S. Justini Philosophi Et Martyris, Cum Trypnone Judaeo Dialogus. Pars altera

162 Pages·1847·7.556 MB·English

by  Justin,M.St., Trollope W.

1

"T^Vjr
JUSTIN!
S.
IMIILOSOrill ET MAHTYRIS
CUM
THYPHONK JUDiBO
DIALOGUS.
PARS ALTERA
t.M.i.o.^i il M >ECUNDI inn CONTINENS.
BDITSD,
WITH A CORRECTED TEXT AND ENGLISH INTROUrCTION
AND NOTES.
BY THR REV. W. TROLLOPE, M.A.
rSMBBOKB roLLSaS, (-AWBatOOR.
M«||m4Im «p. Phtt.
CAMBRIDOB
:
miKTBO HT Alto roB i. BAtx, or»o«rr« tmb rtrr rsMMt
rUt^ IM, rLBBT •TBSBT, M8»«B.
it.eooo.xi.Ttt.
2
I/-
itfiyf/iifo
M
iDUCTOUY OBSERVATIONS.
1{(
SoMB remarks on the reality and thedate of the DialogiuwHk
Trypko, were offered in the aoeoont of the Life and wrttiiigi of
Jvmn Mabttb, prefixed to the Firti Apology, m reoeody
edited on the plan of the preaent Tohmie. It b a coiiaideiBtioB
of trifling motneal indeed, in connerion with Jvstin'a opiaioni^
and the l%fat which hi* writing* throw upon the conditioa and
proepecU ofthe primitive Church, whether the Dialogue melbuJfy
took pboe, or not; but if it did, the dale of the ooenrrenoa b
clearly fixed to the doee of the year a. d. 140, though it may
have been committed to writing tome time afterwarda. From a
paange howerer in whieh Jnetin reproaohea the Jews with a dia-
peakion at all tiroei to opprme the brethren, which was now happily
rartraincd by tkrir prtmnt mtuUrtf the Benedictine editor oimpfy
iaieriy that the meeting with Trypho moat ha;Te preceded the
aepemioo of M. Anrriiaa (a. d. 161.), who oeitafailywaa not likdy
to extend hie protection to the Christaane; bat tha cootaxt phuoly
refiMa thie alloeioo to the reroU nndar Bareliochaba%aad the as-
piMMJew Uk rWc rvv tmmfUTtHtfmt^ darigMlaa ActsfatlBg govern-
ment, by whom the rebelUon had beea ondled, and the mallflfof
of the Maidonite hcraey aflbrd any arguMBt agahaC the dale b
qaartion, eiooe the opiaiooa of Mareion had beanalready aomewhat
widelydiflbeed.*
m
Tide btter obeoMlnca of cowia aqnally Mia, an olf)eetfo«
^{afawt the gMinlnwuai of the Dialogne^ whieh hat abo ba«
I. DM.Trvftk. e. lA. t. ImMite aa Apid. t. e.tS.tl.
;
JiipHijJ bj Kook,WtfMT,mmIotherwril0ra,liM«sli villi hrman
ooiiiWaao ihM Meeewr.^"Fbther IIwtlcMin alMH**«J» l>r. Jortin/
•^aiaitUmiMMVio it, aloiifwitliiIm raHofJnsttn'* worlw
wUebiiOMarguMBt,Mid not« bad ooe^in ili (kroor." Not onlj
dotttiM Ami tlMt IfWMBWftnd Tertalliaa w«r« aeqaaiiitMl whh iIm
Dialog«6» m uppmn ftom lh« igfeweet whidi thaj naka to it,*
m
dMrij Mamp it « prodtteltoa of the »eeood ccntaiy; bat the
writer bioMlf dittiaolty Idivtiftet kioMlf bj birth tutd cdneation,
w M
wdl bj (BreeC raftrmee, with Jusiin't two Apologies in behalf
of the pereecaled bwthrei.» Eotebioe aleo^ in epeaktog of a dki-
kfM te which Jailia m^^g^A with one Trjrpho, the aoet die-
tiagaiehedof the Hebrew*at thattime,ao mctJjr charaeterieee the
work whieh we aow poweei, that there caaaoc be a doabt of hie
aUudia!g t!o the eame predaetioa.* It b moreover tmpoMible to
1. mJw>HbLy6Lt.p.UQ.(Load.IMiL)
t. TImiv mh mamUmft>IIwIbm to tlw Dielo|M la lira. adv. Iter. ii. 04.
