ebook img

Selected speeches and news releases / United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Public Affairs. PDF

34 Pages·1993·1.8 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Selected speeches and news releases / United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Public Affairs.

Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. \ Unitea States Selected Speeches Department of V Agriculture and News Releases Office of Public Affairs Jan. 7 - Jan. 13,1993 IN THIS ISSUE: Statement— by Edward Madigan, Secretary of Agriculture on Preliminary Plans to Restructure USDA Field Offices Jan. 7,1993 *V.> . \ C^> ' . ** __ News Releases— r: ~-rv >' [)> USDA Proposing to Expand Geographical Boundaries of Tobacco Auction Markets - USDA Lowers Fees for Some Quarantine and Inspection Services Official Grain Inspection and Weighing Services Fees Increased -4. ’y... '*>, USDA Announces Prevailing World Market Prk# and User Marketing Certificate Payment Rate for Upland Cotton ^ t/> Producers May Enter 1992-Crop Feed Grains Into Farmer-Owned Reserve USDA Appoints Members to A National Council on Sustainable Agriculture USDA Uses its Surplus Property to House Homeless Families in Rural America Statement Required for Water Added to Export Grain Forest Service Establishes Wilderness Research Institute and Training Center USDA Proposes Revising Grading Standards for Frozen Cauliflower USDA Revises Formula Used to Predict Soil Erosion First Calves of Predetermined Sex Bom Continued on Inside Cover News Releases-Continued Pakistan Eligible for More Wheat Under Export Enhancement Program USDA Seeks U.S. Companies for Trade Mission to Belize US DA Proposes Changing Rice Standards Madigan Names Watermelon Board Members Wasp from Mexico Could be First Insect to Control Boll Weevil USDA Seeks Comments on 1993 Marketing Quotas for 6 Kinds of Tobacco USDA Authorizes Alternative Perennials on CRP Acreage USDA Announces Prevailing World Market Rice Prices Government Announces Public Land 1993 Grazing Fees for 16 Western States Artificial Diet Concocted for Potato Pest USDA Declares Oregon Free of Bovine Brucellosis USDA Revises Grading Standards for Canned Green and Wax Beans Statement- U.S. Department of Agriculture • Office of Public Affairs by Edward Madigan, Secretary of Agriculture on Preliminary Plans to Restructure USDA Field Offices Jan. 7,1993 Last May, we began the most sweeping review ever conducted of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s field office network. Today we are closer to completing the package, and I want to thank the Office of Management and Budget for its expertise. There are 14,309 field offices of the Department of Agriculture. Of that number 7,405 are agencies that deal with the delivery of farm services at the county level. The remaining number of offices are those that deal with the Food and Nutrition Service, Food Inspection, Forest Service, Agricultural Marketing Services and other missions — all of which are the subject of other studies. But the effort toward restructuring USDA began last May with an evaluation of the 7,405 county-based offices charged with delivering farm service benefits. We are dealing today with the preliminary results of that study. Those 7,405 offices are in 3,700 locations around the country, because many offices are located at the same address. What we are submitting to the Congress and agricultural groups today is the completed work of a joint USDA/OMB review team. They studied these county-based offices on the basis of six criteria: • program delivery costs; • number of producers served; • complexity of programs administered; • geographic service area; • whether local offices were scattered or located under one roof, and • intensity of workload at local offices. Our projections are that we will be reducing the total number of USDA locations by roughly 28 percent and the total number of USDA offices in these initially studied categories by 17 percent. That will mean a reduction of about 1,000 locations and more than 1,000 offices. Next week I will make a final decision on the number of offices recommended for closing and make it public. The current USDA field office structure is comparable to that which existed when 20 percent of the U.S. population lived on farms and was 1 without modern communication. Today less than 1 percent of the U.S. population lives on farms and has all of the modern transportation and telecommunication services available to them. Many improvements in the delivery of services to farmers could be made if the field office structure were streamlined so that we could afford to place in each of the offices the technological advances that are available today. This is not about reducing service to farmers. It is about being able