ebook img

Scottish Ambulance Service Business Case PDF

157 Pages·2008·7.94 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Scottish Ambulance Service Business Case

Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Scottish Ambulance Service Business Case EMDC Review Project Final Version 1 January 2008 ! Scottish Ambulance Service National Headquarters Tipperlinn Road Edinburgh EH10 5UU Tel: 0131-446-7000 Fax: 0131-446-7001 www.scottishambulance.com EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 1 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! Acknowledgements Programme Board Pauline Moore, Project Sponsor Sam Kennedy, Project Director Karen McLachlan, Convenor, UNISON John Gallacher, Convenor, T&G Scotland Suzanne Dawson, Non Executive Director Jonathan Price, Scottish Government Ian Shanley, General Manager ICT Mark O’Donnell Executive Team Advisor George Crooks Medical Director and Clinical Advisor Alan Lawton Non Executive Director Dr Lawrence Bidwell NHS Highland John Morton PR Consultant Neville Singh Patient Representative Phase 2 Project Team Richard Muirhead, Project Manager (PhaseII) Ian Donald, Project Manager (Phase1) Ian Shanley, General Manager, ICT David Kinnaird, ICT Systems Development Manager Janey Morrison, Telecomms Services Manager Alan Campbell, ICT Systems Support Manager Lorraine McAffer, Estates Manager Jim Dall, General Manager, Finance Stuart Airey, Project Accountant Project Support Loraine Newberry, Projects Coordinator EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 2 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! Table of Contents Topic Section Page Executive Summary 4 Introduction and Background 1.0 7 Introduction 1.1 7 Background 1.2 7 Objectives 1.3 9 Methodology 1.4 10 Benefits Criteria 2.0 11 Proposed Benefits for Patients 2.1 11 Long List of Options 3.0 12 Short List of Options 4.0 15 The EMDC Technical Team 4.1 15 Technical Team Responsibilities 4.2 16 Technical Workshops 4.3 16 Command and Control Systems 4.4 16 Telephone Systems 4.5 17 Airwave Mobile Radio 4.6 18 Option 1: Status Quo 4.7 19 Option 2: 3 EMDCs Aligned to 3 Divisions 4.8 20 Option 3: 3 EMDCs Augmented by Call Centre at Dundee 4.9 22 Option 4: 3 Call Centres and 6 Dispatch Centres 4.10 23 Option 5: 3 EMDCs Co-located with NHS24 4.11 25 Option 6: 2 EMDCs 4.12 27 Emergency Response Service (Lanarkshire Model) 4a 29 Emergency Response Service 4a.1 29 Emergency Response Service Technical Requirements 4a.2 30 Value for Money Assessment 5.0 31 Value for Money Assessment 5.1 31 Benefits Assessment 5.1.1 31 Economic Appraisal 5.1.2 31 Risk Assessment 5.1.3 32 Value for Money Conclusion 5.1.4 32 Sensitivity Analysis 5.2 34 Affordability 6.0 35 Revenue and Capital Implications 6.1 35 Private Public Partnership / Private Finance 6.2 35 Implementation 7.0 37 Project Management 7.1 37 Project Board and Team 7.2 37 Methodology 7.3 37 Statement of Understanding 7.4 37 Human Resource Issues 7.4 37 Project Plan 7.5 38 Recommendation of the Preferred Option 8.0 39 ! EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 3 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! Executive Summary Background ! i) The Service currently has 3 Emergency Medical Dispatch Centres which were fully established in March 2004. However an unprecedented increase in 999 and urgent demand, referral patterns, and changes to service provision have resulted in the present facilities being overcrowded. In addition, there have been ongoing recruitment and retention difficulties in the East EMDC. This standard business case sets out the issues, aims and objectives of the review project and appraises various options for future service delivery against these aims and objectives. ii) This case covers the review of the 3 operational EMDCs in Paisley, Edinburgh and Inverness together with the disaster recovery facility at Dundee. These EMDCs are responsible for the effective call handling of 999, doctors urgent and air ambulance calls, and the dispatch of an appropriate and timely ambulance response (or sub contracted first responder). iii) The purpose of this business case is to secure Board agreement for the recommended future service provision and any associated capital and revenue funding required to implement. Implementation arrangements are also proposed. Strategic Context and Project Objectives iv) The project objectives are to: ! deliver an EMDC service which effectively contributes to the management of Accident and Emergency services and performance; ! ensure a management structure within the EMDCs which improves the relationship between the dispatch function and operational crews; ! determine the most effective development and support infrastructure which meets staff expectations; ! review number, location, and role of EMDCs; ! investigate reasons for high staff turnover and recommend a strategy which addresses this; ! investigate the scope for partnership working to ensure accessible and safe patient care pathways; ! investigate systems and processes to enable enhanced levels of clinical