Table Of ContentEDUCATION IN A COMPETITIVE AND GLOBALIZING WORLD
S , T ,
CIENCE ECHNOLOGY
E ,
NGINEERING AND
M E
ATHEMATICS DUCATION
T A
RENDS AND LIGNMENT
W N
WITH ORKFORCE EEDS
No part of this digital document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or
by any means. The publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this digital document, but makes no
expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No
liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information
contained herein. This digital document is sold with the clear understanding that the publisher is not engaged in
rendering legal, medical or any other professional services.
E C
DUCATION IN A OMPETITIVE
G W
AND LOBALIZING ORLD
Additional books in this series can be found on Nova’s website
under the Series tab.
Additional e-books in this series can be found on Nova’s website
under the e-book tab.
EDUCATION IN A COMPETITIVE AND GLOBALIZING WORLD
S , T ,
CIENCE ECHNOLOGY
E ,
NGINEERING AND
M E
ATHEMATICS DUCATION
T A
RENDS AND LIGNMENT
W N
WITH ORKFORCE EEDS
TIMOTHY CURTIS
EDITOR
New York
Copyright © 2014 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, electrostatic, magnetic, tape,
mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the
Publisher.
For permission to use material from this book please contact us:
Telephone 631-231-7269; Fax 631-231-8175
Web Site: http://www.novapublishers.com
NOTICE TO THE READER
The Publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this book, but makes no
expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or
omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection
with or arising out of information contained in this book. The Publisher shall not be liable
for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting, in whole or in part, from
the readers’ use of, or reliance upon, this material. Any parts of this book based on
government reports are so indicated and copyright is claimed for those parts to the extent
applicable to compilations of such works.
Independent verification should be sought for any data, advice or recommendations
contained in this book. In addition, no responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any
injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from any methods, products,
instructions, ideas or otherwise contained in this publication.
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard
to the subject matter covered herein. It is sold with the clear understanding that the
Publisher is not engaged in rendering legal or any other professional services. If legal or any
other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent person should be sought.
FROM A DECLARATION OF PARTICIPANTS JOINTLY ADOPTED BY A
COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AND A COMMITTEE OF
PUBLISHERS.
Additional color graphics may be available in the e-book version of this book.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
ISBN: (cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:20)(cid:16)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:16)(cid:20)(cid:24)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:19) (eBook)
Published by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. † New York
CONTENTS
Preface vii
Chapter 1 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
(STEM) Education: A Primer 1
Heather B. Gonzalez and Jeffrey J. Kuenzi
Chapter 2 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
Education: Assessing the Relationship between
Education and the Workforce 47
United States Government Accountability Office
Index 125
PREFACE
Chapter 1 - The term “STEM education” refers to teaching and learning in
the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. It typically
includes educational activities across all grade levels— from pre-school to
post-doctorate—in both formal (e.g., classrooms) and informal (e.g.,
afterschool programs) settings. Federal policymakers have an active and
enduring interest in STEM education and the topic is frequently raised in
federal science, education, workforce, national security, and immigration
policy debates. For example, more than 225 bills containing the term “science
education” were introduced between the 102th and 112th congresses.
The United States is widely believed to perform poorly in STEM
education. However, the data paint a complicated picture. By some measures,
U.S. students appear to be doing quite well. For example, overall graduate
enrollments in science and engineering (S&E) grew 35% over the last decade.
Further, S&E enrollments for Hispanic/Latino, American Indian/Alaska
Native, and African American students (all of whom are generally
underrepresented in S&E) grew by 65%, 55%, and 50%, respectively. On the
other hand, concerns remain about persistent academic achievement gaps
between various demographic groups, STEM teacher quality, the rankings of
U.S. students on international STEM assessments, foreign student enrollments
and increased education attainment in other countries, and the ability of the
U.S. STEM education system to meet domestic demand for STEM labor.
Various attempts to assess the federal STEM education effort have
produced different estimates of its scope and scale. Analysts have identified
between 105 and 252 STEM education programs or activities at 13 to 15
federal agencies. Annual federal appropriations for STEM education are
typically in the range of $2.8 billion to $3.4 billion. All published inventories
viii Timothy Curtis
identify the Department of Education, National Science Foundation, and
Health and Human Services as key agencies in the federal effort. Over half of
federal STEM education funding is intended to serve the needs of
postsecondary schools and students; the remainder goes to efforts at the
kindergarten-through-Grade 12 level. Much of the funding for post-secondary
students is in the form of financial aid.
Federal STEM education policy concerns center on issues that relate to
STEM education as a whole—such as governance of the federal effort and
broadening participation of underrepresented populations—as well as those
that are specific to STEM education at the elementary, secondary, and
postsecondary levels. Governance concerns focus on perceived duplication
and lack of coordination in the federal effort; broadening participation
concerns tend to highlight achievement gaps between various demographic
groups. Analysts suggest a variety of policy proposals in elementary,
secondary, and postsecondary STEM education. At the K-12 level, these
include proposals to address teacher quality, accountability, and standards. At
the post-secondary level, proposals center on efforts to remediate and retain
students in STEM majors.
This report is intended to serve as a primer for outlining existing STEM
education policy issues and programs. It includes assessments of the federal
STEM education effort and the condition of STEM education in the United
States, as well as an analysis of several of the policy issues central to the
contemporary federal conversation about STEM education. Appendix A
contains frequently cited data and sources and Appendix B includes a selection
of major STEM-related acts.
Chapter 2 - Federal STEM education programs help enhance the nation’s
global competitiveness by preparing students for STEM careers. Researchers
disagree about whether there are enough STEM workers to meet employer
demand. GAO was asked to study the extent to which STEM education
programs are aligned with workforce needs.
GAO examined (1) recent trends in the number of degrees and jobs in
STEM fields, (2) the extent to which federal postsecondary STEM education
programs take workforce needs into consideration, and (3) the extent to which
federal K-12 STEM education programs prepare students for postsecondary
STEM education. GAO analyzed trends in STEM degrees and jobs since 2002
using 3 data sets—the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System,
American Community Survey, and Occupational Employment Statistics—and
surveyed 158 federal STEM education programs. There were 154 survey
respondents (97 percent): 124 postsecondary and 30 K-12 programs. In