Disclaimer The recommendations, advice, descriptions, and the methods in this book are presented solely for educational purposes. The author and publisher assume no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage that results from the use of any of the material in this book. Use of the material in this book is solely at the risk of the user. Copyright© 2011 by PennWell Corporation 1421 South Sheridan Road Tulsa, Oklahoma 74112-6600 USA 800.752.9764 +1.918.831.9421 [email protected] www.Fire EngineeringBooks.com www.pennwellbooks.com www.pennwell.com Marketing Coordinator: Jane Green National Account Executive: Cindy J. Huse Director: Mary McGee Managing Editor: Marla Patterson Production Manager: Sheila Brock Production Editor: Tony Quinn Cover Designer: Karla Pfeifer Cover Photo by Lt. Bob Pressler, FDNY (ret.) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Coleman, John, 1950- Searching smarter / John “Skip” Coleman. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-1-59370-258-8 1. Lifesaving at fires. 2. Search and rescue operations. I. Title. TH9402.C65 2011 363.37’81--dc22 2011007442 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transcribed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 15 14 13 12 11 This book is dedicated to Diane Feldman, managing editor of Fire Engineering magazine. Although she has never worn “the uniform,” she works tirelessly to help educate the nation’s fire service and to constantly present us in a positive light. She has become a great friend to me and my family as well as to the fire service family. It is also dedicated to my beautiful wife Theresa. She has put up with me and the same old jokes for more than 31 years, and I can only pray she continues to do so for another 30 or so. To my son Toby, his wife Victoria, and my daughter Fay. Lastly, this book is being completed when the nation and the world are changing at an alarming pace. God help us and be with us all! The republic has worked well for more than 200 years; I pray it continues on as the founders envisioned. v Contents 1 The Scope of the Problem......................................1 2 Types of Search Used Today ...................................7 3 The Incident Commander and the Search Group ...............11 4 The Relationship Between Search and Groups/Divisions .......17 5 The Standard Method of Search...............................23 6 Team Search.................................................33 7 The Oriented Search .........................................45 8 Vent/Enter/Search (VES) ....................................61 9 Primary and Secondary Searches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71 10 Prioritizing Search ...........................................75 11 Search vs. Rescue ............................................85 12 Reading the Building for Search...............................91 13 Where to Start and Where to Stop a Search ....................99 14 How Long Should a Search Last?............................ 105 15 Searching with a Hoseline .................................. 111 16 Searching with a Tool....................................... 115 17 Searching with a Thermal Imager............................ 121 18 Single-Family Occupancies ................................. 125 19 Multi-Family Occupancies.................................. 151 20 Low-Rise Motels........................................... 173 21 Nursing Homes and Other Health Care/ Institutional Occupancies................................... 181 22 Restaurants................................................ 191 23 Strip Malls................................................. 201 24 Places of Worship .......................................... 209 25 Industrial Occupancies ..................................... 217 26 Newer Office Buildings..................................... 225 27 Large Malls and Big Box Stores.............................. 233 28 Final Thoughts............................................. 239 Index...................................................... 241 vii 1 The Scope of the Problem I remember starting my career as a firefighter back in 1975 and all the training that I experienced in recruit school. When I think about it now after 32 years, the subject of search was about as important to the curriculum of my recruit class as it was for the curriculum of my entire fire service career. The thing that sticks out the most in my mind about recruit training was laying and pulling hose. It seemed that for hours on end we would connect to a hydrant, lay out 500 ft. of supply (3-in. and 2½-in.) hose, connect the hose to the engine intake, then pull a preconnected attack line. For days and days we would pull and stretch hoseline. We also spent many, many hours raising 35-ft. ground ladders. We did right-angle raises, parallel raises, three-firefighter raises, four-firefighter raises. We did raises we knew we would never use again after drill school—the dome raise comes to mind. We spent time on knots and on self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). We tied them and untied them, donned them and doffed them. We did all this for hours and hours. With all those hours we spent, it’s sad to say that my best recollection of search training consisted of part of a single afternoon. That was way back in 1975. In 1984 I was tasked with giving detailed training as an instructor for a class of 64 recruits. My assignment was to train the recruits in SCBA and search. I was given a 40-hour block of time to train each group of eight recruits in the use of SCBA and how to conduct a primary search. Since 1984, to the best of my knowledge, every recruit in Toledo has been given at least 40 hours of SCBA and search training. After recruit school I can think of no formal, organized, department-wide search training that was ever conducted before or after 1984 with one exception. While teaching the recruits of the 1984 class the oriented search, deputy chief Robert Schwanzl sat in one of my “hands-on” search sessions. He was so impressed with the evolution that I was ordered to stay in training after the recruit class graduated and put all Toledo firefighters through the oriented search training. 