Self- and Co-regulation in Cybercrime, Cybersecurity and National Security

109 Pages·2015·1.611 MB·English

by  Tatiana Tropina, Cormac Callanan (auth.)

SPRINGER BRIEFS IN CYBERSECURITY
Tatiana Tropina
Cormac Callanan
Self- and Co-
regulation in
Cybercrime,
Cybersecurity and
National Security
123
SpringerBriefs in Cybersecurity
Editor-in-chief
Sandro Gaycken, ESMT European School of Management
and Technology, Germany
Editorial Board
Sylvia Kierkegaard, International Association of IT Lawyers, Denmark
John Mallery, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Steven J. Murdoch, University of Cambridge, UK
Cybersecurity is a difficult and complex field. The technical, political and legal
questions surrounding it are complicated, often stretching a spectrum of diverse
technologies, varying legal bodies, different political ideas and responsibilities.
Cybersecurity is intrinsically interdisciplinary, and most activities in one field
immediately affect the others. Technologies and techniques, strategies and tactics,
motives and ideologies, rules and laws, institutions and industries, power and
money—allofthesetopicshavearoletoplayincybersecurity,andalloftheseare
tightly interwoven.
The SpringerBriefs in Cybersecurity series is comprised of two types of briefs:
topic- and country-specific briefs. Topic-specific briefs strive to provide a
comprehensive coverage of the whole range of topics surrounding cybersecurity,
combining whenever possible legal, ethical, social, political and technical issues.
Authorswithdiversebackgroundsexplaintheirmotivation,theirmindset,andtheir
approachtothetopic,toilluminateitstheoreticalfoundations,thepracticalnutsand
bolts and its past, present and future. Country-specific briefs cover national
perceptions and strategies, with officials and national authorities explaining the
background, the leading thoughts and interests behind the official statements, to
foster a more informed international dialogue.
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10634
Tatiana Tropina Cormac Callanan
(cid:129)
Self- and Co-regulation
in Cybercrime, Cybersecurity
and National Security
123
TatianaTropina Cormac Callanan
Max PlanckInstituteforForeign and Aconite Internet Solutions
InternationalCriminal Law Dublin
Freiburg Ireland
Germany
ISSN 2193-973X ISSN 2193-9748 (electronic)
SpringerBriefs inCybersecurity
ISBN 978-3-319-16446-5 ISBN 978-3-319-16447-2 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16447-2
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2015935411
SpringerChamHeidelbergNewYorkDordrechtLondon
©TheAuthor(s)2015
Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpart
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or
dissimilarmethodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexempt
fromtherelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse.
Thepublisher,theauthorsandtheeditorsaresafetoassumethattheadviceandinformationinthis
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained
hereinorforanyerrorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.
Printedonacid-freepaper
SpringerInternationalPublishingAGSwitzerlandispartofSpringerScience+BusinessMedia
(www.springer.com)
Foreword
The Internet is everywhere. It stretches across all layers of society, involving the
civil society, the business community and governments. And it is not just con-
sumed, but also operationally used, created, maintained and changed by all these
differentactors.Itisenablingthemiftheymasterit,anddisablingordisadvantaging
them if it does not work properly.
Now all of these actors desire basic values such as security, freedom and pri-
vacy,andofcoursetheywouldlikethemimplementedintheInternet,too.Different
culturesmayhavedifferentperceptionsaboutprioritiesandinterpretationsofthese
values,buttheystillwantthemimplementedinsomeway.Yetimplementingthese
values requires changes in this environment. Technologies, business modalities,
innovationorwidelyaccepteduse-modelswillhavetoberevisedandremodelledto
some extent, and many of these revisions will involve trade-offs with other actors’
interests.
Accordingly, the question of who should be the bringer and carrier of this
changeisthecornerstoneofaheateddebate.Alotofactorsarereluctanttoengage
in change at all, as they benefit from the current, unregulated model and mainly
oppose any emergence of other actors. These other actors—mostly disadvantaged
entitiesorinstitutionsinformalresponsibilityforaccordingissues—attheirendare
tryingtoidentifyandenforceleverstochangetheestablishedlandscape.Theresult
is a regulatory and lobbying battle raging behind the colourful outer shell of the
web.
Theauthorsofthisbrief,TropinaandCallanan,embarkedonthemissiontomap
out this contested landscape, its actors, their stakes and interests. This is a chal-
lenging undertaking, as many of these entities and their dynamics are not very
visible, especially in their entanglements and undercurrents, but Tropina and
Callanan managed to identify and analyse them with high granularity. Moreover,
the authors provide a profound theoretical analysis of the effectiveness and effi-
ciency of different regulatory approaches, focusing in particular on industrial
attempts of self-regulation or the more forthcoming variant of public–private
co-regulation, deriving general conclusions and creating recommendations with
high value for anybody working in or on this field.
v
vi Foreword
At the present time of an ever more contested Internet, this contribution could
hardlybemorerelevant,andIassumeitwillhaveanimpactontheongoingprocess
and the debates surrounding it.
February 2015 Dr. Sandro Gaycken
ESMT Berlin
Contents
1 Public–Private Collaboration: Cybercrime, Cybersecurity
