iv CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS VOLUME .R BOLTON Department of Chemistry, Royal and New College, The Bourne Laboratory, Egham Hill, Surrey TW20 0EX .W.D BROWN School of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath 2AB YA7 .F.D EWING Department oCfh emistry, University of Hull, Hull HU6 XR7 A.J. FLOYD School of Chemistry, University Boaft h, Claverton Down, Bath 2AB YA7 .T.D HURST Faculty of Science, Kingston Polytechnic, Penrhyrn Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT1 2EE A.M. JONES Department of Chemical and Life Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic, Ellison Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST .M SAINSBURY School of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath 2AB YA7 .P.S STANFORTH Department of Chemical and Life Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic, Ellison Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST .W.C THOMAS Department of Physical and Biological Sciences, Bristol Polytechnic, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol Preface to Volume 1A/B This is the first sub-volume of the second supplement of "Rodd" encompassing the literature since 1970, the date when the first supplement was published. The rate of growth of the subject matter in this time has been so great that a decision was taken to subdivide the original chapters thus to reduce the burden upon individual contributors. The original brief given to authors was that between 40-50 pages of camera ready text should be devoted to each topic. Once the project was underway, however, it was soon appreciated that for certain subject areas this was insufficient space and some chapters in this volume are expanded far beyond their planned length. Rigid adherence to deadlines is always very difficult for busy chemists and the expansion in the size of some contributions has added considerably to this problem. Despite this I am most grateful to all my co-authors for submitting their chapters on time. Two authors Arthur Floyd and Warner Thomas had an especially arduous task since they were responsible for two chapters each. One problem of timetabling could not be surmounted and it has become necessary to delay the publication of Chapter 6 "Nitrogen derivatives of the Acyclic Hydrocarbons". It will be included in a later sub-volume. Malcolm Sainsbury XVII LIST OF COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS USED A acid A ikngstr~m units Ac acetyl a axial as, asymm, asymmetrical at. atmosphere B base Bu butyl b.p. boiling point ,c C concentration CD circular dichroism conc. concentrated D Debye unit, X 1 10-18 e.s.u. D dissociation energy D dextro-rotatory; dextro configuration d density dec. or decomp with decomposition deriv, derivative E energy; extinction; electromeric effect El, E2 uni- and hi-molecular elimination mechanisms cB 1 E unimolecular elimination in conjugate base ESR electron spin resonance Et ethyl e nuclear charge; equatorial f.p. freezing point G free energy GLC gas liquid chromatography g spectroscopic splitting factor, 2.0023 H applied magnetic field; heat content h Planck's constant Hz hertz I spin quantum number; intensity; inductive effect IR infrared J coupling constant in NMR spectra J Joule K dissociation constant k Boltzmann constant; velocity constant kcal kilocalories M molecular weight; molar; mesomeric effect Me methyl m mass; mole; molecule; meta- m.p. melting point Ms mesyl (methanesulphonyl) XVlll [MI molecular rotation N Avogadro number; normal NMR nucleamra gneticr esonance NOE Nuclear Overhauser Effect n normal; refractive index; principal quantum number o ortho- ORD optical rotatory dispersion P polarisation; probability; orbital state Pr propyl Ph phenyl P para-; orbital PMR proton magnetic resonance R clockwise configuration S counterclockwise config.; entropy; net spin of incompleted electronic shells; orbital state SN 1, SN2 uni- and bi-molecular nucleophilic substitution mechanisms iNS internal nucleophilic substitution mechanisms S symmetrical; orbital see secondary soln. solution symm. symmetrical T