decision making; ! engender specialisation within call taking to maximise call management opportunities, staff motivation and triage outcome. Options ! v) A long list of options was developed by the project board which was shortlisted, by a stakeholder group to: Option 1 Status Quo Option 2 3 EMDCs Option 3 3 dispatch centres and 1 call taking centre Option 4 6 dispatch centres and 3 call taking centres Option 5 3 EMDCs co-located with NHS24 Option 6 2 EMDCs EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 4 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! Economic Appraisal (Value For Money) vi) The appraisal examined the costs, benefits and risks of each option. The costs were built up using the Service’s specialist property advisors and in house ICT team combined with detailed technical workshops with telephony, radio and IT suppliers. The benefit criteria were developed by the project team and endorsed by the project board. A stakeholder group then scored each option against the benefit criteria. The Service’s Patient Focus and Public Involvement contact at the Scottish Health Council provided advice and support to the process. The risk assessments were prepared by the project team. Table ES/1 shows the value for money assessment: Table ES/1 Value for Money Assessment Option Equivalent Benefits Cost per Cost Risk Risk Annual Score Benefit per Score Rank Charge Benefit Rank 1 £14.357m 15,153 £947 3 16 2 2 £15.481m 16,242 £953 4 16 2 3 £15.040m 16,009 £940 2 16 2 4 £17.332m 15,908 £1,090 5 18 5 5 £15.460m 17,696 £874 1 15 1 6 £15.788m 13,685 £1,154 6 19 6 vii) Option 5, co-location with NHS24 is the preferred option, offering best value for money. The option has been subjected to sensitivity analysis and the assessment shown to be robust. viii) Option 5 would comprise: the West EMDC at Paisley moving to a new site at Cardonald at which NHSGG & C out of hours service, NHSGG & C financial services and NHS24 West Hub are moving to during 2008; the North EMDC, which already hosts the Inverness NHS24 spoke, being expanded to accommodate the new operational delivery model of enhanced clinical supervision of call taking and dispatch during 2009; and the East EMDC moving to the existing NHS24 East Hub at South Queensferry during 2010. The 3 new EMDCs would increasingly work as a virtual networked EMDC. Disaster Recovery facilities will be provided at the existing Paisley location. Financial Appraisal (Affordability) ! ix) Option 5 requires the following funding: Table es/2, Funding Requirements 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Totals Capital £0.300m £1,509m £1.306m (£1,759m) £1.356m New £0.590m £0.382m £0.361m £1.333m Revenue Total £0.300m £2,099m £1.688m (£1.398m) £2.689m x) The capital costs relate to estates costs to relocate Paisley and Edinburgh EMDCs to new sites within the same areas and to expand the Inverness site, together with upgraded Command and Control and telephony systems. It is proposed that these capital costs be funded from capital formula allocation monies and from disposal proceeds. xi) The revenue costs increases relate to the capital charges associated with the estates and ICT investments, some of which would be necessarily increased as part of the Service’s ICT Strategy. EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 5 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! xii) The revenue costs have been factored into the Service’s financial plan. Project Implementation ! xiii) Arrangements are in place to manage the implementation of the project. PRINCE2 project management methodology will be adopted. The Service has extensive experience in such an approach. The key stages in implementation are: Table ES/3, Implementation Timetable Action Timetable: by Approval of Standard Business Case 30th January 2008 Consultation & Involvement Feb 2008 to May 2010 Migrate West EMDC to Cardonald Site 22nd September 2008 Refurbish North EMDC March 2009 to September 2009 Commission Refurbished North EMDC October 2009 East EMDC to Norseman House November 2009 – May 2010 xiv) The risks associated with the implementation have been identified and risk management arrangements put in place. The key risks relate to the new radio system, and appropriate controls have been formulated. Post-Project Evaluation xv) End stage assessments will be undertaken by the project team and the Service’s Internal Auditors, Deloittes will review progress as part of their annual work plan. A final post project evaluation will be undertaken, 6 months after full implementation. Conclusions and Recommendations xvi) It is recommended the Board approve the implementation of option 5, co-locate with NHS24 in 3 centres, and authorise the Service to proceed with the procurement and implementation. ! EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 6 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! Section 1: Introduction and Background 1.1 Introduction The EMDC Review Project emerged as a key work-stream of the Scottish Ambulance Service’s Operational Performance Improvement