School principals: core actors in educational improvement An analysis of seven Asian countries prepared for ANTRIEP by Maheswari Kandasamy and Lia Blaton Paris 2004 UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning School principals: core actors in educational improvement An analysis of seven Asian countries This document is the result of research undertaken by the Asian Network of Training and Research Institutions in Educational Planning (ANTRIEP). The views and opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and should in no way be attributed to UNESCO, the IIEP or to any of the institutions which are members of ANTRIEP. This volume has been printed in IIEP’s printshop Cover design by Corinne Hayworth International Institute for Educational Planning 7-9 rue Eugène Delacroix, 75116 Paris ISBN 92-803-1254-5 © UNESCO 2004 Contents Introduction 7 I. Basic facts and data 13 1. Background information about the education system 13 1.1 Administrative set-up 13 1.2 Structure 18 1.3 Intermezzo: the public-private distinction 23 1.4 Level of expansion and quality of education 25 2. Statistical data on head teachers 35 2.1 Distribution by gender 35 2.2 Distribution by age and teaching experience 37 2.3 Distribution by qualification 39 II. Roles and functions of head teachers 41 1. The management of schools at local level 41 1.1 Hierarchical structure in schools 41 1.2 Administration and management 50 1.3 Community representatives 53 1.4 Conclusion 60 2. The role of head teachers 60 2.1 Official job descriptions of head teachers 61 2.2 Main functions 62 2.3 The role of the head teacher: some comments 74 2.4 Strategies used by head teachers 74 2.5 Main problems 76 III. The management of head teachers 79 1. Recruitment 79 1.1 Qualifications of candidates 79 5 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep Contents 1.2 Who is in charge of the appointment? 84 1.3 Recruitment procedure 88 2. Financial conditions 95 2.1 Salaries 95 2.2 How do salaries of head teachers compare with other salaries? 97 2.3 Special allowances 99 3. Posting and transfer practices 101 4. Career development 105 4.1 Career prospects and promotion possibilities 105 4.2 Evaluation of head teachers 106 4.3 Dismissal rules and practices 110 5. Training 112 5.1 Induction training 112 5.2 In-service training 116 6. Support 123 6.1 Manuals 123 6.2 Regulations/law 124 6.3 Support from supervisors/inspectors 126 IV. Main problems and major innovations 133 1. A reminder of the main problems 133 1.1 Autonomy and support 134 1.2 Specific management issues 135 1.3 Relations with the community 136 2. Major innovations 139 2.1 Structure 140 2.2 Personnel management 142 2.3 Training 144 2.4 Finances 145 Conclusion 147 6 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep Introduction This volume discusses and describes from a comparative perspective the role of head teachers in seven different Asian countries: Bangladesh, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, Republic of Korea1, and Sri Lanka. The report is based on a series of studies written by institutions, which are members of the Asian Network of Training and Research Institutions in Educational Planning (ANTRIEP).2 These studies were presented at an international seminar organized in September 2000 in Shanghai on Better school management: the role of the head teacher. This introduction first explains why that particular theme was chosen and then presents briefly the socio-economic situation of the seven countries under study. 1. Objectives and scope The seminar started off from the conviction, supported by much research, that the quality of education primarily depends on the way schools are managed and that the capacity of schools to improve teaching and learning is strongly mediated by the quality of the leadership provided by the head teacher. Most countries have made those conclusions their own and have therefore undertaken actions to support decentralization and to strengthen local management. These reforms invariably affect internal school 1. The adjective ‘Korean’ is used in this document to refer to the Republic of Korea. 2. More information on this network can be found at the end of this volume. 