absolute temperature Tosyl p-toluenesulphonyl Trityl triphenylmethyl t time temp. temperature (in degrees centrigrade) tert tertiary UV ultraviolet optical rotation (in water unless otherwise stated) specific optical rotation dielectric constant; extinction coefficient a dipole moment; magnetic moment aa Bohr magneton ag microgram am micrometer 2 wavelength P frequency; wave number ,X ,dX uX magnetic; diamagnetic and paramagnetic susceptibilities (+) dextrorotatory (-) laevorotatory m negative charge + positive charge Second Supplements ot the 2nd Edition Roofd d's Chemistry of Carbon Compounds, Vol. IA/B, edited by .M Sainsbury (cid:14)9 1991 Elsevier ecneicS Publishers ,.V.B madretsmA Chapter 1 THE SATURATED HYDROCARBONS- ALKANES D. .F EWING .1 Introduction This survey of alkane chemistry coverst he period from 1972 when a review of this subject last appeared in Rodd. This period began with the oil crisis of 3791 which had a significant impact on the petrochemical industry. Subsequent political factors of a similar type have kept the oil and petrochemical industries in a state of flux right up to the present time and this has permeated back to fundamental chemistry with the result that interest in hydrocarbon chemistry has never been greater. In particular the study of alkane functionalization has come from the academic backwaters to become a mainstream activity, the focus of the interest of many prominent academic and industrial laboratories. Many thousands of papers have appeared mostly in the last ten years. Although all important topics are dealt with here the coverage is necessarily selective and this chapter has a substantially changed emphasis when compared with the preceding edition. .2 Sources of alkanes Oil and gas are obviously still the major sources of hydrocarbons and since the discovery of new reserves has kept pace approximately with consumption this situation will still obtain for many decades to come. However gas reserves have increased faster than oil reserves and hence there is a move towards increased use of 1 a C feedstock for the chemical and petrochemical industries. Ideally this requires the conversion of methane directly to higher hydrocarbons, a process which is not yet commercially viable. The chemistry of methane dimerization and oligomerization is discussed below. n A alternative is to convert methane to methanol v/a syngas and then synthesise higher hydrocarbons from that 1 C source (C.D.Chang, "Hydrocarbons from Methanol", M.Dekker, New York, 1983; "Catalytic Conversion of Synthesis Gas and Alcohols to Chemicals", R.G.Herman (Ed.), Plenum, New York, 1984). Petrol obtained by this route accounts for one third of the domestic market in New Zealand (C.J.Maiden, "Methane Conversion", D.M.Bibby et al. (Eds), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pl). This reaction is catalysed by zeolites and by suitable choice of process conditions the conversion can be tailored to produce ethene, light alkenes or petrol (gasoline) (S.A.Tabak and S.Yurchak, Catal. Today, 1990, ,6 307). The utilization of coal as a hydrocarbon source is accomplished by gasification to form syngas then application of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction to afford a range of alkane fractions and other chemicals (R.B.Anderson, 'The Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis", Academic Press, 1984; M.E.Dry, Catal. Today, 1990, ,6 183). This process has provided petrol, diesel and chemicals for decades in South Africa. More than %59 of organic chemicals are derived from these primary hydrocarbon sources and thus the chemistry of the alkanes is of crucial importance to the world chemical industry. The use of vegetable oil as a source of hydrocarbons has been of interest for many years but has been little more than a curiosity until recently. It has now been shown that a diesel fraction of hydrocarbons can be readily obtained from soybean oil by hydrocracking at 250- 053 ~ with high pressure hydrogen using a catalyst which induces hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis (J.Gusmao et al., Catal. Today, 