Project (PIP) at which the drivers for change were originally identified. This business case sets out the EMDC Review Project objectives and describes all of the options that were considered. The short listing process is explained and detailed description is given for each of the short-listed options. The document then considers and assesses the benefits, risks and costs of each option by scoring each short listed option using accepted conventions for such evaluation as prescribed by the Capital Investment Group. From this evaluation, a preferred option is recommended to the Scottish Ambulance Service NHS Board. The Board is invited to consider and endorse this recommendation for funding and implementation. This business case follows Scottish Government guidance for projects of this size and impact and has been compiled by a small group of specialists who have used the findings of the EMDC Review Phase 1 Project Team and Project Board to populate the document. Emergency Medical Dispatch Centres are a vital part of Accident and Emergency service delivery so the timescales for the development of this business case have necessarily been tight. The implementation and migration timeframes described in the document assume that the Board will return its decision immediately after their January meeting. 1.2 Background In April 2000 the Board of the Scottish Ambulance Service established a project to review the number, function and location of the Service’s Operations Rooms. Operations Rooms managed both emergency and non-emergency requests and controlled the deployment of staff and vehicle resources to meet emergency, routine and major incident/event demand. There were eight such centres in Scotland, one of which (Aberdeen) also served as the air desk, controlling and co- ordinating patient air transport resources. The review was commissioned for three main reasons: ! Concerns about the quality and equitable provision of pre-hospital care ! Developments in information technology and systems had significantly enhanced opportunities to improve dispatch systems ! Reports by the National Audit Office and the Audit Committee of the Scottish Parliament recommended that a thorough review was required with a view to improving effectiveness and value for money in the management of ambulance deployment. As a consequence, the existing Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre model was designed and implementation was completed in March 2004. The rationalisation of the function into 3 Emergency Medical Dispatch Centres (EMDCs) and the creation of 30 PTS hospital based centres enabled the investment in information and communications technology that ensure our command and control and communications systems are amongst the most advanced in the UK. EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 7 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! However, during the past 4 years, there has been a significant increase in demand and this has placed an ongoing pressure on the Service to meet its performance standards for call pick up and for its response times to emergency requests. The command & control of an increasing number and complexity of emergency ambulance resources, an increase in demand, changes in referral patterns and a limited ability to expand within our existing accommodation were some of the drivers which prompted a further review of the function, number and location of our EMDCs. In an effort to quantify the resources required to adequately manage the demand that the Service is now experiencing, two consultant led resource modelling analysis exercises were conducted. In October 2006, Catalyst, a Mason Group company undertook an analysis of the call taking function using their sophisticated resource modelling tools.(1) In a separate exercise, the Service commissioned ORH Limited to undertake a resource/demand analysis of the dispatching function. Their report highlighted the need to increase the numbers of dispatch positions at peak demand times across our 3 EMDCs.(2) Although we are committed to move towards this number, we have experienced significant challenges due to limitations with the available accommodation and staff facilities. This was also reflected in comments we received in a recent staff survey. (3) Any further developments within our existing facilities must be considered a temporary solution and will not take account of any future requirements. The drivers for change for this current review include: ! Significant increases in demand ! New sources of demand ! High staff turnover, particularly in the East EMDC ! Limited accommodation availability, particularly in West and North EMDC ! Emerging NHS potential partners (NHS 24 & Out of Hours Hubs) ! Further technical & communications possibilities ! An increasing acknowledgement that the dispatch function is vital to meet performance targets ! Service Redesign ! Continued and developing need to support Service Resilience ! Advances in available technology 1. Copyright of Mason Group Ltd 2006 2. Dispatching Functions in the Three Controls – ORH Limited, 29 May 2007 3. http://samson/eresponse/run/reportprint.cfm?id=82 EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 8 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! 