1 2 Searching Smarter Where We Are Today When I think of every evolution that we do on the fireground, search is the most poorly performed. Most fire departments are great at pulling and stretching hoseline. We can stretch line forward, backward, upstairs, downstairs, through windows, and out windows to buildings next door. We can take hydrants with forward lays and reverse lays. We can tandem pump, draft, inline pump, and pump from the tank. Today when we can’t think of any more pump drills for the morning drill session, we go out and throw ladders up against the station: three-firefighter raises, two-firefighter raises, four-firefighter raises, both parallel and right angle. We do all that, but I guarantee you that most officers and firefighters never practice searching. Many leave the firehouse without even a basic plan of how they are going to search the building in front of them at their next fire. As I said, we perform search the worst of all our evolutions on the fireground. I don’t think most of us are searching the way we would want someone to search for us or for our family members. When we search, we often miss the center of a room. We miss corners. Sometimes we miss rooms altogether. Other times we search where only dead people could be. In most instances, especially in larger buildings, we take way too long to search. One of my concerns in writing this book is a general lack of defining who will be tasked with conducting a search. Many proposals for classes and seminars cross my desk. Some of these are directed toward search evolutions. Many of those proposals directed for search include the words “truck company.” A high number of others focus on “large area search.” I have concerns with both of these groups of seminars and training classes. First off, not everyone has a truck company. In the past and with larger fire departments, it was standard operating procedure that truck companies conducted searches. There are 200 metro departments recognized by the International Association of Fire Chiefs. That’s 200 out of 32,000 departments in the United States. The vast majority of fire departments in the United States today respond to a typical house fire with 13 or fewer firefighters. Many of these departments don’t respond to a house fire initially with a truck. Of those departments that do respond initially with a truck company, many may respond with two or fewer firefighters on board. Second, the concern I have with large area search centers around the aspect of time. This will be discussed in greater detail later in the book, but let me emphasize here that preparing for and conducting a search in a large area, for example a large chain restaurant, may take a single crew from 45 minutes to an hour to conduct. How many viable victims do you believe you will pull out of that restaurant after 45 minutes in an immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH) atmosphere? Chapter 1: The Scope of the Problem 3 Common Search Mistakes Let me start this section by stating that no one individual or department is perfect. Additionally, there is almost always more than one right way to fight a fire or to conduct a search. But after reading countless accounts of fires in trade magazines along with OSHA and NIOSH reports and on the Web, I believe many mistakes are made while conducting searches. These are happening not only in large commercial occupancies, but in single- family residential homes as well. Lack of prior planning One of my biggest concerns in the way searches are conducted is that as today’s fire officer walks toward a fire building preparing to conduct a search, the furthest thing from the officer’s mind is developing a plan. I have asked literally thousands of firefighters during training sessions and seminars if they first developed a search plan before they approached a building on fire with the intent of conducting a search. Unfortunately, I didn’t get too many answers in the affirmative. I don’t understand this. As firefighters, we are trained to think on our feet and develop action plans literally in seconds as we prepare for a specific evolution. If assigned to fire attack on the second floor of a two-story wood frame house, most officers will have developed a plan including the size of hose to be pulled, where the hose will be stretched, and the type of knockdown application to be used, all before getting out of the jump seat. The same holds true for an officer tasked with ventilation. Again, glancing at the fire building, the officer quickly evaluates the type of ventilation—horizontal or vertical— and a means of opening up the building, if required. Additionally, the location of any opening is evaluated prior to the pulling and positioning of ground ladders. Again I ask you the last time you were assigned search, what type of plan did you devise prior to entering the building with your crew? Hopefully, by the time you finish this text, you will learn to develop a plan for every search you are required to conduct. Lack of focus! If you’ve heard any of my lectures or read any of my previous books, you’ll know that a word that I often refer to is a “focus.” I believe the incident management system is built on focus. It is the incident commander’s job to focus on the entire incident. It is the job of group and division officers to focus on their specific assignment. As a search officer, you have several areas of focus that must be maintained in order to conduct an efficient search while maintaining the safety of your crew. An officer assigned to search must maintain focus on the following.