1989, ,5 533). .3 Preparation of alkanes (a) Reduction of alkenes and alkynes Synthetic applications of hydrogenation, including the use of supported catalysts, have been dealt with in several recent books (M.Freifelder, "Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Synthesis: Procedures and Commentary", Wiley, New York, 1978; P.N.Rylander, "Hydrogenation Methods", Academic Press, New York, 1985; F.R.Hartley, "Supported Metal Complexes, A New Generation of Catalysts", D.Reidel Publishing Co., 1985). The work described here is restricted to the direct formation ofa lkanes. Hydrogenation of an unsaturated linkage in functionalised compounds is not included although there is much overlap in methodology. Homogeneous catalysiso f stereospecific hydrogenation by transition metal catalysts has been reviewed (R.E.Harmon, S.K.Gupta and J.W.Scott, Chem. Rev., 73, 1973, ;12 see also D.Valentine and J.W.Scott, Synthesis, 1978, 329). Applications to simple alkene hydrogenation are few but using a rhodium catalyst with chiral ligands 2-cyclohexylbutane was obtained in %06 enantiomeric excess (T.Hayashi, M.Tanaka and I.Ogata, Tetrahedron Left., 1977, 295). An interesting water soluble catalyst is obtained from RhCl 3 and the phosphine (m-NaSO3-C6H4)3P. The exact structure of the active species is unknown but it is air stable and effective for quantitative hydrogenation in a biphasic system (ie aqueous solution of catalyst and liquid alkene) using a standard low pressure hydrogenator (C.Larpent, R.Dabard and H.Patin, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, ,82 2507). Reduction of cobalt or nickel salts with NaBH 4 gives the corresponding metal borides which are efficient heterogeneous hydrogenation catalysts (reviewed by R.C.Wade et al., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1976,14, 211). Nickel boride is often more effective than the traditional Raney nickel (J.A.Schreifels, P.C.Maybury and W.E.Swartz, .J Org. Chem., 1981, 46,1263) and cobalt boride is selective for mono- and di-substituted alkenes and alkynes (J.O.Osby, S.W.Heinzmann and B.Ganem, .J Am. Chem. Soc., 1986,108, 67). E.C.Ashby and J.J.Lin .J( Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 2567) have shown that the chlorides of cobalt, nickel or titanium catalyse the quantitative reduction of alkenes and alkynes with LiAIH .4 With 41CiT greater selectivity is shown for unhindered alkenes (P.W.Chum and S.E.Wilson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1976,15) and simple lithium hydride with 3 VCI is specific for the reduction of terminal alkenes (E.C.Ashby and S.A.Noding, .J Org. Chem., 1980, 45,1041). A heterogeneous catalyst system of similar function is NaH/Ni(OAc)2/EtONa (or other alcoholate salts). The actual catalytic species have unknown stoichiometry but are stable and easily prepared and are not hazardous (J.-J.Brumet, P.Gallois and P.Caubere, .J Org. Chem., 1980, ,54 .)7391 Ionic hydrogenation of a double bond requires a proton donor and a hydride donor. Since a carbocation is formed initially this reduction is selective for CF3COOH Et3SiH R2C---CR 2 ~ R2CH-CR2 +- ~ R2CH-CHR 2 substituted alkenes. This reaction has been reviewed (D.N.Kursanov, Z.N.Parnes and N.M.Loim, Synthesis, 1974, 633). A convenient route to alkanes of specific length has been described by M.C.Whiting and coworkers. It starts with the readily available bromoaldehyde (1). This aldehyde is reacted with the Wittigr eagent made from the acetal of )1( to give a 24-carbon bromoacetal (2). Further analogous chain extension steps and final reductive removal of double bonds and functional groups has afforded a range of alkanes up to 287H093C (I.Bidd et al., .J Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. ,1 1983, 1369; .J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 543). Br(CH2)11CHO Br(CH2)I 1CH~-CH(CH2 2)tEO(HC01) )1( )2( Further studies of this synthetic strategy (E.Igner et al., .J Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,1987, 2447; I.Bidd, D.W.Holdup and M.C.Whiting, C.Jhem. Soc., Perkin Trans. ,1 1987, 2455) have resulted in some