1.3 Objectives The objective of the project was to review the role, locations and numbers of Emergency Medical Dispatch Centres by conducting a thorough, research based analysis of the function as it currently stands and develop options which will ensure that, in the future, EMDCs are the world class facility that contribute optimally towards the operational performance of the Scottish Ambulance Service, are patient focussed, allow for the development of our staff, and ensure that the SAS contributes to the delivery of high quality healthcare within the wider NHSS. To deliver this, the following were the key project aims: To produce a range of options which would deliver an EMDC service which positively contributes to the management of emergency A&E performance To review the management structure and responsibilities in the current EMDC service and produce a model which improves the link between the dispatch function of the EMDC and the deployment of operational teams To review current EMDC infrastructure, at all levels, to determine the most effective development and support strategy which will meet our staff’s expectations To review the number, location and role of current EMDCs and to produce recommendations on future configuration To investigate the reasons for high staff turnover and to recommend a model or strategy which will address this and ensure that the EMDC Service is safe and sustainable To investigate the scope for partnership working with NHS partners and produce recommendations which will allow our EMDCs to facilitate management of all NHS resources ensuring that appropriate patient pathways exist and are accessible To investigate systems and processes which will enable an enhanced level of clinical decision making within the EMDC to support appropriate patient pathways To engender specialisation within the call taking process, to maximise call management opportunities, staff motivation and triage outcome EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 9 Scottish Ambulance Service EMDC Review Business Case! 1.4 Methodology Phase1 of the review project considered how the current EMDC service is delivered, taking into account the number of EMDCs, their location, physical condition and scope for expansion, the volume of calls handled, and the recruitment and retention situation. This information was used as part of the option development process when building up a range of options to offer to the Project Board for consideration. The Project Team also utilised research available in terms of call taking and dispatch, to ensure that options are fit for purpose and also meet the needs of the Service and its stakeholders. The team utilised PRINCE 2 methodology, completing a project plan, product log, risk and issue logs and the project was quality assured. Progress reports were presented to the Project Board at regular meetings. The Project Board considered and ratified the shortlist of options which the team then used to compile the business case. Project Team and Project Board Structure The following schematic, details the membership of the Project Board and Project Team. Project Sponsor Pauline Moore Project Board Project Director Sam Kennedy Convenor Project Team UNISON Karen McLachlan Ph(IaaMsnea D n1oa Pngaerolrdje)ct RPichhaMasread n 2Ma Pguerirorhjeecatd PhMaasnea 3g ePrr o(?je)ct CoTn&veGnor John Gallacher DeSAAvdy eGsvlotirsepeommernsse nt BobMQ Jauonhaanlgitsyet rone Cli&eR nDot beMRepearuptnt yCrae goPselerbronujterancttiv e ReDpLr eBMSsrceataNnnfutdfa lottyinves RReparye UHseseneptrba utivrnes RisMkM i&kae Rn Haeegsrielriireontce SNuzoanDn-Enireex ceDtcoaurwtivseo n D Kinnaird P Cook (?) (?) HR Advisor J Morrison Dorothy McKinney Jonathan Pryce Scottish Executive Systems Development Role of the Project Board Ian Shanley Executive Team Advisor The Project Board was chaired by the Project Sponsor and the Mark O’Donnel secretariat was provided by the Project Administrator. The Board Project Team received copies of the all Progress Reports. Regular Board meetings Manager were held to receive reports from the Project Manager and the Quality User Assessor and to direct, support & advise the Project Team. Representative Jim McCafferty Unscheduled Care Rep. C McFarlane- Slack Clinical Advisor G Crooks Alan Lawton Non-Executive Director Dr Ken Proctor NHS Highland Dr Lawrence Bidwell Argyll & Clyde John Morton PR Consultant Patient Representative tbc EMDC Review Project Business Case Final Version 1 23 January 2008 Page| 10

Description:
Page| 10. 1.4 Methodology. Phase1 of the review project considered how the current EMDC service is delivered, taking into account the number of Non-Executive. Director. Dr Lawrence. Bidwell. Argyll & Clyde. Dr Ken Proctor. NHS Highland. John Morton. PR Consultant. Patient. Representative tbc
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.