III.fl7. ITM.67. TMlalLeiv. Uantn: lit. Ilw !«..9l Adv.JwLect.8. 10. 19.
8mMtai «.OL 19114.ft*.
9. CamfaimDULTtjpk.«e.t.\tlkwUkApAi,e.m.tt.t.\t.
»^
4. Bmi> BIrt. Bed. it. le. A«^X«7*v 'I^AiiMc «»Wr«|n» (i
4p^nrrn rpimwv4Ma x4p«c t^Mv dmi rim r^t Wrrtwc wa^N^fM Xiyw
lfX«I,^Wijayr« w^ripw v<{pj rd ftXi**f» itaB^ttmrm mntri^* «fMr«MBr«,
Cfll fcfr i—14—r> r«« «X||aM«c ^<1MMrd—ry» X«r%«ir. 'iaraylM ^v r«vr^
«l(^lwl«hir»<wcora rfc'••X^wtm a Aiat^n/fenXfravaccvaaafia'rwv,
arfra* ravra »^ r»r Tyrff«»ra dwrwui^wr 04 pdvv 14 ^4 fktnvm^mmf
if'obiwpHmt*racMCt«•r.X. TiprffaiWcal«•<npixP**'arfrav,xmpimftmTm
aytwffrmJ ItAaiiavr tfvi rf« icsX^aia*. M#|ir^ai M cai rfc *i«Mrm>
i<g Xrfi^aM»,0fi* fi 49*mrik»m miriv tlimt Xdjttv. Kmi ^«ri»rIJ rtttiv
gfffrMUMK fitm^tvtim, Imkiyx"* ^^ Tp^'ftwa, «»• av wtfumf^dt^rmp mird
*UmMmmiw4T^typfw*' OoaipeMINaLTtyplkce.t.tqq. 17.80.71. tqq.SI.
M. WMi mpMl to IW aoIlM wlw<«lnd by Chvt (HM. X4/. |k. S7.) ud
Orabt (Jjpfwlif. pw M7.), Md groaadcd oa Um ivpaUtlM Meribcd le liiai
bjIkeMijoriee,Ibel Trj/fkt wm worn eCker thaa tlw ftHBe« KebM Terjiiea,
la Ike icwUi griHiy, It b pertape
Beewlala\y oee aet • RakMatIkeflawofkk
i
Ifcei keb<Hilni kyIkeWrtllei(«.ft); ead he(
iiaiiilf le ke aader ikeir fatdaaet (e.SO.). WkeCker ke eabMqaeatly
eae e# Umm >eac*trt ^fItrmd, b eaetkir ^aertkaj bat ftaoi tke faapiealao
wklakIt b eby tiMt JwtkiV rMieahy iwdaMJ apeo kb ariad. It b
|
HkelytkalkekeeMeaCkibliM.
f
e w
INTRODUOTOftY OMBBTATIOltt. 3
•vtrlook Um ttrikiag BMrks of •imilarity which takH brtwtitiM
Dnlogae and Ui« two Apologim; Mioh m Um peeoliar title,
'AwtftymmniftMrn rAtf 'Awom4ki0¥,* hf whaeh thio writer, ood wnm
obe,ikftimgiuhm theouMMiicol Goepdo; the raMrinble igwaieat
in fiewf t <^ Scriptore, inoorraetly cited from the Mcred lext;f
the eeeripiaoo of the orighi of OiecieB fiible to the iavmAam of
dsmooi;* the imiiniiiofiaierpretatioa aAzedtopeetegeifiwcilUly
oxpleiBed; aad naracioae watukt of identity, both in doctrinal end
fkradioel obeeifHioiie, which pneeotthemeeivee el cvevyelep. I»>
deedtheonlypJeeeibleeiyunentontheeideof•puriooeneeeiithtof
Welitein, inthe Prokgammn to hieedition of the QreekTnitiMwr,
wherehe remerite that the Old Taetoment citBtioBO in the Diekgae,
nuelyoorraepood with the praaent text of theSoptaagint, hotwith
the Tcnion of Symnachna and Thcodotioo, who Ihred long after
Jiutin; and thence he infers that the writer moat ha?eqvoted, not
from the Septoagtnt, bat from the HeiiplMr Text, aa framed by
OrigM.* Not only, howcTor, haa WeMeb greatly orentated the
eslaBtof variataonfrom the lxx. renuoo, but there ie erery reaeoa
tobelieve that amay of the citafione, ae they now itand, haTo beea
altered from the ofigfaMd copy of the Dialogne. It ahonU eeem
that eome trmneeriber had marked in the margin each reading! aa
he may havecoacetTod tobemoreeoafcrmahlatothe Hebrew} aad
that thoeeamigiaal eniewiarfn wereafter arda inacrtod in the text.