modifications which give improved yields and minimise the contamination with compounds of shorter chain length. Another modification (E.A.Adegoke et al., .J Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. ,1 1987, 2465) allows the introduction of lateral alkyl substituents. The properties of many of the compounds longer than 05C indicate folding of the chain. (b) From alkyl halides and alcohols The substitution of a halogen atom by a hydrogen atom is a reaction of great importance and can be effected by a bewildering variety of reagents. An excellent review of this area (A.R.Pinder, Synthesis, 1980, 425) covers catalytic hydrogenation, hydride substitution, metal/acid and metal/ammonia reductions, halogen radical abstraction and sundry other reactions. S.Krishnamurthy and H.C.Brown .J( Org. Chem., 1976, 41, 3064; 1980, 45, 849) have made an interesting comparison of some of the hydride reagents used for NS 2 substitution of Cl, ,rB I or OTs. These reagents are essentially based on the tetrahydroborate or tetrahydroaluminate anions with many substituted variants (see also R.C.Wade, .J Mol. Catal., 1983,18, 273). The best of these hydrides is undoubtedly LiBHEt 3 which has much better nucleophilicity than LiAIH 4 (S.Krishnamurthy and H.C.Brown, .J Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 3085) and readily reduces hindered alkyl halides and mesylates (R.W.Holder and M.G.Matturro, .J Org. Chem., 1977, 42, 2166). This reaction is also effective with LiH and only a catalytic amount of .B3tE The use of polar solvents such as DMSO or sulpholane increases the effectiveness of NaBH 4 as a reducing agent for tosylates (R.O.Hutehings et al., O.Jrg. Chem., 1978, 2259) 43, and (n-Bu4N)BH3CN is a particularly effective reducing agent for derivatives of primary alcohols (R.O.Hutchings et al., .J Org. Chem., 1977, 82). 42, Tertiary and benzylic alcohols have been reduced directly with NaBH3CN/ZnI 2 by what appears to be a radical process (C.K.Lau et al., .J Org. Chem., 1986, ,15 3038). Other new hydride reagents include KBHPh 3 (for primary bromides and iodides only, N.M.Yoon and K.E.Kim, O.Jrg. Chem., 1987, ,25 5564) and LiA1H(i-Bu)2(n-Bu) which is required in stoichiometric amount only rather than the usual excess (S.Kim and K.H.Ahn, .J Org. Chem., 1984, 49, 1717). Zinc borohydride shows high selectivity for hydride substitution in tertiary chlorides without any competition from elimination (S.Kim, C.Y.Hong and S.Yang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1983, 22, 562). This is the reverse of the normal 2NS selectivity for which primary iodides are the most reactive. The presence of a catalytic amount of a transition metal salt can enhance the activity of 4 LiA1H towards the reduction of alkyl halides and CoCl 2 andNiCl 2 are particularly effective (J.O.Osby, S.W.Heinzmann and B.Ganem, .J Am. Chem. Soc., 1986,108, 67). E.C.Ashby and coworkers .J( Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 183) have taken this approach one step further and investigated a series of lithium copper hydrides. Quantitative reduction of Cl, Br, I and OTs at primary sitesi s achieved with Li4CuH 5 in THF. In situ formation of the iodide from primary and secondary alcohols with the reagent Me3SiCI/NaI/MeCN followed by treatment with zinc and acetic acid is a very convenient one-pot process for the reduction of alcohols (T.Morita, Y.Okamoto and H.Sakurai, Synthesis, 1981, 32). This procedure will also reduce simple ethers. Benzylic alcohols are converted to the hydrocarbon without the reducing agent (T.Sakai et.al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, ,82 3817). Using a similar strategy the reduction of tosylates by zinc and t-butanol can be achieved directly in refluxing glyme if excess NaI is added (Y.Fujimoto and T.Tatsumo, Tetrahedron Lett., 1976, 3325). Hydride tranfer from Et3SiH to the stable carbocation generated v/a the 'protonation of a tertiary alcohol is a useful route to some hydrocarbons (reviewed by D.N.Kursanov, Z.N.Parnes and N.M.Loim, Synthesis, 1974, 633). When the carbocation is unstable ( with respect to