FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page i FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page ii To our wonderful wives, the two Debbies, With all of our love, always and forever, Charlie and Allan FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page iii FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/5/2008 12:32 PM Page iv Copyright©2009byCorwinPress All rights reserved. When forms and sample documents are included, their use is authorized only by educators, local school sites, and/or noncommercial or nonprofit entitiesthathavepurchasedthebook.Exceptforthatusage,nopartofthisbookmaybe reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permissioninwritingfromthepublisher. Forinformation: CorwinPress SAGEIndiaPvt.Ltd. ASAGECompany B1/I1MohanCooperative 2455TellerRoad IndustrialArea ThousandOaks, MathuraRoad,NewDelhi110044 California91320 India www.corwinpress.com SAGELtd. SAGEAsia-PacificPte.Ltd. 1Oliver’sYard 33PekinStreet#02-01 55CityRoad FarEastSquare LondonEC1Y1SP Singapore048763 UnitedKingdom PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica. LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData Russo,CharlesJ. Section504andtheADA/CharlesJ.RussoandAllanG.Osborne,Jr. p.cm. Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex. ISBN978-1-4129-5508-9(cloth) ISBN978-1-4129-5509-6(pbk.) 1. Childrenwithdisabilities—Education—Lawandlegislation—UnitedStates. I. Osborne,AllanG. II. Title. KF4210.R872009 344.73’07911—dc22 2008017844 Thisbookisprintedonacid-freepaper. 08 09 10 11 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 AcquisitionsEditor: ArnisBurvikovs AssociateEditor: DesiréeEnayati EditorialAssistant: IrinaDragut ProductionEditor: CassandraMargaretSeibel CopyEditor: CateHuisman Typesetter: C&MDigitals(P)Ltd. Proofreader: SusanSchon Indexer: JeanCasalegno CoverDesigner: RoseStorey GraphicDesigner: KarineHovsepian FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page v Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xiii About the Authors xvii 1. Introduction: Education and the American Legal System 1 Key Concepts in This Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Sources of Law 3 Constitutions 3 Statutes and Regulations 4 Common Law 5 Court Systems 5 Finding Legal Materials 8 History 9 Exclusionary Practices 9 Civil Rights Movement 10 Equal Educational Opportunity Movement 11 ANew Era for Students With Disabilities 12 The Right to an Appropriate Education Delineated 12 Landmark Litigation 13 Other Significant Cases 14 Legislative Response to PARC and Mills 17 Recommendations 18 References 20 2. Antidiscrimination Legislation: An Overview of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans With Disabilities Act 21 Key Concepts in This Chapter 21 Introduction 21 FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page vi Section 504 of the RehabilitationAct 23 Individual With a Disability Defined 23 Otherwise Qualified Explained 24 Requirement to Provide Reasonable Accommodations 25 Application of Section 504 to Parents and Others WhoAccess a School 26 Americans With DisabilitiesAct 26 ADA’s Definition of Individual With a Disability 27 Exceptions 27 Five Titles of theADA 27 Similarities Between Section 504 and the ADA 28 Summary 28 Recommendations 29 References 30 3. Students 31 Key Concepts in This Chapter 31 Introduction 31 Students in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools 33 ProhibitionAgainst Discrimination 33 Definition of Disability 36 Otherwise Qualified Students With Disabilities 38 ReasonableAccommodations 39 Appropriate Education 40 Athletics 43 Testing Accommodations 43 Undue Burden 46 Section 504/ADAService Plans 47 Students in Nonpublic Schools 48 Admissions Examinations/Standards 50 Students in Higher Education 52 Discriminatory Practices Prohibited 52 Disability 53 Otherwise Qualified Students With Disabilities 55 ReasonableAccommodations 56 Summary 58 Recommendations for Practice 59 References 62 4. Employees 65 Key Concepts in This Chapter 65 Introduction 65 FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page vii Discrimination Claims 67 Differential Treatment 67 Impairments Not Covered 68 Mitigation of Impairments 69 DisciplinaryAction 70 Otherwise Qualified Individuals With Disabilities 70 Essential Job Functions 70 Reassignments 71 Failure to Meet Prerequisite Requirements 72 Poor Performance and Misconduct 74 ReasonableAccommodations 75 Accommodating Physical Challenges 75 Accommodating Disease and Illness 77 Reassignments 78 Relief Denied 79 Summary 80 Recommendations for Practice 81 References 82 5. Parents and the General Public 85 Key Concepts in This Chapter 85 Introduction 85 Applicable Provisions of Section 504 and theADA 86 Public Entities 86 PublicAccommodations 87 Private Institutions 87 Parents 87 General Public 89 Summary 91 Recommendations for Practice 92 References 93 6. Defenses, Immunities, and Remedies 95 Key Concepts in This Chapter 95 Introduction 95 Defenses 96 EleventhAmendment Immunity 97 Sovereign Immunity Under Section 504 98 Sovereign Immunity Under theADA 99 Effect on StateAgencies and School Boards 102 Damages 102 Individual Defendants 103 Attorney Fees 104 FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/5/2008 12:33 PM Page viii Exhaustion of IDEAAdministrative Remedies 105 Statute of Limitations 107 Summary 109 Recommendations for Practice 110 References 111 Appendix 1: Useful Education Law Web Sites 115 Appendix 2: Department of Special Education Web Sites, by State 117 Index 121 FM-Russo (504)-45682:FM-Russo (504)-45682 8/4/2008 4:57 PM Page ix Preface SECTION 504 OFTHE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 ANDTHE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERS WhyWeWroteThis Book Americans who are accustomed to living in a world where inequities in schooling and broader society on the basis of race, gender, and disabil- ity have largely been eliminated can easily lose sight of what life was like inthenotsodistantpast.Forexample,in1969,15yearsaftertheSupreme Court’s monumental decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ended state-sanctionedsegregationduetoraceinpublicschools,NeilArmstrong became the first human to walk on the moon, thereby generating a tech- nologicalrevolutionthatledtosuchdevelopmentsastheInternet,e-mail, and a host of other advancements. Yet, about one-half ofAmerican states hadlawsdenyingequaleducational,andother,opportunitiestoindividu- alswithdisabilities.Evenso,changewasonthehorizonasaresultoftwo cases that were litigated in federal trial courts and that had a profound impact on the rights of individuals with disabilities. Thefirstcase,PennsylvaniaAssociationforRetardedChildrenv.Common- wealth of Pennsylvania (PARC) was initiated on behalf of a class of all indi- viduals who were mentally retarded who were excluded from public schools.RulinginfavoroftheplaintiffsinPARC,afederaltrialcourtheld that no child who was mentally retarded or thought to be mentally retarded could be assigned to a special education program or excluded from the public schools without due process. The court added that school systems in Pennsylvania had to provide all children who were mentally retarded with a free appropriate public education and training programs appropriate to their capacities. The second case, Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia (Mills),extendedthesamerighttootherclassesofstudentswithdisabilities, • ix