ebook img

San Francisco bicycle plan: final environmental impact report PDF

2009·29.7 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview San Francisco bicycle plan: final environmental impact report

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME 1 SAN FRANCISCO BICYCLE PLAN San Francisco Planning Department City and County of San Francisco Case No. 2007.0347E August 2009 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS DEPT State Clearinghouse No. 2008032052 FEB 2 3 20I2 Draft EIR Publication Date: November 26, 2008 SAN FRANCISCO PUBL,C LIBRARY D Draft EIR Public Hearing Date: January 8, 2009 REF 388.3472 IR Public Comment Period: November 26, 2008 - January 13, 2009 Sa578f v.l Final EIR Certification Date: June 25, 2009 5/S San Francisco PublicLibrary Government Information Center San Francisco Public Library 100 Larkin Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 REFERENCE BOOK Nottobetakenfrom thelibrary 3 1223 09951 3880 FILE NO. 090913 MOTION NO. 1 [Affirming certification ofthe Bicycle Plan Project FEIR] 2 3 Motion affirming the certification by the Planning Commission of the Final 4 Environmental impact Report for the 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Plan Project. 5 6 WHEREAS, The City and County of San Francisco, through its San Francisco 7 Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) and Planning Commission (collectively, the "Project 8 Sponsor") is proposing adoption of the 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Transportation Plan, 9 which includes minor, long-term, and near-term improvements for the bicycle route network, 10 and amendments to the General Plan and Planning Code to reflect said Bicycle Plan, (the 11 "Project"); and 12 WHEREAS, The MTA Board of Directors, in its Resolution No. 07-012, adopted 13 January 30, 2007, initiated the process for environmental review of the Project and thereafter 14 applied to the Planning Department for environmental review of the Project (City Planning 15 Case No. 2007.0347E); and 16 WHEREAS, The Planning Department for the City and County of San Francisco (the 17 "Department") determined that an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was required and 18 provided public notice of that determination by publication in a newspaper of general 19 circulation on June 5, 2007; and 20 WHEREAS, On November 26, 2008, the Department published the Draft 21 Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the Project; and 22 WHEREAS, On January 8, 2009, the Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on 23 the DEIR, at which time opportunity for public comment was received on the DEIR. and 24 written comments were received through January 13, 2009; and 25 Clerk ofthe Board BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pag* 1 7M7/2008 WHEREAS, The Department prepared responses to comments received at the public 1 2 hearing on the DEIR and submitted in writing to the Department, prepared revisions to the text 3 of the DEIR and published a Draft Summary of Comments and Responses on June 1 1, 2009; 4 and 5 WHEREAS, A Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Project was 6 prepared by the Department, consisting of the DEIR, any consultations and comments 7 received during the review process, any additional information that became available and the 8 Draft Summary of Comments and Responses, all as required by law; and 9 WHEREAS, On June 25, 2009, the Commission reviewed and considered the FEIR 10 and, by Motion No. 17912, found that the contents of said report and the procedures through 11 which the FEIR was prepared, publicized and reviewed complied with the provisions of the 12 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31 of 13 the San Francisco Administrative Code; and 14 WHEREAS, By Motion No. 17912, the Commission found the FEIR to be adequate, 15 accurate and objective, reflected the independentjudgment and analysis of the Department 16 and the Commission and that the Summary of Comments and Responses contained no 17 significant revisions to the DEIR, adopted findings relating to significant impacts associated 18 with the Project and certified the completion ofthe FEIR in compliance with CEQA and the 19 State CEQA Guidelines; and 20 WHEREAS, On June 25, 2009, by Resolution Nos. 17913, 17914, and 17915, the 21 Planning Commission adopted CEQA Findings and adopted and recommended General Plan 22 and Planning Code Amendments, and on June 26, 2009, by Resolutions Nos. 09-105 and 09- 23 106, the MTA Board of Directors adopted CEQA Findings and the 2009 Bicycle 24 Transportation Plan, which includes minor, long-term, and near-term improvements for the 25 Clerk ofthe Board BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 7/17/2009 bicycle route network, and approved legislation for implementation of 45 near-term bicycle improvement projects; and WHEREAS, By letters to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors dated July 15, 2009, Catherine Liddell on behalf