ebook img

Scattering of internal waves from small sea bottom inhomogeneities PDF

0.12 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Scattering of internal waves from small sea bottom inhomogeneities

Scattering of internal waves from small sea bottom inhomogeneities 7 0 0 2 A. D. Zakharenko n a J Il’ichev Pacific oceanological institute, Baltiyskay St. 43, 9 Vladivostok, 41, 690041, Russia 1 ] h p Abstract - o Theproblem of scattering of linear internal waves from small com- a . pact sea bottom inhomogeneities is considered from the point of view s c of mode-to-mode scattering. A simple formula for modal conversion i s coefficients C , quantifying the amount of energy that is scattered nm y into the n-th mode from the incident field m-th mode, is derived. In h p thisformulatherepresentation ofinhomogeneities bytheir expansions [ into the Fourier and Fourier-Bessel series with respect to angular and 1 radial coordinates respectively are used. Results of calculations, per- v formed in a simple model case, are presented. The obtained formula 1 2 can be used for a formulation of the inverse problem, as it was done 2 in the acoustic case [2, 3]. 1 Keywords: internal wave, scattering 0 7 0 / 1 Introduction s c i s The concept of mode-to-mode scattering was considered in the context of y h the acoustic scattering fromsmall compact irregularities of theocean floorby p Wetton,Fawcett[1]. Intheirworksomesimpleformulasformodalconversion : v coefficients, quantifying the amount of energy that is scattered from one i X normal mode of the sound field to another, were derived. Recently new r formulas for these coefficients were obtained by Zakharenko [2] and applied a to the inverse scattering problem in the subsequent work [3]. This paper contains the detailed derivation of such formulas in the case of scattering of linear internal waves from small compact sea bottom inhomogeneities. Some numerical examples are presented. 1 2 Formulation and derivation of the main re- sult We shalluse thelinearized equations forinviscid, incompressible stably strat- ified fluid, written for the harmonic dependence on the time with the factor e−iωt in the form iωρ u+βP = 0, 0 x − iωρ v+βP = 0, 0 y − iωρ w +βP +βρ = 0, (1) 0 z 1 − iωρ +wρ = 0, 1 0z − u +v +w = 0, x y z where x, y, and z are the Cartesian co-ordinates with the z-axis directed upward, ρ = ρ (z) is he undisturbed density, ρ = ρ (x,y,z) is the pertur- 0 0 1 1 bation of density due to motion, P is the pressure, and u, v w are the x, y and z components of velocity respectively. The variables are nondimen- ¯ sional, based on a length scale h(a typical vertical dimension), a time scale N¯−1 (where N¯ is a typical value of the Brunt-V¨ais¨ala frequency), and a den- sity scale ρ¯ (a typical value of the density). The parameter β is g/(h¯N¯2), where g is the gravity acceleration. The boundary conditions for these equations are w = 0 at z = 0, (2) w = uH vH at z = H, x y − − − where H = H(x,y) is the bottom topography. We introduce a small parameter ǫ, and postulate that the components of velocity and the pressure are represented in the form u = u +ǫu +..., v = v +ǫv +..., 0 1 0 1 w = w +ǫw +..., P = P +ǫP +... 0 1 0 1 We suppose also that the bottom topography is represented in the form H = h + ǫh , where h is constant and h = h (x,y) is a function of x, 0 1 0 1 1 y vanishing outside the bounded domain Ω, which in the sequel is called a domain of inhomogeneity. Excluding from the system (1) ρ and substituting the introduced expan- 1 sions, we obtain 2 iωρ (u +ǫu +...)+β(P +ǫP +...) = 0, 0 0 1 0x 1x − iωρ (v +ǫv +...)+β(P +ǫP +...) = 0, 0 0 1 0y 1y − (3) (ω2ρ +βρ )(w +ǫw +...)+iωβ(P +ǫP +...) = 0, 0 0z 0 1 0z z1 (u +ǫu +...)+(v +ǫv +...)+w +ǫw +... = 0, 0x 1x 0y 1y 0z 1z with the boundary conditions w +ǫw +... = 0 at z = 0, 0 1 w +ǫw +... = (u +ǫu +...)