ebook img

Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Utrecht 2011 PDF

280 Pages·2013·1.382 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Utrecht 2011

Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011 Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (RLLT) The yearly ‘Going Romance’ meetings feature research in formal linguistics of Romance languages, mainly in the domains of morphology, syntax, and semantics, and, to a certain extent, phonology. Each volume brings together a peer-reviewed selection of papers that were presented at one of the meetings, aiming to provide a representation of the spread of topics at that conference, and of the variety of research carried out nowadays on Romance languages within theoretical linguistics. Editor Frank Drijkoningen Utrecht University Volume 5 Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Utrecht 2011 Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni and Manuela Pinto Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011 Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Utrecht 2011 Edited by Sergio Baauw Frank Drijkoningen Luisa Meroni Manuela Pinto Utrecht University John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam / Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of 8 the American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Going Romance (Conference) (2011 : Utrecht University) Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011 : Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Utrecht 2011 / Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni and Manuela Pinto. p. cm. (Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, issn 1574-552X ; v. 5) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Romance languages--Congresses. I. Baauw, Sergio, 1970- editor of compilation. II. Title. PC11.G65 2013 440--dc23 2013027691 isbn 978 90 272 0385 4 (Hb ; alk. paper) isbn 978 90 272 7129 7 (Eb) © 2013 – John Benjamins B.V. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. John Benjamins Publishing Co. · P.O. Box 36224 · 1020 me Amsterdam · The Netherlands John Benjamins North America · P.O. Box 27519 · Philadelphia pa 19118-0519 · usa Table of contents Introduction vii A′-dependencies in French: A study in L1 acquisition 1 Anamaria Benţea and Stephanie Durrleman The irregular forms of the Italian “Passato Remoto”: A synchronic and diachronic analysis 17 Andrea Calabrese On the lack of stranded negated quantifiers and inverse scope of negation in Romance 59 Robert Cirillo Evidence for the competition-based analysis of subjunctive obviation from relative and adverbial clauses in Italian 75 Francesco Costantini Quotative expansions 93 Ricardo Etxepare Datives, prepositions, and argument structure in Spanish 125 Héctor Fernández-Alcalde A typology of agreement processes and its implications for language development 143 Vincenzo Moscati and Luigi Rizzi On the syntax of focalizers in some Italo-Romance dialects 157 Nicola Munaro The phonotactics of word-initial clusters in Romance: Typological and theoretical implications 175 Diana Passino Double object constructions in Spanish (and Catalan) revisited 193 Anna Pineda vi Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011 Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Initial stages of L3 Romance and beyond 217 Jason Rothman L1 acquisition of noun ellipsis in French and in Dutch: Consequences for linguistic theory 249 Petra Sleeman and Aafke Hulk Index 267 Introduction In 2011, the conference series Going Romance celebrated its 25th edition, in Utrecht, the founder city of the enterprise. (We are) Going (to study) Romance (languages) was the – admittedly national, Dutch – slogan for the idea behind the first meeting in the winter of 1986, for which a number of key figures of European generativism were invited. The major goal was to discuss the properties of Romance languages within the framework of Government and Binding and the parameters that could distinguish Romance languages from English (and more broadly, Germanic languages) within the Principles and Parameters approach. At that time, it was an important step as it allowed to combine two more political goals: on the one hand, it offered the circle of generative linguists, often working in departments of linguistics, possibilities to spread their ideas by showing relevance for and actual analyses of data from Romance languages; on the other hand, linguists working in language-specific departments with colleagues focussing on literature or culture (French, Italian, Spanish, …) were offered opportunities to discuss the universal and common properties of their languages beyond the historical approach based on the com- mon ancestor. A lingua franca was determined: English. Due to the success of the first meeting, a follow-up was organized in the win- ter of 1987, and another one in the spring of 1988. As there appeared to be a high number of abstract submissions from scholars from different universities in Europe and the United States, it was concluded that there was sufficient interest for the enterprise at the international level for rendering the conference a stan- dard annual series. In the early nineties, the Utrecht community of linguists yearly organized the conference and also made possible the publication of a selection of the papers in a volume of the international journal Probus. As colleagues from the other universities in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, Groningen, Leiden, Nijmegen and the VU in Amsterdam wished to extend their involvement, the organization of the conference became national. Venues alter- nated between Utrecht and one of the other cities at first, but this gradually devel- oped to a situation in which Going Romance was organized in turn by one of Romance language departments of these universities. During this period, due to the quantity of high quality papers, the publication associated to the conference consisted of an entire volume in a series, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. viii Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011 Although Going Romance is associated with the Netherlands, it has been clear from the beginning that it actually has a high international status within Europe. More recently, the steering committee decided that this could very well be reflected in the yearly venues. This resulted in a conference in Nice in 2009 and one in Leuven in 2012; the contribution of other European universities is currently being planned. Since the beginning years, both the frameworks and the issues have evolved, but the conference series has proven to be successfull in focussing on in-depth analyses of (one of the) Romance languages while making use of articulated gen- eral theories, in combination with an open eye for differences with respect to other (Romance) languages. Local organizations are free to include a one day workshop with a specific theme that reflects their local research strength. The rate of accep- tance of abstracts nowadays is between 20% and 40%. Not only the conference in 2011 was a lustrum, this volume published in 2013 is one too. It’s the 5th in our series Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (RLLT) published by John Benjamins. The actual content of this volume may be seen as a continuation of theoriza- tion in interaction with interfaces on the one hand, and the emergence of new research areas, models and theories on the other hand. One of the research areas that have been developed since the eighties of the last century can be defined as research into the ‘developmental problem of lan- guage acquisition’, the actual acquisition process of children. The papers by Benţea & Durrleman and Sleeman & Hulk address typical issues in such L1 Acquisition, of A′ dependencies and nominals respectively. Subsequent theorization into the acquisition of second languages (L2, including bilingualism) is somehwat more recent. As an extension to this field we publish here the contribution by Jason Rothman who presents a novel model for the acquisition of L3, based on cognitive economy and typological proximity. The further elaboration of syntactic theory is visible in the clear paper by Moscati & Rizzi, who discuss the typology of agreement processes in interac- tion with locality, phases and structural adjacency. Ricardo Etxepare shows that quotative constructions have intricate syntactic properties that directly bear on discussions of predication. The topic of datives and indirect objects in Spanish is subject to discussion and analysis in the papers by Fernández-Alcalde and by Pineda. The framework making use of parameters has been further developed towards a differential view with both macro- and micro-parameters; the notion of micro-parameters allows for a certain revival of classical dialectology: the paper by Munaro on focalisers can be considered a representative of this strand. In phonology, Passino discusses the way in which Government Phonology can build a typology of onset-clusters for Romance. Cirillo discusses the semantic Introduction ix phenomenon of inverse scope. The paper by Costantini adresses issues in the interaction between subjunctives and obviation. A certain revival of surface-form oriented morphology can be noted by the popularity of the model of Distributed Morphology. Andrea Calabrese makes extensive use of this model in order to explain the intricate details of the mor- pho-phonological rules for the Italian passato remoto. He thus shows that, at a meta-level of linguistic theory, these subregularities are best classified as being rule-governed. The 2011 venue would not have been possible without the support of a num- ber of people and institutions. We wish to thank here all colleagues (and they were quite a lot) who contributed to the abstract selection procedure and/or the review procedure of this volume. Financial support dominantly came from the Utrecht institute of Linguistics OTS, but all Dutch partner institutions of the enterprise contributed. The Editors

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.