ofSouth Beach-Rincon Hill-Mission Bay Neighborhood Association and Mary Miles on behalf of Coalition for Adequate Review, filed appeals of the FEIR to the Board of Supervisors, which the Clerk ofthe Board of Supervisors received on or around July 15, 2009; and WHEREAS, On August 4, 2009, this Board held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal of the FEIR certification filed by Appellants; and WHEREAS, This Board has reviewed and considered the FEIR, the appeal letters, the responses to concerns document that the Planning Department prepared, the other written records before the Board of Supervisors, and heard testimony and received public comment regarding the adequacy ofthe FEIR; and WHEREAS, the FEIR files and all correspondence and other documents have been made available for review by this Board and the public. These files are available for public review by appointment at the Planning Department offices at 1650 Mission Street and the MTA offices at 1 So. Van Ness, and are part of the record before this Board by reference in this motion; now, therefore, be it MOVED, That this Board of Supervisors hereby affirms the decision of the Planning Commission in its Motion No. 17912 to certify the FEIR and finds the FEIR to be complete, adequate and objective and reflecting the independent judgment of the City and in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Clerk ofthe Board BOARDOF SUPERVISORS Page 3 7/17/2009 CityHall City and County ofSan Francisco 1 Dr.CarltonB.GoodlettPlace SanFrancisco,CA 94102-4689 Tails Motion File Number: 090913 Date Passed: Motion affirming the certification by the Planning Commission ofthe Final Environmental Impact Reportfor the 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Plan Project. — August4, 2009 Board ofSupervisors APPROVED FileNo. 090913 I herebycertify thatthe foregoing Motion wasAPPROVED on August4, 2009 by the Board ofSupervisors ofthe City and County ofSan Francisco. Angela Calvillo Clerk ofthe Board CityandCountyofSanFrancisco 1 Printedat8:17AM on 8/5/09 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1650MissionSt Planning Commission Motion 17912 Suite400 SanFrancisco. CA94103-2479 HEARING DATE: June 25, 2009 Reception 415.558 6378 Hearing Date: June25, 2009 CaseNo.: 2007.0347E Fax; 415.558 6409 Project Title: San Francisco Bicycle Plan Project Address: N/A, Citywide, primarily within the public right-of-way Planning Zoning: N/A Information 415.558.6377 Block/Lot: N/A, Citywide, primarily within the public right-of-way Project Sponsor: Oliver Gajda, Bicycle Program Manager San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency One South Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94103 StaffContact: Debra Dwyer- (415) 575-9031 [email protected] ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATEDTO THE CERTIFICATION OFA FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED UPDATETO THE2009 SAN FRANCISCO BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, WHICH INCLUDES MINOR, LONG-TERM, AND NEAR-TERM IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BICYCLE ROUTE NETWORK, AND AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND PLANNING CODETO REFLECTSAID BICYCLE PLAN. MOVED, that the San Francisco Planning Commission (hereinafter "Commission") hereby CERTIFIES theFinal Environmental Impact Report identified asCase No. 2007.0347E, the San Francisco BicyclePlan (hereinafter "Project"), based upon the following findings: 1. The City and County ofSan Francisco, acting through the Planning Department (hereinafter "Department") fulfilled all procedural requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. CodeSection 21000et sea., hereinafter "CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Admin. Code Title 14, Section 15000et seq., (hereinafter "CEQA Guideline ) and Chapter31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (hereinafter "Chapter 31"). A. The Department determined that an Environmental Impact Report (hereinafter "E1R") was required and provided public notice of that determination by publication in a newspaper ol general circulation on June 5, 2007. B. Publicnotice was provide onJune5, 2007 of a Public Scoping meeting for the KIR tor this project, and such meeting was subsequently held on June 26, 2007. C. On November 26, 2008, the Department published the Draft Environmental Impact Report (hereinafter "DEIR") and provided public notice in a newspaper of general circulation of www.sfplanning.org . Motion No. 17912 CASE NO. 2007.0347E Hearing Date: June 25, 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Plan Project the availability ofthe DEIR for public review and comment and ofthe date and timeof the Planning Commission public hearing on the DEIR; this notice was mailed to the Department's list of persons requesting such notice. D. In addition, the Notices ofavailability of the DEIR (NOA) and of thedate and time of the publichearing were mailed to more than 1,400 persons, neighborhood organizations, and NOA agencies on November26, 2008. The PlanningDepartment alsoemailed a copy ofthe on November 26, 2008 to persons for whom an email address had been provided. E. On November 26, 2008, copies of the DEIR were mailed orotherwise delivered to a list of persons requesting it, to those noted on the distribution list for the DEIR, and to government agencies, the latterboth directly and through the State Clearinghouse. F. Notice ofCompletion was filed with theState Secretary of Resources via the State Clearinghouse on November 26, 2008. 