rearrangement or elimination) the protic acid can be replaced with advantage by FB 3 (M.G.Adlington, M.Orfanopoulos and J.L.Fry, Tetrahedron Lett., 1976, 2955). Deoxygenation of secondary alcohols is often particularly difficult by procedures involving nucleophilic substitution and a radical process can be a convenient alternative. The alcohol is suitably derivatised and then decomposed in presence of a radical activator and hydrogen donor. ROH r ROX r "R ~ RH )3( This type of reaction has been thoroughly reviewed by W.Hartwig (Tetrahedron, 1983, 39, 2069) and since it is rarely applied to the formation of hydrocarbons per se it will only be discussed briefly. The derivative )3( usually contains a thiocarbonyl group since the sulphur atom is particularly sensitive to radical attack and many different types have been investigated. The radical reducing agent is usually (n-Bu)3SnH. The additional presence of triethylborane promotes the reduction at 20~ (K.Nozaki, K.Oshima and K.Utimoto, Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 6125) 29, thus providing exceptionally mild conditions for deoxygenation. The readily accessible acetates of secondary alcohols are reduced by Ph3SiH with t-butylperoxide as initiator (H.Sano, M.Ogata and T.Migita, Chem. Lett., 1986, 77). The silane )4( is found to be even more effective since high yields are also obtained with primary and tertiary acetates (H.Sano, T.Takeda and T.Migita, Chem. Lett., 1988, 119). Ph2HSi-C6H4-SiHPh2 ROC--NC6HTT I )4( NHC6H11 )5( An analogous catalytic reduction (Pd on carbon) of an N,N'-dicyclo- hexylisourea )5( gives the hydrocarbon RH quantitatively (E.Vowinkel and I.Biithe, Chem. Ber., 1974,107, 1353). Hydrogenation of alkyl halides with Na-K alloya s catalyst is enhanced by the use of a phase transfer agent such as a crown ether or tris(3,6-dioxaheptyl)amine (A.K.Bose and P.Mangiaracina, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, ,82 2503). R'SH RO2CCO 2 N RH N Refluxing C6H6 s// )6( A new procedure particularly suitable for tertiary alcohols involves formation of an oxalate hydroxamic ester of type (6). Treatment with a suitable thiol results in homolysis of the hydroxamic bond followed by expulsion of two moles of CO 2 (D.H.R.Barton and D.Crich, .J Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. ,1 1986, 1603). The best thiol was Et3CSH which has a very low nucleophilicity. Hindered second- ary and tertiary acetates are best reduced with Li/EtNH 2 or K/18-crown-6/t- BuNH 2 (D.H.R.Barton and coworkers, .J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1978, 68). (c) From thio- and seleno- compounds The removal of sulphur from alkyl sulphides, sulphoxides or sulphones has long been achieved by hydrogenation with Raney nickel. Recently Mo(CO) 6 in acetic acid has been shown to be effective for desulphurization of thiols (H.Alper and C.Blais, .J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1980, 169) and catalysis by molybdenum compounds is likely to be increasingly important in this area. Other long established but more specific methods of removing the sulphur atom involve Li/EtNH 2 at low temperature or sodium amalgum in MeOH. The activity of sodium amalgum is improved by buffering with Na2HPO 4 (B.M.Trost et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1976, 3477). With Pd(Ph3P) 4 as catalyst LiBHEt 3 is effective for the removal of ,S SO 2 and Se from unreactive sites (R.O.Hutchins and K.Learn, O.Jrg. Chem., 1982, 4380) 47, and reductive deselenization of phenyl selenides occurs quantitatively with NaBH4/NiC12 (T.G.Back et al., O.Jrg. Chem., 1988, ,35 3815) or with Ph3SnH in refluxing toluene (D.L.J.Clive et al., .J Am. Chem. Soc., 1980,102, 4438). (d) From carbonyl and carboxylic derivatives The traditional methods of converting aldehydes and ketones to the hydrocarbon require strongly acidic (Clemmenson reduction, reviewed by E.Vedejs, Org. Reactions, 1975, ,22 401) or strongly basic conditions (Wolff- Kishner reduction). These relatively harsh conditions are unsuitable to much of modern Synthetic methodology and much milder procedures haveb een