ebook img

Science Communication 2005 - 2006: Vol 27 Index PDF

0.6 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Science Communication 2005 - 2006: Vol 27 Index

to SCIENCE COMMUNICATION Volume 27 Number 1 (September 2005) 1-164 Number 2 (December 2005) 165-328 Number 3 (March 2006) 329-XXX Number 4 (June 2006) XXX-XXX Authors: AKERELREA, CAROL, see Zimmerman, D. E. ALLAN, STUART, see Anderson, A. ANDERSON, ALISON, STUART ALLAN, ALAN PETERSEN, and CLARE WILKINSON, “The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press,” 200. ARSENAULT, DARIN J., LAURENCE D. SMITH, and EDITH A. BEAUCHAMP, “Visual Inscriptions in the Scientific Hierarchy: Mapping the ‘Treasures of Science’,” 376. BEAUCHAMP, EDITH A., see Arsenault, D. J. CAREY, JOHN, “Nanofuture: What's Next for Nanotechnology, by J. Storrs Hall” [Book Review], 311. CARR III, ARCHIE, “Heal the Ocean: Solutions for Saving Our Seas, by Rod Fujita” [Book Review], XXX. CHEW, FIONA, JUDITH MANDELBAUM- SCHMID, and SUE KUN GAO, “Can Health Journalists Bridge the State-of-the-Science Gap in Mammography Guidelines?” 331. CLARK, FIONA, and DEBORAH L. ILLMAN, “A Longitudinal Study of the New York Times Science Times Section,” XXX. COBB, MICHAEL D., “Framing Effects on Public Opinion About Nanotechnology,” 221. COLEMAN, CYNTHIA-LOU, and ERIN V. DYSART, “Framing of Kennewick Man against the Backdrop of a Scientific and Cultural Controversy,” 3. DIETRICH, HEATHER, see Schibeci, R. DURFEE, JESSICA L., “‘Social Change’ and ‘Status Quo’ Framing Effects on Risk Perception: An Exploratory Experiment,” XXX. DYSART, ERIN V., see Coleman, C. GAO, SUE KUN, see Chew, F. GROSSMAN, KARL, “Review: Alternative Media Aims at Environmental Issues” [Book Review], 317. GROSSMAN, KARL, “The E-Bomb: How America’s New Directed Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Future Wars Will Be Fought, by Doug Beason” [Book Review], 448. Science Communication, Vol. 27 No. 4, June 2006 581-584 DOI: 10.1177/1075547006289689 © 2006 Sage Publications 582. SCIENCE COMMUNICATION HARWOOD, JEFF, see Schibeci, R. HELLSTEN, IINA, see Leydesdorff, L. ILLMAN, DEBORAH L., see Clark, F. IRANI, TRACY, see Ruth, A. KEARNES, MATTHEW B., see Macnaghten, P. KERANEN, LISA, “Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science, by Ken Baake” [Book Review], 152. KIM, HYO, HAN WOO PARK, and MIKE THELWALL, “Comparing Academic Hyperlink Structures with Journal Publishing in Korea: A Social Network Analysis,” XXX. LEE, CHUL-JOO, DIETRAM A. SCHEUFELE, and BRUCE V. LEWENSTEIN, “Public Attitudes Toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects of Cognitions and Affect on Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology,” 240. LEWENSTEIN, BRUCE V., see Lee, C.-J. LEWENSTEIN, BRUCE V., “Introduction—Nanotechnology and the Public,” 169. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, and II[NA HELLSTEN, “Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication: Mapping the Case of Stem Cell Research,” 64. LUNDY, LISA, see Ruth, A. MACNAGHTEN, PHIL, MATTHEW B. KEARNES, and BRIAN WYNNE, “Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” 268. MANDELBAUM- SCHMID, JUDITH, see Chew, F. MONK, KERSTIN, “Why Some Like It Hot: Food, Genes, and Cultural Diversity, by Gary Paul Nabhan” [Book Review], XXX. O°’K EEFE, GARRETT J., see Zimmerman, D. E. PARK, HAN WOO, see Kim, H. PETERSEN, ALAN, see Anderson, A. PIDGEON, NICK, see Rowe, G. POORTINGA, WOUTER, see Rowe, G. PRIEST, SUSANNA HORNIG, “Commentary—Room at the Bottom of Pandora’s Box: Peril and Promise in Communicating Nanotechnology,” 292. ROGERS, CAROL L., “Report—The Nexus: Where Science Meets Society The 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science” [Report], 146. ROWE, GENE, WOUTER POORTINGA, and NICK PIDGEON, “A Comparison of Responses to Internet and Postal Surveys in a Public Engagement Context,” 352. RUTH, AMANDA, LISA LUNDY, RICKY TELG, and TRACY IRANI, “Trying to Relate: Media Relations Training Needs of Agricultural Scientists,” 127. SCHEUFELE, DIETRAM A., see Lee, C.-J. SCHIBECI, RENATO, JEFF HARWOOD, and HEATHER DIETRICH, “Community Involvement in Biotechnology Policy? The Australian Experience” [Report], 429. SEELY, RON, “Stargazer: The Life and Times of the Telescope, by Fred Watson” [Book Review], 447. SIMON, JAMES, “*The Environmental Communication Yearbook, Volume 2, edited by Susan L. Senecah” [Book Review], XXX. SMITH, JANE KAPLER, see Zimmerman, D. E. SMITH, LAURENCE D., see Arsenault, D. J. STEINKE, JOCELYN, “Cultural Representations of Gender and Science: Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Films,” 27. STEPHENS, LOWNDES F., “News Narratives About Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers,” 175. INDEX 583 TAVANA, GAUGAU, see Valenti, J. M. TELG, RICKY, see Ruth, A. THELWALL, MIKE, see Kim, H. VALENTI, JOANN M., and GAUGAU TAVANA, “Report: Continuing Science Education for Environmental Journalists and Science Writers: In Situ With the