to afford to improve our services to farmers in a manner that respects the role of the American taxpayer. Before leaving office, I will again meet with you to discuss our recommendations for the reorganization of USDA in Washington. I’ll be happy to take your questions. # Becky Unkenholz (202) 720-8998 Arthur Whitmore (202) 720-4026 USDA EXTENDS COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR SHELL EGGS WASHINGTON, Jan. 7—The U.S. Department of Agriculture has extended the comment period on its proposed temperature and labeling requirements for shell eggs to March 29. Daniel D. Haley, administrator of USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service, said, “The 60-day comment period, which was to end Dec. 28, was extended at the request of an industry organization to allow additional time to evaluate the proposal.” The new regulations would require that shell eggs be stored at 45 degrees F (7.2 degrees C) or below after being packed into containers going to consumers and that they be transported in refrigerated trucks at 45 degrees F or below. The proposed regulations also contain egg carton labeling requirements that would remind consumers to keep eggs refrigerated until they are prepared for consumption. Nouce of the extension will appear in the Jan. 8 Federal Register. Written comments may be sent in duplicate, postmarked by March 29, 1993, to Janice L. Lockard, Chief, Standardization Branch, Poultry Division, AMS, USDA, Rm. 3944-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456. # 2 Becky Unkenholz (202) 720-8998 .Arthur Whitmore (202) 720-4026 USDA PROPOSING TO EXPAND GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES OF TOBACCO AUCTION MARKETS WASHINGTON, Jan. 7—The U.S. Department of Agriculture is proposing to expand the geographical boundaries of tobacco auction markets. Daniel D. Haley, administrator of USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service, said the geographical area of designated tobacco auction markets would expand from 3 miles to 5 miles from the boundaries of the city or town where the markets are located. “This change would allow more flexibility in building new warehouses,” Haley said. In many markets, zoning laws and the cost of land make it impossible to build new warehouses within the current 3-mile limit, Haley said. With the spread of residential development and other businesses seeking lower cost advantages, it has become necessary for new warehouses to locate further outside the city limits, he said. The proposed change would also allow existing warehouses, which received price support and inspection services during the 1992 marketing season, to continue to operate at the same location. Notice of the proposed revision will be published in the Jan. 8 Federal Register. Comments, which should be received no later than Feb. 8, may be sent to the Director, Tobacco Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, Rm. 502 Annex, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456. Copies of the proposed rule and additional information are available from the division director at the above address, telephone (202) 205-0567. # Courtney Billet (301) 436-4446 Arthur Whitmore (202) 720-4026 USDA LOWERS FEES FOR SOME QUARANTINE AND INSPECTION SERVICES WASHINGTON, Jan. 7—The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced it will lower several of the user fees it charges for agricultural quarantine and inspection services. This change affects certain international airline passangers, commercial aircraft, and commercial vessels. 3 The new, lower fees will be $1.45 for international airline passengers, $61.00 for commercial aircraft and $369.50 for commercial vessels. The fees are charged for inspections performed to prevent the spread of agricultural pests and diseases in the United States “We have looked at incoming revenue since the inception of the fees and have determined that our operating costs are somewhat lower than the total amount of money being collected,” said B. Glen Lee, deputy administrator for plant protection and quarantine with USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. “We are pleased to be able to pass along the savings.” Because the action is of immediate economic advantage and is consistent with USDA’s responsibility to ensure the rates are consistent with expenditures, USDA is not providing for prior public comment on the fee reductions. Instead, the changes appeared in the Dec. 31, 1992, Federal Register as an interim rule that became effective Jan. 1. Comments on the rule will be accepted if received on or before Feb. 1. An original and three copies of written comments referring to Docket 92-148-1 should be sent to Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, USDA, Room 804 Federal Building, 