The hrtrhMo giaineaim of the Dialogae ie therefore anaffintod
by the Ibrm of the citafiona aa they now appear, thoogfa it amy
not be altogether A«e fttmi corraption»or exhibit aa exact verbal
tranecript of the ooufeimtioa between Jaetia aad hie oppoaente.
At the Mme tiaM the instaacw of eappoeed iatorpolatica, which
have hitherto beea paialed oal, have boaa bmc« iadaHiioaa^y
eounht, thaaevaa plaariblyertabliihed*
Oa the eappooitioa of a real necarwme, of iHlhih Baoebiaa
a doabt, there ie ao rmeoa to qaeatioa the
1. 8mIWsola«aAf«LI.•.tt,ft.
t. SMMlMoa Aprt.l.M.lA,4t.) Ifl^aOl) ty.t.) A4,*.) 41
fl. OovpenMiLTryph.«uM^Ttt.«NkAp«L I.«.M^M.
4. Wiaiila^ riekf. la N. T. ^ lxti. TMi niillii a
kyllMl^efliawla,lahitaMMWiafJMlla,^tikaeliIL
rATioin^
HHw —
hlrtwJM't it,tlMtftli« Didog—look pi>o> dariW
at gphtwM. Itit cMttitelj loo wMh lo iiAr ftoa H
oTTiTpbo, that, ^mb IIm rBoanC diilwfc—om, ho hod ofMil aaob
tiM fai CotMmkM Iw Ml IB wUi JwliB fai tiMt dty. b the
Didpg— teeU; thorn io no ddbilo ollariOB to tho oomm of the
)) oor, oiler oil, b it o matter of objt irery
ThoIWobjm orfcA 7V||4o it Totaoblo, notoidjm a rdhlatioa
oClhotoMHof theJewsfai the earlyogeo of the Ooopel, batooo
praoT thirt thenmeopfadoMoie itill cherywd oatoagtheir daoeaa
duto. la IhettheNoooafaigofJaatiaany beodopled,withretylittle
aodiflootiea, to tho ilato of the ooBtroverqr botwoeii Jewo oad
ChriitiaM at the pieoem day. He eeenw to have beea preceded
fai theiBtoe ooarM of iigaoiuat by ilrMoof PeUb, who itMid to
haifo boM the aathor of aa attempt, la the form of a dUhgm
hUmmm Jasm mtd Pmpitnu^ to prore from the Prc^dieli Uiat
Jmw WM dm Xeariah;* and, ta like maoaer, the aigameale of
Jmtfa abeeqaenHyre^»pearhi diewtitia^tofTeftaUba,and other
Vmhen* Aemight perhape beoxpeeled iaadeeanory oonTormtioBf
there ie littlemethod hi theoomiaot ofthedieeaeikm with Trypho;
b«^ladeed,aoonaeoted arraugeaMatofhie eabjeet ie by oo oMaae
adhtiagaiihlag ftatare ofJaitb'e prodaetkme. Atthe mmeIfaae
a little iHimtiii will arail to anroTel the geoend eoope of the
Dialogae^ of whieh a brief oatliae will here eaAoe to prepare
thowqr ftrthe more ertemled aaafyrie, coutalaed fai the mafsfaMl
hMdia^itotheeereral chapten.
Tho maaaer hi wUeh the Dfadogae ie broaght aboai, kade to
aa aeeoaat ia detail of Jaetia'a eoanremioa to Chrimuiity (ee.
I—0.){ Aerwhieh the dieeamiun rmolToe itedf, with eooae repeli-
thme aad nnnaeinnal digramiom, nito the feBoway headtt T. A
wlhlaihm of the Jewioh prefadkM in fiiToar of the perpetuity of
the Moaaie Law. II. Hie erideoee of the IncarnatkNi aad
CraeiflxtoB of the Bteroal Sob of Ood. III. The call of the
OMtilm, aad the ooaetitafioB of the ChrietiaB Chereh. Under
mti
thofifflt head, Jaitia the identity of the one tnie Oodof
1. IMIM*.BIrt.Bad.nr.& Oi%m«.Orii.nr.M.