Experts” [Report], 300. VALENTI, JOANN MYER. “A Field Guide for Science Writers: The Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers, 2nd ed., Edited by Deborah Blum, Mary Knudson, and Robin Marantz Henig” [Book Review], 446. VALENTI, JOANN MYER, “Science and Sensibility: The Elegant Logic of the Universe, by Keith J. Laidler” [Book Review], 314. VALENTI, JOANN MYER, “Silent Snow: The Slow Poisoning of the Arctic, by Marla Cone” [Book Review], XXX. WARNOCK, SCOTT, “The Optometrist’s Rise to Power in the Health Care Market, or ‘It’s Optometric Physician, to You,” 100. WILKINS, LEE, “The First Idea: How Symbols, Language, and Intelligence Evolved from Our Primate Ancestors to Modern Humans, by Stanley I. Greenspan and Stuart G. Shanker” [Book Review], 150. WILKINSON, CLARE, see Anderson, A. WYNNE, BRIAN, see Macnaghten, P. ZIMMERMAN, DONALD E., CAROL AKERELREA, JANE KAPLER SMITH, and GARRETT J. O°’KEEFE, “Communicating Forest Management Science and Practices through Visualized and Animated Media Approaches to Community Presentations: An Exploration and Assessment.” XXX. Articles: “Can Health Journalists Bridge the State-of-the-Science Gap in Mammography Guidelines?” Chew et al., 331. “Commentary — Room at the Bottom of Pandora’s Box: Peril and Promise in Communicating Nanotechnology,” Priest, 292. “Communicating Forest Management Science and Practices through Visualized and Animated Media Approaches to Community Presentations: An Exploration and Assessment,” Zimmerman et al., XXX. “Comparing Academic Hyperlink Structures with Journal Publishing in Korea: A Social Network Analysis,” Kim et al., XXX. “A Comparison of Responses to Internet and Postal Surveys in a Public Engagement Context,” Rowe et al., 352. “Cultural Representations of Gender and Science: Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Films,” Steinke, 27. “Framing Effects on Public Opinion About Nanotechnology,” Cobb, 221. “Framing of Kennewick Man against the Backdrop of a Scientific and Cultural Controversy,” Coleman and Dysart, 3. “The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press,” Anderson et al., 200. “Introduction—Nanotechnology and the Public,” Lewenstein, 169 “A Longitudinal Study of the New York Times Science Times Section,” Clark and Illman, XXX “Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication: Mapping the Case of Stem Cell Research,” Leydesdorff and Hellsten, 64. 584 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION “Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” Macnaghten et al., 268. “News Narratives About Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers,” Stephens, 175. “The Optometrist’s Rise to Power in the Health Care Market, or ‘It’s Optometric Physician, to You,” Warnock, 100. “Public Attitudes Toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects of Cognitions and Affect on Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology,” Lee et al., 240. “*Social Change’ and ‘Status Quo’ Framing Effects on Risk Perception: An Exploratory Experiment,” Durfee, XXX. “Trying to Relate: Media Relations Training Needs of Agricultural Scientists,” Ruth et al., 127. “Visual Inscriptions in the Scientific Hierarchy: Mapping the ‘Treasures of Science’,” Arsenault et al., 376. Book Reviews: “The E-Bomb: How America’s New Directed Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Future Wars Will Be Fought, by Doug Beason,” Grossman, 448. “The Environmental Communication Yearbook, Volume 2, edited by Susan L. Senecah,” Simon, XXX. “A Field Guide for Science Writers: The Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers, 2nd ed., Edited by Deborah Blum, Mary Knudson, and Robin Marantz Henig,” Valenti, 446. “The First Idea: How Symbols, Language, and Intelligence Evolved from Our Primate Ancestors to Modern Humans, by Stanley I. Greenspan and Stuart G. Shanker,” Wilkins, 150. “Heal the Ocean: Solutions for Saving Our Seas, by Rod Fujita,’ Carr Il, XXX. “Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science, by Ken Baake,” Keranen, 152. “Nanofuture: What’s Next for Nanotechnology, by J. Storrs Hall,’ Carey, 311. “Review: Alternative Media Aims at Environmental Issues,’ Grossman, 317. “Science and Sensibility: The Elegant Logic of the Universe, by Keith J. Laidler,” Valenti, 314. “Silent Snow: The Slow Poisoning of the Arctic, by Marla Cone,” Valenti, XXX. “Stargazer: The Life and Times of the Telescope, by Fred Watson,” Seely, 447. “Why Some Like It Hot: Food, Genes, and Cultural Diversity, by Gary Paul Nabhan,” Monk, XXX. Report: “Community Involvement in Biotechnology Policy? The Australian Experience,” Schibeci et al., 429. “Report: Continuing Science Education for Environmental Journalists and Science Writers: In Situ With the Experts,” Valenti and Tavana, 300. “Report—The Nexus: Where Science Meets Society The 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science,” Rogers, 146.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.