6505 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Md. 20782. Comments may be inspected as soon as received at USDA, Room 1141 South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C., between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. # Dana Stewart (202) 720-5091 Arthur Whitmore (202) 720-4026 OFFICIAL GRAIN INSPECTION AND WEIGHING SERVICES FEES INCREASED WASHINGTON, Jan. 7—The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Federal Grain Inspection Service is increasing its fees by 3.7 percent for official inspection and weighing services performed in the United States under the U.S. Grain Standards Act. According to FGIS administrator John C. Foltz, the agency, which is predominantly funded by user fees, operated at a loss in fiscal 1992. The increase is needed to comply with laws that require FGIS to cover agency operating costs, he said. 4 The fee increase does not include fees for administration and supervision of official agencies or for inspection and weighing services provided in Canada. Because the fee increase is being announced as an interim rule in the Jan. 8 Federal Register, the agency can implement the increase and still accept public comment. The fee increase will become effective Feb. 1. Comments should be submitted on or before March 3,1993, to George Wollam, USDA, FGIS, Room 0624-S, P.O. Box 96454, Washington, D.C. 20090-6454; facsimile machine (202) 720-4628. # Minnie Tom H. Meyer (202) 720-6734 Leslie Parker (202) 720-4026 USDA ANNOUNCES PREVAILING WORLD MARKET PRICE AND USER MARKETING CERTIFICATE PAYMENT RATE FOR UPLAND COTTON WASHINGTON, Jan. 7—John Stevenson, acting executive vice president of USDA’s Commodity Credit Corporation, today announced the prevailing world market price, adjusted to U.S. quality and location (adjusted world price), for Strict Low Middling (SLM) 1-1/16 inch (micronaire 3.5-3.6 and 4.3-4.9, strength 24-25 grams per tex) upland cotton (base quality) and the coarse count adjustment (CCA) in effect from 5:00 p.m. today through 3:59 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 14. The user marketing certificate payment rate announced today is in effect from 12:01 a.m. Friday, Jan. 8, through midnight Thursday, Jan. 14. The Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended, provides that the AWP may be further adjusted if: (a) the AWP is less than 115 percent of the current crop year loan rate for base quality upland cotton, and (b) the Friday through Thursday average price quotation for the lowest-priced U.S. growth as quoted for Middling (M) 1-3/32 inch cotton, C.I.F. northern Europe (USNE price) exceeds the Northern Europe (NE) price. The maximum allowable adjustment is the difference between the USNE price and the NE price. A further adjustment to this week’s calculated AWP may be made in accordance with this provision. The calculated AWP is 79 percent of the 1992 upland cotton base quality loan rate, and the USNE price exceeds the NE price by 5.32 cents per pound. Following are the relevant calculations: 5 I. Calculated AWP.41.50 cents per pound 1992 Base Loan Rate.52.35 cents per pound AWP as a Percent of Loan Rate.79 II. USNE Price.60.50 cents per pound NE Price.-55.18 cents per pound Maximum Adjustment Allowed.5.32 cents per pound Based on a consideration of the U.S. share of world exports, the current level of cotton export sales and cotton export shipments, and other relevant data, no further adjustment to this week’s calculated AWP will be made. This week’s AWP and coarse count adjustment are determined as follows: Adjusted World Price NE Price.55.18 Adjustments: Average U.S. spot market location.11.82 SLM 1-1/16 inch cotton. 1.55 Average U.S. location... 0.31 Sum of Adjustments.-13.68 Calculated AWP.41.50 Further AWP Adjusuncnt.^_0_ ADJUSTED WORLD PRICE.41.50 ccnts/lb. Coarse Count Adjustment NE Price.55.18 NE Coarse Count Price.-50.77 . 4.41 Adjustment to SLM 1-1/32 inch cotton.-3.95 COARSE COUNT ADJUSTMENT. 0.18 cents/lb. Because the AWP is below the 1991 and 1992 base quality loan rates of 50.77 and 52.35 cents per pound, respectively, the loan repayment rate during this period is equal to the AWP, adjusted for the specific quality and location plus applicable interest and storage charges. The AWP will continue to be used to determine the value of upland cotton that is obtained in exchange for commodity certificates. Because the AWP is below the 1992-crop loan rate, cash loan deficiency payments will be paid to eligible producers who agree to forgo obtaining a price support loan with respect to the 1992 crop. The payment rate is equal to the difference between the loan rate and the AWP. Producers are allowed to obtain a loan deficiency payment on a bale-by-bale basis. 6

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.