(h +ǫh ) (4) 0 1 0 1 x0 1x − ǫ(v +ǫv +...)(h +...) at z = H. 0 1 1y − − Separating terms in various orders of ǫ, we obtain a sequence of boundary problems. At order O(ǫ0) we have iωρ u +βP = 0, 0 0 0x − iωρ v +βP = 0, 0 0 0y − (5) (ω2ρ +βρ )w +iωβP = 0, 0 0z 0 0z u +v +w = 0, 0x 0y 0z with the boundary conditions w = 0 at z = 0 0 w = 0 at z = h . 0 0 − Differentiating the third equation in (5) twice with respect to x and twice with respect to y, summing obtainedequations andreplacing β(P +P ) 0zxx 0zyy by iω(ρ w ) , we obtain 0 0z z − (ω2ρ +βρ )(w +w )+ω2(ρ w ) = 0. (6) 0 0z 0xx 0yy 0 0z z We seek a solution to this equation in the form of the sum of normal modes w = ei(kx+ly)φ(z), where φ is the eigenfunction of the spectral boundary 0 problem (ω2ρ +βρ )(k2 +l2)φ+ω2(ρ φ ) = 0, 0 0z 0 z z − (7) φ(0) = φ( h ) = 0, 0 − with the eigenvalue λ = k2 + l2. It is well known that the problem (7) has countably many eigenvalues λ , which are all positive. The corresponding n real eigenfunctions φ we normalize by the condition n 0 ω2 0 ω2ρ +βρ φ2dz = ρ (φ )2dz = 1. (8) −Z−h0(cid:0) 0 0z(cid:1) k2 +l2 Z−h0 0 z 3 The eigenfunctions φ and φ with n = m are also orthogonal n m 6 (φ ,φ ) = 0 (9) n m with respect to the inner product 0 (φ,ψ) = ω2ρ +βρ φψdz (10) 0 0z −Z−h0(cid:0) (cid:1) In our scattering problem w is the incident field, and we shall calculate the 0 main term of scattering field w , so we act in the framework of the Born 1 approximation. At the first order of ǫ we obtain the following system of equations: iωρ u +βP = 0, 0 1 1x − iωρ v +βP = 0, 0 1 1y − (11) (ω2ρ +βρ )w +iωβP = 0, 0 0z 1 1z u +v +w = 0, 1x 1y 1z with the boundary conditions w = 0 at z = 0, 1 (12) w = u h v h at z = h ǫh . 1 0 1x 0 1y 0 1 − − − − Sofarasweareinteresting intheconnection ofmodalcontents ofincident and scattering fields, we suppose that the incident field consists of one mode w = ei(knx+lny)φ (z). Reducing the second boundary condition (12) to the 0 n boundaryz = h withtakingintoaccounttheexplicit formofw , weobtain 0 0 − the new boundary condition for w at the boundary z = h : 1 0 − ik il w = h n h n h ei(knx+lny)φ . (13) 1 1 1x 1y nz (cid:18) − k2 +l2 − k2 +l2 (cid:19) n n n n Reducing the system (11) in the same manner as it was done for the system (5), we obtain the equation for w : 1 (ω2ρ +βρ )(w +w )+ω2(ρ w ) = 0. (14) 0 0z 1xx 1yy 0 1z z We seek the scattering field in the form w = N C (x,y)φ , the func- 1 m=1 nm m tions C (x,y) are called the modal conversioPn coefficients. To obtain the nm equationforC wesubstitutethepostulatedformofw tothe(13),multipli- nm 1 cate it by the function φ and integrate from h to 0. Using the conditions m 0 − of orthogonality and normalization (8), (9) and the boundary condition (13), we finally obtain 4 ∂2 ∂2 C + C +(k2 +l2 )C = F, (15) ∂x2 nm ∂y2 nm m m nm where ik il F = ω2ρ h n h n h ei(knx+lny)φ ( h )φ ( h ). 0 1 1x 1y nz 0 mz 0 (cid:18) − k2 +l2 − k2 +l2 (cid:19) − − n n n n Writing the solution to the equation (15) as the convolution of the fundamental solution (Green function) of the Helmholtz operator G = ( i/4)H(1)( k2 +l2 R) with the right-hand side F, we have − 0 m m p i C (x ,y ) = FH(1)( k2 +l2 R)dydx, (16) nm r r −4 Z Z 0 m m p x y where R = (x x )2 +(y y )2 andby theindex r we designate thepoint r r − − of registratipon of the field. Integrating by parts the terms containing h ,h and passing to the 1x 1y cylindrical coordinatesystem with the origin in our domain of inhomogeneity and such that k = κ , l = 0, x = rcosα, y = rsinα, we obtain n n n ∞ 2π 1κ C = mG h eiκnrcosαcos(ψ α )H(1)(κ R)rdαdr, (17) nm −4 κ Z Z 1 − r 1 m n 0 0 G = ω2ρ φ ( h )φ ( h ), R = r2 +r2 2rr cos(α α ), (r ,α ) are 0 nz − 0 mz − 0 r − r − r r r the polar coordinates of the registraption point, tan(ψ) = rsin(α α )/(r