and National Security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Tatiana Tropina
1.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Cybersecurity, Cybercrime, Cyberwar? Terminology
and Misconceptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.1 Cybersecurity: Different Dimensions and Blurring
Borders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2.2 Areas of Public–Private Collaboration
on Cybersecurity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3 Regulating Cybersecurity: What Are the Options?. . . . . . . . . . 11
1.3.1 Cybersecurity as a Multi-stakeholder
Environment: Transformation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.3.2 Self- and Co-regulation: Theoretical Approaches
and Practical Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.3.3 Legislating Cybersecurity?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.4 Existing Initiatives: From Illegal Content Towards
Cyber-Resilience. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.4.1 Fighting Cybercrime: Forms of Cooperation. . . . . . . . 21
1.4.2 Cybersecurity: A Call for More Structured
Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.5 Problems and a Way Forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.5.1 Limitations: Mandate of the Governments
in Criminal Law and Security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.5.2 Degree of Governmental Intervention . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.5.3 EU NIS Directive: From Voluntary Collaboration
to Statutory Regulation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1.5.4 Safeguards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
vii
viii Contents
1.5.5 Incentives and Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
1.5.6 Way Forward: Is Statutory Regulation Still
an Option?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
1.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2 Evolution, Implementation and Practice of Internet
Self-regulation, Co-regulation and Public–Private
Collaboration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Cormac Callanan
2.1 The Birth of Self-regulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.1.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.1.2 Individual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.1.3 Company. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.1.4 Industry Sector. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.1.5 Guided by Regulation (Sometimes Called
Co-regulation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
2.1.6 Multi-stakeholder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
2.1.7 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.1.8 Content versus Traffic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.1.9 Usenet News . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.1.10 Log Records and Charging. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.1.11 Traditional Telecom Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.1.12 Open Telecommunications Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.1.13 Dropping Newsgroups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.1.14 Embryonic Self-regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2.1.15 Anecdote. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2.1.16 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2.2 Self-regulation Matures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.2.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.2.2 Putting Structure on Self-regulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.2.3 UK French Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.2.4 UK Child Pornography Laws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
2.2.5 The Protection of Minors and Human Dignity
in Audio-Visual Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
2.2.6 US Framework for Global Electronic Commerce . . . . 66
2.2.7 Global Information Networks: Realising
the Potential Conference, Bonn Germany. . . . . . . . . . 68
2.2.8 Irish Working Group on Illegal and Harmful
Use of the Internet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
2.2.9 Electronic Mail. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
2.2.10 Newsgroups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2.2.11 Web Browsing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2.2.12 Web Hosting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Contents ix
2.2.13 File Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
2.2.14 Online Chat. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
2.2.15 Child Pornography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
2.2.16 Recommendations of the Committee on Illegal
and Harmful Use of the Internet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
2.2.17 Internet Service Provider Associations. . . . . . . . . . . . 77
2.2.18 Bertelsmann Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
2.2.19 EC Daphne Programme. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
2.2.20 EC Safer Internet Action Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
2.2.21 The INHOPE (Internet Hotline Providers
of Europe) Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
2.2.22 Legislation and Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
2.2.23 Directive 2000/31/EC on Certain Legal Aspects
of Information Society Services, in Particular
Electronic Commerce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
2.2.24 The Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention . . . . . 87
2.3 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Annex—Technology Options: Internet Monitoring and Blocking . . . . 90
Appendix I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99