2. The Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on said DEIR on January 8, 2009 at which opportunity for public comment was given, and publiccomment was received on the DEIR. The period for acceptance ofwritten commentsended onJanuary 13, 2009. 3. The Department prepared responses to comments on environmental issues received at the public hearing in writing during the47-day public review period for the DEIR and submitted after the close of the public comment period, prepared revisions to the text of the DEIR in response to comments received orbased on additional information thatbecame available during the public review period, and corrected errors in the DEIR. This material was presented in a Comments and Responses document, published onJune 11, 2009, distributed to the Commission, to the SFMTA Board, and to all parties whocommented on the DEIR, and made available to others upon request at Departmentoffices. 4. A Final Environmental Impact Report hasbeen prepared by the Department, consisting of the Draft Environmental Impact Report, supporting studies, documents and other materials, any consultations and comments received during the review process, any additional information thatbecame available, and the Comments and Responses document, all as required by law. 5. Project Environmental Impact Report files havebeen made available for reviewby the Commission and the public. These files are available for public review by appointment at the Department offices at 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, in San Francisco, and are part of the record before the Commission. 6. OnJune 25, 2009, the Commission reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report and hereby does find that the contents ofsaid report and the procedures through which the Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared, publicized, and reviewed comply with the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and Chapter31. SPALNAFRNANNCIINSCGO DEPARTMENT 2 Motion No. 17912 CASE NO. 2007.0347E Hearing Date: June 25, 2009 San Francisco Bicycle Plan Project 7. The project sponsorhas indicated that the presently preferred alternative consists of the preferred project design for47 of thenear-term improvements as described in the Final Environmental Impact Report and presented in Exhibit A hereto. 8. The Planning Commission hereby does find that the Final Environmental Impact Report concerning File No. 2007.0347E, the San Francisco Bicycle Plan, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City and County ofSan Francisco, is adequate, accurate and objective, and that the Comments and Responses document contains no significant revisions to the DEIR, and hereby doesCERTIFY THE COMPLETION ofsaid Final Environmental Impact Report in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. 9. The Commission, in certifying the completion ofsaid Final Environmental Impact Report, hereby does find that the project described in the Environmental Impact Report and the project preferred by the project sponsor, described in Exhibit A attached hereto: A. Will have project-specificsignificant effects on the environment resulting in a potential reduction of traffic Ievels-of-service on some roadway segments and at some intersections, a potential slowing of transit movement in specific locations, and a potential reduction ofloading spaces in certain locations within the project area. While none ofthe policy goals, objectives, and actions taken to support the 2009 Bicycle Plan, now and into the future, would, in themselves, have a significant effect on the physical environment, the predictable indirect impact ofimplementing the policy goals, objectives, and actions would be the implementation of the proposed physical environmental improvements which are described in the 2009 Bicycle Plan. Therefore, the implementation of policy goals, objectives, and actions could indirectly lead to the same impacts as identified for the actual improvement projects. Specifically, the project may result in the significant and unavoidable impacts described in Exhibit B hereto. I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion was ADOPTED by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting ofJune 25, 2009. Linda Avery t Commission Secretary AYES: Miguel, Antonini, Borden, Olague, Sugaya NOES: ABSENT: Lee, Moore ADOPTED June 25, 2009 SPALNAFRNANNCIINSCGO DEPARTMENT 3

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.