r r − − rcos(α α )). r − Using the addition theorem for the Bessel functions we express contained (1) (1) in (17) cosψH (κ R) and sinψH (κ R) in the form: 1 m 1 m ∞ cos(ψ) H(1)(κ R) = H(1) (κ r )J (κ r) cosk(α−αr) . sin(ψ) 1 m k+1 m r k m sink(α−αr) n o kX=−∞ n o From now on we shall assume that the distance r to the registration point r (1) is big enough to replace the functions H (κ r ) by their asymptotics k+1 m r (1) H (κ r ) 2/(πκ r )exp[i(κ r (π/2)(k+1) π/4)]. k+1 m r ≈ m r m r − − p Then, expanding h (r,α) as function of α in Fourier series with the coeffi- 1 ˜ cients h (r), after integration with respect to α, we obtain 1ν 5 ∞ i√2π√κ exp(iκ r iπ/4) C = m m r − Gcosα (i)νe−iνα0 nm r 2 κ √r n r νX=−∞ (18) ∞ ∞ e−ikαr h˜ (r)J (κ r)J (κ r)rdr 1ν k m ν+k n × Z kX=−∞ 0 Changing the order of integration and summation we can achieve further simplification by using the formula ∞ J (κ r)J (κ r)e−ikαr = J (ξr)e−iνθ, k m ν+k n ν kX=−∞ κ sinα where ξ = κ2 +κ2 2κ κ cosα , θ = arctan m r . We ex- m n − m n r κ κ cosα p ˜ n − m r pand now the radial coefficients h (r) on the segment [0,L], where they do 1ν not vanish, in the Fourier-Bessel series ∞ γν h˜ (r) = fνJ pr , 1ν p ν (cid:18) L (cid:19) Xp=1 where γν are the positive roots of the function J , J (γν) = 0. Substituting p ν ν p this expansion in (18) and taking into account that L γν L2γνJ (ξL)J′(γν) J pr J (ξr)rdr = − p ν ν p , Z ν (cid:18) L (cid:19) ν γν2 ξ2L2 p − 0 we obtain the final expression for modal conversion coefficients iL2√2π√κ exp(iκ r iπ/4) m m r C = − Gcosα nm r − 2 κ √r n r (19) ∞ ∞ γνJ′(γν) (i)νJ (ξL)e−iν(α0+θ) fν p ν p . × ν p γν2 ξ2L2 νX=−∞ Xp=1 p − 6 3 Numerical examples For a model example we choose ρ = e−λz,β = λ−1 and H = 1 . Then the spectral boundary problem is written in the form ω2φ ω2λφ κ2(ω2 1)φ = 0, zz z − − − φ(0) = 0, φ( 1) = 0. − The eigenfunctions of such a problem are φ = Aeλz/2sin((l+1)πz) with the eigenvalues ω (l+1)2π2 +λ2/4 κ = . p √1 ω2 − Here A = √2/(√1 ω2) by the condition (9). For the calculations the value − of parameter λ was taken to be equal to 0.003 , which corresponds to the typical stratification in the ocean shelf zones. The domain of inhomogeneity has the form of the ellipse with the big and small radii a and b of which were taken in proportion a : b = 2 : 1, and in this region x2 y2 h (x,y) = 0.05 1 . 1 r − a2 − b2 In the figure are presented the results of calculations with ω = 0.5 and the angle of incident field α = 0, conducted for various wave sizes κa of the 0 scatterer. We note that according to the meaning of the small parameter ǫ, in these calculations ǫ = 0.05. For the presentation of results we use the scattering amplitude eiκmrr −1 F (α ) = C (α ). nm r nm r (cid:18) √r (cid:19) r References [1] Wetton, B. T. R., Fawcett, J. A. Scattering fromsmall three-dimensional irregularitiesintheoceanfloor.J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol.85.(1989),No4, pp. 1482-1488. [2] Zakharenko, A. D. Sound scattering by small compact inhomogeneities in a sea waveguide. Acoustical Physics, vol. 46 (2000), pp. 160-163. [3] Zakharenko, A. D. Sound scattering by small compact inhomogeneities in a sea waveguide. Acoustical Physics, vol. 46 (2000), pp. 160-163. 7 90 90 0.015 0.02 120 60 120 60 0.015 0.01 150 30 150 0.01 30 0.005 0.005 180 0 180 0 210 330 210 330 240 300 240 300 270 270 (a) F11 (b) F12 | | | | 90 90 0.05 0.08 120 60 120 60 0.04 0.06 0.03 150 30 150 0.04 30 0.02 0.02 0.01 180 0 180 0 210 330 210 330 240 300 240 300 270 270 (c) F11 (d) F12 | | | | 90 90 0.8 0.15 120 60 120 60 0.6 0.1 150 0.4 30 150 30 0.05 0.2 180 0 180 0 210 330 210 330 240 300 240 300 270 270 (e) F11 (f) F12 | | | | Figure 1: Absolute value of scattering amplitude: κa = 1 (a,b), κa = 2 (c,d), κa = 8 (f,g) 8

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.