7 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep School principals: core actors in educational improvement An analysis of seven Asian countries management and the role of the school heads. The gradual move towards school-based management and enhanced autonomy of schools automatically implies that the educational institutions are entrusted with more responsibilities. It also demands different, non- traditional managerial skills from the head teacher. The way head teachers manage and lead their schools and teachers is not only influenced by their capacities and skills, but as much by recruitment and posting procedures, evaluation practices and by the provision of incentives, such as an attractive career ladder. This implies that, in order to strengthen the role of the head teacher, it is not sufficient to examine the way they manage their schools, but one also needs to look at the efforts made by national authorities to develop the job of head teacher into an attractive profession. The seminar’s overall objective was to identify policies and strategies that would improve the quality of schools by strengthening the leadership and management capacities of head teachers. In the workshop, an overview of the situation in different Asian countries and government policies concerning the management of the profession of head teachers was presented. Promising strategies to improve the role of head teachers in leading and managing schools were explored, and existing capacity-building activities for head teachers were examined. Strategies to reinforce them were also discussed. The objectives of this comparative analysis, which strongly reflects the seminar’s discussions and conclusions are, firstly, to present the basic information on head teachers in different Asian countries; secondly, to analyze their roles and functions and the ways in which they are being managed; and finally to suggest innovative strategies in order to strengthen their impact on the quality and effectiveness of schools. 8 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep Introduction 2. Background: social and economic development of the countries According to the Human Development Index3 and the Human Development Classification4 (Table 1 shows selected indicators of human development) the countries of this study can be divided into three groups: the Republic of Korea falls under ‘countries with a high human development’, the second group consists of Malaysia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka and has a ‘medium human development’, and Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh fall under the category ‘low human development’. 3. UNDP. 2002. Human development report 2002. Deepening democracy in a fragmented world. UNDP (www.undp.org/hdr2002). 4. All countries are classified into three clusters by achievement in human development: high human development (HDI 0.800 or above), medium human development (HDI between 0.500-0.799) and low human development (HDI less than 0.500). 9 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep School principals: core actors in educational improvement An analysis of seven Asian countries Table 1. Human development indicators5 Life Adult GDP per Human HDI expectancy literacy rate capita development rank at birth (% age 15 Index (years) and above) (PPP US$) (HDI) 2000 2000 2000 value 2000 High human development Korea (Rep. of) 74.9 97.8 17,380 0.882 27 Medium human development Malaysia 72.5 87.5 9,068 0.782 59 Philippines 69.3 95.3 3,971 0.754 77 Sri Lanka 72.1 91.6 3,530 0.741 89 Low human development Pakistan 60.0 43.2 1,928 0.499 138 Nepal 58.6 41.8 1,327 0.490 142 Bangladesh 59.4 41.3 1,602 0.478 145 Table 2 completes these data with other background information, indicating huge differences between the countries. The percentage population living in the urban areas reflects the level of development, so does to a lesser extent the foreign aid they receive: the Republic of Korea is actually a donor, while in particular Sri Lanka and Nepal receive a significant amount of foreign aid, when expressed per person. 5. UNDP. 2002. Human development report 2002. Deepening democracy in a fragmented world. UNDP (www.undp.org/hdr2002). 10 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep Introduction Table 2. World development indicators6 Total population Urban population Aid per capita (millions) (% of total population) (US$) 2001 2001 2000 Korea (Rep. of) 48 82 -4 Malaysia 24 58 2 Philippines 77 59 8 Sri Lanka 20 23 14 Bangladesh 133 25 9 Nepal 24 12 17 Pakistan 141 33 5 Though the study focuses on the management of head teachers, it is necessary to keep in mind these economic and social differences and similarities. 3. Method of comparative analysis The national diagnoses, which were all prepared following similar guidelines, had as a main objective to develop a comprehensive understanding of the role and functions of head teachers and of the critical issues involved in the management of head teachers by national and sub-national authorities. The diagnoses generally covered primary and general secondary schools, while making a distinction between these two levels. Furthermore, differences between private and public schools 6. Data from World development indicators database (www.worldbank.org). 11 International Institute for Educational Planning http://www.unesco.org/iiep
Description: