitywithoutconsent BySOA2003,s4(1),aperson(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallycausesanotherperson(B)toengageinanactivity; (b) theactivityissexual; (c) Bdoesnotconsenttoengagingintheactivity;and (d) AdoesnotreasonablybelievethatBconsents. Amoreseriousoffenceiscommittediftheactivitycausedinvolved: (a) penetrationofB’sanusorvagina; (b) penetrationofB’smouthwithaperson’spenis; (c) penetrationofaperson’sanusorvaginawithapartofB’sbodyorbyBwithany- thingelse;or (d) penetrationofaperson’smouthwithB’spenis. SOA2003,s4(1)providesthatwhetherabeliefisreasonablemustbedetermined withregardtoallthecircumstances,includinganystepstheaccusedhastakentoascer- tainwhetherthecomplainantconsents.Intermsoftherequirementsoftheabsenceof consentbythecomplainantandofnoreasonablebeliefinconsent,theprosecution isassistedbytheevidentialandconclusivepresumptionsreferredtoonp867,which alsoapplytothepresentoffence.Forthepurposesofthepresentoffence,the‘relevant act’isthattheaccusedintentionallycausedthecomplainanttoengageinanactivity, wheretheactivitywassexual. Childsexoffences 871 Causingorincitingachildunderthirteentoengageinsexualactivity BytheSOA2003,s8(1),apersoncommitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallycausesorincitesanotherperson(B)toengageinanactivity; (b) theactivityissexual,and (c) Bisunderthirteen. Amoreseriousoffenceiscommittediftheactivitycausedorincitedinvolved: (a) penetrationofB’sanusorvagina; (b) penetrationofB’smouthwithaperson’spenis; (c) penetrationofaperson’sanusorvaginawithapartofB’sbodyorbyBwithany- thingelse;or (d) penetrationofaperson’smouthwithB’spenis. TheabsenceofB’sconsentisnotanelementofanoffenceunders8. Adviceinnon-consensualsexcases (1) Tobefullyeffective,anonymityforcomplainantsmuststartfromthemoment whentheallegationismadetothepolice. (2) Tactfulandsympatheticquestioningofcomplainantsisimportant.Experience andsympathyintheinterviewingofficeraremoreimportantthanhisorhersex. (3) Medical examination in a clinical environment, such as a hospital or surgery, shouldreducedistress,produceanatmosphereofcareandconcern,andprovide forimmediatetreatmentwheredesirable.As,however,theremaybedifficulties inthewayofhavingsuchexaminationsawayfromapolicestation,adequateand suitablefacilitiesformedicalexaminationinpolicestationsareneededincaseitis necessaryforsuchexaminationstotakeplacethere. (4) Ifpossible,andiftimepermits,thepoliceshouldensurethatthecomplainantis referredtotheappropriateservices,whethermedicalorsocial;thisisbestdone beforethecomplainantleavesthepolicestation. Thisadvice is includedin the reportof theAdvisoryGrouponthe Law of Rape (1976).Itisextremelyimportantandisobviouslyapplicablenotjusttorapebutto any other non-consensual sexual offence. The complainant has just undergone an extremelyfrighteningexperienceandwillrequirealltheassurancewhichitispossible togive. CHILDSEXOFFENCES Intheseoffences,itisirrelevantthatthechildmayhaveconsented. Sexualactivitywithachild BySOA2003,s9(1),apersonagedeighteenorover(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallytouchesanotherperson(B); 872 Sexualoffences,childabductionandkidnapping (b) thetouchingissexual;and (c) either: (i) B is under sixteen and A does not reasonably believe that B is sixteen or over;or (ii) Bisunderthirteen. Amoreseriousoffenceiscommittedifthetouchinginvolved: (a) penetrationofB’sanusorvaginawithapartofA’sbodyoranythingelse; (b) penetrationofB’smouthwithA’spenis; (c) penetrationofA’sanusorvaginawithapartofB’sbody;or (d) penetrationofA’smouthwithB’spenis. Theexceptionsfromliabilityforaiding,abettingorcounsellingunderSOA2003, s73,describedonp868,applytosuchanoffence. Causingorincitingachildtoengageinsexualactivity BySOA2003,s10(1),apersonagedeighteenorover(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallycausesorincitesanotherperson(B)toengageinanactivity; (b) theactivityissexual;and (c) either: (i) B is under sixteen and A does not reasonably believe that B is sixteen or over;or (ii) Bisunderthirteen. Amoreseriousoffenceiscommittediftheactivitycausedorincitedinvolved: (a) penetrationofB’sanusorvagina(withapartofthebodyoranythingelse); (b) penetrationofB’smouthwithaperson’spenis; (c) penetrationofaperson’sanusorvaginawithapartofB’sbodyorbyBwithany- thingelse;or (d) penetrationofaperson’smouthwithB’spenis. Engaginginsexualactivityinthepresenceofachild BySOA2003,s11(1),apersonagedeighteenorover(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallyengagesinanactivity; (b) theactivityissexual; (c) forthepurposeofobtainingsexualgratification,heengagesinit: (i) when another person (B)is present or is in a place from which A can be observed;and (ii) knowingorbelievingthatBisaware,orintendingthatBshouldbeaware, thatheisengaginginit;and (d) either: (i) B is under sixteen and A does not reasonably believe that B is sixteen or over;or (ii) Bisunderthirteen. Childsexoffences 873 ‘Observed’in(c)andelsewhereintheActmeansobservationwhetherdirectorby lookingatanimageproducedbyanymeans. Causingachildtowatchasexualact BySOA2003,s12(1),apersonagedeighteenorover(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) forthepurposeofobtainingsexualgratification,heintentionallycausesanother person(B)towatchathirdpersonengaginginanactivity,ortolookatanimage ofanypersonengaginginanactivity; (b) theactivityissexual;and (c) either: (i) B is under sixteen and A does not reasonably believe that B is sixteen or over,or (ii) Bisunderthirteen. ‘Image’in(a),andelsewhereintheAct,includesamovingorstillimage,however produced,and,where—ashere—thecontextpermits,athree-dimensionalimage.It doesnotincludewrittenmaterial.Referencestoanimageofapersonincluderefer- encestoanimageofanimaginaryperson. Childsexoffencescommittedbychildrenoryoungpersons BySOA2003,s13(1),apersonundereighteencommitsanoffenceifhedoesanything whichwouldbeanoffenceunderSOA2003,ss9to12ifhewereagedeighteen.Itis, however,alessseriousoffencethanthoseoffences.Theexceptionsfromliabilityfor aiding,abettingorcounsellingundertheSOA2003(p868)applytothisoffence. Arrangingorfacilitatingthecommissionofachildsexoffence BySOA2003,s14(1),apersoncommitsanoffenceif: (a) heintentionallyarrangesorfacilitatessomethingthatheintendstodo,intends anotherpersontodo,orbelievesthatanotherpersonwilldo,inanypartofthe world;and (b) doingitwillinvolvethecommissionofanoffenceunderSOA2003,ss9to13. SOA2003,s14(2)and(3)providesexceptionsforpeoplewhoseektoprotectachild frompregnancyorsexuallytransmitteddiseaseortoprotectachild’sphysicalsafetyor togiveitadvice,wheretheydonotintendthatthechildwillcommitanoffenceunder SOA2003,ss9to13butbelievethatitwill. TheexceptionsarepartofathemewhichliesattheheartoftheAct:thepromotion oftheprotectionofthosewhoarevulnerable. Apersondoesnotcommitanoffenceunders14if: (a) heintentionallyarrangesorfacilitatessomethingthathebelievesanotherperson willdo,butthathedoesnotintendtodoorintendanotherpersontodo;and (b) anyoffencewithinss9to13whichthedoingofthatthingwouldinvolvewouldbe anoffenceagainstachildforwhoseprotectionheacts. 874 Sexualoffences,childabductionandkidnapping Inthiscontext,apersonactsfortheprotectionofachildifheactsforthepurposeof: (a) protectingthechildfromsexuallytransmittedinfection; (b) protectingthephysicalsafetyofthechild; (c) preventingthechildfrombecomingpregnant;or (d) promotingthechild’semotionalwell-beingbythegivingofadvice, andnotforthepurposeofobtainingsexualgratificationorforthepurposeofcaus- ingorencouragingtheactivityconstitutinganoffencewithinss9to13orthechild’s participationinit. Examples of conduct falling within s14(3) would be giving an under-age boy a condom(ifdoneforthepurposeofprotectingtheboyagainstasexually-transmitted infection,butnotifdonetoprotecttheboyagainsttheriskofhissixteen-year-old girlfriendbecomingpregnant); giving an under-agegirl a condom(if donefor the purpose of protecting her against a sexually-transmitted infection or pregnancy); givingadvice(egbyan‘agonyaunt’orcounsellor)toanunder-agechildorchildren aboutprotectedsex(ifdoneforthepurposeofprotectionagainstsexually-transmitted infection,or,wheretheadviceisgiventoagirl,pregnancy,ortopromotethechild’s emotionalwell-being). Meetingachildfollowingsexualgroomingwithaviewtoengaging insexualactivitywithit Paedophileshavenotbeenslowtomakeuseoftheinternettogainthetrustandcon- fidenceofchildrenin‘chatroomconversations’andtherebytobefriendthem.Typic- ally,thepaedophilepretendsthatheisateenagersharingthesameinterestsandthen arrangesameetingwiththechild.Grooming,however,isnotlimitedtotheinternet. SOA2003,s15(1)dealswithgroomingbyprovidingthatapersonagedeighteenor over(A)commitsanoffenceif: (a) havingmetorcommunicatedwithanotherperson(B)anywhereintheworldon atleasttwoearlieroccasions,he: (i) intentionallymeetsB;or (ii) travelswiththeintentionofmeetingBinanypartoftheworld; (b) atthetime,heintendstodoanythingtoorinrespectofB,duringorafterthe meeting,andinanypartoftheworld,whichifdonewillinvolvethecommission byAofanyoffencedescribedinthischapterorunderthecorrespondinglawof NorthernIrelandorofanothercountry; (c) Bisundersixteen;and (d) AdoesnotreasonablybelievethatBissixteenorover. ABUSEOFPOSITIONOFTRUST Abuseofpositionoftrust:sexualactivitywithachild Provided that he has any necessary mens rea, a person aged eighteen or over (A) commitsanoffenceunderSOA2003,s16(1)if: (a) heintentionallytouchesanotherperson(B);

Description:
868 Sexual offences, child abduction and kidnapping. The specified circumstances are that: (a) any person was, at the time of the relevant act or
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.