Joseph Drew Saving Local Government Financial Sustainability in a Challenging World Saving Local Government Joseph Drew Saving Local Government Financial Sustainability in a Challenging World Joseph Drew University of Technology Sydney and Tokyo Metropolitan University Moonbi, NSW, Australia ISBN 978-981-16-4331-6 ISBN 978-981-16-4332-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4332-3 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721, Singapore Contents 1 Saving Local Government: Financial Sustainability in a Challenging World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Why Save Local Government? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Why I Wrote This Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Kal Vahomer and Personal Budgets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 A Health Metaphor and Outline of Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Using This Book as a Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 My Hope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2 Principles of Local Government Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Natural Law and Local Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 The Wherefore of Local Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 The Decentralisation Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 The Principle of Subsidiarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Principle of Double Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Prescription and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3 Evaluating Public Policy Interventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Three Lenses Through Which to View Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 An Epistemology of Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 A Moral Lens for Evaluating Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Prescription and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Concluding Comments for Part I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 v vi Contents 4 Local Government Amalgamations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Key Theoretical Concepts Associated with Amalgamation . . . . . . . . . . 45 Why Amalgamations Often Fail to Live Up to Expectations . . . . . . . . . 53 The Special Case of Rural Local Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Alternatives to Radical Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Conclusion and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5 Local Government De-Amalgamation and Boundary Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Key Theoretical Concepts Associated with De-Amalgamation and Boundary Reductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Planning an Efficacious Separation – A Detailed Template . . . . . . . . . . 74 Post-separation Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Conclusions and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 6 Moral Expenditure and Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 Natural Law and Government Finance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 Public Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 Merit Goods, Goods with Externalities, and Subsidium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Private Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 Conclusions and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 7 Local Government Debt and Intergovernmental Grants . . . . . . . . . . 117 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Supplements and Their Effects – The Importance of Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Local Government Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 Intergovernmental Grants and Minimising Fiscal Illusion . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Conclusions and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 8 Local Government and the Common Good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 The Common Good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 Discovering the Common Good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 Planning the Common Good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Conclusions and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 Concluding Comments for Part II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 Appendix: The Duties of the King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 Contents vii 9 Local Government Fiscal Emergency Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 Warning Signs of Impending Crisis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 Emergency Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 A Mentor Model for Providing Help . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 The Fiscal Physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 Conclusions and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 10 The Prognosis for Local Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 Change of Philosophy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 Conclusions and Prescriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 Chapter 1 Saving Local Government: Financial Sustainability in a Challenging World Truth does not become more true by virtue of the fact that the entire world agrees with it, nor less so even if the whole world disagrees with it. Maimonides, The Guide for the Perplexed (1956 [1190]) Abstract In this chapter I make the case for why we should save local government. Following this I discuss a recent consulting engagement for a beautiful community that motivated me to go through the toil of writing yet another book. Thereafter I outline the rhetorical practice of kal vahomer and explain how it can help us gain new insights into morally licit local government finance. I then discuss the major areas that we will examine throughout this book, before revealing my hopes for both this tome and local government. Why Save Local Government? Local government across the globe provides important public goods and services upon which most of us rely on a daily basis. Curiously though, few of us acknowl- edge this close dependence on local government – rarely do we give local govern- ment a thought as we drive along its roads, take our trash out to the bin, or turn on our faucets. Indeed, you probably take it for granted that you will be able to access these services on a daily basis, and that your children and grandchildren will also benefit from similar services in the future. However, as an increasing number of communities are finding out – much to their dismay – this assumption is far from an apodictic (beyond dispute) premise. For instance, in the Australian state where I live, Central Darling Shire effectively became insolvent in December 2013 leading to a period of at least ten years of financial administration. Jobs were slashed, services such as rubbish collection deemed discretionary extravagances, and the community was denied a voice in the © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 1 J. Drew, Saving Local Government, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4332-3_1 2 1 Saving Local Government: Financial Sustainability in a Challenging World affairs of what is supposed to be the level of government closest to the people (Drew &Campbell, 2016). Indeed, between writing this chapter and going to print yet another local government in New South Wales, Australia, was forced into financial administration – Central Coast (a large metropolitan Council which was amalgam- ated in May 2016). I know similar bankruptcies and solvency crises have occurred abroad – most notably in the United States, but also the United Kingdom, Germany, South America, and China. The events are not always well-publicised and sometimes clandestine bailouts are executed to avoid public exposure. But what these events have in com- mon is that they show us that our assumptions about continued service provision are probably much shakier than most of us would like to believe. When local governments fail financially people suffer. In addition to the direct job effects and service interruptions that I noted earlier, there are also a number of indirect effects. Especially for the case of rural areas, the failure of a local government repre- sents a large shock to the local economy because invariably local government is both the major employer as well as the employer of choice (in terms of wages and condi- tions). A reduction in jobs therefore flows on to local retailers. In addition, where municipal bonds are traded (something that doesn’t happen in my part of the world), substantial wealth may also disappear when local governments fail. Moreover, the almost inevitable bailout by higher tiers of government – whether it is done openly or behind closed doors – means that other local governments and taxpayers across the state all end up effectively paying to fix a problem that they had no part in making. For example, in the case of Central Darling Shire in New South Wales (NSW) Australia, intergovernmental grants rose by around twenty-two percent in the first few years fol- lowing administration, despite a freeze to the overall federal grants programme. What this means is that close to a million dollars was taken out of the grant money pool that would ordinarily have been destined for other local government areas in the state. When the local government in question is an isolated case of financial failure in the remote outback, 970 km from the capital city of Sydney, few know about the consequences and even fewer seem to care. However, as we begin to accumulate multiple failures, as well as failures in much more densely populated areas, then we will end up with much more pervasive effects on people’s lives that will force us to care. In times past, I used to boldly predict that the next financial crisis would be a crisis brought about by sub-national financial failure. However, the economically destructive public policy responses to COVID-19 saw my prophecy fail to be realised. Nevertheless, I haven’t given up my fear that eventually the sub-national financial crisis I predicted will indeed come to pass. Even if we manage to avoid the wide-ranging financial failures of local govern- ment that I fear, we will still all lose out if we neglect to save local government. As you will discover throughout this book I have a firm belief in the potential for local government to be much more than it is – to perform more of the functions we rely on and care about (often currently delivered by state and federal governments), provide a greater voice for citizens about matters integral to their lives, and help us all to fight back against Leviathan-like central governments that ‘uses its subjects as beasts, according to the violence of their own wills and inclinations…as wholly car- ried away with the lust of power’ (the first century historian Josephus Flavius in Why I Wrote This Book 3 Whiston, 1987, p. 156). In short, I believe that local government could be the key to greater freedom and a more just world,1 but only if it is strong and vigorous – not on life-support as so many local governments appear to be. Why I Wrote This Book At the beginning of 2020 I had the absolute honour to provide expert help to a strug- gling rural community of around 10,000 souls reeling from the effects of an unpop- ular forced amalgamation programme three years earlier. This was by no means my first engagement in consulting, nor likely to be my last. But it got me thinking about the desperate need for real independent expertise which stands in stark contrast to most of the snake-oil commercial consultants I have encountered who take local community money and invariably leave a bigger mess behind them than what moti- vated the initial engagement in the first place. During the course of three months I worked closely with the elected representa- tives, executives, media, and the community. What I found myself dealing with was a group of wonderful people all wanting to genuinely do their best but, without the anchor of theory and independent advice, having no idea what ‘the best’ was. Like any group of people there was a mix of perspectives that needed to be responded to. Some simply didn’t want to face the facts – that their local government was quickly going insolvent and that the obvious solutions were either more revenue or less expenditure. Others wanted to avoid hard decisions that would cause pain, and also avoid acknowledging that the longer decisions were put off the more pain would ultimately have to be suffered. Yet others were distracted by every piece of advice they could source from social media or self-professed experts and had to be con- stantly brought back to focus on the substantive matters at hand. Moreover, a large part of the community were still angry that they had been forced into an unpopular amalgamation, in the first place, and simply wanted to blame the other community and the state government for their woes. It was a challenging mix of emotions and perspectives for an academic – who like most scholars – is more comfortable with books than people. But despite all the chaos and frustrating obstacles put before us by well meaning, and not so well- meaning, meddlers we did arrive at a plan for a path forward for the community. What impressed me most about this experience was the willingness and capacity of everyday people to learn about local government, engage with theory, and weigh up the pros and cons of various courses of action. In a public meeting, just as the hysteria of COVID-19 was commencing, around 400 people generously gave up over an hour of their time to listen to an address about the options and a plan for a path forward. Many spoke to me for some time afterwards and I was heartened by the thought and sophistication of the questions they put to me. 1 This is the topic of the third (and last) book of this series, provisionally titled Natural Law and Government, due to be completed sometime in 2022.